Vertebral Tortuosity Index in Patients with Non-Connective Tissue Disorder-Related Aneurysm Disease.

OBJECTIVE: The vertebral tortuosity index (VTI) predicts increased risk of acute aortic events in patients with known genetic aortopathies. This study describes the VTI in a cohort of patients with non-connective tissue disorder-related large aneurysms. METHODS: Hospital imaging records from July 2012 to March 2016 were interrogated to identify patients with aneurysmal disease who had undergone computed tomographic angiography that included imaging of vertebral arteries. A control group of consecutive patients undergoing carotid and vertebral imaging was also assessed. VTI was calculated using the formula: [(centre-line distance) / (straight-line distance)-1] ×100 for all patients, and statistical analysis undertaken to determine whether measured VTI was statistically different in patients of younger age, with larger aneurysms, or an acute presentation. Comparison was made with patients who had no aneurysm disease. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients were identified with adequate imaging to assess the entire aorta, including vertebral arteries. The majority of patients were male (71%, 46/65) and mean age at the time of the CT scan was 71 years (SD 11.1 years). There were 11 patients under the age of 60 years in this cohort. The mean VTI was 33.17 (SD 20.43). There was no statistically significant difference between different territories of presentation (proximal vs. distal aneurysm, p=.94), age of patient (>60 years vs. <60 years, p=.2), or size of aneurysm (>6 cm vs. <6 cm, p=.09). Acuity of presentation was not predicted by a higher VTI (p=.69). The VTI in patients with aneurysms was higher than in patients without aneurysm disease (VTI = 16.1, p<.005) CONCLUSIONS: An elevated VTI is consistently present in patients with degenerative aneurysms and has potential as a universally available predictive measurement. However, the increased VTI in the older cohort without connective tissue disease may not carry the same predictive value for acute presentations as has been demonstrated in younger patients with a known genetic basis for their aortopathy.

Changes in Renal Anatomy After Fenestrated Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.

OBJECTIVE: To assess short- and long-term movement of renal arteries after fenestrated endovascular aortic repair (FEVAR). METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent FEVAR at one institution with a custom-made device designed with fenestrations for the superior mesenteric (SMA) and renal arteries, a millimetric computed tomography angiography (CTA), and a minimum of 2 years' follow-up were included. Angulation between renal artery trunk and aorta, clock position of the origin of the renal arteries, distance between renal arteries and SMA, and target vessel occlusion were retrospectively collected and compared between the pre-operative, post-operative (<6 months), and last (>12 months) CTA. RESULTS: From October 2004 to January 2014, 100 patients met the inclusion criteria and 86% of imaging was available for accurate analysis. Median follow-up was 27.3 months (22.7-50.1). There were no renal occlusions. A significant change was found in the value of renal trunk angulation of both renal arteries on post-operative compared with pre-operative CTA (17° difference upward [7.5-29], p < .001), but no significant change thereafter (p = .5). Regarding renal clock positions (7.5° of change equivalent to 15 min of renal ostial movement): significant anterior change was found between post-operative and pre-operative CTA (15 min [0-30], p = .03 on the left and 15 min [15-30], p < .001 on the right), without significant change thereafter (15 min [0-30], p = .18 on the left and 15 min [0-15] on the right, p = .28). No changes were noted on the distance between renal and SMA ostia (difference of 1.65 mm [1-2.5], p = .63). CONCLUSION: The renal arteries demonstrate tolerance to permanent changes in angulation after FEVAR of approximately 17° upward trunk movement and of 15-30 min ostial movement without adverse consequences on patency after a median of more than 2 years' follow-up. The distance between the target vessels remained stable over time. These results may suggest accommodation to sizing errors and thus a compliance with off the shelf devices in favourable anatomies.

A Comparison of Accuracy of Image- versus Hardware-based Tracking Technologies in 3D Fusion in Aortic Endografting.

