Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy: mapping surgical maneuvers towards operative standardization.

AIM: To analyze the minimally invasive surgical maneuvers currently performed to remove pancreatic tail, with or without preservation of the spleen, for benign and borderline malignant neoplasms. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We described operative steps and technical pitfalls encountered during laparoscopic and robotic distal pancreatectomy. The methodology of research focused on recruitment of evidence-based surgical strategies and critical analysis of modern minimally invasive techniques. RESULTS: Laparoscopic and robotic distal pancreatectomy have gradually accepted by pancreatic surgeons and clinical evidences document its growing interest. The choice of patient positioning, port placement, surgical dissection and operative techniques used for pancreatic parenchymal transection is not codified and changes according to personal preference. The technical variability in minimally invasive approach to pancreatic surgery strongly depends depends on surgeon's training and to limited application of these procedures in single institutions. CONCLUSIONS: Pancreatic surgeons worldwide accept laparoscopic and robotic distal pancreatectomy but the best intraoperative praxis is not defined in clinical routine. To date, the pancreatic resection adopts hybrid techniques and the conduction of minimally invasive resection depends to surgeon's experience, patient body habitus and location of pancreatic lesion. Although several technical variations have described, no standardization of the operative minimally invasive surgical method is convincingly built. KEY WORDS: Laparoscopy, Minimally invasive surgery, Pancreas, Robotic pancreatectomy.

Laparoscopic and open complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation for right colonic adenocarcinoma: a retrospective comparative study.

BACKGROUND: To examine the outcome of patients treated with complete mesocolic excision (CME) with central vascular ligation (CVL) after conventional and laparoscopic surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated stage I-IV colon adenocarcinoma patients treated by the same surgeon (L.M.) from 2013 to 2018. Postoperative complications, recurrences and survival are assessed. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients (M/F: 24/27) underwent laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with CME (L-CME) or open CME (O-CME) plus CVL. Tumour location was the caecum in 39.2% of cases, the transverse in 23.5%, the hepatic colonic flexure in 21.5%, and the ascending colon in 15.6%. Twenty-four patients underwent L-CME while 27 underwent O-CME. More than 15 harvested lymphnodes are reported in 74.1% of O-CME patients and in 66.7% of L-CME patients (p = 0.562). Postoperative complications occurred in 7 O-CME and 5 L-CME patients, respectively (p = 0.669). Three-year overall survival, including stage IV, was of 75% versus 77.8% for L-CME and O-CME patients, respectively, while for stage I-III, was of 88.9% vs. 80% in L-CME and O-CME, respectively (p = 0.440). The median follow-up was of 2.43 years. CONCLUSION: CME with CVL is a meticulous, complex but feasible technique. In our experience, oncological results in terms of recurrences and overall survival, after conventional and laparoscopic CME plus CVL, are comparable. Patients with stage I-III colon adenocarcinoma have a better prognostic trend especially when more than 15 lymphnodes are removed. The respect of oncological radicality and the correct indication to minimally invasive surgery are the undiscussed key outcome variables.

Treatment Intensification for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Impact on Pathological Complete Response and Outcomes.

AIM: Pathological complete response (pCR) and clinical outcomes [overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), locoregional control (LC)] were evaluated in a single-institution experience of different schedules of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data for 322 patients with LARC were retrospectively analyzed. pCR was evaluated according to Mandard tumor regression grade (TRG). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate OS, DFS and LC. RESULTS: Three hundred and three (94.1%) patients underwent surgery. pCR was observed in 81 patients (26.7%), with TRG1-2 rate of 41.8%. The 5- and 10-year OS, DFS and LC rates were 82.5%±2.5% and 65.5%±3.8%, 81.2%±2.4% and 79.3%±2.9%, 93.1%±1.7% and 90.5%±2.1%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant CRT in LARC patients resulted in favorable long-term oncological outcomes, with a high pCR rate and acceptable toxicity.

