Rituximab in B-Cell Hematologic Malignancies: A Review of 20 Years of Clinical Experience.

Rituximab is a human/murine, chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody with established efficacy, and a favorable and well-defined safety profile in patients with various CD20-expressing lymphoid malignancies, including indolent and aggressive forms of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Since its first approval 20 years ago, intravenously administered rituximab has revolutionized the treatment of B-cell malignancies and has become a standard component of care for follicular lymphoma, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and mantle cell lymphoma. For all of these diseases, clinical trials have demonstrated that rituximab not only prolongs the time to disease progression but also extends overall survival. Efficacy benefits have also been shown in patients with marginal zone lymphoma and in more aggressive diseases such as Burkitt lymphoma. Although the proven clinical efficacy and success of rituximab has led to the development of other anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies in recent years (e.g., obinutuzumab, ofatumumab, veltuzumab, and ocrelizumab), rituximab is likely to maintain a position within the therapeutic armamentarium because it is well established with a long history of successful clinical use. Furthermore, a subcutaneous formulation of the drug has been approved both in the EU and in the USA for the treatment of B-cell malignancies. Using the wealth of data published on rituximab during the last two decades, we review the preclinical development of rituximab and the clinical experience gained in the treatment of hematologic B-cell malignancies, with a focus on the well-established intravenous route of administration. This article is a companion paper to A. Davies, et al., which is also published in this issue. FUNDING: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland.

Comparison of mycophenolate mofetil and azathioprine for prevention of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome in de novo lung transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: There are no data on the effects of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) on the incidence of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) in lung-transplant patients. This study attempted to determine whether MMF reduces the incidence of BOS in de novo lung transplant recipients compared with azathioprine (AZA). METHODS: This prospective, randomized, open-label, multicenter study compared the effects of MMF with AZA in combination with induction therapy, cyclosporine (Neoral) and corticosteroids in patients receiving their first lung transplant. Primary endpoint was incidence of BOS at 3 years. Secondary endpoints were incidence of acute rejection, time to first rejection event, and survival. RESULTS: The incidence of acute rejection and the time to first rejection event at 1 and 3 years did not differ between groups (54.1% vs. 53.8% and 56.6% vs. 60.3% for MMF and AZA respectively). Survival at 1 year tended to be better in patients receiving MMF (88 vs. 80%, P = 0.07). At year 3, there was no difference in survival or in the incidence, severity or time to acquisition of BOS between the two groups. Treatment was generally well tolerated, however more patients withdrew from AZA treatment than from MMF (59.6% vs. 46.5%, P = 0.02). As a result, there was an imbalance in the observation times of the two groups (876 +/- 395 vs. 947 +/- 326 days). CONCLUSIONS: No differences were seen in the incidence of acute rejection or BOS in lung transplant recipients treated with MMF or AZA. This null result may have been influenced by the shorter observation time for AZA patients.