OBJECTIVES: Fusion of three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography and intraoperative two-dimensional imaging in endovascular surgery relies on manual rigid co-registration of bony landmarks and tracking of hardware to provide a 3D overlay (hardware-based tracking, HWT). An alternative technique (image-based tracking, IMT) uses image recognition to register and place the fusion mask. We present preliminary experience with an agnostic fusion technology that uses IMT, with the aim of comparing the accuracy of overlay for this technology with HWT. METHOD: Data were collected prospectively for 12 patients. All devices were deployed using both IMT and HWT fusion assistance concurrently. Postoperative analysis of both systems was performed by three blinded expert observers, from selected time-points during the procedures, using the displacement of fusion rings, the overlay of vascular markings and the true ostia of renal arteries. The Mean overlay error and the deviation from mean error was derived using image analysis software. Comparison of the mean overlay error was made between IMT and HWT. The validity of the point-picking technique was assessed. RESULTS: IMT was successful in all of the first 12 cases, whereas technical learning curve challenges thwarted HWT in four cases. When independent operators assessed the degree of accuracy of the overlay, the median error for IMT was 3.9 mm (IQR 2.89-6.24, max 9.5) versus 8.64 mm (IQR 6.1-16.8, max 24.5) for HWT (p = .001). Variance per observer was 0.69 mm(2) and 95% limit of agreement ±1.63. CONCLUSION: In this preliminary study, the error of magnitude of displacement from the "true anatomy" during image overlay in IMT was less than for HWT. This confirms that ongoing manual re-registration, as recommended by the manufacturer, should be performed for HWT systems to maintain accuracy. The error in position of the fusion markers for IMT was consistent, thus may be considered predictable.

Early Experience of Endovascular Repair of Post-dissection Aneurysms Involving the Thoraco-abdominal Aorta and the Arch.

OBJECTIVES: Outcomes are reported in management of post-dissection aneurysms involving the aortic arch and/or thoraco-abdominal segment (TAAA) treated with fenestrated and branched (complex) endografts. METHODS: This report includes all patients with chronic post-dissection aneurysms >55 mm in diameter, deemed unfit for open surgery, treated using complex endografts between October 2011 and March 2015. When appropriate, staged management strategies including left subclavian artery revascularization, thoracic endografting, dissection flap fenestration or tear enlargement, and other endovascular procedures were performed at least 3 weeks prior to definitive complex endovascular repair. The following outcome data were collected prospectively at discharge, 12 months and annually thereafter: technical success, endoleaks, target vessel patency, false lumen patency, aneurysm diameter, major and minor complications, re-interventions, and mortality. RESULTS: The cohort comprised 23 patients with a median age of 65 years. Staged procedures were performed in 14 patients (61%). Seven patients with dissections involving the arch were treated with inner branched endografts, and 16 TAAA patients were treated with fenestrated or branched endografts. The technical success rate was 71% following arch repair and 100% following TAAA repair. During early follow up, one of the arch group patients died and one in the TAAA group suffered spinal cord ischemia. The median follow up was 12 months (range 3-48), during which time one patient died of causes unrelated to aneurysm or treatment. Two early re-interventions were performed in the arch group to correct access vessel complications and there were a further two late re-interventions in the TAAA group to treat endoleaks. All target vessels (n = 72) remained patent. CONCLUSIONS: This experience indicates that complex endovascular repair of post-dissection aneurysms is a viable alternative to open repair in patients deemed unfit for open surgery. There are insufficient data to allow comparison with the outcome of open surgery in anatomically similar, but fit, patients.

