Exome sequencing in every pregnancy? Results of trio exome sequencing in structurally normal fetuses.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the detection rate of clinically significant results of prenatal exome sequencing (pES) in low-risk pregnancies and apparently normal fetuses in non-consanguineous couples. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of pES conducted at a single center from January 2020 to September 2023 was performed. Genetic counseling was provided, and detailed medical histories were obtained. High-risk pregnancies were excluded due to major ultrasound anomalies, sonographic soft markers, abnormal maternal biochemical screening, or family history suggestive of monogenic diseases as well as cases with pathogenic and likely pathogenic (P/LP) chromosomal microarray results. Exome analysis focused on ∼2100 genes associated with Mendelian genetic disorders. Variant analysis and classification followed the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) guidelines. RESULTS: Among 1825 pES conducted, 1020 low-risk cases revealed 28 fetuses (2.7%) with potentially clinically significant variants indicating known monogenic diseases, primarily de novo dominant variants (64%). Among these 28 cases, 9 fetuses (0.9%) had the potential for severe phenotypes, including shortened lifespan and intellectual disability, and another 12 had the potential for milder phenotypes. Seven cases were reported with variants of uncertain significance (VUS) that, according to the ACMG criteria, leaned toward LP, constituting 0.7% of the entire cohort. Termination of pregnancy was elected in 13 out of 1020 cases (1.2%) in the cohort, including 7/9 in the severe phenotypes group, 2/12 in the milder phenotype group, and 4/7 in the VUS group. CONCLUSION: The 2.7% detection rate highlights the significant contribution of pES in low-risk pregnancies. However, it necessitates rigorous analysis, and comprehensive genetic counseling before and after testing.

The Diagnostic Yield of Chromosomal Microarray Analysis in Third-Trimester Fetal Abnormalities.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the diagnostic yield of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) performed in cases of fetal abnormalities detected during the third trimester of pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review of medical records was conducted for women who underwent amniocentesis at or beyond 28 weeks of gestation between January 2017 and February 2023. CMA results of pregnancies with abnormal sonographic findings not detected before 28 weeks were included. RESULTS: A total of 482 fetuses met the inclusion criteria. The average maternal age was 31.3 years, and the average gestational age at amniocentesis was 32.3 weeks. The overall diagnostic yield of CMA was 6.2% (30 clinically significant copy number variations [CNVs]). The yield was 16.4% in cases with two or more fetal malformations, while cases with a single anomaly revealed a diagnostic yield of 7.3%. Cases presenting isolated polyhydramnios or isolated fetal growth restriction had a lower yield of 9.3 and 5.4%, respectively. Of the 30 clinically significant cases, 19 (or 63.4%) exhibited recurrent CNVs. The remaining 11 cases (or 36.6%) presented unique CNVs. The theoretical yield of Noninvasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT) in our cohort is 2% for aneuploidy, which implies that it could potentially miss up to 70% of the significant findings that could be identified by CMA. In 80% of the fetuses (or 24 out of 30) with clinically significant CNVs, the structural abnormalities detected on fetal ultrasound examinations corresponded with the CMA results. CONCLUSION: The 6.2% detection rate of significant CNVs in late-onset fetal anomalies confirms the value of CMA in third-trimester amniocentesis. The findings underscore the necessity of CMA for detecting CNVs potentially overlooked by NIPT and emphasize the importance of thorough genetic counseling. KEY POINTS: · CMA yields 6.2% for third-trimester anomalies.. · NIPT may miss 70% of CMA findings.. · Ultrasound matched 80% of CMA results..

Exploring inheritance, and clinical penetrance of distal Xq28 duplication syndrome: insights from 47 new unpublished cases.

BACKGROUND: Distal Xq28 duplication, or int22h1/int22h2-mediated Xq28 duplication syndrome, leads to cognitive impairment, neurobehavioral issues, and facial dysmorphisms. Existing literature has limited information on clinical traits and penetrance. METHODS: We identified cases of distal Xq28 duplication (chrX: 154,126,575-154,709,680, GRCh37/hg19) through a review of clinical records and microarray reports from five centers, encompassing both postnatal and prenatal cases, with no prior family knowledge of the duplication. RESULTS: Our search found 47 cases across 26 families, with duplications ranging from 208 to 935 Kb. In total, 8 out of 26 index cases featured a 200-300 kb partial duplication, mainly from Armenian/Caucasian Jewish backgrounds. Most prenatal cases showed no major fetal ultrasound malformations. Of cases with known inheritance mode (15 out of 26), maternal inheritance was more common (80%). The study identified seven male carriers of the duplication from six unrelated families, indicating partial penetrance in males. CONCLUSION: Our study provides key insights into distal Xq28 duplication. Most prenatal tests showed no major fetal ultrasound issues. Maternal inheritance was common, with unaffected mothers. In the postnatal group, a balanced gender distribution was observed. Among male family members, two fathers had ADHD, one was healthy, and one brother had mild symptoms, indicating partial penetrance in males.

