Pregnancy with epilepsy: obstetric and neonatal outcome of a controlled study.

PURPOSE: To determine the influence of epilepsy and its treatment on pregnancy and its outcome. DESIGN: Controlled, observational study. SETTING: National Health Service maternity hospitals in Liverpool and Manchester regions. POPULATION: 277 women with epilepsy (WWE) and 315 control women. METHODS: WWE were recruited from antenatal clinics. Controls were matched for age and parity but not gestational age. Information was obtained by interview and from clinical records. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Obstetric complications, mode of delivery, condition of newborn. RESULTS: Distribution of epilepsy syndromes was similar to previous surveys. Most WWE (67%) received monotherapy with carbamazepine, sodium valproate or lamotrigine. Half WWE had no seizures during pregnancy but 34% had tonic clonic seizures. Seizure-related injuries were infrequent. Pregnancies with obstetric complications were increased in women with treated epilepsy (WWTE 45%, controls 33%; p=0.01). Most had normal vaginal delivery (WWTE 63%, controls 61%; p=0.65). Low birth weight was not increased (WWTE 6.2%, controls 5.2%; p=0.69). There were more major congenital malformations (MCM) (WWTE 6.6%, controls 2.1%; p=0.02) and fetal/infant deaths (WWTE 2.2%, controls 0.3%; p=0.09). Amongst monotherapies MCM prevalence was highest with valproate (11.3%; p=0.005). Lamotrigine (5.4%; p=0.23) and carbamazepine (3.0%; p=0.65) were closer to controls (2.1%). There was no association between MCM and dose of folic acid pre-conception. CONCLUSION: MCM were more prevalent in the babies of WWTE particularly amongst those receiving sodium valproate.

In utero antiepileptic drug exposure: fetal death and malformations.

BACKGROUND: Pregnancy outcomes following in utero exposure to antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are uncertain, limiting an evidenced-based approach. OBJECTIVE: To determine if fetal outcomes vary as a function of different in utero AED exposures. METHODS: This ongoing prospective observational study across 25 epilepsy centers in the USA and UK enrolled pregnant women with epilepsy from October 1999 to February 2004 to determine if differential long-term cognitive and behavioral neurodevelopmental effects exist across the four most commonly used AEDs. This initial report focuses on the incidence of serious adverse outcomes including major congenital malformations (which could be attributable to AEDs) or fetal death. A total of 333 mother/child pairs were analyzed for monotherapy exposures: carbamazepine (n = 110), lamotrigine (n = 98), phenytoin (n = 56), and valproate (n = 69). RESULTS: Response frequencies of pregnancies resulting in serious adverse outcomes for each AED were as follows: carbamazepine 8.2%, lamotrigine 1.0%, phenytoin 10.7%, and valproate 20.3%. Distribution of serious adverse outcomes differed significantly across AEDs and was not explained by factors other than in utero AED exposure. Valproate exhibited a dose-dependent effect. CONCLUSIONS: More adverse outcomes were observed in pregnancies with in utero valproate exposure vs the other antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). These results combined with several recent studies provide strong evidence that valproate poses the highest risk to the fetus. For women who fail other AEDs and require valproate, the dose should be limited if possible.

The longer term outcome of children born to mothers with epilepsy.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of cognitive delay and possible associated dysmorphic features in children exposed to antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in utero. DESIGN: Retrospective study of children born to mothers with epilepsy. SETTING: Regional epilepsy clinics in Liverpool and Manchester, UK. PARTICIPANTS: Children aged between 6 months and 16 years born to mothers with epilepsy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Structured interviews, hospital records, clinical examination, and psychometric tests (Wechsler) were used to assess exposure and intelligence quotient (IQ). Blinded assessment of photographs was used to score children with characteristic dysmorphic features. RESULTS: A total of 249 children aged 6 and over were studied: 41 were exposed to sodium valproate, 52 to carbamazepine, 21 to phenytoin, 49 to polytherapy, and 80 were unexposed. Mean verbal IQ was significantly lower in the valproate group compared to unexposed and other monotherapy groups. Multiple regression analysis showed that both valproate exposure and frequent tonic-clonic seizures in pregnancy were significantly associated with a lower verbal IQ despite adjusting for other confounding factors. There was a significant negative correlation between dysmorphic features and verbal IQ in children exposed to valproate. CONCLUSIONS: This study identifies valproate as a drug carrying potential risks for developmental delay and cognitive impairment and is the first to suggest that frequent tonic-clonic seizures have a similar effect. Our results need to be interpreted with caution given their retrospective nature. Women with epilepsy need careful counselling about individual risk benefit of AED treatment before pregnancy.

