Prognostic Significance of Enlarged Lymph Nodes in Stage II Colorectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Many studies have reported a correlation between lymph node metastasis and prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer. However, the clinical significance of enlarged lymph nodes for prognosis has scarcely been explored. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the clinical significance of enlarged lymph nodes in stage II colorectal cancer. DESIGN: This is a multicenter retrospective observational study with a median follow-up period of 66.8 months. SETTINGS: Patients' medical records were retrospectively collected from the Japanese Study Group for Postoperative Follow-up of Colorectal Cancer database. PATIENTS: This study included 2212 patients with stage II colorectal cancer who underwent surgical resection between January 2009 and December 2012. Patients were classified into the enlarged lymph node and nonenlarged lymph node groups and their data were compared. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinicopathological characteristics and prognoses of the 2 groups were compared. The main outcomes measured were recurrence-free survival and overall survival. RESULTS: The enlarged lymph node group showed significantly better overall survival and recurrence-free survival in pT4b cases but not in pT3 or pT4a cases. In pT4b cases, an enlarged lymph node (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.29-0.98) was an independent prognostic factor for longer recurrence-free survival, whereas a rectal lesion (HR, 3.46; 95% CI, 1.90-6.29) was an independent prognostic factor for shorter recurrence-free survival. An enlarged lymph node was associated with a lower distant recurrence rate (HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.26-0.92) and a tendency to correlate with better overall survival (HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.22-1.14). LIMITATIONS: The retrospective design may have increased the risk of selection bias. Inadequate information regarding enlarged lymph nodes is another study limitation. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that enlarged lymph nodes are associated with a favorable prognosis in patients with pT4b stage II colorectal cancer. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/C246 . IMPORTANCIA PRONSTICA DE LOS GANGLIOS LINFTICOS AGRANDADOS EN EL CNCER COLORRECTAL EN ESTADIO II: ANTECEDENTES:Muchos estudios han informado una correlación entre la metástasis en los ganglios linfáticos y el pronóstico en pacientes con cáncer colorrectal. Sin embargo, apenas se ha explorado la importancia clínica de los ganglios linfáticos agrandados para el pronóstico.OBJETIVO:El objetivo fue evaluar la importancia clínica de los ganglios linfáticos agrandados en el cáncer colorrectal en estadio II.DISEÑO:Este es un estudio observacional retrospectivo multicéntrico con una mediana de seguimiento de 66,8 meses.CONFIGURACIÓN:Los registros médicos de los pacientes se recopilaron retrospectivamente de la base de datos del Grupo de estudio japonés para el seguimiento posoperatorio del cáncer colorrectal.PACIENTES:Incluimos 2212 pacientes con cáncer colorrectal en estadio II que se sometieron a resección quirúrgica entre enero de 2009 y diciembre de 2012. Los pacientes se clasificaron en grupos de ganglios linfáticos agrandados y no agrandados y se compararon sus datos.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Se compararon las características clinicopatológicas y los pronósticos de los dos grupos. Los principales resultados medidos fueron la supervivencia sin recurrencia y la supervivencia general.RESULTADOS:El grupo de ganglios linfáticos agrandados mostró una supervivencia general significativamente mejor y una supervivencia libre de recurrencia en los casos pT4b, pero no en los casos pT3 ni pT4a. En los casos de pT4b, el agrandamiento de los ganglios linfáticos (CRI, 0,53; IC 95 %, 0,29-0,98) fue un factor pronóstico independiente para una supervivencia sin recidiva más prolongada, mientras que la lesión rectal (CRI, 3,46; IC 95%, 1,90-6,29) fue un factor pronóstico independiente para RFS más cortos. Los ganglios linfáticos agrandados se relacionaron con una tasa más baja de recurrencia a distancia (CRI, 0,49; IC 95%, 0,26-0,92) y una tendencia a correlacionarse con una mejor supervivencia general (CRI, 0,50; IC 95%, 0,22-1,14).LIMITACIONES:El diseño retrospectivo puede haber aumentado el riesgo de sesgo de selección. La información inadecuada sobre el agrandamiento de los ganglios linfáticos es otra limitación del estudio.CONCLUSIONES:Este estudio mostró que los ganglios linfáticos agrandados están asociados con un pronóstico favorable en pacientes con cáncer colorrectal pT4b en estadio II. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/C246 . ( Traducción - Dr. Mauricio Santamaria ).

