Right Ventricular Assist Device with an Oxygenator for the Management of Combined Right Ventricular and Respiratory Failure: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Severe lung disease frequently presents with both refractory hypoxemia and right ventricular (RV) failure. OxyRVAD is an extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) configuration of RV bypass that also supplements gas exchange. This systematic review summarizes the available literature regarding the use of OxyRVAD in the setting of severe lung disease with associated RV failure. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar were queried on September 27th, 2023, for articles describing the use of an OxyRVAD configuration. The main outcome of interest was survival to ICU discharge. Data on the duration of OxyRVAD support and device-related complications were also recorded. RESULTS: Of 475 identified articles, 33 were retained for analysis. Twenty-one articles were case reports and 12 were case series representing a total of 103 patients. No article provided a comparison group. Most patients (76.4%) were transitioned to OxyRVAD from another type of mechanical support. OxyRVAD was used as a bridge to transplant or curative surgery in 37.4% and as a bridge to recovery or decision in 62.6%. Thirty-one patients (30.1%) were managed with the dedicated single-access dual-lumen ProtekDuo cannula. Median time on OxyRVAD was twelve days (IQR 8-23) and survival to ICU discharge was 63.9%. Device-related complications were infrequently reported. CONCLUSION: OxyRVAD support is a promising alternative for RV support when gas exchange is compromised with good ICU survival in selected cases. Comparative analyses in patients with RV failure with and without severe lung disease are needed.

Adherence to Cardiovascular Prevention Guidelines in an Academic Centre.

Background: Adherence to guidelines is associated with better patient outcomes. Although studies show suboptimal adherence to cardiovascular prevention guidelines among general practitioners, adherence among specialist physicians is understudied. The aim of this analysis was to identify practice gaps among cardiologists in a tertiary academic centre. Methods: We retrospectively audited cardiology outpatient clinic notes taken at the Cardiology Clinic at the Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), from the period January 1, 2019 to February 28, 2019. Data were abstracted from hospital medical records. The primary outcome of interest was the rate of adherence to cardiovascular prevention guidelines. We compared the chart-documented practice at our centre to the Canadian hypertension, lipid, diabetes, antiplatelet, and heart failure guidelines in effect at the time of the audit. We also collected information regarding discussions of smoking, alcohol consumption, physical activity, and diet. Results: A total of 2503 patients were included, with a mean age of 65.6 ± 14.5 years. Dyslipidemia occurred in 63% of patients, hypertension in 55%, and coronary artery disease in 41%. Optimal low-density lipoprotein control was documented as having been achieved in just 39% of cases. Blood pressure control was adequate for 65% of patients, and glycemic control was achieved in 47% of patients with diabetes. Heart failure treatment was optimal in 34% of patients. Nearly all patients with coronary artery disease (95%) had appropriate antithrombotic therapy. The incidence of discussion of nonpharmacologic interventions varied, ranging from 91% (smoking) to 16% (diet). Conclusions: Primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular events was found to be suboptimal in an academic tertiary-care outpatient cardiology clinic and may be representative of similar shortcomings nationwide. Strategies to ensure guideline adherence are needed.

Contexte: Le respect des lignes directrices est associé à de meilleurs résultats pour les patients. Bien que les études montrent que les omnipraticiens adhèrent de façon sous-optimale aux lignes directrices en matière de prévention des événements cardiovasculaires, l'observance chez les médecins spécialistes n'a pas été assez étudiée. Notre analyse a pour objectif de déceler les lacunes dans la pratique des cardiologues exerçant dans des centres universitaires de soins tertiaires. Méthodologie: Nous avons examiné de manière rétrospective les notes cliniques consignées au dossier des patients du Centre cardiovasculaire du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) et résumé les données issues des consultations ayant eu lieu du 1er janvier au 28 février 2019. Le principal résultat d'intérêt était le taux d'adhésion aux lignes directrices en matière de prévention des événements cardiovasculaires. Nous avons comparé les pratiques enregistrées dans les dossiers de notre centre aux lignes directrices canadiennes sur la prise en charge de l'hypertension, de la lipidémie, du diabète, du traitement antiplaquettaire et de l'insuffisance cardiaque en place au moment de l'évaluation. Nous avons aussi recueilli de l'information sur les discussions entourant le tabagisme, la consommation d'alcool, l'activité physique et l'alimentation. Résultats: Les données de 2 503 patients, âgés en moyenne de 65,6 ± 14,5 ans, ont été retenues. De ces patients, 63 % présentaient une dyslipidémie, 55 %, une hypertension et 41 %, une maladie coronarienne. Le taux de lipoprotéines de basse densité n'était maîtrisé de façon optimale que dans 39 % des cas. La normalisation de la pression artérielle était adéquate chez 65 % des patients, et 47 % des patients diabétiques atteignaient les cibles glycémiques. L'insuffisance cardiaque était optimalement traitée chez 34 % des patients. Presque tous les patients atteints de maladie coronarienne (95 %) recevaient un traitement antithrombotique approprié. La fréquence des discussions sur les interventions non pharmacologiques variait, allant de 91 % dans le cas du tabagisme à 16 % dans celui de l'alimentation. Conclusions: La prévention primaire et secondaire des événements cardiovasculaires s'est révélée sous-optimale dans une clinique externe de cardiologie d'un hôpital universitaire et pourrait être représentative de lacunes similaires dans l'ensemble du pays. Des stratégies visant à assurer le respect des lignes directrices sont nécessaires.