A pharmacoepidemiologic study of factors influencing the outcome of treatment with lamotrigine in chronic epilepsy.

PURPOSE: To identify prognostic factors for freedom from seizures and long-term retention of treatment in patients receiving lamotrigine (LTG). METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective, case record study of 1,050 patients with chronic epilepsy was carried out. Logistic regression and Cox regression analyses were used to identify clinical features associated with freedom from seizures and retention of treatment, respectively. Long-term retention rates of LTG therapy were estimated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. RESULTS: The 1,050 patients with chronic epilepsy were included in the study. Patients with generalized epilepsy (p = 0.01), who were not receiving carbamazepine (CBZ; p = 0.02) were more likely to become seizure-free. Sixty percent of patients continued on LTG therapy >1 year and estimated retention at 8 years was 38%. Patients with generalized epilepsy (p = 0.002), patients receiving concurrent sodium valproate (VPA; p < 0.0001), those not previously exposed to gabapentin and vigabatrin (p < 0.0001), and those in whom the starting dose was lower (p < 0.0012), were more likely to remain on long-term treatment with LTG. The relationships with exposure to other antiepileptic drugs remained significant in patients with focal and with generalized epilepsy when considered separately. CONCLUSIONS: The best results from LTG treatment in terms of freedom from seizures and long-term retention of treatment were obtained in patients with generalized epilepsy. Retention of treatment was enhanced by VPA not only in generalized but also in focal epilepsy. The importance of a low starting dose of LTG was again confirmed. The apparent negative effect of CBZ in patients taking LTG merits further investigation.

Adverse event monitoring in lamotrigine patients: a pharmacoepidemiologic study in the United Kingdom.

PURPOSE: This postmarketing surveillance study of lamotrigine (LTG) was performed to provide complementary data to large-scale Prescription-Event Monitoring study with a retrospective case records survey in five tertiary referral epilepsy centres in the United Kingdom. METHODS: Adverse events were recorded and compared with those of two other new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), gabapentin (GBP) and vigabatrin (VGB). All deaths were followed up and standardised mortality ratios (SMRs) were calculated. Serious adverse events were assessed individually. RESULTS: A total of 2,701 patients was identified as being exposed to LTG and/or the comparators. It was necessary to exclude 1,326 patients because LTG and/or comparators had been commenced outside the study centres. The adverse events with LTG reported by this study were similar to those reported in the literature. Skin rash was the major adverse event. Life-threatening hepatic failure, acute exacerbation of ulcerative colitis, disseminated intravascular coagulation, and renal failure were reported. No death could be directly attributed to the use of LTG. The SMR was slightly higher than that reported in the literature; this probably reflects severity of epilepsy in the study population. CONCLUSIONS: The safety profile of LTG was similar to that in the large-scale Prescription-Event Monitoring study and generally acceptable. Life-threatening adverse reactions were rare.

Medical students' errors in pharmacotherapeutics.

OBJECTIVES: This study analysed the errors made by 16 final-year medical students in a classroom prescribing exercise. The aim was to gain greater understanding of the reasons for non-optimal prescribing and of how to improve basic training in pharmacotherapeutics. METHODS: The task was to adjust a patient's phenytoin sodium dosage to achieve better control of seizures. It was based on a real-life case, and was presented as a written exercise. Process-tracing and think-aloud techniques were used to study the students' performance. RESULTS: The results suggest that the root cause of the errors was lack of a knowledge base which integrated scientific knowledge with clinical know-how. Three different clinical reasoning strategies were observed. Students who followed an incremental strategy demonstrated superior scientific knowledge and this resulted in less hazardous errors. Those who followed gambling or backward-reasoning strategies appeared to possess inferior scientific knowledge and this resulted in more hazardous errors. CONCLUSIONS: The results support current trends towards integrating basic medical science into a foundation of clinical know-how, as in the problem-based curriculum. They also emphasize the importance of a thorough grounding in medical science as a means of minimizing error.