Solitary fibrous tumor of the anterior abdominal wall. A case report and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Solitary fibrous tumor (SFT) is a rare mesenchymal neoplasm affecting soft tissues with a not well defined biological behavior. SFT occurs mostly in the pleura and the thorax, while extra-thoracic localization is uncommon and abdominal localization is very rare. Histologically, SFT is a well defined mass with splindle-cell proliferation in collagenous matrix with staghorn vascular network and CD34 reactive. CASE REPORT: A 64 years-old man with a history of recurrent gastric cancer previously treated with total gastrectomy, was admitted with contrast enhanced CT-scan diagnosis of a well demarcated oval mass of 4.8 cm with microcysts, vascularized in the arterial phase and with wash out in the tardive phase, located in the peritoneal side of right rectus abdominis muscle, suspected for metastatic gastric tumor. The patient underwent minilaparotomy and en-bloc excision of the lesion. Histologically the tumor was characterized by a hemangiopericitoma like growth pattern and the immunostaining was positive to CD34, CD99, BCL-2 and Vimentin. The definitive diagnosis was SFT with a proliferation index (Ki-67/MIB-1) <3%. In our case, chemotherapy was not indicated. At the 6-month follow-up, the patient is in good clinical conditions with no recurrence or metastasis. CONCLUSIONS: We reported a rare case of primitive SFT located in peritoneal side of the of right rectus abdominis muscle treated surgically, in a patient previously affected by gastric adenocarcinoma. In this case, SFT showed a benign behaviour during a short term follow-up. Dimensional pattern, histopathological features and curative surgery remain the most important indicators of clinical outcome. KEY WORDS: Abdominal wall, Hemangiopericitoma, SFT, Solitary fibrous tumorSpindle cell.

Minimally Invasive Treatment of Sporadic Burkitt's Lymphoma Causing Ileocaecal Invagination.

INTRODUCTION: Primary NHL (non-Hodgkin lymphoma) of the colon represents only 0.2% to 1.2% of all colonic malignancies. Burkitt's lymphoma (BL) is usually a disease reported in children and young people, most of them associated with EBV or HIV infection. We describe a rare case of intestinal obstruction due to sporadic Burkitt's lymphoma causing ileocaecal invagination explaining our experience Methods. A 31-year-old man presented with diffuse colic pain and weight loss. Clinical examination revealed an abdominal distension with pain in the right iliac fossa. Colonoscopy documented a caecal large lesion with ulcerated mucosa. Computed tomography (CT) have shown a 60 × 50 mm right colic parietal lesion with signs of ileocolic intussusception. RESULTS: Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy was performed. Postoperative period was uneventful. CD20+ high-grade B-cell Burkitt's lymphoma was confirmed by immunohistochemistry (CD20+, CD79+, and CD10+) and FISH test (t (8;14) (q24; q32). The patient was subsequently treated with adjuvant combination chemotherapy (Hyper-CVAD) and is alive and disease-free at 8 months follow-up. DISCUSSION: Adult sporadic Burkitt's lymphoma (BL) causing intestinal obstruction due to ileocaecal intussusception is an extremely rare occurrence and a diagnostic dilemma. Despite the surgical approach is selected based on patient's conditions and surgeon's expertise, minimally invasive method could be preferred.

Developing a decision-making model based on an interdisciplinary oncological care group for the management of colorectal cancer.

AIM: To report our experience on implementation and preliminary results of a decision-making model based on the recommendations of an Interdisciplinary Oncological Care Group developed for the management of colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The multidisciplinary team identified a reference guideline using appraisal of guidelines for research and evaluation (AGREE) tool based on a sequential assessment of the guideline quality. Thereafter, internal guidelines with diagnostic and therapeutic management for early, locally advanced and metastatic colonic and rectal cancer were drafted; organizational aspects, responsibility matrices, protocol actions for each area of specialty involved and indicators for performing audits were also defined. RESULTS: The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) UK guideline was the reference for drafting the internal guideline document; from February to November 2013, 125 patients with colorectal cancer were discussed by and taken under the care of the Interdisciplinary Oncological Care Group. The first audit performed in December 2013 revealed optimal adherence to the internal guideline, mainly in terms of uniformity and accuracy of perioperative staging, coordination and timing of multi-modal therapies. To date, all patients under observation are within the diagnostic and therapeutic course, no patient came out from the multidisciplinary "path" and only in 14% of cases have the first recommendations proposed been changed. The selected indicators appear effective and reliable, while at the moment, it is not yet possible to assess the impact of the multidisciplinary team on clinical outcome. CONCLUSION: Although having a short observation period, our model seems capable of determining optimal uniformity of diagnostic and therapeutic management, to a high degree of patient satisfaction. A longer observation period is necessary in order to confirm these observations and for assessing the impact on clinical outcome.

The SIC-GIRCG 2013 Consensus Conference on Gastric Cancer.

The topic chosen by the Board of the Italian Society of Surgery for the 2013 annual Consensus Conference was gastric cancer. With this purpose, under the direction of 2 chairmen, 36 experts nominated by the Regional Societies of Surgery and by the Italian Research Group for Gastric Cancer (GIRCG) participated in an experts consensus exercise, preceded by a questionnaire and mainly held by telematic vote, in accordance with the rules of the Delphi method. The results of this Consensus Conference, presented to the 115th National Congress of the Italian Society of Surgery, and approved in plenary session, are reported in the present paper.