Chromosomal microarray testing yield in 829 cases of microcephaly: a clinical characteristics-based analysis for prenatal and postnatal cases.

INTRODUCTION: Microcephaly, characterized by abnormal head growth, can often serve as an initial indicator of congenital, genetic, or acquired disorders. In this study, we sought to evaluate the effectiveness of chromosomal microarray (CMA) testing in detecting abnormalities in both prenatal and postnatal cases of microcephaly. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CMA Testing: We conducted CMA testing on 87 prenatally-detected microcephaly cases and 742 postnatal cases at a single laboratory. We evaluated the CMA yield in relation to specific clinical characteristics. RESULTS: In prenatal cases, pathogenic and likely pathogenic (LP) results were identified in 4.6% of cases, a significantly higher rate compared to low-risk pregnancies. The male-to-female ratio in this cohort was 3, and the CMA yield was not influenced by gender or other clinical parameters. For postnatal cases, the CMA yield was 15.0%, with a significantly higher detection rate associated with dysmorphism, hypotonia, epilepsy, congenital heart malformations (CHM), learning disabilities (LD), and a history of Fetal growth restriction (FGR). No specific recurrent copy number variations (CNVs) were observed, and the rate of variants of unknown significance was 3.9%. CONCLUSIONS: The yield of CMA testing in prenatal microcephaly is lower than in postnatal cases (4.6% vs. 15%). The presence of microcephaly, combined with dysmorphism, hypotonia, epilepsy, CHD, LD, and FGR, significantly increases the likelihood of an abnormal CMA result.

Exploring the factors affecting classification and reporting of uncertain prenatal microarray findings, using a "virtual fetus" model-a pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: Significant discrepancy exists between laboratories in classification and reporting of copy number variants (CNVs). Studies exploring factors affecting prenatal CNV management are rare. Our "virtual fetus" pilot study examines these factors. METHOD: Ten prenatally diagnosed CNVs of uncertain significance (VUS) > 1Mb, encompassing OMIM-morbid genes, inherited from healthy parents, were classified by 15 MD geneticists from laboratory, prenatal, and preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) units. Geneticists addressed factors affecting classification, obligation to report, and recommendation for invasive testing or PGT. RESULTS: CNVs were classified likely benign (10.7%), VUS (74.7%), likely pathogenic (8.7%), or pathogenic (6.0%). Classification discrepancy was higher for losses versus gains. Classifying pathogenic/likely pathogenic was more common for losses (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 10.9, 95% CI 1.55-76.9), and geneticists specializing in gynecology (aOR 4.9, 95% CI 1.03-23.3). 84.0% of respondents would report CNVs, depending on classification and family phenotype. Invasive testing in pregnancies was recommended for 29.3% of CNVs, depending on the classification and geneticist's specialization. PGT was recommended for 32.4%, depending on classification, experience years, and family's phenotype (38.0% for patients undergoing in vitro fertilization irrespectively, 26.7% otherwise). CONCLUSION: Factors affecting CNV classification/reporting are mainly dosage, family phenotype, geneticist specialization and experience. Understanding factors from our pilot study may facilitate developing an algorithm for clinical consensus and optimal management.