A placebo-controlled, double-blind cross-over trial of adjunctive one month remacemide hydrochloride treatment in patients with refractory epilepsy.

The efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of adjunctive remacemide hydrochloride, a novel, low-affinity non-competitive NMDA receptor channel blocker, were investigated in 28 adult patients with refractory epilepsy. This was a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled cross-over study with five 4-week periods (baseline, treatment 1, washout, treatment 2, washout). Baseline median seizure frequency was reduced by 33% following adjunctive remacemide hydrochloride 150 mg q.i.d. for 4 weeks compared with placebo (P= 0.041). Seizure frequency was reduced by > or =50% in 30% of patients treated with remacemide hydrochloride compared with 9% on placebo. Mean plasma concentration of concomitant carbamazepine increased by approximately 15% following adjunctive remacemide hydrochloride. There was no correlation between increased plasma carbamazepine and reduced seizure frequency. Remacemide hydrochloride was well tolerated and only three patients withdrew due to adverse events (two remacemide hydrochloride, one placebo). Two patients died unexpectedly from their epilepsy during placebo treatment; both deaths were considered by the investigators to be unrelated to earlier remacemide hydrochloride treatment. This first specific efficacy investigation with adjunctive remacemide hydrochloride demonstrated anticonvulsant effects in patients with refractory epilepsy. More extensive clinical investigation is justified.

Factors influencing the incidence of lamotrigine-related skin rash.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidences of serious and nonserious lamotrigine-related rash, determine the risk factors for lamotrigine-related rash, and evaluate the impact on the incidence of rash of the manufacturer's recommendation to reduce the starting dose of lamotrigine. METHODS: This was a retrospective case record survey at five tertiary referral epilepsy centers in the UK. The risk factors for lamotrigine-related rash were identified by logistic regression. The independent factors tested were gender, age, epilepsy type, concurrent medication, and starting dose of lamotrigine. The incidences of rash before and after the recommendation of reduction in starting dose were compared by chi2 analysis. RESULTS: A total of 1050 patients were included. The incidences of serious and nonserious rash were 1.1% (95% CI 0.5% to 1.8%) and 7% (95% CI 5.5% to 8.6%), respectively. Females were at higher risk of developing rash than were males, with a relative risk of 1.8 (95% CI 1.2 to 2.8). The starting dose of lamotrigine was reduced in response to the manufacturer's recommendation, and there was a significant reduction (p = 0.045) in the incidence of serious rash, from 1.5% (12/805) to 0% (0/245). However, there was no reduction in the overall incidence of lamotrigine-related rash, with 63/805 (8%) before and 23/245 (9%) after the recommendation. CONCLUSIONS: Failure to detect a reduction in the incidence of lamotrigine-related rash since the new (reduced) recommended starting dose of lamotrigine may arise from failure to reduce the starting dose below a critical threshold level, incomplete compliance with current recommendations, or insufficient sample size. The results of this and other studies show that the starting dose of lamotrigine is a significant factor affecting the incidence of rash; furthermore, this study also shows that significant reduction in the incidence of serious rash can be achieved by reducing the starting dose. Therefore, clinicians should not deviate from the recommendations.

The long-term use of gabapentin, lamotrigine, and vigabatrin in patients with chronic epilepsy.

PURPOSE: To compare the long-term retention of gabapentin (GBP), lamotrigine (LTG), and vigabatrin (VGB) by patients with chronic epilepsy and the reasons for treatment discontinuation. To assess the likelihood of seizure freedom, seizure-related injury/hospital admission and mortality after these drugs were commenced. METHODS: This was a retrospective case-records survey in five tertiary referral epilepsy centres in the U.K. The retention times on treatment (from initiation to discontinuation) for the different antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) were compared by using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression. Incidences of seizure freedom and seizure-related injury/hospital admissions and standardised mortality ratios were calculated. RESULTS: There were 1,375 patients with chronic epilepsy included; 361 were taking GBP, 1,050 LTG, and 713 VGB. The retention of GBP, LTG, or VGB was <40% at 6 years. Fewer than 4% of patients become seizure free while taking one of the drugs. There was no reduction in mortality or seizure-related injury/admission. CONCLUSIONS: The impact of these new AEDs on chronic epilepsy can be described only as modest. This view may be revised, however, as more experience is gained with new drugs in previously untreated patients.