Antithrombotic therapies in Canadian atrial fibrillation patients with concomitant coronary artery disease: Insights from the CONNECT AF + PCI-II program.

BACKGROUND: Selecting the appropriate antithrombotic regimen for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or have had medically managed acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains complex. This multi-centre observational study evaluated patterns of antithrombotic therapies utilized among Canadian patients with AF post-PCI or ACS. METHODS AND RESULTS: By retrospective chart audit, 611 non-valvular AF patients [median (interquartile range) age 76 (69-83) years, CHADS2 score 2 (1-3)] who underwent PCI or had medically managed ACS between August 2018 and December 2020 were identified by 68 cardiologists across eight provinces in Canada. Overall, triple antithrombotic therapy [TAT: combined oral anticoagulation (OAC) and dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT)] was the most common initial antithrombotic strategy, with use in 53.8 % of patients, followed by dual pathway therapy (32.7 % received OAC and a P2Y12 inhibitor, and 4.1 % received OAC and aspirin) and DAPT (9.3 %). Median duration of TAT was 30 (7, 30) days. Compared to the previous CONNECT AF + PCI-I program, there was an increased use of dual pathway therapy relative to TAT over time (P-value <.0001). DOACs (direct oral anticoagulants) represented 90.3 % of all OACs used overall, with apixaban being the most utilized (50.5 %). Proton pump inhibitors were used in 57.0 % of all patients, and 70.1 % of patients on ASA. Planned antithrombotic therapies at 1 year were: 76.2 % OAC monotherapy, 8.3 % OAC + ASA, 7.9 % OAC + P2Y12 inhibitor, 4.3 % DAPT, 1.3 % ASA alone, and <1 % triple therapy. CONCLUSION: In accordance with recent Canadian Cardiovascular Society guideline recommendations, we observed an increased use of dual pathway therapy relative to TAT over time in both AF patients post-PCI (elective and emergent) and in those with medically managed ACS. Additionally, DOACs have become the prevailing form of anticoagulation across all antithrombotic regimens. Our findings suggest that Canadian physicians are integrating evidence-based approaches to optimally manage the bleeding and thrombotic risks of AF patients post-PCI and/or ACS.

Prevalence of H. pylori among patients undergoing coronary angiography (The HP-DAPT prevalence study).

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) screening and treatment is recommended for patients on chronic aspirin (ASA) therapy to reduce the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding. Coronary artery disease patients requiring combination antithrombotic therapy (dual antiplatelet therapy; DAPT, or dual pathway inhibition; DPI) are at an even higher risk of GI bleeding. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the prevalence of H. pylori among patients referred for angiography and likely to receive DAPT or DPI. This single-center prospective observational study recruited patients undergoing coronary angiography and with the possibility of requiring DAPT or DPI. All included patients underwent H. pylori serology testing. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine predictors of seropositivity. 195 patients were included in the analysis. Mean age was 67 years, 50% had known prior CAD, and 49% underwent coronary intervention. H. pylori serology was positive in 36%. Chronic kidney disease (odds ratio [OR] 2.76; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.24 to 6.15; p = 0.01) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR 2.52; 95% CI 1.14 to 5.55; p = 0.02) history were independent predictors of H. pylori seropositivity. Given the clinically significant prevalence of H. pylori seropositivity among patients referred for angiography, systematic screening strategies and eradication of H. pylori could significantly reduce the incidence of GI bleeding in patients requiring DAPT or DPI.

Prehospital STEMI Referral Systems and Sex-Related Bias in Canada: A National Survey.

Background: Prehospital electrocardiographic ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) diagnosis and prehospital cardiac catheterization laboratory activation have been shown to significantly reduce average treatment delay, and further standardization of such systems may help reduce sex-related treatment and outcome gaps. However, what types of prehospital STEMI activation systems are in place across Canada, and to what extent sex-based STEMI treatment disparities are tracked, is unknown. Methods: We conducted a national survey of catheterization laboratory directors between October 11 and December 25, 2021. Seventeen catheterization laboratory directors representing 6 community and 11 academic centres completed the survey (40% response rate). Results: : All responding centres use a prehospital STEMI diagnosis and cardiac catheterization laboratory activation system, and the majority (59%) rely on real-time physician oversight. Slightly less than half (47%) of percutaneous coronary intervention centres reported prospectively tracking sex-related differences in STEMI care, and only one respondent believed that a significant systemic sex-related bias was present in their prehospital STEMI referral system. Patient factors (symptom description or time to presentation; 23.5%) and limitations of electrocardiogram diagnosis of STEMI in women (23.5%) were cited most frequently as contributing to sex-related bias in STEMI referral systems. In contrast, implicit bias in the referral algorithm, prehospital provider bias, and physician bias were not considered important contributing factors. Conclusions: Although all responding centres employ prehospital activation systems, less than half tracked sex-related differences, and most respondents believed that no sex-related bias existed in their prehospital STEMI system.

