Effect of Tucatinib on Cardiac Repolarization in Healthy Volunteers.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Tucatinib is a selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor of the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) approved to treat metastatic HER2-positive breast and colorectal cancers. The International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Human Use (ICH) E14 guideline mandates that new drugs are assessed for potential effects on cardiac repolarization through electrocardiogram (ECG) evaluation in a QT/corrected QT (TQT) study. METHODS: We evaluated the effect of tucatinib on cardiac repolarization in healthy volunteers in a phase I, randomized, partially double-blind, placebo-and positive-controlled three-period crossover study. The primary endpoint was the placebo-corrected change from baseline in QT interval values, corrected for heart rate using Fridericia's method (ΔΔQTcF). RESULTS: After achieving steady-state tucatinib exposures with 300 mg twice daily, the observed ΔΔQTcF ranged from -2.9 msec at 2 hours post-dose to 0 msec at 4 hours post-dose. The upper bound of the 90% confidence interval (CI) was below 5 ms at all post-dose timepoints. Assay sensitivity was confirmed as the lower bound of the 90% CI and was >5 ms following moxifloxacin dosing. As the mean ΔΔQTcF of tucatinib was predicted to be -  1.80 ms (90% CI -  3.90, 0.30) at clinically relevant tucatinib concentrations (511 ng/mL), an effect of tucatinib on QTcF exceeding 10 ms was excluded within observed ranges of tucatinib (up to ~1000 ng/mL). Tucatinib had no clinically relevant effect on heart rate or cardiac conduction. The safety profile of tucatinib was manageable after multiple doses. CONCLUSION: Tucatinib had no clinically relevant effects on studied ECG parameters. This study constitutes a clearly negative TQT study per ICH E14 guidance. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial (NCT03777761) was registered on 17 December 2018.

The Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Tucatinib in Volunteers with Hepatic Impairment.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Tucatinib, a highly selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor of the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) approved for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, is cleared by hepatic metabolism and subsequent biliary excretion. Liver disease can alter drug disposition and pharmacokinetics (PK). The objective of this study is to characterize PK and safety of tucatinib in volunteers with hepatic impairment. METHODS: This Phase 1 study compared the PK and safety of a single 300-mg oral dose of tucatinib in volunteers with mild, moderate, and severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh A/B/C) to healthy volunteers matched for sex, age, and body mass index. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined for tucatinib and its predominant metabolite ONT-993. RESULTS: Compared with healthy volunteers, tucatinib exposure was similar in volunteers with mild impairment and increased in those with moderate or severe impairment without reaching statistical significance. Respective fold increases in geometric mean ratios for AUC0-t and AUC0-∞ were 1.13 and 1.15 in moderate impairment, and 1.43 and 1.61 in severe impairment compared with healthy volunteers. Three treatment-emergent adverse events (nausea, dermatitis, and increased transaminases) were reported in three volunteers and showed no obvious association with hepatic impairment status. CONCLUSION: The 1.61-fold geometric mean ratio AUC0-∞ increase in volunteers with severe hepatic impairment supports the recommendation in the tucatinib prescribing information to reduce the dose from 300 mg twice daily to 200 mg twice daily in patients with severe impairment; no dose adjustment is recommended for patients with mild or moderate hepatic impairment. This trial (NCT03722823) was registered on October 29, 2018.