Accurate diagnosis of convulsive syncope: role of an implantable subcutaneous ECG monitor.

Convulsive syncope due to transient bradycardia is recognized as a cause of treatment-resistant seizures. However, the diagnosis may be difficult to make with conventional electrocardiographic devices if attacks are infrequent. We present a case of apparent epilepsy in which a new implantable electrocardiographic event recorder (the 'Reveal' insertable loop recorder) was used to show that attacks were caused by prolonged asystole of up to 36 s in duration. The insertable loop recorder may have an important role in the investigation of patients with treatment-resistant seizures, particularly where there is a strong suspicion of an underlying cardiac arrhythmia.

Adjustment of carbamazepine dose to offset the effects of the interaction with remacemide hydrochloride in a double-blind, multicentre, add-on drug trial (CR2237) in refractory epilepsy.

PURPOSE: The efficacy of remacemide hydrochloride (REM) as an antiepileptic drug (AED) was tested in a double-blind, add-on trial in patients with refractory epilepsy. Concurrent drugs included carbamazepine (CBZ). The interfering effects of the pharmacokinetic interaction between REM and CBZ were offset by the monitoring of plasma CBZ concentration and the appropriate reduction of CBZ dose by an unblinded observer. METHODS: Patients taking CBZ entered a 4-week run-in period to stabilise their dosage regimen to Tegretol tablets and blinded capsules containing Tegretol tablets. They then entered an 8-week baseline period during which variation of plasma CBZ concentration was used to derive an individual Shewart Control Chart for each patient. These charts were used to define the threshold for CBZ dose reduction after the addition of trial drug. Where necessary the unblinded observer adjusted that portion of the daily dose of CBZ concealed in the opaque capsules, thereby maintaining the blind for the investigator and the patient. RESULTS: CBZ dosage reductions ranging from 14 to 50% were required by 63% of patients who received REM. Substantial increases in plasma CBZ concentration, which would have confounded the results of the trial, were thus avoided. The small increases in CBZ concentration that occurred in spite of this procedure were of similar magnitude in responders (patients who experienced > or =50% reduction in seizure frequency during treatment) and nonresponders, and in both groups the mean increase was <1 mg/L. CONCLUSIONS: The method is offered as a model solution for problems caused by pharmacokinetic interactions in add-on trials.

Interactions involving new antiepileptic drugs.

The advent of new antiepileptic drugs (AED) has increased the opportunities for interaction. Clinicians seek therapeutic interactions in which two AED together have greater efficacy than either drug alone; there are case reports of such, but few prospective studies. Interactions must also be suspected when the adverse effects of a new AED differ according to the co-medication. The basis can be pharmacodynamic, but more frequently it is pharmacokinetic. Inhibition of cytochrome P450 enzymes by the new drugs is more common than induction. There are important implications for the design of clinical trials and the planning of treatment changes in patients.

Impairment of psychomotor function at modest plasma concentrations of carbamazepine after administration of the liquid suspension to naive subjects.

1. The influence of pharmaceutical formulation on the plasma drug concentration-time curve and the psychomotor responses to 400 mg carbamazepine has been assessed in 12 healthy male volunteers; three formulations and placebo were compared in a randomised, blind, crossover study. 2. The plasma concentration of carbamazepine rose to a maximum of 3-7 mg l-1 by 2-3 h after administration of the liquid suspension. Conventional and controlled release tablet formulations gave lower peaks at about 8 and 32 h, respectively. From 32 h onwards the plasma concentrations from the three formulations were indistinguishable. 3. Significant impairment of psychomotor function was observed after the liquid suspension only; subjective sedation was significant at 1 and 2 h and the critical flicker fusion frequency threshold was lowered at 1-8 h. Digit-symbol substitution, choice reaction time and body sway gave less conclusive evidence of impairment. 4. The results do not support the hypothesis that a psychomotor effect from carbamazepine is a threshold phenomenon with a critical plasma drug concentration at about 8 mg l-1. 5. A second hypothesis that rate of rise of plasma carbamazepine concentration has an important influence on psychomotor effect fits the observations. This interpretation is tentative since the use of a fixed dose of carbamazepine meant that differences due to rate of rise of drug concentration were confounded with differences due to peak height.