Contexte: Il a été démontré que le diagnostic préhospitalier par électrocardiogramme de l'infarctus du myocarde avec élévation du segment ST (STEMI) et l'activation du laboratoire de cathétérisme cardiaque préhospitalier permettent de réduire significativement le délai moyen de traitement, et un usage plus standardisé de ces systèmes pourrait contribuer à la réduction des écarts liés au sexe dans les traitements et les résultats de santé. Toutefois, on ignore quels types de systèmes d'activation préhospitaliers pour la prise en charge du STEMI sont en place à travers le Canada, ni dans quelle mesure les disparités de traitement liées au sexe font l'objet d'un suivi. Méthodologie: Nous avons mené un sondage national auprès des directeurs de laboratoires de cathétérisme entre le 11 octobre et le 25 décembre 2021. Notre questionnaire a été rempli par les directeurs de 17 laboratoires de cathétérisme, dont six centres communautaires et 11 centres universitaires (taux de réponse de 40 %). Résultats: Pour tous les centres répondants, un système de diagnostic préhospitalier du STEMI et d'activation de laboratoire de cathétérisme cardiaque était en place, dont la surveillance était assurée majoritairement par un médecin en temps réel (59 %). Un peu moins de la moitié des centres d'intervention coronarienne percutanée (47 %) ont rapporté faire un suivi prospectif des différences liées au sexe dans la prise en charge du STEMI, et un seul répondant a dit croire qu'un biais systématique lié au sexe était présent dans le système d'orientation préhospitalier pour les STEMI. Les facteurs liés aux patients (la description des symptômes ou le temps écoulé depuis leur apparition; 23,5 %) et les limites inhérentes au diagnostic du STEMI par électrocardiogramme chez les femmes (23,5 %) étaient les facteurs les plus fréquemment mentionnés comme sources de biais liés au sexe dans les systèmes d'orientation pour les STEMI. Par ailleurs, les biais implicites dans l'algorithme d'orientation et les biais des prestataires de soins préhospitaliers et des médecins n'étaient pas des facteurs contributifs jugés importants. Conclusions: Bien que des systèmes d'activation préhospitaliers soient en place dans tous les centres répondants, moins de la moitié d'entre eux ont rapporté faire le suivi des différences liées au sexe, et la plupart des répondants étaient d'avis que leur système préhospitalier de prise en charge des STEMI ne comportait pas de biais liés au sexe.

Canadian Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection Cohort Study: 3-Year Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is an important cause of myocardial infarction (MI) in young to middle-aged women. OBJECTIVES: We aim to define the long-term natural history of SCAD. METHODS: We performed a multicenter, prospective, observational study of patients with nonatherosclerotic SCAD presenting acutely from 22 North American centers. We recorded baseline demographics, in-hospital characteristics, precipitating and predisposing conditions, angiographic features (adjudicated), in-hospital and 3-year major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Cox regression multivariable analysis was performed. RESULTS: We prospectively enrolled 750 consecutive patients with SCAD from June 2014 to June 2018. Mean age was 51.7 ± 10.5 years, 88.5% were women (55.0% postmenopausal); 31.3% presented with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, and 68.3% with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Precipitating emotional stressor was reported in 50.3%, and physical stressor in 28.9%. Predisposing conditions included fibromuscular dysplasia in 42.9% (56.4% in those with complete screening), peripartum state 4.5%, and genetic disorders 1.6%. Most patients were treated conservatively (84.3%); 14.1% underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), 0.7% coronary artery bypass graft. At 3.0-year median follow-up, mortality was 0.8%, recurrent MI 9.9% (extension of previous SCAD 3.5%, de novo recurrent SCAD 2.4%, iatrogenic dissection 1.9%), with overall MACE 14.0%. Presence of genetic disorders, peripartum SCAD, and extracoronary fibromuscular dysplasia were independent predictors of 3-year MACE. Patients who underwent PCI at index hospitalization had similar postdischarge MACE compared with no PCI. At 3 years, 80.0% remained on aspirin and 73.5% on beta-blockade. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term mortality and de novo recurrent SCAD was low in our contemporary large SCAD cohort that included low revascularization rate and high use of beta-blockade and aspirin. Genetic disorders, extracoronary fibromuscular dysplasia, and peripartum SCAD were independent predictors of long-term MACE.

Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support in Post-Myocardial Infarction Cardiogenic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Cardiogenic shock (CS) complicates 5%-10% of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and is the leading cause of early mortality. It remains unclear whether percutaneous mechanical support (pMCS) devices improve post-AMI CS outcome. METHODS: A systematic review of original studies comparing the effect of pMCS on AMI-CS mortality was conducted with the use of Medline, Embase, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library databases. RESULTS: Of 8672 records, 50 were retained for quantitative analysis. Four additional references were added from other sources. Four references reported a significant mortality reduction with intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) in patients with failed primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) or managed with thrombolysis. Meta-analyses showed no advantage of Impella over conventional therapy (pooled OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.20-1.46; I2 = 0.85) and increased mortality compared with IABP (pooled OR 1.32; 95% CI 1.08-1.62; I2 = 0.85). No study reported a mortality advantage for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) over conventional therapy, IABP, or Impella support. Early mortality might be improved with the addition of IABP or Impella to ECMO. Bleeding Academic Research Consortium ≥ 3 bleeding was increased with every pMCS strategy. CONCLUSIONS: The current evidence is of poor to moderate quality, with only 1 in 5 included articles reporting randomised data and several reporting unadjusted outcomes. Yet, there is some evidence to favour IABP use in the setting of thrombolysis or with failed pPCI, and adding IABP or Impella should be considered for patients requiring ECMO.