Renal Outcomes Following Fenestrated and Branched Endografting.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to analyze immediate and long-term renal outcomes (renal function and renal events) after fenestrated (FEVAR) and branched endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (BEVAR). METHODS: All FEVAR and BEVAR performed between October 2004 and October 2012 were included in this study. Post-operative acute renal failure (ARF) was defined according to the RIFLE criteria. Renal volume (calculated with a 3D workstation) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (estimated with the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease [MDRD] formula) were evaluated before the procedure, before discharge, 12 months after, and yearly thereafter. Renal stent occlusion, dissection, fracture, stenosis, kink, renal stent related endoleak, and renal stent secondary intervention were all considered "renal composite events" and analyzed. A time to event analysis was performed for renal events and secondary renal interventions. RESULTS: 225 patients were treated with FEVAR and BEVAR. Renal target vessels (n = 427) were perfused by fenestrations (n = 374), or branches (n = 53). Median follow up was 3.1 years (2.9-3.3 years). Technical success was achieved in 95.5% of patients. Post-operative ARF was seen in 64 patients (29%). Mean total renal volume and eGFR at 1 year, 2 year, and 3 year follow up were significantly lower when compared with pre-operative levels (after BEVAR and FEVAR); the decrease at 3 years was 14.8% (6.7%; 22.2%) (p = .0006) for total renal volume and 14.3% (3.1%; 24.3%) (p = .02) for eGFR. The 30 day and 5 year freedom from renal composite event was 98.6% (95.8-99.6%) and 84.5% (76.5-89.9%) after FEVAR and BEVAR (NS). The 30 day and 5 year freedom from renal occlusion was 99.5% (96.7-99.9%) and 94.4% (89.3-97.1%) after FEVAR and BEVAR (NS). CONCLUSION: FEVAR and BEVAR are durable options for the treatment of complex aortic aneurysms and are associated with low renal morbidity, without differences between devices types. The clinical impact of decreasing renal volume over time in these patients is yet to be fully understood.

Editor's Choice - Minimizing Radiation Exposure During Endovascular Procedures: Basic Knowledge, Literature Review, and Reporting Standards.

CONTEXT: Endovascular procedures, requiring X-ray guidance, are commonly performed in vascular surgery. X-ray exposure is associated with biological risks for both patients and physicians. Medical X-ray use must follow "as low as reasonably achievable" (ALARA) principles, which aim at using the lowest radiation exposure to achieve a procedure safely. This is underlined by European and international recommendations that also suggest that adequate theoretical and practical training is mandatory during the initial education of physicians. However, the content of this education and professional practices vary widely from one country to another. OBJECTIVE: This review aims to summarize the basic knowledge required for vascular surgeons on X-ray physics and image production. METHODS: A panel of endovascular therapists (vascular surgeons and radiologists) and physicists dedicated to X-rays was gathered. International recommendations were summarized. A literature review was performed via MEDLINE to identify studies reporting dosages of common endovascular procedures. RESULTS: The different mechanisms inducing biological risks, and the associated potential effects on health, are described. Details on dose metrics are provided and a common nomenclature to measure, estimate, and report dose is proposed in order to perform accurate comparisons between publications and practices. Key points of the European and international legislation regarding medical X-ray use are summarized, and radiation protection basics for patients and staff, are detailed. Finally, a literature review is proposed for physicians to evaluate their practice. CONCLUSIONS: Today's trainees will be highly exposed to radiation throughout their practice. It is thus compulsory that they undergo dedicated radiation education during their initial training, and regular refresher sessions later. In daily practice, focus on dose reduction and monitoring of patient and staff exposure are mandatory.

Benefits of Completion 3D Angiography Associated with Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound to Assess Technical Success after EVAR.