Fetal phenytoin exposure, hypoplastic nails, and jitteriness.

In a prospective study infants born to mothers with epilepsy (n = 61) were found to have an unexpectedly high incidence of congenital anomalies (26/61, 43%) and neonatal conditions (26/61, 43%) compared with controls (0/62, and 6/62, 10%, respectively). There were two neonatal deaths in the study group but none among the controls. Hypoplasia of the finger or toenails was a common congenital anomaly in those infants whose mothers had received phenytoin alone or in combination with other anticonvulsant drugs (11 of 40, 28%). The mean serum phenytoin concentration was higher among mothers of infants with hypoplastic nails than among those with normal nails. Jitteriness was a common neonatal condition affecting infants of epileptic mothers (11 of 61, 18%) but not controls The mean cord serum phenytoin concentrations were similar among jittery and non-jittery infants. At follow up (after excluding one infant with Down's syndrome from the study group) the infants seemed to have developed normally, though one had serious learning difficulties at school. We suggest that hypoplasia of the nails is related to high maternal serum concentrations of phenytoin, and though 18% of infants born to epileptic mothers were jittery compared with no control infants this may not be the result of withdrawal of the drug in all cases.

Respiratory and sedative effects of clobazam and clonazepam in volunteers.

1. The respiratory and psychomotor effects of two benzodiazepines used mainly as anticonvulsants were compared in healthy volunteers, using a double-blind placebo controlled design. 2. Clobazam (10 and 20 mg) produced significantly fewer psychomotor side effects than clonazepam (0.5 and 1 mg). Neither drug at either dose affected the ventilatory response to CO2. 3. Although clonazepam produced significant effects on psychomotor performance, these did not correlate with plasma drug concentration. 4. Our studies provide further evidence that at the doses chosen clobazam is considerably less sedating than clonazepam. Further investigation is required into the tolerance profile of both drugs in patients.

Equivalence of conventional and sustained release oral dosage formulations of acetazolamide in primary open angle glaucoma.

1. Outpatients with primary open angle glaucoma uncontrolled on single topical therapy with either pilocarpine or timolol were recruited for a stratified double dummy cross over trial. Once or twice daily sustained release acetazolamide (SRA) was compared with an identical regimen of conventional tablets (CA). 2. During the run in period the patients received 500 mg SRA once or twice daily as needed to control intraocular pressure (IOP). The dose was thereafter kept constant and patients were allocated randomly to 4 weeks treatment with CA followed by 4 weeks SRA or vice versa. IOP and venous plasma concentrations of acetazolamide were measured at weekly intervals. At the end of each 4 week course, patients were admitted for a 24 h profile of IOP and drug concentration measurements. 3. Thirty-five patients were recruited, but eleven were withdrawn during the run in period largely because of adverse effects; these became less troublesome when it was decided to give the once daily dose at 22.00 h. Four were withdrawn during the cross over, two because of inadequate IOP control. Twenty completed the trial. 4. The morning plasma concentration of acetazolamide measured each week showed no tendency to accumulation during the study. The mean swing (maximum minus minimum) in plasma acetazolamide concentration during the 24 h profile was less (P less than 0.005) with the SR formulation (11.6 +/- 4.9; mg l-1) +/- s.d.) than with the conventional (15.5 +/- 4.7) but the mean concentrations over the 24 h profile were indistinguishable (P greater than 0.05; 9.7 +/- 3.8 and 8.6 +/- 2.8 respectively). 5. Satisfactory control of IOP (no more than one reading above 22 mmHg) was maintained despite the changes in formulation in all but two of the patients who entered the cross over study. No close relationship between IOP and plasma concentration of acetazolamide was found. The 24 h IOP profiles whilst receiving each of the formulations were indistinguishable; thus the smoothing of the plasma drug concentration profile achieved by the SR formulation did not reduce the amplitude of swings in IOP. Similarly, no difference was observed between the formulations with respect to adverse effects. 6. It is concluded that the SR and conventional formulations were equivalent with respect to mean plasma acetazolamide concentration, IOP control and adverse effects. The SR formulation did not show practical advantages over the conventional formulation which was equally effective even with dosage intervals of 12 or 24 h.