Assessing the Accuracy of a Second-Generation Optical Sensor Pressure Wire in a Wire-to-Wire Comparison (The ACCURACY Study).

BACKGROUND: The phenomenon of "pressure drift" increases uncertainty about the correct FFR value. Redesigned and incorporating an optical pressure sensor, the "OptoWire Deux™" is purported to be less prone to the pressure drift seen with piezoelectric coronary pressure wires. The aim of this first in vivo real-world clinical study is to evaluate the performance of OptoWire Deux™ in terms of measurements agreement and propensity to pressure drift in a wire to wire comparison. METHODS: This is a single center, prospective, non-blinded clinical investigation enrolling 45 consecutive patients with a clinical indication for coronary lesion FFR assessment. Lesions were either simultaneously assessed with two optical sensor pressure wires (OSPW) (Group O-O; 30 patients, 34 lesions) or one OSPW and one piezoelectric pressure wire (PEPW) simultaneously (Group O-P; 15 patients, 15 lesions). Significant drift was defined as a pressure ratio deviation of >0.03. RESULTS: Mean FFR measurements in Group OO were not statistically different between the two sets of OSPW (overall 0.84±0.10; P = 0.52). In Group OP, however, mean FFR measurement with PEPW (0.85±0.09) was numerically lower than that observed with the OSPW (0.88±0.08; P = 0.09). Level of agreement using the Bland-Altman method was higher when 2 OSPW were used for FFR assessment (-0.002 95% CI [-0.033,0.029] vs. 0.026 95% CI [-0.078, 0.130], respectively). The rate of drift was significantly lower with an OSPW compared to a PEPW (4.8% vs. 26.7% respectively, P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: The optical sensor guidewire showed a high level of readings' agreement after simultaneous usage of 2 optical sensor guidewires. There was also significantly less drift when compared to a piezoelectric guidewire.

A comparison of confounder selection and adjustment methods for estimating causal effects using large healthcare databases.

PURPOSE: Confounding adjustment is required to estimate the effect of an exposure on an outcome in observational studies. However, variable selection and unmeasured confounding are particularly challenging when analyzing large healthcare data. Machine learning methods may help address these challenges. The objective was to evaluate the capacity of such methods to select confounders and reduce unmeasured confounding bias. METHODS: A simulation study with known true effects was conducted. Completely synthetic and partially synthetic data incorporating real large healthcare data were generated. We compared Bayesian adjustment for confounding (BAC), generalized Bayesian causal effect estimation (GBCEE), Group Lasso and Doubly robust estimation, high-dimensional propensity score (hdPS), and scalable collaborative targeted maximum likelihood algorithms. For the hdPS, two adjustment approaches targeting the effect in the whole population were considered: Full matching and inverse probability weighting. RESULTS: In scenarios without hidden confounders, most methods were essentially unbiased. The bias and variance of the hdPS varied considerably according to the number of variables selected by the algorithm. In scenarios with hidden confounders, substantial bias reduction was achieved by using machine-learning methods to identify proxies as compared to adjusting only by observed confounders. hdPS and Group Lasso performed poorly in the partially synthetic simulation. BAC, GBCEE, and scalable collaborative-targeted maximum likelihood algorithms performed particularly well. CONCLUSIONS: Machine learning can help to identify measured confounders in large healthcare databases. They can also capitalize on proxies of unmeasured confounders to substantially reduce residual confounding bias.

Evolution of Antithrombotic Management of Atrial Fibrillation After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Over 10 Years and Guidelines Uptake.

BACKGROUND: The management of atrial fibrillation and/or flutter (AF) patients requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has evolved significantly. The Canadian Cardiovascular Society AF guidelines, last updated in 2020, seek to aid physicians in balancing both bleeding and thrombotic risks. METHODS: A tertiary academic centre registry of patients with AF who had PCI was examined for the antithrombotic therapy at discharge in 4 time periods (cohort 2010-2011; cohort 2014-2015; cohort 2017; cohort 2019). Discharge prescription patterns were compared among the cohorts, using the χ2 test. In addition, antithrombotic management in cohorts 2017 and 2019 were compared to guideline-expected therapy, using the χ2 test. RESULTS: A total of 576 AF patients undergoing PCI were included. Clinical and procedural characteristics were similar among cohorts, except for an increase in drug-eluting stent use in the most recent cohort (94% vs 99%; P = 0.04). The rate of oral anticoagulation increased over time (75% vs 89%; P < 0.01), driven primarily by an increase in direct oral anticoagulants prescription (63% vs 84%; P < 0.01). In contrast to previous cohorts, there was no significant difference between the observed and the guideline-expected anticoagulation rate in cohort 2019 (89% vs 94%; P = 0.23). CONCLUSIONS: A combination of expert guidance and educational initiatives in the past decade contributed to dramatic changes in the management of patients with AF undergoing PCI.

