Increasing Activity After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial of High-Intensity Walking and Step Activity Intervention.

BACKGROUND: Physical inactivity in people with chronic stroke profoundly affects daily function and increases recurrent stroke risk and mortality, making physical activity improvements an important target of intervention. We compared the effects of a high-intensity walking intervention (FAST), a step activity monitoring behavioral intervention (SAM), or a combined intervention (FAST+SAM) on physical activity (ie, steps/day). We hypothesized the combined intervention would yield the greatest increase in steps/day. METHODS: This assessor-blinded multisite randomized controlled trial was conducted at 4 university/hospital-based laboratories. Participants were 21 to 85 years old, walking without physical assistance following a single, unilateral noncerebellar stroke of ≥6 months duration, and randomly assigned to FAST, SAM, or FAST+SAM for 12 weeks (2-3 sessions/week). FAST training consisted of walking-related activities at 70% to 80% heart rate reserve, while SAM received daily feedback and goal setting of walking activity (steps/day). Assessors and study statistician were masked to group assignment. The a priori-determined primary outcome and end point was a comparison of the change in steps/day between the 3 intervention groups from pre- to post-intervention. Adverse events were tracked after randomization. All randomized participants were included in the intent-to-treat analysis. RESULTS: Participants were enrolled from July 18, 2016, to November 16, 2021. Of 2385 participants initially screened, 250 participants were randomized (mean [SE] age, 63 [0.80] years; 116 females/134 males), with 89 assigned to FAST, 81 to SAM, and 80 to FAST+SAM. Steps/day significantly increased in both the SAM (mean [SE], 1542 [267; 95% CI, 1014-2069] P<0.001) and FAST+SAM group (1307 [280; 95% CI, 752-1861] P<0.001) but not in the FAST group (406 [238; 95% CI, -63 to 876] P=0.09). There were no deaths or serious study-related adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Only individuals with chronic stroke who completed a step activity monitoring behavioral intervention with skilled coaching and goal progression demonstrated improvements in physical activity (steps/day). REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02835313.

Increasing activity after stroke: a randomized controlled trial of highintensity walking and step activity intervention.

Background: Physical inactivity in people with chronic stroke profoundly affects daily function and increases recurrent stroke risk and mortality, making physical activity improvements an important target of intervention. We compared the effects of a highintensity walking intervention (FAST), a step activity monitoring behavioral intervention (SAM), or a combined intervention (FAST+SAM) on physical activity (i.e., steps per day). We hypothesized the combined intervention would yield the greatest increase in steps per day. Methods: This assessor-blinded multi-site randomized controlled trial was conducted at four university/hospital-based laboratories. Participants were 21-85 years old, walking without physical assistance following a single, unilateral non-cerebellar stroke of ≥6 months duration, and randomly assigned to FAST, SAM, or FAST+SAM for 12 weeks (2-3 sessions/week). FAST training consisted of walking-related activities for 40 minutes/session at 70-80% heart rate reserve, while SAM received daily feedback and goal-setting of walking activity (steps per day). Assessors and study statistician were masked to group assignment.The a priori-determined primary outcome and primary endpoint was change in steps per day from pre- to post-intervention. Adverse events (AEs) were tracked after randomization. All randomized participants were included in the intent-to-treat analysis.This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02835313. Findings: Participants were enrolled from July 18, 2016-November 16, 2021. Of 250 randomized participants (mean[SE] age 63[0.80], 116F/134M), 89 were assigned to FAST, 81 to SAM, and 80 to FAST+SAM. Steps per day significantly increased in both the SAM (mean[SE] 1542[267], 95%CI:1014-2069, p<0.001) and FAST+SAM groups (1307[280], 752-1861, p<0.001), but not in the FAST group (406[238], 63-876, p=0.09). There were no deaths or serious study-related AEs and all other minor AEs were similar between groups. Interpretation: Only individuals with chronic stroke who completed a step activity monitoring behavioral intervention with skilled coaching and goal progression demonstrated improvements in physical activity (steps per day).