Potential Founder Variants in COL4A4 Identified in Bukharian Jews Linked to Autosomal Dominant and Autosomal Recessive Alport Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Alport syndrome is a hereditary disorder caused by pathogenic variants in the COL4A gene, which can be inherited in an autosomal recessive, dominant, or X-linked pattern. In the Bukharian Jewish population, no founder pathogenic variant has been reported in COL4A4. METHODS: The cohort included 38 patients from 22 Bukharian Jewish families with suspected Alport syndrome who were referred the nephrogenetics clinic between 2012 and 2022. The study collected demographic, clinical, and genetic data from electronic medical records, which were used to evaluate the molecular basis of the disease using Sanger sequencing, and next-generation sequencing. RESULTS: Molecular diagnosis was confirmed in 20/38 patients, with each patient having at least one of the three disease-causing COL4A4 variants detected: c.338GA (p.Gly1008Arg), and c.871-6T>C. In addition, two patients were obligate carriers. Overall, there were 17 heterozygotes, 2 compound heterozygotes, and 3 homozygotes. Each variant was detected in more than one unrelated family. All patients had hematuria with/without proteinuria at referral, and the youngest patient with proteinuria (age 5 years) was homozygous for the c.338G>A variant. End-stage renal disease was diagnosed in two patients at the age of 38 years, a compound heterozygote for c.338G>A and c.871-6T>C. Hearing deterioration was detected in three patients, the youngest aged 40 years, all of whom were heterozygous for c.338G>A. CONCLUSION: This study unveils three novel disease-causing variants, c.3022G>A, c.871-6T>C, and c.338G>A, in the COL4A4 gene that are recurrent among Jews of Bukharian ancestry, and cause Alport syndrome in both dominant and recessive autosomal inheritance patterns.

Prevalence of high-penetrant copy number variants in 7734 low-risk pregnancies.

BACKGROUND: The rate of clinically significant copy number variants in chromosomal microarray analysis in low-risk pregnancies is approximately 1%. However, these results include copy number variants with low and variable penetrance, although some patients might be interested only in the detection of high-penetrant variants. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to calculate the prevalence of high-penetrant copy number variants in a large cohort of low-risk pregnancies. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective study was performed using microarray results of pregnancies with normal ultrasound and maternal serum screening. All clinically significant (pathogenic and likely pathogenic) copy number variants were recorded. Of these, only high-penetrant findings were selected. Findings with low and medium penetrance and copy number variants with unknown clinical penetrance, including uniparental disomy of segments not related to known imprinted syndromes, mosaic aneuploidy of <50%, and segmental mosaicism, were excluded. The calculation was performed for the overall cohort, for women aged >35 years and women aged <35 years, and after omission of noninvasive prenatal screening theoretically detectable findings (trisomies 13, 18, and 21). RESULTS: Clinically significant copy number variants were detected in 118 of 7734 cases (1.50% or 1:65), and high-penetrant copy number variants were detected in 33 of 7734 cases (0.43% or 1:234). In women aged ≥35 years, the rates of high-penetrant copy number variants were 29 of 5734 cases (0.51% or 1:198) and 4 of 2000 cases (0.20% or 1:500) in women aged <35 years (P=.0747). Following the omission of 12 theoretically noninvasive prenatal screening-detectable findings, the rates of high-penetrant copy number variants declined to 21 of 7722 cases (0.27% or 1:368) in the whole cohort-18 of 5723 cases (0.31% or 1:318) in woman aged ≥35 years and 3 of 1999 cases (0.15% or 1:666) in younger women (P=.319). CONCLUSION: The risk of high-penetrant copy number variants in low-risk pregnancies exceeds the risk of miscarriage after invasive testing, even after normal noninvasive prenatal screening results. These results are of importance to genetic counselors and obstetricians, to facilitate maternal informed decision-making when considering invasive prenatal testing in low-risk pregnancies.

Proximal 1q21 duplication: A syndrome or a susceptibility locus?

Proximal 1q21 microduplication is an incomplete penetrance and variable expressivity syndrome. This study reports 28 new cases and summarizes data on phenotype, gender, and parental origin. Data on isolated proximal 1q21.1 microduplications (g. chr1:145,394,956-145,762,959 GRCh37/hg19) was retrieved in postnatal and prenatal "clinical cases" group, and prenatal "control group." The "clinical cases" cases included cases where chromosomal microarray (CMA) was performed due to congenital anomalies, autism spectrum disorder, seizures, and developmental delay/intellectual disability. The "control group" cases consisted of fetal CMA performed upon parental request despite normal nuchal translucency and anatomical second trimester fetal scans. We analyzed a local database of 27,990 cases and another cohort of 80,000 cases (including both indicated and non-indicated cases) for population frequency analysis. A total of 62 heterozygous cases were found, including 28 index cases and 34 family members. Among the index cases, 13 (9 males, 4 females) were identified in the "clinical cases" group, of which 10 had developmental abnormalities. Parental origin was tested in 9/13 cases, and all were found to be maternally inherited. In the "control group," which comprised non-affected cases, of 15 cases (10 males, 5 females), only 5/11 were maternally inherited. Four cases with clinical follow-up showed no reported neurodevelopmental abnormalities. No de-novo cases were detected, and the population frequency in both cohorts was 1:1000. Proximal 1q21.1 microduplication is a recurrent copy number variant, associated with neurodevelopmental abnormalities. It has a greater impact on males inheriting it from their mothers than females from their fathers.