INTRODUCTION: La prise en charge des patients atteints de fibrillation auriculaire et/ou de flutter (FA) qui ont besoin d'une intervention coronarienne percutanée (ICP) a considérablement évolué. La dernière révision, en 2020, des lignes directrices sur la FA de la Société canadienne de cardiologie vise à aider les médecins à établir l'équilibre entre les risques d'hémorragie et de thrombose. MÉTHODES: Nous avons fouillé le registre d'un centre universitaire en soins tertiaires portant sur des patients atteints de FA qui avaient subi une ICP pour nous pencher sur le traitement antithrombotique offert à la sortie de l'hôpital de quatre périodes (cohorte 2010­2011; cohorte 2014­2015; cohorte 2017; cohorte 2019). Nous avons comparé les pratiques en matière d'ordonnances à la sortie de l'hôpital entre les cohortes à l'aide du test du χ2 . De plus, nous avons comparé la prise en charge des cohortes de 2017 et de 2019 qui avaient reçu le traitement antithrombotique à celles qui avaient reçu le traitement prévu dans les lignes directrices à l'aide du test du χ2 . RÉSULTATS: Nous avons sélectionné un total de 576 patients atteints de FA qui avaient subi une ICP. Les caractéristiques cliniques et interventionnelles étaient similaires entre les cohortes, à l'exception d'une augmentation de l'utilisation d'une endoprothèse médicamentée dans la plus récente cohorte (94 % vs 99 %; P = 0,04). Le taux d'anticoagulation par voie orale qui avait augmenté au fil du temps (75 % vs 89 %; P < 0,01) était principalement attribuable à l'augmentation des ordonnances d'anticoagulants d'action directe par voie orale (63 % vs 84 %; P < 0,01). Contrairement aux cohortes précédentes, il n'y avait aucune différence significative entre le taux d'anticoagulation observé et le taux d'anticoagulation prévu dans les lignes directrices dans la cohorte de 2019 (89 % vs 94 %; P = 0,23). CONCLUSIONS: La combinaison des conseils d'experts et des initiatives éducationnelles de la dernière décennie a contribué à des changements radicaux dans la prise en charge des patients atteints de FA qui subissaient une ICP.

Impact of STEMI Diagnosis and Catheterization Laboratory Activation Systems on Sex- and Age-Based Differences in Treatment Delay.

BACKGROUND: Women and the elderly with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) experience longer treatment delays despite prehospital STEMI diagnosis and catheterization laboratory activation systems. It is not known what role specific STEMI referral systems might play in mediating this gap in care. We therefore examined sex- and age-based differences in STEMI treatment delay (TD) in different STEMI activation systems. METHODS: This observational comparative effectiveness study comprised 3 retrospective STEMI cohorts: a traditional hospital-based activation cohort (Cohort 1), an automated "physician-blind" prehospital activation cohort (Cohort 2), and a prehospital activation with real-time physician oversight cohort (Cohort 3). Outcomes of interest included sex and age group (< or ≥ 75 years) differences in suboptimal (> 90 minutes) first medical contact-to-device time (FMC-to-device) within each cohort, as well as independent predictors of suboptimal FMC-to-device and in-hospital mortality across cohorts. RESULTS: Five hundred-sixty STEMI activations were analyzed. In Cohort 1 (n = 179), women and those ≥ 75 were more likely to experience suboptimal FMC-to-device times (78.7% vs 36.4%, P = 0.02 and 85.0% vs 58.3%, < 0.01, respectively). Similar findings were observed in Cohort 3 (n = 109) (53.5% vs 32.9%, 56.5% vs 33.3%, respectively; P = 0.05, for both). In Cohort 2 (n = 272), however, there was no significant age-based difference (30.4% vs 21.7%, P = 0.18), and the gap was numerically lower but still significant for women (32.1% vs 20.1%, P = 0.04). When examining prehospital activation cohorts only, female sex (P = 0.03), off-hours presentation (P < 0.01), and physician oversight (P < 0.01) were independent predictors of longer FMC-to-device times. Age ≥ 75 (P < 0.01), Killip class (P < 0.01), and female sex (P = 0.04) were independently associated with in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Automated "physician-blind" STEMI activation was associated with a reduced TD gap in women and the elderly, suggesting possible systemic bias. Appropriately powered confirmatory studies are required, but incorporating automated diagnosis and catheterization laboratory activation may be a solution to treatment gaps in STEMI care.