Optimal Intensity and Duration of Walking Rehabilitation in Patients With Chronic Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: For walking rehabilitation after stroke, training intensity and duration are critical dosing parameters that lack optimization. Objective: To assess the optimal training intensity (vigorous vs moderate) and minimum training duration (4, 8, or 12 weeks) needed to maximize immediate improvement in walking capacity in patients with chronic stroke. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter randomized clinical trial using an intent-to-treat analysis was conducted from January 2019 to April 2022 at rehabilitation and exercise research laboratories. Survivors of a single stroke who were aged 40 to 80 years and had persistent walking limitations 6 months or more after the stroke were enrolled. Interventions: Participants were randomized 1:1 to high-intensity interval training (HIIT) or moderate-intensity aerobic training (MAT), each involving 45 minutes of walking practice 3 times per week for 12 weeks. The HIIT protocol used repeated 30-second bursts of walking at maximum safe speed, alternated with 30- to 60-second rest periods, targeting a mean aerobic intensity above 60% of the heart rate reserve (HRR). The MAT protocol used continuous walking with speed adjusted to maintain an initial target of 40% of the HRR, progressing up to 60% of the HRR as tolerated. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was 6-minute walk test distance. Outcomes were assessed by blinded raters after 4, 8, and 12 weeks of training. Results: Of 55 participants (mean [SD] age, 63 [10] years; 36 male [65.5%]), 27 were randomized to HIIT and 28 to MAT. The mean (SD) time since stroke was 2.5 (1.3) years, and mean (SD) 6-minute walk test distance at baseline was 239 (132) m. Participants attended 1675 of 1980 planned treatment visits (84.6%) and 197 of 220 planned testing visits (89.5%). No serious adverse events related to study procedures occurred. Groups had similar 6-minute walk test distance changes after 4 weeks (HIIT, 27 m [95% CI, 6-48 m]; MAT, 12 m [95% CI, -9 to 33 m]; mean difference, 15 m [95% CI, -13 to 42 m]; P = .28), but HIIT elicited greater gains after 8 weeks (58 m [95% CI, 39-76 m] vs 29 m [95% CI, 9-48 m]; mean difference, 29 m [95% CI, 5-54 m]; P = .02) and 12 weeks (71 m [95% CI, 49-94 m] vs 27 m [95% CI, 3-50 m]; mean difference, 44 m [95% CI, 14-74 m]; P = .005) of training; HIIT also showed greater improvements than MAT on some secondary measures of gait speed and fatigue. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings show proof of concept that vigorous training intensity is a critical dosing parameter for walking rehabilitation. In patients with chronic stroke, vigorous walking exercise produced significant and meaningful gains in walking capacity with only 4 weeks of training, but at least 12 weeks were needed to maximize immediate gains. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03760016.

Predictors of non-stepping time in people with chronic stroke.

BACKGROUND: Sedentary time is an independent construct from active time. Previous studies have examined variables associated with sedentary time to inform behavior change programs; however, these studies have lacked data sets that encompass potentially important domains. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to build a more comprehensive model containing previously theorized important predictors of sedentary time and new predictors that have not been explored. We hypothesized that variables representing the domains of physical capacity, psychosocial, physical health, cognition, and environmental would be significantly related to sedentary time in individuals post-stroke. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional analysis of 280 individuals with chronic stroke. An activity monitor was used to measure sedentary (i.e. non-stepping) time. Five domains (8 predictors) were entered into a sequential linear regression model: physical capacity (6-Minute Walk Test, assistive device use), psychosocial (Activities Specific Balance Confidence Scale and Patient Health Questionnaire-9), physical health (Charlson Comorbidity Index and body mass index), cognition (Montreal Cognitive Assessment), and environmental (Area Deprivation Index). RESULTS: The 6-Minute Walk Test (ß = -0.39, p < .001), assistive device use (ß = 0.15, p = .03), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (ß = 0.16, p = .01), and body mass index (ß = 0.11, p = .04) were significantly related to non-stepping time in individuals with chronic stroke. The model explained 28.5% of the variability in non-stepping time. CONCLUSIONS: This work provides new perspective on which variables may need to be addressed in programs targeting sedentary time in stroke. Such programs should consider physical capacity, depressive symptoms, and physical health.

Designing a screening battery for exercisers with Parkinson's disease.

PURPOSE: Develop a screening battery for persons with Parkinson's Disease (PD) that is easily administered in a short amount of time by community exercise professionals and measures changes in function. METHODS: An integrated, stakeholder-engaged, mixed methods approach included interviews and meetings with community exercise professionals on the development of a screening battery. Persons with PD (n = 57, age = 72.1 ± 8.1 years) who were already enrolled in fitness classes or individualized training at three locations participated in the screening battery twice over 8-16 weeks and provided feedback. Trends from interviews and meeting notes were identified using summative content analysis. Quantitative changes in performance were compared with paired t-tests. Cohen's d effect sizes were calculated for all significant differences. RESULTS: Current barriers for functional screenings included time and space. Using this feedback, we developed a screening battery that took under 20 min, required little equipment, had been previously validated, could be performed in individual and group settings, and provided objective feedback that was motivating for persons with PD to continue exercising. Persons with PD demonstrated improved functional performance on sit-to-stand (d = -0.71), two-minute walk test (d = -3.83), and arm curls (d = -0.78). CONCLUSION: Test results can be a motivator for persons with PD and lead to increased exercise adherence. Easily administered tests can show improvements in this population. Community exercise professionals are able to safely screen persons with PD to detect functional deficits and assist with programming.Implications for RehabilitationRegular exercise can slow declines in physical function and quality of life in people with Parkinson's disease.Use of physical assessments in community exercise programs can improve motivation to exercise for this population.Physical assessments such as sit-to-stand and arm curls can be used to demonstrate improvements in people with Parkinson's disease.