Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Vasc Endovascular Surg ; 55(8): 798-803, 2021 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34105422

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the primary and assisted secondary percutaneous and non-invasive technical success of the ProGlide device on all-comers in a consecutive case series of percutaneous endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (P-EVAR). METHOD: A single-center consecutive case series where 434 elective and acute P-EVAR procedures were registered prospectively between May 2011 and July 2017. The mean age was 74.5 years ± SD 11.4 years. 82.3% of the patients were male. All patients were pre-planned from CT angiography. Percutaneous access punctures, performed in local anesthesia in the common femoral artery, with a final introducer size between 12-22 Fr OD were included and stratified in 2 groups, 12-16 Fr and 17-22 Fr. RESULTS: By screening 868 access groins 22 groins were excluded. Of the remaining 846 groins, intended to be treated with ProGlide, 9 groins were excluded peri-procedurally and treated with the Fascia Suture Technique or surgical cutdown. The remaining 837 groins had access closure with ProGlide, with a mean value of 2.15 devices per groin with a slight significant difference between the 2 stratification groups. Primary ProGlide technical success was achieved in 68.1% of the groins. Secondary percutaneous or non-invasive technical success was achieved in 96.9%. Here there was no statistically significant difference between the 2 stratification groups. Thirty-one (3.7%) groin complications were registered during 30-day follow-up and 17 required additional treatment. Total mortality was 2.8%. None of these deaths were related to the access site. CONCLUSION: ProGlide by itself has a significant failure rate in the closure of large-bore access holes on an unselected cohort of patients eligible for P-EVAR. However, together with adjunct percutaneous or non-invasive methods a success rate of 97% can be achieved. The access complication rate was lower than 4% at 30-day follow-up.


Assuntos
Implante de Prótese Vascular , Procedimentos Endovasculares , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Implante de Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Artéria Femoral/diagnóstico por imagem , Artéria Femoral/cirurgia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Punções , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Vasc Med ; 22(5): 406-410, 2017 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28835175

RESUMO

In this single center, retrospective cohort study we wished to compare early and total mortality for all patients treated for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) with open surgery who were taking statins compared to those who were not. A cohort of 640 patients with AAA was treated with open surgery between 1999 and 2012. Patients were consecutively recruited from a source population of 390,000; 21.3% were female, and the median age was 73 years. The median follow-up was 3.93 years, with an interquartile range of 1.79-6.58 years. The total follow-up was 2855 patient-years. An explanatory strategy was used. The propensity score (PS) was implemented to control for selection bias and confounders. The crude effect of statin use showed a 78% reduction of the 30-day mortality. A stratified analysis using the Mantel-Haenszel method on quintiles of the PS gave an adjusted effect of the odds ratio equal to 0.43 (95% CI: 0.18-0.96), indicating a 57% reduction of the 30-day mortality for statin users. The adjusted rate ratio was 0.62 (95% CI: 0.45-0.83), indicating a reduction of long-term mortality of 38% for statin users compared to non-users for a median follow-up of 3.93 years. This retrospective cohort study showed a significant beneficial effect of statin use on early and long-term survival for patients treated with open surgery. To be conclusive, our results need to be replicated by a randomized clinical trial.


Assuntos
Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/uso terapêutico , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/mortalidade , Idoso , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/mortalidade , Área Sob a Curva , Feminino , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Noruega , Razão de Chances , Pontuação de Propensão , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Fatores de Proteção , Curva ROC , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/efeitos adversos
3.
Vascular ; 15(4): 211-4, 2007.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17714637

RESUMO

The purpose of this article is to describe three cases of kissing stent placement in the common femoral artery bifurcation in patients unsuitable for open endarterectomy and patch plasty. In three patients with critical limb ischemia, caused by primary atherosclerotic disease or dissection-related injury when performing a lower extremity intervention, a technique of kissing stents was used to treat the flow-obstructing lesion in the common femoral artery bifurcation. Technical success was uniform, and during follow-up (4.5-8 months), all patients showed improved symptoms, wound healing, and duplex ultrasonography-verified patency of the stents. Kissing stents in the common femoral artery bifurcation are a feasible treatment option in patients with limited mobililty or contraindications to open repair. The short-term results seem promising, but longer follow-up and an increased number of patients will be needed to assess the durability of the reconstruction.


Assuntos
Artéria Femoral/cirurgia , Isquemia/cirurgia , Perna (Membro)/irrigação sanguínea , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos , Stents , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Artéria Femoral/diagnóstico por imagem , Seguimentos , Oclusão de Enxerto Vascular/cirurgia , Humanos , Isquemia/diagnóstico por imagem , Radiografia
4.
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen ; 126(11): 1488-9, 2006 May 25.
Artigo em Norueguês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16808006

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Out of all peripheral arterial aneurysms, 70% are located in the popliteal artery; less than 4% of these rupture. Ruptured popliteal aneurysms may be mistaken for deep venous thrombosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From March until June 2001 three patients were primarily admitted with a diagnosis of venous thrombosis. This delayed the appropriate treatment of a ruptured popliteal aneurysm considerably. Two patients were first anticoagulated with warfarin before being transferred to the surgical ward. All the patients were operated on with the exclusion of the popliteal aneurysm and a femoropopliteal bypass conduit. RESULTS: The haematoma from a ruptured popliteal aneurysm presenting with pain and venous swelling is easily mistaken for a deep venous thrombosis. In these three patients the correct diagnosis was made respectively 18, 2 and 20 days after the onset of swelling and pain. INTERPRETATION: Ruptured popliteal aneurysms can be mistaken for a venous thrombosis or a Baker cyst. A Duplex scan will most often lead to a correct diagnosis. Surgery is mandatory. Delayed diagnosis and treatment increases morbidity and may lead to loss of limb.


Assuntos
Aneurisma Roto/diagnóstico por imagem , Artéria Poplítea/diagnóstico por imagem , Idoso , Aneurisma Roto/cirurgia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Artéria Poplítea/cirurgia , Radiografia , Trombose Venosa/diagnóstico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...