Evaluation of Safety and Clinically Relevant Drug-Drug Interactions with Tucatinib in Healthy Volunteers.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Tucatinib is approved for treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Understanding potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) informs proper dosing when co-administering tucatinib with other therapies. The aim of this study was to evaluate DDIs between tucatinib and metabolizing enzymes and transporters in healthy volunteers. METHODS: Parts A-C assessed the impact of itraconazole (cytochrome P450 [CYP] 3A4 inhibitor), rifampin (CYP3A4/CYP2C8 inducer), or gemfibrozil (CYP2C8 inhibitor) on the pharmacokinetics of a single 300 mg dose of tucatinib administered orally and its primary metabolite, ONT-993. Parts D and E assessed the effect of steady-state tucatinib on the pharmacokinetics of repaglinide (CYP2C8 substrate), tolbutamide (CYP2C9 substrate), midazolam (CYP3A4 substrate), and digoxin (P-glycoprotein substrate). RESULTS: Tucatinib area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-inf) increased by ~ 1.3- and 3.0-fold with itraconazole and gemfibrozil, respectively, and decreased by 48% with rifampin, indicating that tucatinib is metabolized primarily by CYP2C8, and to a lesser extent via CYP3A. Tucatinib was a strong inhibitor of CYP3A (midazolam AUC0-inf increased 5.7-fold), a weak inhibitor of CYP2C8 and P-glycoprotein, and had no impact on CYP2C9-mediated metabolism in humans. Tucatinib was well tolerated, alone and with co-administered drugs. CONCLUSION: The potential DDIs identified here may be mitigated by avoiding concomitant use of tucatinib with strong CYP3A inducers, moderate CYP2C8 inducers, CYP3A substrates with a narrow therapeutic window (modifying substrate dose where concomitant use is unavoidable), and strong CYP2C8 inhibitors (decreasing tucatinib dose where concomitant use is unavoidable), or by reducing the dose of P-glycoprotein substrates with a narrow therapeutic window. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial (NCT03723395) was registered on October 29, 2018.

Tucatinib Inhibits Renal Transporters OCT2 and MATE Without Impacting Renal Function in Healthy Subjects.

Tucatinib is a potent tyrosine kinase inhibitor selective for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer and in development for other HER2-positive solid tumors. Modest, reversible serum creatinine (SCr) elevations have been observed in tucatinib clinical trials. SCr is conveyed by the renal drug transporters organic cation transporter 2 (OCT2) and multidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1 (MATE1) and 2-K (MATE2-K) and can increase in the presence of inhibitors of these transporters. In vitro, tucatinib inhibited OCT2-, MATE1-, and MATE2-K-mediated transport of metformin, with IC50 values of 14.7, 0.340, and 0.135 µM, respectively. Tucatinib also inhibited OCT2- and MATE1-mediated transport of creatinine, with IC50 values of 0.107 and 0.0855 µM, respectively. A phase 1 study with metformin administered orally in the absence and presence of tucatinib was conducted in 18 healthy subjects. Renal function was assessed by measuring glomerular filtration rate (GFR; based on iohexol plasma clearance) and endogenous markers (SCr, cystatin C-based estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR]) with and without tucatinib. Metformin exposure increased (1.4-fold) and renal clearance decreased (29.99-17.64 L/h) with tucatinib, with no effect on metformin maximum concentration. Creatinine clearance transiently decreased 23% with tucatinib. GFR and eGFR, which are unaffected by OCT2 and/or MATE1/2-K transport, were unchanged with tucatinib. These data demonstrate that tucatinib inhibits OCT2- and MATE1/2-K-mediated tubular secretion of creatinine, which may manifest as mild SCr elevations that are not indicative of renal impairment.

Intracranial Efficacy and Survival With Tucatinib Plus Trastuzumab and Capecitabine for Previously Treated HER2-Positive Breast Cancer With Brain Metastases in the HER2CLIMB Trial.