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated a new strategy to assess technical success after standard and complex endovascular aortic repair (EVAR), combining completion contrast enhanced cone beam computed tomography (ceCBCT) and post-operative contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). METHODS: Patients treated with bifurcated or fenestrated and branched endografts in the hybrid room during the study period were included. From December 2012 to July 2013, a completion angiogram (CA) was performed at the end of the procedure, and computed tomography angiography (CTA) before discharge (group 1). From October 2013 to April 2014, a completion ceCBCT was performed, followed by CEUS during the 30 day post-operative period (group 2). The rate of peri-operative events (type I or III endoleaks, kinks, occlusion of target vessels), need for additional procedures or early secondary procedures, total radiation exposure (mSv), and total volume of contrast medium injected were compared. RESULTS: Seventy-nine patients were included in group 1 and 54 in group 2. Peri-operative event rates were respectively 8.9% (n = 7) and 33.3% (n = 18) (p = .001). Additional procedures were performed in seven patients (8.9%) in group 1 versus 17 (31.5%) in group 2 (p = .001). Two early secondary procedures were performed in group 2 (3.7%), and three (3.8%) in group 1 (p = .978). Median radiation exposure due to CBCT was 7 Gy cm(2) (5.25-8) (36%, 27%, and 9% of the total procedure exposure, respectively for bifurcated, fenestrated, and branched endografts). CEUS did not diagnose endoleaks or any adverse events not diagnosed by ceCBCT. Overall radiation and volume of contrast injected during the patient hospital stay in groups 1 and 2 were 34 (25.8-47.3) and 11 (5-20.5) mSv, and 184 (150-240) and 91 (70-132.8) mL respectively (reduction of 68% and 50%, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Completion ceCBCT is achievable in routine practice to assess technical success after EVAR. Strategies to evaluate technical success combining ceCBCT and CEUS can reduce total in hospital radiation exposure and contrast medium volume injection.

MR imaging of arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia: What the radiologist needs to know.

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy (ARVD/C) is an inherited heart muscle disease that predominantly affects the right ventricle. Clinical manifestations are related to severe ventricular arrhythmia that may lead to sudden death, mostly in young patients. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), included in the new diagnostic criteria since 2010, aims to detect segmental and global wall motion abnormalities, reduced ejection fraction, right ventricular dilatation and right ventricular diastolic/systolic dysfunction. An MRI assessment of the right ventricle is often challenging, partly because the MRI diagnostic criteria have some limitations, and also because it requires a significant learning curve due to the low prevalence of the disease. Therefore, this article aims to review the pathophysiology of the disease, the cardiac MRI protocol, images of the various stages of this affection as well as the differential diagnosis.

Current and future perspectives in the repair of aneurysms involving the aortic arch.

The repair of aneurysms involving the aortic arch is technically and physiologically demanding. Historically, these aneurysms have been treated using open surgical techniques that require cardiopulmonary bypass and deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. Many patients have been deemed "untreatable" and among those selected for surgery there are reported risks of death in 2% to 16.5% and stroke rates ranging from 2% to 18%. "Hybrid arch repair" combines one of a number of open surgical procedures (to secure a proximal landing zone for an endograft) with subsequent or immediate placement of an endograft in the arch and descending aorta. Although this concept is described as "minimally invasive" because it avoids aortic cross-clamping and hypothermic circulatory arrest, the morbidity and mortality rates remain considerable (mortality 0% to 15%, stroke 0% to 11%). Ongoing development of endograft technology has enabled total endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysms involving the visceral segment, using fenestrated and branched endografts. Encouraging early results in this anatomy have inspired extension of the concept to include the aortic arch and great vessels. These strategies can be considered in patients generally at high-risk for the conventional procedures. However, the endeavour is at an early stage of its development and the arch poses unique challenges including the potential for stroke, angulation of the arch and the great vessel ostia to the arch, extremely high volume flow, three-dimensional pulsation and rotation with the cardiac cycle and the proximity of the aortic valve and coronary arteries.

The impact of early pelvic and lower limb reperfusion and attentive peri-operative management on the incidence of spinal cord ischemia during thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm endovascular repair.

