Preferential B cell differentiation by combined immune checkpoint blockade for renal cell carcinoma is associated with clinical response and autoimmune reactions.

Combined immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) is effective therapy for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, the dynamic changes in circulating B cells induced by combined ICB have not been clarified. The present study prospectively examined 22 patients scheduled to receive ICB for unresectable or metastatic RCC between March 2018 and August 2021. Eleven patients received combined therapy with anti-PD-1 (nivolumab) and anti-CTLA-4 (ipilimumab), and the other 11 patients received nivolumab monotherapy. Comprehensive phenotypes of circulating immune cells obtained prior to and after ICB therapy were analyzed by flow cytometry. Although the proportion of naïve B cells among total B cells was significantly decreased, that of switched memory B cells was significantly increased after combined therapy. In responders, the proportion of B cells among peripheral blood mononuclear cells was significantly higher prior to ICB therapy, and the proportion of switched memory B cells among total B cells tended to increase after ICB therapy. Of note, the proportion of plasmablasts among total B cells was significantly increased after ICB therapy in patients who developed severe immune-related adverse events (irAEs), and the proportion of B cells among peripheral blood decreased significantly. Furthermore, in four of five patients who developed immune-related hypophysitis following combined therapy, anti-pituitary antibody was detected in the serum. These results suggested that immune-related hypophysitis was closely related to the increase in circulating plasmablasts. Collectively, this study suggests that combined ICB promotes the differentiation of B cell populations, which is associated with efficient tumor suppression and development of irAEs.

Predictive impact of C-reactive protein to albumin ratio for recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma receiving nivolumab.

Although the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was reported to be a predictive biomarker for clinical outcomes in various types of cancer, including recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer (R/M HNSCC) treated with nivolumab, the usefulness of the pretreatment C-reactive protein/albumin ratio (CAR) as a prognostic marker remains to be clarified. This study aimed to analyze the clinical usability of the CAR in comparison with that of the NLR. 46 R/M HNSCC patients treated with nivolumab were retrospectively analyzed. The optimal cutoff value for the CAR was calculated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. The optimal cutoff value for the CAR was set to 0.30. On multivariate analyses, a high CAR was significantly associated with poor overall survival (adjusted HR, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.42-3.47; p < 0.01) and progression-free survival (adjusted HR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.38-2.80; p < 0.01). The overall response rate and disease control rate for the high CAR patients were lower than for the low CAR patients. The CAR had significantly higher area under the curve values than the NLR at 2 and 4 months. The pretreatment CAR might be an independent marker for prognosis and efficacy in R/M HNSCC patients treated with nivolumab.

First-line chemotherapy with S-1 alone or S-1 plus cisplatin for elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer: a multicenter propensity score matched study.

BACKGROUND: Fluoropyrimidine and platinum combination is the standard treatment for advanced or recurrent gastric cancer (AGC). However, fluoropyrimidine monotherapy is commonly used for elderly patients with AGC because of its good tolerability. METHODS: In this multicenter retrospective study, we collected clinical data of AGC patients aged 70 years or older, treated with S-1 alone or S-1 plus cisplatin (SP) as the first-line treatment between January 2009 and December 2011. Propensity score matched cohorts (PSMC) were used for reducing the confounding effects to compare efficacy and safety between the two treatment groups. Cox regression analysis was performed to clarify the prognostic factors. RESULTS: PSMC (n = 109 in each group) were selected from among 444 eligible patients (S-1 group, 210; SP group, 234); the S-1 group included more patients deemed unfit for intensive chemotherapy than the SP group (e.g., higher age, poorer PS, poor renal function). In the PSMC, patients' characteristics were comparable between groups, except the male ratio (S-1 group, 64.2%; SP group, 77.1%; p = 0.04). No significant differences were observed in either overall survival [hazard ratio (HR) 0.93, p = 0.63] or progression-free survival (HR 1.09, p = 0.61). Severe adverse events (AEs) and hospitalization due to AEs were more frequent in the SP group than in the S-1 group (p < 0.001 each). CONCLUSION: Our findings do not support the survival benefit of SP over S-1 in elderly patients with AGC. We are now conducting a prospective comparative study to optimize treatment strategy and explore applicability of the geriatric assessment for these patients.

Irinotecan monotherapy as third-line or later treatment in advanced gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) are often treated with irinotecan monotherapy as salvage-line therapy. However, the survival benefit of this therapy remains to be elucidated. METHODS: Medical records of AGC patients who were treated with irinotecan monotherapy as salvage-line treatment in six institutions from 2007 to 2014 were reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 146 patients had prior fluoropyrimidine and taxane therapies, and 75.3% had prior platinum therapy. The median age was 66 (range 27-81) years, and 102 males (69.9%) were included. Performance status (PS) was 0/1/2/3 in 53/70/19/4 patients. Eighty-nine patients (61.0%) had two or more metastatic sites. Irinotecan monotherapy as 3rd-/4th-line therapy was performed in 135/11 (92.5%/7.5%). The median number of administrations was 4 (range 1-62). Forty-six patients (31.5%) required initial dose reduction at the physician's discretion. The overall response rate was 6.8%, and the disease control rate was 43.1%. The median PFS was 3.19 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.30-4.08 months], and the median OS was 6.61 months (95% CI 5.94-7.28 months). Grade 3/4 adverse events were hematological toxicity (46 patients, 31.5%) and non-hematological toxicity (50 patients, 34.2%). Hospitalization due to adverse events was required in 31 patients (21.2%). Patients with relative dose intensity (RDI) less than 80% showed similar survival to those with RDI 80% or higher. CONCLUSIONS: Irinotecan monotherapy was relatively safely performed as salvage-line treatment for AGC in Japanese clinical practice. Careful patient selection and intensive modification of the dose of irinotecan might possibly be associated with favorable survival.