PURPOSE: In the HER2CLIMB study, patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer with brain metastases (BMs) showed statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) with tucatinib. We describe exploratory analyses of intracranial efficacy and survival in participants with BMs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to tucatinib or placebo, in combination with trastuzumab and capecitabine. All patients underwent baseline brain magnetic resonance imaging; those with BMs were classified as active or stable. Efficacy analyses were performed by applying RECIST 1.1 criteria to CNS target lesions by investigator assessment. CNS-PFS (intracranial progression or death) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated in all patients with BMs. Confirmed intracranial objective response rate (ORR-IC) was evaluated in patients with measurable intracranial disease. RESULTS: There were 291 patients with BMs: 198 (48%) in the tucatinib arm and 93 (46%) in the control arm. The risk of intracranial progression or death was reduced by 68% in the tucatinib arm (hazard ratio [HR], 0.32; 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.48; P < .0001). Median CNS-PFS was 9.9 months in the tucatinib arm versus 4.2 months in the control arm. Risk of death was reduced by 42% in the tucatinib arm (OS HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.85; P = .005). Median OS was 18.1 versus 12.0 months. ORR-IC was higher in the tucatinib arm (47.3%; 95% CI, 33.7% to 61.2%) versus the control arm (20.0%; 95% CI, 5.7% to 43.7%; P = .03). CONCLUSION: In patients with HER2-positive breast cancer with BMs, the addition of tucatinib to trastuzumab and capecitabine doubled ORR-IC, reduced risk of intracranial progression or death by two thirds, and reduced risk of death by nearly half. To our knowledge, this is the first regimen to demonstrate improved antitumor activity against BMs in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer in a randomized, controlled trial.

Characterization of collaborative practice agreements held by hematopoietic stem cell transplant pharmacists.

BACKGROUND: Current workforce shortages within the hematopoietic stem cell transplant field necessitate capitalizing on the role of oncology-trained pharmacists. Working within an agreed-upon protocol, pharmacists are able to expand patient care delivery through optimal medication therapy management. METHODS: An electronic survey was developed by the Advocacy & Policy Working Committee of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Pharmacy Special Interest Group and distributed to pharmacists involved in the care of hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients. The primary objective was to assess the current state of collaborative practice agreements in the hematopoietic stem cell transplant setting. RESULTS: Forty-eight responses representing 41 institutions were returned. Respondents were mostly female (67%) and practiced in the adult setting (83%). Reponses represented a range of practice experience in hematopoietic stem cell transplant with the majority of the hematopoietic stem cell transplant positions (83%) funded by the department of pharmacy at an academic medical center. Of the 48 responses, 22 (46%) respondents reported having collaborative practice agreements in place; 10 (21%) respondents did not currently have collaborative practice agreements, but were planning to implement them; and 16 (33%) respondents did not have collaborative practice agreements at their institution. Clinical activities performed under a collaborative practice agreement included medication selection and dosing modifications, therapeutic drug monitoring, supportive care management, and management of comorbid conditions and chronic diseases. The most commonly cited barrier to establishing collaborative practice agreements was the inability to secure reimbursement for services provided. No respondents reported a negative impact on job satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this survey provide the pharmacy community with a robust understanding of the current landscape of hematopoietic stem cell transplant pharmacy collaborative practice agreements.

The effective use of plerixafor as a real-time rescue strategy for patients poorly mobilizing autologous CD34(+) cells.

Plerixafor enhances CD34(+) cell mobilization, however, its optimal use is unknown. We hypothesized that plerixafor could "rescue" patients in the midst of mobilization when factors indicated a poor CD34(+) yield. Of 295 consecutive autologous peripheral blood mobilization attempts at our center, 39 (13%) used plerixafor as rescue strategy due to a CD34(+) cell concentration <10/µl (median 5.95/µl, n = 30), low CD34(+) cell yield from prior apheresis day (median 1.06 × 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg, n = 7), or other (n = 2). Patients received a median of one plerixafor dose (range: 1-4). Thirty-four (87%) collected =2 × 10 (6) CD34(+) cells/kg and 26 (67%) collected =4 × 10 (6) CD34(+) cells/kg. Median collections for lymphoma (n = 24) and myeloma (n = 15) patients were 4.1 × 10(6) and 8.3 × 10(6) CD34/kg, respectively. A single dose of plerixafor was associated with an increase in the mean peripheral blood CD34(+) concentration of 17.2 cells/µl (P < 0.001) and mean increased CD34(+) cell yield following a single apheresis of 5.11 × 10(6) /kg (P < 0.03). A real-time rescue use of plerixafor is feasible and may allow targeted use of this agent. J. Clin. Apheresis, 2012. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.