A national questionnaire survey of Japanese urologists on treatment perspectives for elderly prostate cancer patients.

OBJECTIVE: This study conducted a national questionnaire survey of Japanese urologists from a treatment perspective for older patients with prostate cancer. METHODS: A questionnaire was distributed to 922 teaching hospitals of the Japanese Urological Association. Questionnaire items included years of urologist experience, gender, workplace, treatment equipment owned, daily specialty practice area, urological cancer specialty, treatment reference items for older adults, upper age limit for radical treatment, medication, and two hypothetical cases of Gleason grade group 2 prostate cancer with or without oligometastasis. RESULTS: In total, 1732 questionnaires were analyzed, with responses evenly distributed across all age groups. Workplaces included general hospitals (49.4%), university hospitals (40.3%), and cancer centers (4.2%). Performance status was the most frequently mentioned treatment-related item, followed by comorbidities and cognitive function. In addition, geriatric assessment was used by only 13.3% of respondents. No upper age limit was found for total prostatectomy, brachytherapy, and external beam radiation. Anti-androgens, androgen receptor-axis-targeted agents, chemotherapy, poly ADP ribose polymerase inhibitors, and immune-checkpoint inhibitors were selected by 6.8%, 35.6%, 47.3%, 89%, 62.8%, 24.7%, 41.9%, and 41.7% of the respondents, respectively. Response rates for administration of hormone therapy for hypothetical cases of Gleason grade group 2 prostate cancer with or without oligometastases were 96.8% and 61.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Less than 15% of urologists used geriatric assessments. Several responded that they would set age limits for highly invasive radical and systemic therapies.

Active surveillance in younger patients with prostate cancer: clinical characteristics including longitudinal patient-reported outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: this study aimed to evaluate the active surveillance continuation period, treatment intervention rate and health-related quality of life in younger patients. METHODS: we prospectively conducted a health-related quality of life survey of patients enrolled in the Prostate Cancer Research International: Active Surveillance-JAPAN study at Kagawa University between January 2010 and December 2020. Health-related quality of life was assessed by mail using a validated Japanese version of the Short-Form 8 Health Survey and Expanded Prostate Cancer Index at active surveillance enrolment and annually thereafter until discontinuation of active surveillance. We divided the patients into two groups, younger (aged <65 years) and older (aged ≥65 years), and compared the two groups. RESULTS: of the 84 patients, 22 were in the younger group. The active surveillance continuation period was shorter in the younger group than in the older group. The 3-year treatment intervention rate was higher in the younger group than in the older group. The majority of the reasons for definitive treatment were related to the protocol, which was similar in both groups (80 versus 76%). The sexual summary scores at active surveillance enrolment were higher in the younger group than in the older group. During active surveillance, the younger group and the older group showed no deterioration in all health-related quality of life scores compared with the scores at the enrolment of active surveillance. CONCLUSIONS: patient-reported health-related quality of life survey indicated that the health-related quality of life of younger Japanese patients was maintained over time during active surveillance, similar to that of older patients.

A national questionnaire survey of Japanese urologists on active surveillance for low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a national questionnaire survey of Japanese urologists on active surveillance (AS) for low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to 922 Japanese Urological Association Teaching Base Hospitals. The items included were years of experience as a urologist, sex, workplace, treatment equipment owned, specialty area of daily practice, specialty area of urological cancer, and six hypothetical cases of AS. The cases were categorized by the following Gleason scores: 3 + 3 low risk of PCa, 3 + 4 intermediate risk, and 4 + 3 intermediate risk, with or without comorbidities for each case. Comorbidities were defined as cardiovascular diseases or illnesses warranting anticoagulant therapy. RESULTS: Altogether, 1962 questionnaires were analyzed. Responses were almost equally distributed among all age groups. Workplaces included general hospitals (49.4%), university hospitals (40.3%), and cancer centers (4.2%). Percentages of proposed AS for low risk/no comorbidity, low risk/with comorbidity, intermediate-risk 3 + 4/no comorbidity, intermediate risk 3 + 4/with comorbidity, intermediate risk 4 + 3/no comorbidity, and intermediate risk 4 + 3/with comorbidity were 90.5%, 90%, 39.5%, 48.7%, 15%, and 22%, respectively. Analysis of the correspondents' backgrounds showed that the more the urologists' years of experience, the less they were to advise AS of low-risk patients. In the presence of comorbidities, urologists across all age groups tended to propose AS, even in the same Gleason grade group. Cancer center urologists recommended AS more often than their counterparts at general and university hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 40% of urologists proposed AS for intermediate-risk cases, confirming that AS for intermediate-risk patients is being considered in Japan.

Incidental Bladder Cancer Found on Cystoscopy during Prostate Biopsy: Prevalence, Pathological Findings, and Oncological Outcome.

