Comparison of insulin degludec (IDeg)/insulin Aspart (IAsp) co-formulation therapy twice-daily with free combination of GLP-1 receptor agonist liraglutide plus insulin degludec in Tochigi: IDEAL Trial.

AIM: We compared the efficacy and safety of insulin degludec/insulin aspart co-formulation (IDegAsp) twice-daily to a free combination of basal insulin degludec and GLP-1 receptor agonist liraglutide (IDeg + Lira) once-daily for patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes on insulin therapy and oral antidiabetic drugs. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients were randomly allocated at a 1:1 ratio to receive either the once-daily dual injection of IDeg + Lira (n = 24) or twice-daily single injection of IDegAsp (n = 28). The primary endpoints were as follows: HbA1c changes over 52 weeks of treatment and the percentage of participants achieving HbA1c < 7.0% at week 52. RESULTS: After 52 weeks, HbA1c decreased by 0.3% in the IDegAsp group and by 0.7% in the IDeg + Lira group. The HbA1c reduction was greater in the IDeg + Lira group than in the IDegAsp group. 19% of patients on IDegAsp versus 40% on IDeg + Lira achieved HbA1c < 7.0%. Pre-breakfast and pre-dinner blood glucose at 52 weeks were significantly lower in the IDeg + Lira group than in the IDegAsp group. The reduction in body mass index (BMI) was greater in the IDeg + Lira group than in the IDegAsp group throughout the study period. The confirmed hypoglycaemia rates were 1.32 and 0.69 per patient/year of exposure to IDegAsp and IDeg + Lira, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes on insulin therapy and oral antidiabetic drugs, treatment with the once-daily dual injection of IDeg + Lira compared with the twice-daily single injection of IDegAsp showed no significant difference in glycaemic control but statistically superior weight loss.

Erratum to: Efficacy of Additional Canagliflozin Administration to Type 2 Diabetes Patients Receiving Insulin Therapy: Examination of Diurnal Glycemic Patterns Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM).

Unfortunately, the original publication of this paper contained errors in the presentation of Fig. 2.

Efficacy of Additional Canagliflozin Administration to Type 2 Diabetes Patients Receiving Insulin Therapy: Examination of Diurnal Glycemic Patterns Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM).

INTRODUCTION: The efficacy of administering a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor during insulin therapy has not been established. In this study, we examined its effects based on diurnal glycemic patterns using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). METHODS: The subjects were 15 patients who had received insulin therapy for 1 year or more. A CGM device was attached to all subjects for 1 week. The administration of canagliflozin at 100 mg was started 4 days after attachment. The mean glucose concentrations, standard deviation (SD), mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE), mean of daily difference of blood glucose (MODD), and area under the curve (AUC) (≥180, <70 mg h/dL) after the start of administration were compared with the pretreatment values. In addition, we compared changes in the number of insulin units between basal and bolus insulin. Furthermore, we investigated the influence of canagliflozin on oxidative stress markers and cytokines using 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and adiponectin as parameters. RESULTS: The mean glucose concentrations decreased from 161.1 to 139.1 mg/dL (P < 0.01). The SD decreased from 36.5 to 29.6 mg/dL (P = 0.05). The MAGE decreased from 89.2 to 77.4 mg/dL (P < 0.01), and the MODD decreased from 34.3 to 25.5 mg/dL (P < 0.05). All parameters showed significant improvements in diurnal changes. AUC of ≥180, i.e., the total area of blood glucose levels at or above 180 on the blood glucose curve of CGM, decreased from 339.1 to 113.6 mg/dL (P < 0.05). AUC of <70, i.e., the total area of blood glucose levels below 70 on the blood glucose curve of CGM, slightly decreased from 1.6 to 0.3 mg/dL (P = 0.08). The total number of basal insulin units decreased from 128 to 76, and that of bolus insulin decreased from 266 to 154; the dose of insulin could be markedly decreased. In addition, the mean 8-OHdG level decreased from 11.4 to 10.8 ng/mg Cre (P < 0.05), and the mean TNF-α level decreased from 2.31 to 1.79 pg/mL (P = 0.10). The mean adiponectin level increased from 5.01 to 5.53 µg/mL (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Canagliflozin improved blood glucose changes in type 2 diabetes using insulin. In addition, the results suggest its antioxidant actions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN no. 000019429).

Short-Term Caloric Restriction Suppresses Cardiac Oxidative Stress and Hypertrophy Caused by Chronic Pressure Overload.