A call for public funding of invasive and non-invasive prenatal testing.

For decades, prenatal screening and genetic testing strategies were limited, requiring less complex decisions. Recently, however, several new advanced technologies were introduced, including chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) and non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS), bringing about the need to choose the most appropriate testing for each pregnancy. A worrisome issue is that opposed to the wide implementation and debates over public funding of NIPS, currently invasive testing is still recommended only in selected pregnancies with increased risk for chromosomal aberrations (according to screening tests or sonographic anomalies). This current decision-making regarding public funding for invasive and screening testing might compromise informed consent and patient's autonomy. In this manuscript, we compare several characteristics of CMA vs. NIPS, namely: the accuracy and the diagnostic scope, the risks for miscarriage and for clinically uncertain findings, the timing for testing, and pretest counselling. We argue that it must be recognized that one size might not fit all, and suggest that both options should be presented to all couples through early genetic counseling, with public funding for the specific selected test.

Delineation of a KDM2B-related neurodevelopmental disorder and its associated DNA methylation signature.

PURPOSE: Pathogenic variants in genes involved in the epigenetic machinery are an emerging cause of neurodevelopment disorders (NDDs). Lysine-demethylase 2B (KDM2B) encodes an epigenetic regulator and mouse models suggest an important role during development. We set out to determine whether KDM2B variants are associated with NDD. METHODS: Through international collaborations, we collected data on individuals with heterozygous KDM2B variants. We applied methylation arrays on peripheral blood DNA samples to determine a KDM2B associated epigenetic signature. RESULTS: We recruited a total of 27 individuals with heterozygous variants in KDM2B. We present evidence, including a shared epigenetic signature, to support a pathogenic classification of 15 KDM2B variants and identify the CxxC domain as a mutational hotspot. Both loss-of-function and CxxC-domain missense variants present with a specific subepisignature. Moreover, the KDM2B episignature was identified in the context of a dual molecular diagnosis in multiple individuals. Our efforts resulted in a cohort of 21 individuals with heterozygous (likely) pathogenic variants. Individuals in this cohort present with developmental delay and/or intellectual disability; autism; attention deficit disorder/attention deficit hyperactivity disorder; congenital organ anomalies mainly of the heart, eyes, and urogenital system; and subtle facial dysmorphism. CONCLUSION: Pathogenic heterozygous variants in KDM2B are associated with NDD and a specific epigenetic signature detectable in peripheral blood.

Chromosomal Microarray Analysis Compared With Noninvasive Prenatal Testing in Pregnancies With Abnormal Maternal Serum Screening.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of maternal age on the rate of clinically significant chromosomal microarray analysis results in pregnancies with abnormal maternal serum screening and to establish the residual risk for abnormal microarray findings after omitting noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT)-detectable aberrations in pregnancies with abnormal maternal serum screening. METHODS: This retrospective study included all chromosomal microarray analysis tests performed in pregnancies with abnormal maternal serum screening and normal ultrasonogram results over the years 2013-2021. The rate of clinically significant (pathogenic and likely pathogenic) chromosomal microarray analysis findings was compared with a local control cohort of 7,235 pregnancies with normal maternal serum screening and ultrasonogram results, stratified by maternal age. Calculation of residual risk for clinically significant chromosomal microarray analysis results after normal NIPT was performed by omission of common NIPT-detectable anomalies. Systematic review for studies examining the yield of chromosomal microarray analysis in pregnancies with abnormal maternal serum screening was performed from inception to October 2021, with no time or language restrictions. RESULTS: Of the 559 amniocenteses performed due to abnormal maternal serum screening, 21 (3.8%; 95% CI 2.4-5.7%) clinically significant chromosomal microarray analysis results were found. The residual risk for chromosomal microarray analysis aberrations after theoretically normal NIPT was estimated to be 2.0% (95% CI 1.1-3.6%) (1/50) and was significantly higher for women younger than age 35 years with abnormal maternal serum screening, compared with women with low-risk pregnancies. Systematic review yielded six articles encompassing 4,890 chromosomal microarray analysis results in pregnancies with abnormal maternal serum screening, demonstrating 2.3% residual risk for chromosomal microarray analysis anomalies after theoretically normal NIPT. DISCUSSION: Clinically significant chromosomal microarray analysis findings can be found in 1 of every 50 pregnancies with high-risk maternal serum screening after theoretically normal NIPT, implying that invasive testing and not NIPT should be recommended in such pregnancies. In addition, NIPT use as a first-tier screening modality instead of maternal serum screening would miss pregnancies at increased risk not only for common autosomal trisomies but for additional chromosomal microarray analysis-detectable disorders.