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: Spinal cord ischemia (SCI) is a devastating complication following endovascular thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair. In an attempt to reduce its incidence two peri-procedural changes were implemented by the authors in January 2010: (i) all large sheaths are withdrawn from the iliac arteries immediately after deploying the central device and before cannulation and branch extension to the visceral vessels; (ii) the peri-operative protocol has been modified in an attempt to optimize oxygen delivery to the sensitive cells of the cord (aggressive blood and platelet transfusion, median arterial pressure monitoring >85 mmHg, and systematic cerebrospinal fluid drainage). METHODS: Between October 2004 and December 2013, 204 endovascular TAAA repairs were performed using custom made devices manufactured with branches and fenestrations to maintain visceral vessel perfusion. Data from all of these procedures were prospectively collected in an electronic database. Early post-operative results in patients treated before (group 1, n = 43) and after (group 2, n = 161 patients) implementation of the modified implantation and peri-operative protocols were compared. RESULTS: Patients in groups 1 and 2 had similar comorbidities (median age at repair 70.9 years [range 65.2-77.0 years]), aneurysm characteristics (median diameter 58.5 mm [range 53-65 mm]), and length of procedure (median 190 minutes [range 150-240 minutes]). The 30 day mortality rate was 11.6% in group 1 versus 5.6% in group 2 (p = .09). The SCI rate was 14.0% versus 1.2% (p < .01). If type IV TAAAs were excluded from this analysis, the SCI rate was 25.0% (6/24 patients) in group 1 versus 2.1% (2/95 patients) in group 2 (p < .01). CONCLUSION: The early restoration of arterial flow to the pelvis and lower limbs, and aggressive peri-operative management significantly reduces SCI following type I-III TAAA endovascular repair. With the use of these modified protocols, extensive TAAA endovascular repairs are associated with low rates of SCI.

Juxtarenal aortic aneurysm with hostile neck anatomy: midterm results of minilaparotomy versus f-EVAR.

AIM: The aim of this study was to compare the results of complex aneurysm (hostile neck anatomies) repair in high-risk patients with two minimally invasive techniques, fenestrated endografting (f-EVAR where EVAR stands for endovascular aneurysm repair) and minilaparotomy. METHODS: All high-risk patients (N.=50, group 1) with hostile neck abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) operated in the vascular surgery department of the "Policlinico Universitario G. Martino" of Messina (Italy) during a 5-year period (January 2006-December 2010) were cross-matched with 50 similar patients (group 2) treated in the Vascular Surgery Department of the "Hopital Cardiologique" University of Lille (France) with similar anatomies, comorbidities and risk factors. The patients in group 1 underwent open minilaparotomy surgery, and the patients in group 2 were treated with f-EVAR. The aim of our study was to compare perioperative complications, survival and reintervention rates. RESULTS: Perioperative cardiac complications occurred in 5 patients (10%) in group 1, and 1 patient (2%) in group 2 (P<0.092). Renal impairment not requiring permanent hemodialysis was significantly higher in group 1 (14% vs. 2% P<0.027), as well as respiratory complications (32% vs. 2% P<0.0001). Five patients (10%) in group 1 underwent reintervention vs. 4 patients in group 2 (P<0.7268). There was no statistically significant difference for survival rates at 30 days (92% in group 1 and 96% in group 2; P=0.399); at six months (90% vs. 96%; P=0.239); at one year (90% vs. 96%; P=0.239); and at two years (84% vs. 94%; P=0.110). However, we observed statistically significant differences in survival rates at three years (74% vs. 94%; P<0.006); at four years (70% vs. 86%; P<0.005); and at five years (65% vs. 68%; P<0.003). CONCLUSION: Our results showed that both techniques are effective in the treatment of AAA with hostile neck in high-risk patients. Although operative mortality rate was not statistically different, f-EVAR showed better results in terms of early complications and late survival.