INTRODUCTION: Les femmes et les personnes présentant ont un infarctus du myocarde avec élévation du segment ST (STEMI) subissent de plus longs retards de traitement en dépit du diagnostic préhospitalier de STEMI et des systèmes d'activation de laboratoires de cathétérisme. On ignore le rôle que pourraient jouer les systèmes d'aiguillage des personnes atteintes de STEMI pour combler cette lacune en matière de soins. Nous avons donc examiné les différences selon le sexe et l'âge dans le retard de traitement du STEMI des différents systèmes d'activation de laboratoire en présence de STEMI. MÉTHODES: La présente étude comparative sur l'efficacité regroupait trois cohortes rétrospectives de STEMI : une cohorte traditionnelle d'activation à l'hôpital (cohorte 1), une cohorte d'activation du laboratoire lors de diagnostic préhospitalier automatisé « à l'insu du médecin ¼ (cohorte 2) et une cohorte d'activation du laboratoire de diagnostic préhospitalier dont la surveillance est assurée par un médecin en temps réel (cohorte 3). Les critères d'intérêt étaient les différences selon le sexe et le groupe d'âge (< ou ≥ 75 ans) dans le taux d'intervalle sous-optimal entre la première prise de contact avec les services médicaux et la pose d'un dispositif (> 90 minutes) au sein de chaque cohorte, ainsi que les prédicteurs indépendants de l'intervalle sous-optimal entre la première prise de contact avec les services médicaux et la pose d'un dispositif et la mortalité à l'hôpital de toutes les cohortes. RÉSULTATS: Cinq cents soixante (560) activations de diagnostic de STEMI ont fait l'objet d'une analyse. Dans la cohorte 1 (n = 179), les femmes et les personnes ≥ 75 ans étaient plus susceptibles de subir des intervalles sous-optimaux entre la première prise de contact avec les services médicaux et la pose d'un dispositif (78,7 % vs 36,4 %, P = 0,02 et 85,0 % vs 58,3 %, < 0,01, respectivement). Nous avons observé des résultats similaires dans la cohorte 3 (n = 109) (53,5 % vs 32,9 %, 56,5 % vs 33,3 %, respectivement ; P = 0,05, pour les deux). Toutefois, dans la cohorte 2 (n = 272), il n'y avait aucune différence significative selon l'âge (30,4 % vs 21,7 %, P = 0,18) et l'écart était numériquement plus faible, mais encore significatif chez les femmes (32,1 % vs 20,1 %, P = 0,04). Lorsque nous examinions seulement les cohortes d'activation du laboratoire lors de diagnostic préhospitalier, le sexe féminin (P = 0,03), la survenue dans les heures creuses (P < 0,01) et la surveillance du médecin (P < 0,01) étaient des prédicteurs indépendants d'intervalles plus longs entre la première prise de contact avec les services médicaux et la pose d'un dispositif. L'âge ≥ 75 ans (P < 0,01), la classification de Killip (P < 0,01) et le sexe féminin (P < 0,04) étaient indépendamment associés à la mortalité à l'hôpital. CONCLUSIONS: L'activation du laboratoire lors de diagnostic automatisé du STEMI « à l'insu du médecin ¼ a été associée à une réduction de l'écart dans le retard de traitement chez les femmes et les personnes âgées. Ceci indique un possible biais systémique. Des études confirmatives d'une puissance suffisante sont nécessaires, mais l'incorporation du diagnostic et de l'activation du laboratoire de cathétérisme atuomatisés peut être une solution aux écarts de traitement dans les soins de STEMI.

Effect of Real-Time Physician Oversight of Prehospital STEMI Diagnosis on ECG-Inappropriate and False Positive Catheterization Laboratory Activation.

BACKGROUND: ST-elevation myocardial infarction diagnosis at first medical contact (FMC) and prehospital cardiac catheterization laboratory (CCL) activation are associated with reduced total ischemic time and therefore have become the dominant ST-elevation myocardial infarction referral method in primary percutaneous coronary intervention systems. We sought to determine whether physician oversight was associated with improved diagnostic performance in a prehospital CCL activation system and what effect the additional interpretation has on treatment delay. METHODS: Between 2012 and 2015, all patients in 2 greater Montreal catchment areas with a chief symptom of chest paint or dyspnea had an in-the-field electrocardiogram (ECG). A machine diagnosis of "acute myocardial infarction" resulted either in automatic CCL (automated cohort without oversight) or transmission of the ECG to the receiving centre emergency physician for reinterpretation before CCL activation. System performance was assessed in terms of the proportion of false positive and inappropriate activations (IA), as well as the proportion of patients with FMC-to-device times ≤ 90 minutes. RESULTS: Four hundred twenty-eight (428) activations were analyzed (311 automated; 117 with physician oversight). Physician oversight tended to decrease IAs (7% vs 3%; P = 0.062), but was also associated with a smaller proportion of patients achieving target FMC-to-device (76% vs 60%; P < 0.001). There was no significant effect on the proportion of false positive activation. CONCLUSIONS: Real-time physician oversight might be associated with fewer IAs, but also appears to have a deleterious effect on FMC-to-device performance. Identifying predictors of IA could improve overall performance by selecting ECGs that merit physician oversight and streamlining others. Larger clinical studies are warranted.