Prenatal and postnatal chromosomal microarray analysis in 885 cases of various congenital heart defects.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of clinically significant (pathogenic and likely pathogenic) variants detected by chromosomal microarray (CMA) tests performed for prenatally and postnatally detected congenital heart defects. METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of CMA analyses over a period of four years in a single tertiary medical center was performed. Detection rate of clinically significant variants was calculated in the whole cohort, prenatal vs. postnatal cases, and isolated vs. non-isolated CHD. This rate was compared to previously published control cohorts, and to a theoretical detection rate of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPS; 5 chromosomes). RESULTS: Of the 885 cases of CHD, 111 (12.5%) clinically significant variants were detected, with no significant difference between the 498 prenatal and the 387 postnatal cases (10.8% vs. 14.7%, p = 0.08). In both groups, the detection rate was significantly higher for non-isolated vs. isolated CHD (76/339 = 22.4% vs. 35/546 = 6.4%, respectively, p < 0.05). The detection rate was higher than the background risk in both groups, including cases of postnatal isolated CHD. 44% of abnormal findings in the prenatal setting would be detectable by NIPS. CONCLUSION: CMA should be performed for both prenatally and postnatally detected CHD, including postnatal cases of isolated CHD, while NIPS can be considered in specific scenarios.

Residual risk for clinically significant copy number variants in low-risk pregnancies, following exclusion of noninvasive prenatal screening-detectable findings.

BACKGROUND: Chromosomal microarray analysis detects a clinically significant amount of copy number variants in approximately 1% of low-risk pregnancies. As the constantly growing use of noninvasive prenatal screening has facilitated the detection of chromosomal aberrations, defining the rate of abnormal chromosomal microarray analysis findings following normal noninvasive prenatal screening is of importance for making informed decisions regarding prenatal testing and screening options. OBJECTIVE: To calculate the residual risk for clinically significant copy number variants following theoretically normal noninvasive prenatal screening. STUDY DESIGN: The chromosomal microarray results of all pregnancies undergoing amniocentesis between the years 2013 and 2021 in a large hospital-based laboratory were collected. Pregnancies with sonographic anomalies, abnormal maternal serum screening, or multiple fetuses were excluded. Clinically significant (pathogenic and likely pathogenic) copy number variants were divided into the following: 3-noninvasive prenatal screening-detectable (trisomies 13, 18, and 21), 5- noninvasive prenatal screening-detectable (including sex chromosome aberrations), 5-noninvasive prenatal screening and common microdeletion-detectable (including 1p36.3-1p36.2, 4p16.3-4p16.2, 5p15.3-5p15.1, 15q11.2-15q13.1, and 22q11.2 deletions), and genome-wide noninvasive prenatal screening-detectable (including variants >7 Mb). The theoretical residual risk for clinically significant copy number variants was calculated following the exclusion of noninvasive prenatal screening-detectable findings. RESULTS: Of the 7235 pregnancies, clinically significant copy number variants were demonstrated in 87 cases (1.2%). The residual risk following theoretically normal noninvasive prenatal screening was 1.07% (1/94) for 3-noninvasive prenatal screening, 0.78% (1/129) for 5- noninvasive prenatal screening, 0.74% (1/136) for 5- noninvasive prenatal screening including common microdeletions, and 0.68% (1/147) for genome-wide noninvasive prenatal screening. In the subgroup of 4048 pregnancies with advanced maternal age, the residual risk for clinically significant copy number variants following theoretically normal noninvasive prenatal screening ranged from 1.36% (1/73) for 3- noninvasive prenatal screening to 0.82% (1/122) for genome-wide noninvasive prenatal screening. In 3187 pregnancies of women <35 years, this residual risk ranged from 0.69% (1/145) for 3- noninvasive prenatal screening to 0.5% (1/199) for genome-wide noninvasive prenatal screening. CONCLUSION: The residual risk of clinically significant copy number variants in pregnancies without structural sonographic anomalies is appreciable and depends on the noninvasive prenatal screening extent and maternal age. This knowledge is important for the patients, obstetricians, and genetic counselors to facilitate informed decisions regarding prenatal testing and screening options.

