Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Curr Sports Med Rep ; 20(6): 306-311, 2021 Jun 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34099608

RESUMO

ABSTRACT: Running is a popular form of exercise that is easily accessible to various populations; endurance running, defined as distances beyond 5 km, continues to grow within the sport. Endurance running-related injuries are common in the lower extremities and are primarily overuse related. A multitude of risk factors for injury exist, including extrinsic factors, such as running distance and frequency, and intrinsic factors, such as biomechanics and nutrition status. Training and rehabilitation techniques vary with a general focus on strengthening and gradual increase in activity, but evidence is mixed, and it is difficult to generalize programs across different running populations. Management of specific running groups, including youth runners, is an area in which additional research is needed. New treatments, such as orthobiologics and wearable technology, have promising potential to optimize performance and recovery and minimize injury. However, they need to be further evaluated with high-quality studies.


Assuntos
Extremidade Inferior/lesões , Resistência Física , Corrida/lesões , Traumatismos em Atletas/prevenção & controle , Traumatismos em Atletas/terapia , Fenômenos Biomecânicos , Transtornos Traumáticos Cumulativos/etiologia , Órtoses do Pé , Humanos , Corrida de Maratona/lesões , Corrida de Maratona/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistema Musculoesquelético/lesões , Estado Nutricional , Condicionamento Físico Humano , Fatores de Risco , Corrida/estatística & dados numéricos , Dispositivos Eletrônicos Vestíveis , Esportes Juvenis/lesões
2.
J Spinal Cord Med ; 44(3): 392-398, 2021 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31859608

RESUMO

Objective: For patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) who undergo flap surgery to treat pressure injuries (PIs), the optimal duration of post-operative bedrest to promote healing and successful remobilization to sitting is unknown. At the study center, the minimum duration of post-operative bedrest was changed from 4 to 6 weeks. The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes of patients who underwent flap surgery using bedrest protocols of different duration.Design: This was a retrospective review of all flap procedures completed at VA Puget Sound Health Care System from 1997 to 2016 to treat PIs in patients with SCI. Surgeries were excluded if they were not a flap (i.e. primary skin closure or graft), involved a non-pelvic region, or were a same-hospitalization revision of a prior surgery. The primary outcome of this investigation was the number of days between surgery and the first time the patient mobilized to sitting out of bed for 2 h with an intact surgical incision.Methods: 190 patients received a total of 286 flap surgeries from 1994 to 2016. A chart review of each case was completed to determine the planned duration of bedrest (4- vs 6-weeks), first date of successful mobilization out of bed for 2 h, length of stay post-surgery, and occurrence of complications such as dehiscence or need for operative revisions.Results: Among 286 primary surgeries, 171 surgeries used the 4-week protocol and 115 used the 6-week protocol. When compared to the 4-week protocol, patients treated with the 6-week protocol were slightly older, more likely to have a diagnosis of diabetes, and less likely to be current smokers. Healing was never achieved after 4 surgeries in the 4-week group and 2 surgeries in the 6-week group. With the analysis restricted to a single surgery per subject who achieved healing (109 treated with 4-week protocol and 75 with 6-week protocol), there was a significant difference in days until 2-h sitting: median 54 days for the 4-week protocol compared to 60 days for the 6-week protocol (p = 0.041). Up to about 60 days post-operatively, the 4-week protocol produced a greater proportion remobilized to sitting, and thereafter the proportion of patients successfully remobilized did not differ between protocols.Conclusions: The 6-week protocol was not associated with improved remobilization outcomes (reduced rates of dehiscence or surgical revisions), and the 4-week protocol resulted in a significantly shorter time to remobilization to sitting for 2 h as well as a shorter length of stay. We did not identify any subgroup of patients that benefited from the longer protocol.


Assuntos
Traumatismos da Medula Espinal , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Retalhos Cirúrgicos , Cicatrização
3.
Sports Med Arthrosc Rev ; 27(2): 48-55, 2019 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31046008

RESUMO

As adaptive sports grow in popularity, it is increasingly important to understand the injuries for which their athletes are at risk. This population is challenging to study given its small size and diversity of its participants; accordingly, research is mostly low quality because of limited sample sizes and study durations. Summer adaptive sports account for 22 of 28 Paralympic sports, with the most frequently studied being wheelchair basketball, rugby, tennis, athletics, swimming, and soccer. Injuries vary by sport because of differences in contact level, limbs utilized, and athlete impairments. Equipment changes and technological advances, especially within wheelchair and amputee sports, have increased the level of competition and reduced injury rates. Fortunately, the majority of injuries across adaptive sports are minor and do not result in significant time off from sport. Still, even minor injuries can negatively impact these athletes' mobility and activities of daily living compared to the nondisabled population.


Assuntos
Traumatismos em Atletas/epidemiologia , Estações do Ano , Equipamentos Esportivos , Esportes para Pessoas com Deficiência , Atletas , Traumatismos em Atletas/classificação , Humanos , Tecnologia/instrumentação , Cadeiras de Rodas
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...