Clinical significance of the KRAS G13D mutation in anastomotic recurrence of colorectal cancer.

The genetic risk factors for anastomotic recurrence (AR) after curative surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC) are unclear. The present study is a single-center retrospective observational study that aimed to elucidate the association between the KRAS G13D mutation and AR in CRC. The present study included 21 patients with AR and 67 patients with non-anastomotic local recurrence (NALR) following curative surgery for CRC between January 2005 and December 2019. KRAS G13D mutation status was examined by droplet digital polymerase chain reaction. Data of clinicopathological findings and oncological outcomes were analyzed and compared between the AR group and the matched NALR group. The prevalence of the KRAS G13D mutation was significantly higher in the AR group (AR vs. NALR, 33.3 vs. 4.8%; P=0.047). Comparing the KRAS G13D mutation-positive and KRAS G13D mutation-negative patients in the AR group, there was no significant difference in the time from initial surgery to AR or resection rate of AR; however, all patients with KRAS G13D mutation who underwent resection of AR had subsequent recurrence within 2 years after resection, and overall survival was poor (3-year survival rate: Positive vs. negative, 68.6 vs. 90.9%; P=0.02). The prevalence of the KRAS G13D mutation was significantly higher in patients with AR, and KRAS G13D-mutant patients with AR had a poorer prognosis than those that were negative for the KRAS G13D mutation. In conclusion, postoperative surveillance and treatment strategies should be considered with attention to the possibility of AR and subsequent recurrence in KRAS G13D-mutant patients.

Clinicopathological Characteristics of Anastomotic Recurrence After Curative Resection for Colorectal Cancer: Comparison With Nonanastomotic Local Recurrences.