Impact of hybrid rooms with image fusion on radiation exposure during endovascular aortic repair.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate exposure to radiation during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) performed with intraoperative guidance by preoperative computed tomographic angiogram fusion. METHODS: All consecutive patients who underwent standard bifurcated (BIF) or thoracic (THO), and complex fenestrated (FEN) or branched (BR) EVAR were prospectively enrolled. Indirect dose-area product (DAP), fluoroscopy time (FT), and contrast medium volume were recorded. These data were compared with a previously published prospective EVAR cohort of 301 patients and to other literature. Direct DAP and peak skin dose were measured with radiochromic films. Results are expressed as median (interquartile range). RESULTS: From December 2012 to July 2013, 102 patients underwent standard (56.8%) or complex (43.2%) EVAR. The indirect DAP (Gy.cm(2)) was as follows: BIF 12.2 (8.7-19.9); THO 26.0 (11.9-34.9); FEN 43.7 (24.7-57.5); and BR 47.4 (37.2-108.2). The FT (min) was as follows: BIF 10.6 (9.1-14.7); THO 8.9 (6.0-10.5); FEN 30.7 (20.2-40.5); and BR 39.5 (34.8-51.6). The contrast medium volume (mL) was as follows: BIF 59.0 (50.0-75.0); THO 80.0 (50.0-100.0); FEN 105.0 (70.0-136.0); and BR 120.0 (100.0-170.0). When compared with a previous cohort, there was a significant reduction in DAP during BIF, FEN, and BR procedures, and a significant reduction of iodinated contrast volume during FEN and BR procedures. There was also a significant reduction in DAP during BIF procedures when compared with the literature (p < .01). DAP measurement on radiochromic films was strongly correlated with indirect DAP values (r(2) = .93). CONCLUSION: The exposure of patients and operators to radiation is significantly reduced by routine use of image fusion during standard and complex EVAR.

Chronic dissection - indications for treatment with branched and fenestrated stent-grafts.

The treatment of chronic aortic dissection is a major challenge for the vascular surgeon. Close imaging follow-up after the acute episode frequently identifies dilation of untreated aortic segments. Aortic dissection often extends to both the supra-aortic trunks and to the visceral aorta. The poor medical condition that often characterizes these patients may preclude extensive open surgical repair. Recent advances in endovascular techniques provide a valid alternative to open surgery. These complex lesions can now be managed using thoracic branched and fenestrated endografts. However, clinical data are scarce and only 3 small series from 3 high-volume aortic centers are currently available. Careful anatomical study on 3D workstations is mandatory to select patients that are candidates for complex endovascular exclusion; a specific focus on the available working space within the true lumen, extension to the arch and/or the visceral/renal arteries, and false lumen perfusion of visceral vessels is required. An excellent understanding of those anatomic details demands high-quality preoperative CTA. Intraoperative advanced imaging applications are a major adjunct in the achievement of technical success.

Total endovascular treatment of an aortic arch aneurysm in a patient with a mechanical aortic valve.

INTRODUCTION: Endovascular repair of aortic arch aneurysms using an inner-branched device is a new treatment option for patients unfit for open surgery. There are many anatomical restrictions, such as the presence of a mechanical aortic valve that can contraindicate this complete endovascular approach. REPORT: A new delivery system to overcome this issue has been developed. This new system was used to treat an aortic arch aneurysm 77 mm in diameter in a 37-year-old patient with Marfan's syndrome. The patient was considered to be at major risk for open surgery because of severe respiratory insufficiency following a second sternotomy. DISCUSSION: Total endovascular arch aneurysm repair is no longer contraindicated in patients with a mechanical aortic valve.

Techniques to reduce radiation and contrast volume during EVAR.

There is a large variability observed in the literature regarding radiation exposure and contrast volume injection during endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). Reducing both in order to decrease their respective toxicities must be a priority for the endovascular therapist. Radiation dose reduction requires a strict application of the "as low as reasonably achievable" principles. Firstly, all X-ray system settings should be defaulted to low dose, and fluoroscopic time reduced as much as possible. Digital subtraction angiography runs should be replaced by recorded fluoroscopy runs when possible. Magnification should be avoided, whereas collimation should be systematic to minimize scatter radiation and focus only on the area of interest. Advanced imaging modes can also contribute to dose reduction. For instance, image fusion can facilitate endovascular navigation, and allow table and C-arm positioning without fluoroscopy. In our experience, routine use of image fusion during EVAR significantly reduces both radiation exposure and contrast volumes during complex EVAR. To make these imaging modes useable in real life settings, the X-ray system should be fully controlled by the operator from table side. Reducing iodinated contrast volume, while maintaining image quality, can also be achieved through the use of automated contrast injectors. Additionally, alternative contrast agents, like carbon dioxide (CO2) and gadolinium, have also been evaluated and can be used in specific cases. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound and intravascular ultrasonography are currently developed as potential alternatives to both iodinated contrast use and X-ray during EVAR. Lastly, specific education and training of operators in radiation protection are essential.