BACKGROUND: Caloric restriction (CR) prevents senescent changes, in which reactive oxygen species (ROS) have a critical role. Left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy is a risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. We examined whether CR alters cardiac redox state and hypertrophy from chronic pressure overload. METHODS AND RESULTS: Male c57BL6 mice were subjected to ascending aortic constriction (AAC) with ad libitum caloric intake (AL + AAC group) or 40% restricted caloric intake (CR + AAC group). CR was initiated 2 weeks before AAC and was continued for 4 weeks. Two weeks after constriction, AAC increased LV wall thickness, impaired transmitral flow velocity, and augmented myocyte hypertrophy and fibrosis, in association with enhancement of BNP and collagen III expressions in the AL + AAC group. In the AL + AAC group, oxidative stress in cardiac tissue and mitochondria were enhanced, and NADPH oxidase activity and mitochondrial ROS production were elevated. These changes were significantly attenuated in the CR + AAC group. Additionally, in antioxidant systems, myocardial glutathione peroxidase and superoxide dismutase activities were enhanced in the CR + AAC group. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic pressure overload increased cardiac oxidative damage, in association with cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis. Short-term CR suppressed oxidative stress and improved cardiac function, suggesting that short-term CR could be a useful strategy to prevent pressure overload-induced cardiac injury.

A Randomized Trial of Step-up Treatment with Premixed Insulin Lispro-50/50 vs. Aspart-70/30 in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

INTRODUCTION: When insulin treatment is started in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), there are many regimens that control serum glucose levels to a normal range. Basal-bolus insulin therapy is one of the most effective treatments for improving glycemic control to prevent the progression of diabetic microvascular complications. This study was conducted to determine whether step-up insulin treatment with premixed insulin aspart-30/70 (BIAsp 30) or lispro-50/50 (Mix50) in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus could achieve better glycemic control. METHODS: In this open label study, 72 insulin-naïve patients with poorly controlled T2DM (HbA1c ≥8.4%), who had been taking oral antidiabetic drugs for at least 12 months, were randomized to receive BIAsp 30 or Mix50 therapy. Patients started treatment of a pre-dinner injection of each type of insulin (Step 1). At 16 ± 2 weeks, a pre-breakfast injection of each type of insulin was added if HbA1c exceeded 7.4% (step 2). If patients had still not achieved HbA1c <7.4% after an additional 16 ± 2 weeks, a pre-lunch insulin injection was added (step 3). Hypoglycemic episodes were also recorded. RESULTS: The cumulative percentages of subjects who achieved HbA1c <7.4% were 36.1% (13/36) for both Mix50 and BIAsp 30 in step 1, 62.9% (23/36) for BIAsp 30 and 52.8% (19/36) for Mix50 in step 2, and 66.7% (24/36) in BIAsp 30 and 72.2% (26/36) in Mix50 in step 3. The achievement rates of HbA1c <7.4% were not statistically different between the two groups. A total of ten hypoglycemic episodes occurred in this study. However, there were no severe hypoglycemic episodes. All cases recovered by taking glucose and drinking juice. CONCLUSION: Mix50 step-up treatment has a clinical effect in achieving good glycemic control equal to that of BIAsp 30 treatment.

Improvement of glycemic control by re-education in insulin injection technique in patients with diabetes mellitus.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of re-education in the insulin injection technique for glycemic control. METHODS: A preliminary experimental study was performed with 87 insulin-treated diabetic outpatients (11 with type 1 diabetes, 76 with type 2 diabetes; 43 men, 44 women). All patients had been treated with insulin for more than 3 years. After answering questions about the insulin injection technique, the patients' knowledge levels were scored. Correct answers and explanation sheets were subsequently given to all patients. The physicians in charge gave a short lecture and provided 10 min of individual advice. Two, three, and four months after re-education the HbA1c and glycoalbumin levels were measured. RESULTS: The mean HbA1c levels of almost all patients significantly improved from 7.46 ± 0.09% to 6.73 ± 0.10% (P < 0.01), and the mean glycoalbumin levels significantly improved from 22.76 ± 0.50% to 20.26 ± 0.68% (P < 0.01). Twenty-five patients demonstrated a poor understanding (score of ≤6 points) and showed a significant decrease in the HbA1c level from 7.62 ± 0.20% to 6.71 ± 0.21% (P = 0.02). Forty-three patients demonstrated a moderate understanding (score of 7 or 8 points) and showed a decrease in the HbA1c level from 7.40 ± 0.13% to 6.68 ± 0.07% (P = 0.07). Finally, 19 patients demonstrated a good understanding (score of ≥9 points) and showed a slight decrease in the HbA1c level from 7.38 ± 0.15% to 6.93 ± 0.12% (P = 0.09). Patients with a poor understanding showed the largest decrease in the mean level of HbA1c. CONCLUSION: Re-education in the insulin injection technique led to an improvement in glycemic control in insulin-treated diabetic patients, especially in those with a poor understanding of the insulin injection technique. More attention should be paid to these strategies for outpatients.