The yield of chromosomal microarray analysis among pregnancies terminated due to fetal malformations.

BACKGROUND: Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) is preferred for genetic work-up when fetal malformations are detected prenatally. OBJECTIVES: To assess the detection rate of CMA after pregnancy termination due to abnormal ultrasound findings. METHODS: CMA was successfully performed in 71 pregnancies using fetal DNA (mainly from skin) or placenta. Data regarding clinical background, pregnancy work-up, and CMA were analyzed. RESULTS: Findings were abnormal in 17 cases (23.9%), of which 13 were detectable by karyotype. The incremental yield of CMA was 4/71 (5.6%); 1/32 (3.1%) for cases with an isolated anomaly and 3/39 (7.7%) for cases with nonisolated anomalies. CONCLUSIONS: CMA yield from terminated pregnancies was 23.9%. Although most chromosomal abnormalities are detectable by karyotype, CMA does not require viable dividing cells; hence, it is more practical for work-up after termination. In most cases, the diagnosis was followed by consultation regarding the risk of recurrence and recommendations for testing in subsequent pregnancies.

Chromosomal Microarray Analysis in Pregnancies With Corpus Callosum or Posterior Fossa Anomalies.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the detection rate of clinically significant chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) results in pregnancies with sonographic diagnosis of fetal corpus callosum anomalies (CCA) or posterior fossa anomalies (PFA). METHODS: All CMA tests in pregnancies with CCA or PFA performed between January 2015 and June 2020 were retrospectively evaluated from the Israeli Ministry of Health database. The rate of CMA with clinically significant (pathogenic or likely pathogenic) findings was calculated and compared to a local Israeli cohort of 5,541 pregnancies with normal ultrasound. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-two pregnancies were enrolled: 102 cases with CCA and 89 with PFA (9 cases had both). Clinically significant CMA results were found in 7/102 of CCA (6.9%) and in 7/89 of PFA (7.9%) cases. The CMA detection rate in pregnancies with isolated CCA (2/57, 3.5%) or PFA (2/50, 4.0%) was lower than in nonisolated cases, including additional CNS and/or extra-CNS sonographic anomalies (CCA-5/45, 11.1%; PFA-5/39, 12.8%), but this was not statistically significant. However, the rate among pregnancies that had extra-CNS anomalies, with or without additional CNS involvement (CCA-5/24, 20.8%; PFA-5/29, 17.2%), was significantly higher compared to all other cases (p = 0.0075 for CCA; p = 0.035 for PFA). Risk of CMA with clinically significant results for all and nonisolated CCA or PFA pregnancies was higher compared to the background risk reported in the control cohort (p < 0.001), but was not significant for isolated cases. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that CMA testing is beneficial for the genetic workup of pregnancies with CCA or PFA, and is probably most informative when additional extra-CNS anomalies are observed.

The yield of chromosomal microarray in pregnancies with congenital cardiac defects and normal noninvasive prenatal screening.

