The essential role of histone H3 Lys9 di-methylation and MeCP2 binding in MGMT silencing with poor DNA methylation of the promoter CpG island.

Silencing of the O (6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene, a key to DNA repair, is involved in carcinogenesis. Recent studies have focused on DNA hypermethylation of the promoter CpG island. However, cases showing silencing with DNA hypomethylation certainly exist, and the mechanism involved is not elucidated. To clarify this mechanism, we examined the dynamics of DNA methylation, histone acetylation, histone methylation, and binding of methyl-CpG binding proteins at the MGMT promoter region using four MGMT negative cell lines with various extents of DNA methylation. Histone H3K9 di-methylation (H3me2K9), not tri-methylation, and MeCP2 binding were commonly seen in all MGMT negative cell lines regardless of DNA methylation status. 5Aza-dC, but not TSA, restored gene expression, accompanied by a decrease in H3me2K9 and MeCP2 binding. In SaOS2 cells with the most hypomethylated CpG island, 5Aza-dC decreased H3me2K9 and MeCP2 binding with no effect on DNA methylation or histone acetylation. H3me2K9 and DNA methylation were restricted to in and around the island, indicating that epigenetic modification at the promoter CpG island is critical. We conclude that H3me2K9 and MeCP2 binding are common and more essential for MGMT silencing than DNA hypermethylation or histone deacetylation. The epigenetic mechanism leading to silent heterochromatin at the promoter CpG island may be the same in different types of cancer irrespective of the extent of DNA methylation.

Silencing of imprinted CDKN1C gene expression is associated with loss of CpG and histone H3 lysine 9 methylation at DMR-LIT1 in esophageal cancer.

The putative tumor suppressor CDKN1C is an imprinted gene at 11p15.5, a well-known imprinted region often deleted in tumors. The absence of somatic mutations and the frequent diminished expression in tumors would suggest that CDKN1C expression is regulated epigenetically. It has been, however, controversial whether the diminution is caused by imprinting disruption of the CDKN1C/LIT1 domain or by promoter hypermethylation of CDKN1C itself. To clarify this, we investigated the CpG methylation index of the CDKN1C promoter and the differentially methylated region of the LIT1 CpG island (differentially methylated region (DMR)-LIT1), an imprinting control region of the domain, and CDKN1C expression in esophageal cancer cell lines. CDKN1C expression was diminished in 10 of 17 lines and statistically correlated with the loss of methylation at DMR-LIT1 in all but three. However, there was no statistical correlation between CDKN1C promoter MI and CDKN1C expression. Furthermore, loss of CpG methylation was associated with loss of histone H3 lysine 9 (H3K9) methylation at DMR-LIT1. Histone modifications at CDKN1C promoter were not correlated with CDKN1C expression. The data suggested that the diminished CDKN1C expression is associated with the loss of methylation of CpG and H3K9 at DMR-LIT1, not by its own promoter CpG methylation, and is involved in esophageal cancer, implying that DMR-LIT1 epigenetically regulates CDKN1C expression not through histone modifications at CDKN1C promoter, but through that of DMR-LIT1.

Silencing effect of CpG island hypermethylation and histone modifications on O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene expression in human cancer.

O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) repairs the cytotoxic and mutagenic O6-alkylguanine produced by alkylating agents such as chemotherapeutic agents and mutagens. Recent studies have shown that in a subset of tumors, MGMT expression is inversely linked to hypermethylation of the CpG island in the promoter region; however, how the epigenetic silencing mechanism works, as it relates to hypermethylation, was still unclear. To understand the mechanism, we examined the detailed methylation status of the whole island with bisulfite-sequencing in 19 MGMT non-expressed cancer cell lines. We found two highly methylated regions in the island. One was upstream of exon 1, including minimal promoter, and the other was downstream, including enhancer. Reporter gene assay showed that methylation of both the upstream and downstream regions suppressed luciferase activity drastically. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assay revealed that histone H3 lysine 9 was hypermethylated throughout the island in the MGMT negative line, whereas acetylation on H3 and H4 and methylation on H3 lysine 4 were at significantly high levels outside the minimal promoter in the MGMT-expressed line. Furthermore, MeCP2 preferentially bound to the CpG-methylated island in the MGMT negative line. Given these results, we propose a model for gene silencing of MGMT that is dependent on the epigenetic state in cancer.