Severe hypoglycemia accompanied with thyroid crisis.

We report a 32-year-old Japanese women with severe hypoglycemia accompanied with thyroid crisis. She complained of dyspnea, general fatigue, and leg edema. She was diagnosed with hyperthyroidism with congestive heart failure and liver dysfunction. Soon after admission, sudden cardiopulmonary arrest occurred. She was then transferred to the intensive care unit. Her serum glucose level was 7 mg/dl. Intravenous glucose, hydrocortisone, diuretics, and continuous hemodiafiltration (CHDF) saved her. We considered that hypoglycemia occurred due to heart failure and liver dysfunction due to thyroid crisis.

A case of myeloma with hypercalcemia caused by high serum concentrations of both parathyroid hormone-related peptide (PTHrP) and macrophage inflammatory protein-1α (MIP-1α).

A 62-year-old woman was admitted with dry mouth, general fatigue, and severe back pain. Biochemistry examination showed extreme hypercalcemia (21.2 mg/dL). Bone marrow examination was negative, but needle biopsy of a metastatic lung tumor revealed abnormal plasma cells; thus, multiple myeloma stage III-A was finally diagnosed. Serum concentrations of both parathyroid hormone-related peptide (PTHrP) and macrophage inflammatory protein-1α (MIP-1α) were markedly elevated (PTHrP 7.2 pmol/L, normal <1.1 pmol/L; MIP-1α 84.9 pg/mL, normal <46.9 pg/mL). Her myeloma appeared to have simultaneously caused two mechanisms producing hypercalcemia: humoral hypercalcemia of malignancy (HHM) by PTHrP and local osteolytic hypercalcemia (LOH) by MIP-1α. Therefore, the combination of two calcium-modulating abnormalities likely aggravated her hypercalcemia.

A crossover study of rosuvastatin and pitavastatin in patients with type 2 diabetes.

INTRODUCTION: The effects of a low dose of rosuvastatin (ROS) and pitavastatin (PIT) on lipid profiles and inflammation markers were assessed in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: A total of 90 Japanese type 2 diabetes patients with hyperlipidemia (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C] ≥140 mg/dL) were enrolled in this study. They were randomly assigned to four groups with open-label treatment with ROS (2.5 mg daily) or PIT (2 mg daily); two groups were sequentially treated with both drugs, with crossover of medication after 12 weeks, and the other two groups underwent treatment with either ROS or PIT for 24 weeks. The primary endpoints were the percentage changes in LDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and triglyceride, and the LDL-C/HDL-C ratio. RESULTS: Both ROS and PIT lowered LDL-C and triglyceride, and increased HDL-C. In particular, significantly greater reduction in LDL-C was seen with ROS (-44.1%) than with PIT (-36.9%, P<0.01) in the crossover group from ROS to PIT, and the same result was detected in the crossover group from PIT (-34.8%) to ROS (-44.7%). The ratio of LDL-C/HDL-C was significantly reduced with ROS treatment (from 3.45 to 1.85) compared with that with PIT (from 3.45 to 2.22, P<0.01). Both ROS and PIT lowered plasma levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1). In addition, the hsCRP level with the administration of ROS was significantly improved compared with the administration of PIT. There was no significant correlation between changes in LDL-C and hsCRP, TNF-alpha, and PAI-1 levels. ROS and PIT did not have an adverse effect on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes patients. CONCLUSION: Therapy with both statins improved lipid profiles and reduced proinflammatory responses; however, 2.5 mg of ROS have a potent LDL-C-lowering and hsCRP-lowering effect compared with 2 mg of PIT in patients with diabetes.

Effects of twice-daily injections of premixed insulin analog on glycemic control in type 2 diabetic patients.

PURPOSE: Premixed insulin is effective to improve glycemic control; however, clinicians may be less likely to know which premixed insulin is appropriate for which patients. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of twice-daily injections of premixed insulin lispro on glycemic control in type 2 diabetic patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty type 2 diabetic patients, who had been treated with twice-daily injections of human protamine mixture 30/70 insulin for at least 12 months, were divided into two groups; one group whose blood glucose 2 hours after breakfast was greater than 200 mg/dL, was switched to lispro mix50, and the other group whose blood glucose 2 hours after breakfast < 200 was switched to lispro mix25. RESULTS: Glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) significantly improved in the Mix50 group from 8.3% to 7.5% (at 12 weeks; p < 0.05), and to 7.5% (at 24 weeks; p < 0.05). On the other hand, HbA1c levels in the Mix25 group were slightly decreased from 8.1% to 7.7% at 12 weeks (p < 0.05), and to 7.9% at 24 weeks (not significant). Both postprandial plasma glucose and fasting plasma glucose levels were significantly improved in the Mix50 group, but not in the Mix25 group. Overall, 95% of subjects preferred premixed lispro insulin from human insulin in the viewpoint of the timing of insulin injection by questionnaire analysis. CONCLUSION: Switching from human protamine mixture 30/70 insulin to lispro mix50 twice-daily injection therapy in patients with high postprandial plasma glucose could improve their glycemic control and quality of life.