INTRODUCTION: We examined the prevalence, pathological findings, and oncological outcomes of incidental bladder cancer found on cystoscopy among patients eligible for prostate biopsy (PB). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 803 patients who underwent cystoscopy prior to PB between January 2010 and September 2020. In cases of bladder tumor-like findings on cystoscopy, biopsy or transurethral resection of the bladder tumor was performed. The primary and secondary outcomes were the prevalence of incidental bladder cancer and pathological and oncological outcomes of incidental bladder cancer, respectively. RESULTS: Incidental findings were observed in 31/803 patients (3.9%). Bladder tumor-like findings were found in 24/803 patients (3%), while 9/803 patients (1.1%) were pathologically diagnosed with urothelial carcinoma. The stage and grade of incidental bladder cancer were pTa in 8/9 patients and pT1 in 1/9 and low grade in 8/9 and high in 1/9, respectively. The median tumor size of the papillary pedunculated type was 0.5 cm. At 26-month median follow-up, no recurrence was observed. CONCLUSION: Cystoscopy during PB may yield incidental bladder cancer findings, although the prevalence is very low. Incidental bladder cancer was of low stage and grade, which seemed unrelated to survival. Moreover, performing routine cystoscopy in conjunction with PB is not recommended as it may lead to overdiagnosis of low-risk bladder cancer.

A case of pyelocalyceal diverticulum urothelial carcinoma that was difficult to distinguish from cystic renal cell carcinoma preoperatively.

INTRODUCTION: Pyelocalyceal diverticulum is a rare disease sometimes difficult to distinguish from cysts. We report a case of urothelial carcinoma originating from a pyelocalyceal diverticulum, difficult to distinguish from cystic renal cell carcinoma preoperatively. CASE PRESENTATION: A 51-year-old Japanese man complained of gross hematuria. Computed tomography revealed a solid mass in one of the many cystic lesions in the left kidney. He was diagnosed with left cystic renal cell carcinoma and underwent retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy. Pathological examination revealed high-grade invasive urothelial carcinoma arising within the renal pyelocalyceal diverticulum. The definitive diagnosis was high-grade invasive urothelial carcinoma (pT3). In retrospect, the retrograde pyelography findings indicated the cyst and urinary tract connection. Residual ureterectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy were later performed. The patient has since been recurrence-free. CONCLUSION: Whether cystic renal cell carcinoma is suspected on imaging, pyelocalyceal diverticulum should be considered a differential diagnosis, though unlikely to be encountered in daily practice.

Positive Culture Prior to Transperineal Prostate Biopsy Was Not Associated with Post-Biopsy Febrile Urinary Tract Infection Development.

PURPOSE: To investigate the association between urine culture before transperineal prostate biopsy and post-biopsy febrile urinary tract infection (fUTI). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 307 patients who underwent urine culture before transperineal prostate biopsy between April 2017 and September 2020. Patients with indwelling urinary catheters (n=7) were excluded. Urine culture was performed 1-3 days before the biopsy, and all patients received prophylactic cefazolin regardless of culture results. A urine culture was defined as positive if cell density was more than 1×105 colony-forming units per mL. Baseline characteristics and the incidence of post-biopsy fUTI were compared between patients showing positive pre-biopsy culture results and those showing negative findings. RESULTS: Out of 300, seven patients (2.3%) had positive urine culture results before the biopsy. Age (p=0.077); prostate-specific antigen at diagnosis (p=0.267); prostate volume (p=0.78); number of biopsy cores (p=0.277); percentage of patients testing positive for cancer on biopsy (p=0.71); and percentages of patients with a history of biopsy (p>0.999), diabetes mellitus (p=0.604), and immunosuppressive medication use (p>0.999) were similar between the two groups. No patient in the positive urine culture group had post-biopsy fUTI. However, 1.7% (five patients) of the negative urine culture group had the disease (p>0.999) (four patients with prostatitis and one with pyelonephritis). Among them, two patients were diagnosed by urine culture at the time of post-biopsy fUTI. CONCLUSION: In asymptomatic patients, positive pre-biopsy cultures were not associated with the development of post-biopsy fUTI.

The predictive factor for pathological downgrading after prostatectomy in patients with biopsy Gleason score 4+3 or 4+4 prostate cancer.

The proportion of Gleason pattern (GP) 4 prostate cancers at prostate biopsy has a clinically significant impact on risk stratification for patients with prostate cancer. In pathological diagnosis including GP 4, a biopsy Gleason score (GS) of 3+4 has a more favorable prognosis than a GS of 4+3 and 4+4. However, the discrepancy between biopsy and prostatectomy specimens is well known. The current study investigated the clinical parameters and biopsy specimens associated with pathological downgrading after prostatectomy in biopsies with a GS of 4+3 or 4+4 prostate cancer. A total of 302 patients with prostate cancer who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy between August 2013 and May 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 103 patients had biopsies with GSs of 4+3 and GS 4+4 (unfavorable pathology). The proportion of patients who were downgraded from unfavorable disease to GS ≤3+4 (favorable pathology) in prostatectomy specimens was investigated. Logistic regression analysis was used to explore the association between clinical parameters and downgrading in prostatectomy specimens. A total of 43 patients (41.7%) were downgraded from biopsy GS to prostatectomy GS. The proportions of downgrade in biopsy GS 4+4 and 4+3 were 14.6 and 27.1%, respectively. The percentage of highest GS out of positive biopsy cores and the maximum percentage of cancer involvement within a positive core with the highest GS were lower in the downgrade group than in the no downgrade group (45 vs. 66.7%, P=0.025; 20 vs. 30%, P=0.048, respectively). When performing multivariate logistic regression analysis, the only significant predictor for downgrade was lower percentage of highest GS cores out of positive biopsy cores (odds ratio, 2.469; 95% confidence interval, 1.029-5.925 P=0.043). In conclusion, patients with biopsy GS 4+4 and 4+3 often exhibit a downgrade to GS 3+4 or less in prostatectomy specimens. The lower percentage of highest GS cores out of positive biopsy cores was associated with downgrade.