Loss of expression of DNA repair enzymes MGMT, hMLH1, and hMSH2 during tumor progression in gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Disorders of the DNA repair system that protects against alkylating mutagens are known to play an important role in carcinogenesis. METHODS: We investigated the expression of the DNA repair enzyme that protects against alkylating mutagens, O(6)-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT), and the mismatch repair (MMR) enzymes, hMLH1 and hMSH2, in 135 gastric cancer specimens by immunohistochemical means. RESULTS: The immunoreactivity of MGMT and MMR proteins correlated significantly with several clinicopathologic factors. The survival curve in 116 patients showed that a loss of MGMT or hMLH1, but not of hMSH2, correlated with a poor prognosis. Combined evaluation of MGMT and hMLH1 revealed that the survival of patients with negative status for both MGMT and hMLH1 was shortest. However, this significant association between patient survival and MGMT or hMLH1 expression disappeared when early and advanced cancers were separately analyzed, indicating that synchronous losses of MGMT and hMLH1 increase during tumor progression and stage. Further evaluation according to histologic type revealed that loss of MGMT, hMLH1, and hMSH2 expression significantly differed between early and advanced cancer in differentiated-type cancers. In contrast, in undifferentiated-type cancer, loss of MGMT and MMR expression was frequently found even in intramucosal (m) cancer, and no significant difference was found in loss of hMLH1 and hMSH2 between early and advanced cancer. CONCLUSION: These findings demonstrate that the reduced expression of MGMT, hMLH1, and hMSH2 in differentiated-type cancer may play an important role during tumor progression between the early and advanced stage. On the other hand, in undifferentiated-type cancer, loss of MGMT and the MMR proteins appears to be an important event at carcinogenesis or at an earlier step of tumor progression.

Combined loss of expression of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase and hMLH1 accelerates progression of hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) and human Mut L homologue 1 (hMLH1) are proteins that play an important role in DNA repair. No reports have yet described whether deficient MGMT and hMLH1 expression correlates with tumor progression and the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: Using immunohistochemical analysis, we evaluated the expression status of MGMT and hMLH1 protein in 60 paraffin-embedded samples from consecutive patients with curatively resected HCC. RESULTS: The lack of expression of both MGMT and hMLH1 in HCCs (n = 7) correlated with advanced pTNM stage (P = 0.039), as compared with HCCs expressing both proteins (n = 25). The absence of both MGMT and hMLH1 was a significant indicator of malignant potential. The expression status of both MGMT and hMLH1 was a predictive factor for overall survival in patients with HCC (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: HCC lacking both MGMT and hMLH1 is correlated with an advanced stage and a poor prognosis. The expression status of both repair proteins is a predictive prognostic marker in patients with HCC after surgical resection.

Deficient expression of O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase combined with mismatch-repair proteins hMLH1 and hMSH2 is related to poor prognosis in human biliary tract carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: O(6)-Methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) is a DNA repair enzyme that transfers methyl groups from O(6)-methylguanine to itself. Alkylation of DNA at the O(6) position of guanine is an important step in the induction of mutations in the organism by alkylating agents. The O(6)-methyl G:T mismatch is recognized by the mismatch-repair (MMR) pathway. The biliary duct is highly exposed to alkylating agents because of its anatomical location. METHODS: We examined 39 surgically resected gallbladder carcinomas and 35 extrahepatic bile duct carcinomas and evaluated the expression of MGMT and MMR protein (hMLH1 and hMSH2) by immunohistochemical staining. RESULTS: MGMT-negative staining was detected in 59.0% of gallbladder carcinoma specimens and 60.0% of extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma specimens. In gallbladder carcinoma, hMLH1- and hMSH2-negative staining was observed in 51.3% and 59.0%, respectively, whereas in extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma, the respective values were 57.1% and 65.7%. MGMT-negative staining correlated with hepatic invasion in gallbladder carcinoma and with poor prognosis in both types of tumor. Furthermore, a combined MGMT and MMR status was shown to be a more significant prognostic biomarker in both tumor types. CONCLUSIONS: Combined MGMT and MMR is a possible prognostic marker that probably reflects an accumulation of genetic mutations.