CONTEXTE: Un diagnostic d'infarctus du myocarde avec élévation du segment ST au moment du premier contact avec un professionnel de la santé et l'activation du processus de cathétérisme cardiaque avant l'arrivée à l'hôpital sont associés à une réduction de la durée totale de l'épisode ischémique, et sont donc désormais la méthode de préférence en cas d'infarctus du myocarde avec élévation du segment ST dans les établissements où l'intervention coronarienne percutanée primaire est possible. Nous avons voulu déterminer si la supervision par un médecin était associée à une amélioration de la justesse du diagnostic dans un tel contexte et les répercussions d'une interprétation additionnelle sur les délais de traitement. MÉTHODOLOGIE: De 2012 à 2015, tous les patients de deux zones desservies du Grand Montréal qui présentaient comme principal symptôme une douleur à la poitrine ou une dyspnée ont subi un électrocardiogramme (ECG) sur le terrain. Un diagnostic d'infarctus aigu du myocarde posé par l'appareil a automatiquement donné lieu à l'activation du processus de cathétérisme cardiaque (cohorte automatisée sans supervision) ou à la transmission de l'ECG à l'urgentologue de l'établissement où le patient était conduit pour la réinterprétation des résultats avant l'activation du processus de cathétérisme cardiaque. La performance du système a été évaluée en fonction de la proportion de faux positifs et d'activations inappropriées, ainsi que de la proportion de patients chez qui le délai entre le premier contact avec un professionnel de la santé et l'intervention était ≤ 90 minutes. RÉSULTATS: Quatre cent vingt-huit (428) activations du processus ont été analysées (311 automatisées; 117 après la supervision par un médecin). La supervision par un médecin était associée à une baisse non significative des activations inappropriées du processus (7 % vs 3 %; p = 0,062), mais était aussi associée à une plus faible proportion de patients chez qui le délai visé entre le premier contact avec un professionnel de la santé et l'intervention était respecté (76 % vs 60 %; p < 0,001). Aucun effet significatif quant à la proportion de faux positifs n'a été observé. CONCLUSIONS: La supervision en temps réel par un médecin pourrait être associée à une réduction des activations inappropriées du processus de cathétérisme cardiaque urgent, mais pourrait également nuire aux résultats quant au délai entre le premier contact avec un professionnel de la santé et l'intervention. L'identification des facteurs prédictifs d'une activation inappropriée du processus pourrait améliorer les résultats globaux en permettant de choisir les résultats d'ECG qui mériteraient d'être passés en revue par le médecin, et en déclenchant le processus habituel pour les autres. Des études cliniques de plus grande envergure sont de mise.

Implications of COVID-19 on Time-Sensitive STEMI Care: A Report From a North American Epicenter.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has forced dramatic changes to the healthcare systems throughout the world. Time-sensitive management of cardiovascular emergencies such as ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has yet to be evaluated in the context of these new policies, particularly in so-called "hot spot" cities. METHODS: We evaluated the early impact of the pandemic on STEMI performance in the Greater Montreal Area. A total of 167 patients from 3 different study periods were included. Patients presenting in the lockdown period from mid-March to mid-May 2020 (Group C, 53 patients) were compared to those from mid-March to mid-May 2019 (Group A, 60 patients) and the 2020 pre-COVID-19 period (Group B, 54 patients). RESULTS: The number of STEMI admissions was unaffected during the lockdown. However, significantly longer delays between symptom onset and first medical contact (FMC) were noted (Group C 189.0 IQR [70.0, 840.0] min vs. Group A 103.0 IQR [42.5, 263.0] min vs. Group B 91.0 IQR [38.0, 235.5 min], P = 0.007). In contrast, additional safety protocols do not appear to have significantly affected delays between FMC and first intracoronary device activation (Group C 102 IQR [73.0, 133.0] min vs. Group A 104 IQR [87.0, 146.0] min vs. Group B 99.5 IQR [80.0, 150.0] min, P = 0.37). Patients that presented during the outbreak were more likely to be unstable with a higher incidence of Killip classes II-IV compared to groups A and B (28.3% vs. 18.3% vs. 5.6% respectively, P = 0.008). Worse in-hospital outcomes were also noted with a significantly higher rate of major adverse cardiac events (Group A 5.0% vs. Group B 11.1% vs. Group C 22.6%, P = 0.007). CONCLUSION: During the lockdown period, many patients appear to have been reluctant to present to hospitals. This was associated with more unstable STEMI presentations and worse in-hospital course. Importantly, the health care system appears able to ensure timely acute cardiac care while ensuring that COVID-19 protocols are respected.

Effectiveness and safety among direct oral anticoagulants in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: A multi-database cohort study with meta-analysis.

AIMS: There are conflicting signals in the literature about comparative safety and effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). METHODS: We conducted multicentre matched cohort studies with secondary meta-analysis to assess safety and effectiveness of dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban across 9 administrative healthcare databases. We included adults with NVAF initiating anticoagulation therapy (dabigatran, rivaroxaban or apixaban), and constructed 3 cohorts to compare DOACs pairwise. The primary outcome was pooled hazard ratio (pHR) of ischaemic stroke or systemic thromboembolism. Secondary outcomes included pHR of major bleeding, and a composite of stroke, major bleeding, or all-cause mortality. We used proportional hazard Cox regressions models, and pooled estimates were obtained with random effect meta-analyses. RESULTS: The cohorts included 73 414 new users of dabigatran, 92 881 of rivaroxaban, and 61 284 of apixaban. After matching, the pHRs (95% confidence intervals) comparing rivaroxaban initiation to dabigatran were: 1.11 (0.93, 1.32) for ischaemic stroke or systemic thromboembolism, 1.26 (1.09, 1.46) for major bleeding, and 1.17 (1.05, 1.30) for the composite endpoint. For apixaban vs dabigatran, they were: 0.91 (0.74, 1.12) for ischaemic stroke or systemic thromboembolism, 0.89 (0.75, 1.05) for major bleeding, and 0.94 (0.78 to 1.14) for the composite endpoint. For apixaban vs rivaroxaban, they were: 0.85 (0.74, 0.99) for ischaemic stroke or systemic thromboembolism, 0.61 (0.53, 0.70) for major bleeding, and 0.82 (0.76, 0.88) for the composite endpoint. CONCLUSION: We found that apixaban use is associated with lower risks of stroke and bleeding compared with rivaroxaban, and similar risks compared with dabigatran.

