Assessment of anterior segment tumors with ultrasound biomicroscopy versus anterior segment optical coherence tomography in 200 cases.

PURPOSE: To compare ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) versus anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) for imaging of tumors of the anterior segment of the eye. DESIGN: Retrospective, noninterventional case series. PARTICIPANTS: We included 200 patients. METHODS: Review of medical records of patients who underwent both UBM and AS-OCT for evaluation of anterior segment tumors. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Comparison of tumor surface and internal visualization. RESULTS: There were 200 eyes with anterior segment tumors involving the iris stroma in 96 (48%), ciliary body in 14 (7%), combined iris and ciliary body in 32 (16%), iris pigment epithelium (IPE) in 44 (22%), conjunctiva in 6 (3%), sclera in 4 (2%), and others in 6 (1% each). The diagnoses included nevus in 75 eyes (38%), melanoma in 47 (24%), cyst in 48 (24%), epithelioma (adenoma) in 5 (3%), metastasis, melanocytosis and melanocytoma in 4 eyes each (2%), and others (1% each). Image analysis (UBM vs AS-OCT) revealed adequate visualization of all tumor margins (189 [95%] vs 80 [40%]), posterior tumor shadowing (9 [5%] vs 144 [72%]), and high overall image quality (159 [80%] vs 136 [68%]). Comparison for better image resolution (UBM vs AS-OCT) disclosed UBM provided better overall tumor visualization (138 [69%] vs 62 [31%]) and better resolution of the posterior margin (147 [74%] vs 53 [27%]), whereas AS-OCT provided better resolution of the anterior margin (40 [20%] vs 160 [80%]) as well as better overall resolution of anterior segment anatomy (41 [21%] vs 159 [80%]). Better resolution was found with UBM for pigmented tumors (n = 162; 107 [66%] vs 55 [34%]) as well as for nonpigmented tumors (n = 38; 23 [61%] vs 15 [39%]). Regarding location, iris tumor resolution was similar with each technique (49 [52%] vs 45 [48%]). CONCLUSIONS: For anterior segment tumors, UBM offers better visualization of the posterior margin and provides overall better images for entire tumor configuration compared with AS-OCT.

Anterior segment optical coherence tomography of conjunctival nevus.

PURPOSE: To evaluate conjunctival nevi using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT). DESIGN: Retrospective interventional case series. PARTICIPANTS: There were 22 eyes of 21 patients with conjunctival nevus imaged with AS-OCT for evaluation and detection of cysts within conjunctival nevi. INTERVENTION: Anterior segment OCT. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Evaluation and detection of intralesional cysts. RESULTS: All margins of the nevus, including the deep margin, could be visualized on AS-OCT with high resolution of the anterior margin in 100% of cases, posterior margin in 82% of cases, and lateral margin in 86% of cases. The nevus was optically dense with homogeneous pattern in all cases. Some degree of deep optical shadowing, mostly from pigmented nevi, was noted in 86%. Intrinsic cysts within the nevus were detected by slit-lamp biomicroscopy in 18 cases (82%) and by AS-OCT in 17 cases (77%). In comparison with histopathologic findings, AS-OCT detected intrinsic cysts with a sensitivity of 80%, specificity of 100%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 100%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 60%. Slit-lamp biomicroscopy (by experienced observers) compared with histopathology revealed detection of cysts with a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 100%, a PPV of 100%, and an NPV of 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Anterior segment OCT provides high-resolution imaging of conjunctival nevi with the ability to demonstrate all margins and to provide information on the presence of intralesional cysts, which are important in the diagnosis. The main drawback is optical shadowing of deeper structures from pigment within nevi.