RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Elucidate the efficacy (as per current biochemical criteria) of cabergoline monotherapy or as addition to long-acting somatostatin receptor ligand (SRL) in patients with acromegaly and no previous pituitary radiotherapy. DESIGN: Multi-centre, retrospective, cohort study (four UK Pituitary centres: Birmingham, Bristol, Leicester, Oxford). METHODS: Clinical, laboratory, imaging data were analysed. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients on cabergoline monotherapy were included [median IGF-1 xUpper Limit of Normal (ULN) pre-cabergoline 2.13 (1.02-8.54), median treatment duration 23 months, median latest weekly dose 3 mg]. 31.9% achieved normal IGF-1 (25% GH-secreting, 60% GH+prolactin co-secreting tumours); median weekly cabergoline dose was similar between responders and non-responders. IGF-1 normalisation was related with GH+prolactin co-secreting adenoma (B 1.50, p=0.02) and lower pre-cabergoline IGF-1 xULN levels (B -0.70, p=0.02). Both normal IGF-1 and GH<1 mcg/L were detected in 12.9% of cases and tumour shrinkage in 29.4% of GH-secreting adenomas.Twenty-six patients on SRL+cabergoline were included [median IGF-1 xULN pre-cabergoline 1.7 (1.03-2.92), median treatment duration 36 months, median latest weekly dose 2.5 mg]. 23.1% achieved normal IGF-1 (15.8% GH-secreting, 33.3% GH+prolactin co-secreting tumours). Normal IGF-1 and GH<1 mcg/L were detected in 17.4%. CONCLUSIONS: In non-irradiated patients, cabergoline normalises IGF-1 in around one-third and achieves both IGF-1 and GH targets in approximately one out of ten cases. SRL+cabergoline is less efficient than previously reported possibly due to differences in studies methodology and impact of confounding factors.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The optimal approach to the surveillance of non-functioning pituitary microadenomas (micro-NFPAs) is not clearly established. Our aim was to generate evidence on the natural history of micro-NFPAs to support patient care. DESIGN: Multi-centre, retrospective, cohort study involving 23 endocrine departments (UK NFPA consortium). METHODS: Clinical, imaging, and hormonal data of micro-NFPA cases between January, 1, 2008 and December, 21, 2021 were analysed. RESULTS: Data for 459 patients were retrieved [median age at detection 44 years (IQR 31-57)-152 males/307 females]. Four hundred and nineteen patients had more than two magnetic resonance imagings (MRIs) [median imaging monitoring 3.5 years (IQR 1.71-6.1)]. One case developed apoplexy. Cumulative probability of micro-NFPA growth was 7.8% (95% CI, 4.9%-8.1%) and 14.5% (95% CI, 10.2%-18.8%) at 3 and 5 years, respectively, and of reduction 14.1% (95% CI, 10.4%-17.8%) and 21.3% (95% CI, 16.4%-26.2%) at 3 and 5 years, respectively. Median tumour enlargement was 2â mm (IQR 1-3) and 49% of micro-NFPAs that grew became macroadenomas (nearly all >5â mm at detection). Eight (1.9%) patients received surgery (only one had visual compromise with surgery required >3 years after micro-NFPA detection). Sex, age, and size at baseline were not predictors of enlargement/reduction. At the time of detection, 7.2%, 1.7%, and 1.5% patients had secondary hypogonadism, hypothyroidism, and hypoadrenalism, respectively. Two (0.6%) developed hypopituitarism during follow-up (after progression to macroadenoma). CONCLUSIONS: Probability of micro-NFPA growth is low, and the development of new hypopituitarism is rare. Delaying the first follow-up MRI to 3 years and avoiding hormonal re-evaluation in the absence of tumour growth or clinical manifestations is a safe approach for micro-NFPA surveillance.