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic recurrence is thought to be caused by implantation of tumor cells to the anastomotic line; however, its risk factors and prognostic significance remain unclear. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to clarify the risk factors for anastomotic recurrence in colorectal cancer and assess the prognosis in comparison to nonanastomotic local recurrence. DESIGN: A single-center retrospective observational study. SETTINGS: The medical records of the study participants were retrospectively collected from the Department of Surgical Oncology at the University of Tokyo Hospital database. PATIENTS: This study included 1584 patients with colorectal cancer who underwent surgical resection between January 2005 and December 2017. We focused on 15 patients who had an anastomotic recurrence. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measures were the risk factors of anastomotic recurrence at the primary resection and prognosis data in comparison to that of nonanastomotic local recurrence. RESULTS: There were 15 patients (0.95%) with anastomotic recurrence and 35 (2.21%) with nonanastomotic local recurrence. Univariate analysis revealed that lymph node metastasis and advanced T stage are the risk factors for anastomotic recurrence. The prognosis of patients with anastomotic recurrence was similar to that of those with nonanastomotic local recurrence who underwent resection. LIMITATIONS: The small number of patients with anastomotic recurrence is a major limitation of this study. Additionally, the retrospective study design may have increased the risk of selection bias. CONCLUSIONS: Lymph node metastasis and advanced T stage were associated with anastomotic recurrence. The prognosis of patients with anastomotic recurrence was similar to that with resected nonanastomotic local recurrence. Thus, surveillance should be carefully continued while considering the poor prognosis of patients with anastomotic recurrence. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/C92 . CARACTERSTICAS CLINICOPATOLGICAS DE LA RECURRENCIA ANASTOMTICA DESPUS DE LA RESECCIN CURATIVA DEL CNCER COLORRECTAL COMPARACIN CON LAS RECURRENCIAS LOCALES NO ANASTOMTICAS: ANTECEDENTES:Se cree que la recurrencia anastomótica es causada por la implantación de células tumorales en la línea anastomótica; sin embargo, los factores de riesgo asociados y el significado en cuanto a pronóstico siguen sin estar claros.OBJETIVO:Este estudio tuvo como objetivo aclarar los factores de riesgo para la recurrencia anastomótica en el cáncer colorrectal y evaluar el pronóstico en comparación con la recurrencia local no anastomótica.DISEÑO:Un estudio observacional retrospectivo de un solo centro.ESCENARIO:Los registros médicos de los participantes del estudio se recopilaron retrospectivamente de la base de datos del Departamento de Cirugía Oncológica del Hospital de la Universidad de Tokio.PACIENTES:Este estudio incluyó a 1584 pacientes con cáncer colorrectal que se sometieron a resección quirúrgica entre enero de 2005 y diciembre de 2017. Nos enfocamos en 15 pacientes que tuvieron recurrencia anastomótica.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Las principales medidas de resultado fueron los factores de riesgo de recurrencia anastomótica en la resección primaria y los datos de pronóstico en comparación con la recurrencia local no anastomótica.RESULTADOS:Hubo 15 pacientes (0.95%) con recurrencia anastomótica y 35 (2.21%) con recurrencia local no anastomótica. El análisis univariable reveló que la metástasis en los ganglios linfáticos y el estadio T avanzado son los factores de riesgo para la recurrencia anastomótica. El pronóstico de los pacientes con recidiva anastomótica fue similar al de aquellos con recidiva local no anastomótica sometidos a resección.LIMITACIONES:El pequeño número de pacientes con recurrencia anastomótica es una limitación importante de este estudio. Además, el diseño retrospectivo del estudio puede haber aumentado el riesgo de sesgo de selección.CONCLUSIONES:La metástasis en los ganglios linfáticos y el estadio T avanzado se asociaron con recurrencia anastomótica. El pronóstico de los pacientes con recidiva anastomótica fue similar al de la recidiva local no anastomótica resecada. Por lo tanto, la vigilancia debe continuarse cuidadosamente considerando el mal pronóstico de los pacientes con recurrencia anastomótica. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/C92 . (Traducción-Dr. Jorge Silva Velazco ).

Loss of RUNX3 Immunoreactivity in Non-Neoplastic Rectal Mucosa May Predict the Occurrence of Ulcerative Colitis-Associated Colorectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Runt-related transcription factor (RUNX) 3 is a tumor suppressor whose expression is reduced in non-neoplastic rectal mucosa of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) with coexisting colitis-associated cancer (CAC). We aimed to evaluate RUNX3 utility as a predictive marker for CAC using immunohistochemistry (IHC) for non-neoplastic UC mucosa. METHODS: We retrospectively compared the RUNX3 expression detected by IHC between non-neoplastic rectal biopsy specimens from 20 cases with invasive cancer (CAC group) and 20 cases selected from 138 patients without CAC (non-CAC group) that were treated during the same period (2006-2017) and were matched for sex, duration, extension, and age. We validated the results using tissue microarrays (TMA) of 44 operated cases with CAC. The RUNX3 expression level was determined by calculating the percentage of RUNX3-positive-cells. RESULTS: The RUNX3 expression was lower in the CAC than that in the non-CAC group (35.6 vs. 70.7%, p = 0.03). For a cutoff value of 58%, the sensitivity and specificity for predicting CAC were 75.0 and 70.0% respectively. The immunostaining results for the TMA showed the same trend; 74% of cases with CAC were negative for the RUNX3 expression. CONCLUSION: RUNX3 immunostaining of non-neoplastic mucosa is useful for identifying UC patients at a high risk of developing CAC.