Regorafenib-induced retinal and gastrointestinal hemorrhage in a metastatic colorectal cancer patient with liver dysfunction: A case report.

RATIONALE: Regorafenib is effective for metastatic colorectal cancer but its toxicity such as hemorrhage should be considered. The safety of regorafenib for the patient with the liver disease is not known. PATIENT CONCERNS: Seventy-one-year old man of colon cancer had myodesopsia and blood stool after 14 days from the initiation of regorafenib administration with 50% dose reduction due to liver dysfunction. DIAGNOSES: Fundus examination revealed hemorrhage of the retinal vein. INTERVENTIONS: Regorafenib treatment was discontinued and observational therapy was pursued. OUTCOMES: Retinal and gastrointestinal hemorrhage resolved in 1 week. LESSONS: Retinal hemorrhage should be considered as the differential diagnosis of myodesopsia in the patient treated by regorafenib. Safety and pharmacokinetic of continuous regorafenib administration for patients with liver dysfunction remains to be clarified.

Efficacy and Safety Analysis of Oxaliplatin-based Chemotherapy for Advanced Gastric Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Significant efficacy of oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy has been demonstrated for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). However, the appropriate dose of oxaliplatin, and the efficacy and toxicity of administration of oxaliplatin subsequent to cisplatin therapy still remain unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In total, 55 patients with AGC that were scheduled to receive oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy were prospectively examined. RESULTS: The median age was 67 years and oxaliplatin was administered to 39 (71%) patients as first-line and in 16 (29%) patients as second-line therapy. An initial dose of 130 or 100 mg/m2 of oxaliplatin was administered to 11 and 36 patients, respectively. The overall response rates (ORR) and median progression free survival (mPFS) were 86 and 33%, and 7.2 and 7.8 months, respectively. Compared to 100 mg/m2, the relative dose intensity was significantly lower and severe toxicity tended to increase with oxaliplatin at 130 mg/m2 A total of 10 patients (18%) had a prior cisplatin-based therapy. The ORR of the patients pretreated with cisplatin was 14% and the mPFS was 6.1 months. CONCLUSION: An initial oxaliplatin dose of 130 mg/m2 resulted in a good response, but tended to increase the risk of toxicity. Subsequent oxaliplatin-based therapy after cisplatin exhibited modest efficacy, especially in cases with cisplatin intolerance.

Efficacy and Safety of TAS-102 in Clinical Practice of Salvage Chemotherapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: TAS-102 is an anti-metabolite which demonstrated activity against multidrug-resistant advanced colorectal cancer. Its major toxicities are hematological disorders. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Background, TAS-102 efficacy, toxicities and outcomes for patients with multidrug-resistant advanced colorectal cancer from six Institutions of the Kyushu Medical Oncology Group were retrospectively surveyed. RESULTS: Forty-three patients, including fragile patients due to declining performance status and other comorbidities (37%) were analyzed. Efficacy was reflected in an objective overall response of 3%, median progression-free survival of 74 days (2.5 months) and median overall survival of 229 days (7.6 months). The most frequent Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (44%), leukopenia (26%) and anemia (23%). Febrile neutropenia was found in 7%. Sub-group analysis demonstrated an improved outcome on treatment with the sequence regorafenib-TAS-102. CONCLUSION: TAS-102 was safely administered to modestly fragile patients with equivalent efficacy to that for the non-fragile population. Further investigation of sequential treatment using regorafenib and TAS-102 is needed.

Reduced dose of salvage-line regorafenib monotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Salvage-line regorafenib monotherapy exhibited a marked survival benefit for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, the toxicity of this regimen has resulted in the clinical use of a reduced dose of regorafenib. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-two Japanese mCRC patients (median age=61 years) who had been treated with regorafenib were retrospectively examined. RESULTS: Best objective response rate was 0% and stable disease (SD) was 31%. Median progression-free survival was 81 days and median overall survival was 233 days. Adverse events of any grade were observed in all patients: 17 (53%) patients suffered grade 3 or 4 adverse events including fatigue (13%), anorexia (13%), hand-foot skin reaction (22%) and elevations of alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase (19%/16%). One patient with grade 5 liver dysfunction was identified (3%). Twenty-nine (91%) patients required treatment dose reduction or a delay in treatment. The relative dose intensity was 59%. Regorafenib treatments were terminated because of disease progression (59%) or adverse events (34%). CONCLUSION: Despite a decrease in the intensity of regorafenib treatment, because of severe adverse events, a fairly favorable efficacy was achieved in Japanese patients.