A new score to predict post operative complications after endovascular treatment of thoraco abdominal aortic aneurysms.

BACKGROUND: The endovascular treatment of thoraco abdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAA) is a minimally invasive solution. However, patient selection remains a major problem. We have analysed our experience to identify the risk factors for post-operative morbidity and mortality and to construct a scoring system to identify those patients likely to benefit from this treatment. METHODS: We have analysed a consecutive cohort of patients treated electively for TAAA using endovascular techniques between 2006 and October 2012. All data were collected prospectively. The risk factors associated with spinal cord ischemia (SCI), the need for post-operative dialysis and 30 day mortality were determined using multivariate statistical techniques and a logistic regression model including all variables that were significant on univariate analysis (p < 0.05). A predictive score was calculated using a Received Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve, defining best specificity and sensibility. RESULTS: We analysed the data from 123 patients (median age 70 years). The 30 day mortality rate was 8% (10 patients). The SCI rate was 6% (7 patients). One patient (1%) required long-term dialysis after the aortic procedure. The cumulative early mortality, SCI and permanent dialysis rate was 14% (17 patients). In multivariate analysis, adverse outcome was associated with advanced age (OR = 1.110 ; p = 0.022), and Crawford type I or II or III (OR = 9.292 ; p = 0.002) as compared with Crawford type IV. Pre-operative beta blocker (BB) treatment was a protective factor (OR = 0.099 ; p = 0.005). A predictive score was then constructed : Score = -10.060 + 0.104x(A) +2.229x(B) -2.315x(C) (A = patient age ; B = 1 if TAAA Crawford type 1, 2 or 3, 0 if TAAA type 4 ; C = 1 if on-going BB treatment (30 days pre-surgery minimum), 0 if none). Its sensitivity and specificity were 88% and 89% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We propose a simple predictive scoring system. This tool is useful in predicting the most feared complications after endovascular TAAA repair and has potential use in the identification and counselling of vulnerable patients being considered for surgery. More data are needed to refine the prediction of individual operative risks.

The benefits of EVAR planning using a 3D workstation.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the influence of planning endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) with a three-dimensional (3D) workstation on early and midterm outcomes. METHODS: All patients undergoing infrarenal EVAR performed between 2006 and 2009 at our institution were included in the current study. Prior to 2008 (group 1), endograft sizing was performed by interrogation of computed tomography angiography axial images. After 2008 (group 2), endograft sizing was routinely performed using a 3D workstation (Aquarius, Terarecon), allowing for multiplanar reconstruction and centerline analysis. Pre-, peri-, postoperative, and follow-up data were prospectively entered in an electronic database. All postoperative complications and subsequent secondary interventions depicted during the 2-year period following EVAR were compared. Secondary intervention and mortality rates were defined at 2 years and compared. Freedom from secondary intervention and overall survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method during follow-up and compared by log-rank test. RESULTS: A total of 295 patients (149 patients in group 1 and 146 patients in group 2) were included. All patients had completed a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. During this 2-year period following EVAR, the type 1 endoleak rate was 8.7% in group 1 and 1.4% in group 2 (p = .004) respectively. Secondary intervention rates related to type 1 endoleak was 5.4% in group 1 and 0 in group 2 (p < .001). No difference was observed regarding all-cause mortality, aneurysm-related death, and freedom from secondary intervention rates during follow-up. CONCLUSION: The routine use of 3D workstations for EVAR planning significantly reduces the rate of type 1 endoleaks and, therefore, the rate of related secondary interventions.