RESUMO
The papilionoid legume genus Sophora (Fabaceae) exhibits a worldwide distribution, but a phylogenetic framework to understand the evolution of this group is lacking to date. Previous studies have demonstrated that Sophora is not monophyletic and might include Ammodendron, Ammothamnus, and Echinosophora, but the relationships among these four genera (defined as Sophora s.l.) are unclear. Here we used a nuclear DNA dataset (ETS, ITS, SQD1) and a plastid DNA dataset (matK, rbcL, rpl32-trnL, trnL-F) of 654 accession sequences to reconstruct the phylogenetic relationships, estimate the divergence times and ancestral range of Sophora s.l., and infer the evolution of chromosome number and morphological characteristics. Our major aim was to reconstruct phylogenetic relationships to test monophyly and elucidate relationships within the genus. Our results indicated that Ammodendron, Ammothamnus, and Echinosophora are embedded within Sophora s.s. and that nine well-supported clades can be recognized within comprise Sophora s.l. Ancestral character state estimation revealed that the most recent common ancestor of Sophora s.l. was a deciduous shrub that lacks rhizome spines and has unwinged legumes. Divergence times estimation and ancestral area reconstruction showed that Sophora s.l. originated in Central Asia and/or adjacent Southeast China in the early Oligocene (ca. 31 Mya) and dispersed from these regions into East and South Asia's adjacent areas and North America via the Bering land bridge. The analyses also supported a South American origin for S. sect. Edwardsia, which experienced rapid radiation with its major lineages diversifying over a relatively narrow timescale (8 Mya).
Assuntos
Fabaceae , Sophora , Filogenia , Fabaceae/genética , Sophora/genética , América do Norte , China , DNA de Plantas/genética , Teorema de BayesRESUMO
Following recent mimosoid phylogenetic and phylogenomic studies demonstrating the non-monophyly of the genus Albizia, we present a new molecular phylogeny focused on the neotropical species in the genus, with much denser taxon sampling than previous studies. Our aims were to test the monophyly of the neotropical section Arthrosamanea, resolve species relationships, and gain insights into the evolution of fruit morphology. We perform a Bayesian phylogenetic analysis of sequences of nuclear internal and external transcribed spacer regions and trace the evolution of fruit dehiscence and lomentiform pods. Our results find further support for the non-monophyly of the genus Albizia, and confirm the previously proposed segregation of Hesperalbizia, Hydrochorea, Balizia and Pseudosamanea. All species that were sampled from section Arthrosamanea form a clade that is sister to a clade composed of Jupunba, Punjuba, Balizia and Hydrochorea. We find that lomentiform fruits are independently derived from indehiscent septate fruits in both Hydrochorea and section Arthrosamanea. Our results show that morphological adaptations to hydrochory, associated with shifts into seasonally flooded habitats, have occurred several times independently in different geographic areas and different lineages within the ingoid clade. This suggests that environmental conditions have likely played a key role in the evolution of fruit types in Albizia and related genera. We resurrect the name Pseudalbizzia to accommodate the species of section Arthrosamanea, except for two species that were not sampled here but have been shown in other studies to be more closely related to other ingoid genera and we restrict the name Albizia s.s. to the species from Africa, Madagascar, Asia, Australia, and the Pacific. Twenty-one new nomenclatural combinations in Pseudalbizzia are proposed, including 16 species and 5 infraspecific varietal names. In addition to the type species Pseudalbizziaberteroana, the genus has 17 species distributed across tropical regions of the Americas, including the Caribbean. Finally, a new infrageneric classification into five sections is proposed and a distribution map of the species of Pseudalbizzia is presented.