Comparative effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: a Canadian multicentre observational cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have widely replaced warfarin for stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Our objective was to compare the safety and effectiveness of DOACs (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban) versus warfarin for stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in the Canadian setting. METHODS: We conducted a population-based observational multicentre cohort study with propensity score matching and subsequent meta-analysis. We used health care databases from 7 Canadian provinces (British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Ontario, Quebec and Nova Scotia). Patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who initiated anticoagulation therapy in 2009-2017 were matched to an equal number who initiated warfarin. The primary outcome was the pooled hazard ratio (HR) for ischemic stroke or systemic embolization. Secondary outcomes included pooled HRs for major bleeding; a composite outcome of stroke, systemic embolization, major bleeding and all-cause mortality; and myocardial infarction. We modelled HRs using proportional hazard Cox regression with inverse probability of censoring weights, and estimated pooled HRs with random-effect meta-analyses. RESULTS: We included 128 273 patients who initiated anticoagulation with a DOAC (40 503 dabigatran, 49 498 rivaroxaban and 38 272 apixaban) and 128 273 patients who initiated anticoagulation with warfarin. The pooled HR for ischemic stroke or systemic embolization comparing DOACs to warfarin was 1.02 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.87 to 1.19). Direct oral anticoagulants were associated with lower rates of major bleeding (pooled HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.97), the composite outcome (pooled HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.89) and all-cause mortality (pooled HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.85). INTERPRETATION: In this real-world study, DOACs were associated with similar risks of ischemic stroke or systemic embolization, and lower risks of bleeding and total mortality compared to warfarin. These findings support the use of DOACs for anticoagulation in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, no. NCT03596502.

Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes Beyond the First Year: A Canadian Clinical Practice Survey.

BACKGROUND: Antithrombotic management following acute coronary syndromes (ACSs) has evolved significantly. However, given lingering uncertainty as to when an ACS may be considered stable, there is the possibility of practice divergence beyond the first year. METHODS: An online adaptive survey describing patients with varying cardiac and extracardiac ischemic risk was developed in order to asses self-reported physician practice intentions pertaining to the antithrombotic management of ACS patients who lack a formal indication for therapeutic anticoagulation. Provincial "champions" (Prince Edward Island not represented) were identified to ensure dissemination of the survey within their jurisdictions via 3 coordinated e-mailings; the survey was made available in French and English from November 2018 through January 2019. RESULTS: A total of 135 practitioners responded to the survey (response rate 15%). Surveys were fully completed in all cases. Nearly all respondents (97%) were cardiologists; 76% worked at an academic center, and 54% had been in practice ≥ 10 years. Most respondents (81%-90%, depending on the scenario) preferred ticagrelor-based dual antiplatelet therapy as the initial ACS treatment. However, beyond 12 months, management decisions differed significantly according to the balance of cardiac and extracardiac risk. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a first look at how the introduction of rivaroxaban 2.5 mg might be integrated into the clinical management of ACS patients beyond the first year in Canada. Whether to pursue dual antiplatelet therapy or transition early to low-dose rivaroxaban plus acetylsalicylic acid will likely be driven by patient clinical characteristics and perceived cardiac vs extra-cardiac ischemic risk.

CONTEXTE: La prise en charge antithrombotique des patients ayant subi un syndrome coronarien aigu (SCA) a sensiblement évolué au fil du temps. Toutefois, compte tenu de l'incertitude qui persiste quant aux critères définissant un SCA stable, il est possible que les pratiques divergent après la première année. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Nous avons mis au point un questionnaire adaptatif en ligne décrivant les cas de patients présentant divers degrés de risque d'ischémie cardiaque ou extracardiaque, afin d'évaluer les objectifs autodéclarés des médecins quant à la prise en charge antithrombotique des patients ayant subi un SCA chez qui une anticoagulothérapie n'est pas formellement indiquée. Des « champions ¼ provinciaux (l'Île-du-Prince-Édouard n'étant pas représentée) ont été désignés pour assurer la diffusion du questionnaire dans leur province respective en trois envois par courriel coordonnés; le questionnaire était offert en français et en anglais, et l'enquête s'est déroulée de novembre 2018 à janvier 2019. RÉSULTATS: Au total, 135 praticiens ont répondu au sondage (taux de réponse : 15 %). Tous les participants ont répondu à toutes les questions. Presque tous les participants (97 %) étaient cardiologues; 76 % des participants travaillaient dans un centre universitaire, et 54 % exerçaient depuis 10 ans ou plus. La plupart des participants (de 81 à 90 %, selon le scénario) préféraient une bithérapie antiplaquettaire à base de ticagrélor comme premier traitement après un SCA. Toutefois, les décisions quant au traitement au-delà des 12 premiers mois suivant le SCA variaient considérablement selon le risque cardiaque et extracardiaque résiduel évalué. CONCLUSIONS: L'étude constitue une première évaluation de la façon dont le rivaroxaban à 2,5 mg pourrait être intégré à la stratégie canadienne de prise en charge des patients au-delà de la première année suivant le SCA. Le choix de poursuivre la bithérapie antiplaquettaire ou de faire promptement la transition vers un traitement associant rivaroxaban à faible dose et acide acétylsalicylique dépendra vraisemblablement des caractéristiques cliniques du patient et du risque d'ischémie cardiaque et extracardiaque perçu.