Effect of raloxifene on serum lipids for type 2 diabetic menopausal women with or without statin treatment.

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to investigate the effect of 1-year treatment with raloxifene, a selective estrogen receptor modulator, on plasma lipid profiles in Japanese postmenopausal type 2 diabetic patients. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A total of 43 Japanese women with postmenopausal osteoporosis and type 2 diabetes with serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) <3.59 mmol/l, serum triglyceride <1.68 mmol/l and serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) >1.03 mmol/l, who took 60 mg/day of raloxifene for 12 months, were enrolled. For analysis, they were divided into 2 groups: nonhyperlipidemia (n = 23) and hyperlipidemia treated with statin (n = 20). RESULTS: Raloxifene treatment significantly induced a mean reduction in serum LDL-C from 2.90 to 2.36 and 2.67 mmol/l in the nonhyperlipidemia and statin-treated group, respectively. However, the reduction ratio of serum LDL-C showed a significant difference in the nonhyperlipidemia group (17%) compared to the statin-treated group (7%; p = 0.03). Although serum HDL-C showed an increase in both groups (from 1.45 to 1.58 vs. from 1.40 to 1.47 mmol/l), the increase ratio of serum HDL-C was not significant between the two groups. Raloxifene administration showed 15% reduction in the nonhyperlipidemia group (p = 0.02) and 13% reduction in the statin-treated group (p = 0.02) of urinary N-telopeptide of type I collagen. No significant change in blood HbA(1c) was observed in either group. CONCLUSION: The administration of raloxifene to type 2 diabetic women showed favorable efficacy on serum lipid profiles, particularly in patients without statin treatment.

Effects of changeover from voglibose to acarbose on postprandial triglycerides in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients.

INTRODUCTION: In this study, we examined the effects of the alpha-glucosidase inhibitors acarbose and voglibose on postprandial plasma glucose and serum triglyceride levels in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: Twenty-one Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes were enrolled in this study. Subjects had been treated with voglibose for at least 3 months. They underwent a 400 kcal balanced food meal tolerance test before and 8 weeks after the changeover from voglibose to acarbose. Subjects were divided into two groups: the first group (low-dose group; n=11) was changed over from 0.6 mg/day voglibose to 150 mg/day acarbose, and the other (high-dose group; n=10) from 0.9 mg/day voglibose to 300 mg/day acarbose. RESULTS: The increment rate of postprandial plasma glucose ([plasma glucose 2 hours after test meal - fasting glucose]/fasting glucose) decreased from 34.7%+/-23.9% to 25.0%+/-24.6% (P=0.13) in the low-dose group, and decreased significantly from 56.1%+/-53.1% to 31.5%+/-36.0% (P=0.03) in the high-dose group after changeover. However, there were no significant changes in blood glycated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) levels before and after changeover in either group. The increment rate of postprandial serum triglyceride (TG) ([serum TG 2 hours after test meal - fasting TG]/fasting TG) decreased significantly only in the high-dose group (52.4%+/-60.0% to 24.3%+/-16.6%) (P=0.05). No significant changes in serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were observed in either group, whereas serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels decreased significantly from 3.20+/-0.25 to 2.65+/-0.18 mmol/L (P=0.04), only in the high-dose group. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with type 2 diabetes our findings suggest that acarbose 300 mg/day is superior to voglibose 0.9 mg/day in improving postprandial hyperglycemia and hypertriglyceridemia.

Ventricular fibrillation due to severe hypokalemia induced by steroid treatment in a patient with thyrotoxic periodic paralysis.

We report a 25-year-old Japanese man with ventricular fibrillation associated with severe hypokalemia. He developed arm and leg paralysis. He had received 2 g of methylprednisolone because thoracic epidural hematoma had been suspected in another hospital. His serum potassium was 0.8 mEq/l on arrival at our hospital. Half an hour after arrival ventricular fibrillation occurred. Treatment with electric defibrillation 8 times was successful. Afterward Graves' disease was diagnosed, therefore, his clinical symptom was diagnosed as thyrotoxic periodic paralysis. We considered that the unusual condition of hyperthyroid-related hypokalemia worsened by steroid therapy induced the ventricular fibrillation.