BACKGROUND: Evidence comparing the yield of chromosomal microarray analysis to noninvasive prenatal screening in pregnancies with congenital heart anomalies is currently limited. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the residual risk of clinically significant chromosomal microarray analysis results in fetuses with congenital heart defects by its various subtypes following a normal noninvasive prenatal screening. STUDY DESIGN: Using a population-based, countrywide computerized database, we retrieved the reports of all pregnancies undergoing chromosomal microarray analysis because of congenital heart defects through the years 2013-2019. We examined the risk of clinically significant (pathogenic and likely pathogenic) chromosomal microarray analysis results and compared it with the results of a local cohort of low-risk pregnancies. Of 5541 fetuses, 78 (1.4%) showed abnormal results. The residual risk of abnormal chromosomal microarray analysis results was calculated using several options-trisomies 21, 18, and 13; sex chromosome aneuploidies; 22q11.2 deletion, and deletions and duplications of at least 10 MB in size (genome-wide noninvasive prenatal screening)-following the exclusion of theoretically detectable noninvasive prenatal screening anomalies. RESULTS: Of the 1728 fetuses with congenital heart defects, 93 (5.4%) showed clinically significant chromosomal microarray analysis results (relative risk, 2.7; 95% confidence interval, 2.3-3.1). The result of pregnancies with fetuses with congenital heart defects was compared with the results of the control population. Unique variants were found in 15 pregnancies (16.1%). The detection rate of noninvasive prenatal screening in isolated congenital heart defects varied from 1.0% (aimed at 3 common trisomies) to 2.2% (aimed at 5 common aneuploidies and 22q11.2 deletion) using noninvasive prenatal screening. In nonisolated congenital heart defects, the noninvasive prenatal screening detection rates ranged from 7.8% (aimed at common autosomal trisomies) to 9.2% using genome-wide noninvasive prenatal screening. The residual risk of clinically significant chromosomal microarray analysis results following normal noninvasive prenatal screening ranged from 2.0% to 2.8% in isolated congenital heart defects and 4.5% to 5.9% in nonisolated cases and was significantly higher than those of the control cohort in all noninvasive prenatal screening options. In addition, the residual risk following noninvasive prenatal screening aimed at chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X, and Y was significantly higher than those of the control cohort for most specific congenital heart defect subtypes, except for ventricular septal defects and aberrant right subclavian artery. CONCLUSION: The residual risk of clinically significant chromosomal microarray analysis results in pregnancies with fetuses with congenital heart defects following normal noninvasive prenatal screening was higher than those in pregnancies with normal ultrasound in most isolated and nonisolated congenital heart defect subtypes. This information should be taken into account by obstetricians and genetic counselors when considering the option of diagnostic testing.

Is it time to report carrier state for recessive disorders in every microarray analysis?-A pilot model based on hearing loss genes deletions.

This study aimed to examine the implications of reporting heterozygous losses of recessive genes in Chromosomal Microarray Analysis (CMA), based on the incidence of microdeletions of three common hearing impairment genes in the local cohort and the prevalence of sequence variants in these genes in worldwide databases. Prevalence of heterozygous microdeletions in OTOA and STRC genes, as well as deletions in the DFNB1 locus encompassing GJB6 gene, was determined using electronic database of Rabin Medical Center. ClinVar archive and Deafness Variation Database were used to generate a list of clinically significant sequence variants in these three genes, as well as GJB2 gene, and estimation of the frequency of sequence variants was performed. Of the 19,189 CMA tests were performed in our laboratory, 107 STRC microdeletions were found (0.56%), followed in frequency by OTOA deletions (39, 0.2%), and DFNB1 locus deletions (10, 0.05%). The estimated risk for a hearing loss in the examined individual carrying the microdeletion was estimated as 0.11-0.67% for STRC, 0.016-0.13% for OTOA, and 1.9-7.5% in the DFNB1 locus (including double heterozygocity with GJB2 clinically significant sequence variants). The risks were higher in specific populations. In conclusion, we believe that that general decision whether to report or to disregard such incidental findings cannot be part of a uniform policy, but rather based on a detailed evaluation of origin-specific variants for each gene, with a careful consideration and discussion whether to include the microdeletion in the final report for each patient.

The phenotype of 15 cases with rare 8q24.13-q24.3 deletions-A new syndrome or still an enigma?

Diagnosis of rare copy number variants (CNVs) with scarce literature evidence poses a major challenge for interpretation of the clinical significance of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) results, especially in the prenatal setting. Bioinformatic tools can be used to assist in this issue; however, this prediction can be imprecise. Our objective was to describe the phenotype of the rare copy number losses encompassing the 8q24.13-q24.3 locus, and to find common features in terms of genomic coordinates, gene content, and clinical phenotypic characteristics. Appropriate cases were retrieved using local databases of two largest Israeli centers performing CMA analysis. In addition, literature and public databases search was performed. Local database search yielded seven new patients with del (8)(q24.13q24.3) (one of these with an additional copy number variant). Literature and public databases search yielded eight additional patients. The cases showed high phenotypic variability, ranging from asymptomatic adults and fetuses with normal ultrasound to patients with autism/developmental delay (6/11 postnatal cases, 54.5%). No clear association was noted between the specific disease-causing/high-pLI gene content of the described del (8)(q24.13q24.3) to neurodevelopmental disorders, except for a possibly relevant locus encompassing the KCNQ3 gene. We present the challenges in classification of rare variants with limited clinical information. In such cases, genotype-phenotype correlation must be assessed with extra-caution and possibly using additional methods to assist the classification, especially in the prenatal setting.