A topical azithromycin preparation for the treatment of acne vulgaris and rosacea.

BACKGROUND: Erythromycin is a common therapy for acne and rosacea. A newer macrolide, azithromycin, offers superior tissue distribution and cellular concentration and is an effective oral anti-acne agent. Topical formulations such as erythromycin have been a major clinical therapy for acne. To date, no topical solution of azithromycin is available for the treatment of acne. OBJECTIVE: To prepare a stable topical 2% azithromycin formulation that could be used in an acne clinical trial to determine the efficacy of topical azithromycin in treating subjects with acne vulgaris and acne rosacea. METHODS: The study was divided into two phases. In phase I, azithromycin was prepared over a range of ethanol/water concentrations to determine solubility. The stability of a 2% azithromycin in 60% ethanol/water preparation was assessed by high-pressure liquid chromatography. The temperature, light, and pH dependence of the stability was also assessed. In phase II, a single center, randomized, double-blind, treatment-controlled study compared once-nightly application of topical 2% azithromycin versus 2% erythromycin. A total of 20 subjects with moderate inflammatory acne and 20 with rosacea were examined clinically at 0, 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks for a 12-week period. Efficacy was evaluated with the Physician's Visual Analog Scale evaluation (PVAS), the papulopustule count, and acne severity rating (in subjects with acne). RESULTS: In phase I, azithromycin was soluble in 60% ethanol/water. A 2% azithromycin in 60% ethanol/water solution maintained stability at room temperature for up to 26 weeks but at 37 degrees C there was some decay (16%) at 26 weeks. The stability was greatest at pH 6.8 and was unaffected by ambient light exposure. In phase II, the number of inflammatory lesions decreased in both acne and rosacea subjects treated with 2% erythromycin (7.56, p=0.03 and 4.4, p=0.01, respectively). Azithromycin was not as effective for the treatment of rosacea. Both azithromycin (p=0.01) and erythromycin (p=0.03) treatment significantly reduced the inflammatory lesion count in acne vulgaris. No significant adverse events were identified in the acne group. In patients with rosacea, transient irritation occurred in five patients. CONCLUSIONS: A 2% azithromycin in 60% ethanol/water solution can be prepared and is stable for at least 6 months at room temperature. The methodology and power of the study were adequate to identify improvement in acne vulgaris and rosacea. Though it appears the formulation of topical azithromycin was at least comparable with topical erythromycin, larger studies would be needed to determine whether topical azithromycin has any significant advantage over topical erythromycin.

An open-label pilot study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of topically applied tacrolimus ointment for the treatment of hand and/or foot eczema.

BACKGROUND: Hand and foot eczema is a chronic skin disorder. Although topical corticosteroids are often used to control the predominant symptoms of the disease, the chronicity of the condition increases the risk of long-term adverse effects. A safer alternative is needed. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of tacrolimus ointment 0.1% in hand and/or foot eczema. METHODS: Twenty-five adults applied tacrolimus ointment 0.1% to affected areas three times daily for 8 weeks and were followed for 2 additional weeks. RESULTS: Except for vesiculation, compared with baseline there were significant improvements in erythema, scaling, induration, fissuring, composite severity, and pruritus (p<0.007). Two weeks after discontinuing treatment, significant improvement in scaling and composite severity (p<0.03) persisted, whereas erythema, induration, vesiculation, fissuring, and pruritus had returned to pre-treatment levels. CONCLUSION: Tacrolimus ointment 0.1% is a promising corticosteroid alternative for hand/foot eczema.

Response element sequence modulates estrogen receptor alpha and beta affinity and activity.

The relationship between estrogen receptor (ER)-estrogen response element (ERE) binding affinity and estradiol (E(2))-induced transcription has not been systematically or quantitatively tested. We examined the influence of ERE palindrome length and the 3' ERE flanking sequence on ERalpha and ERbeta affinity binding in vitro and on the induction of reporter gene activity in transfected cells. The addition of one nucleotide in each arm of the 13 bp ERE palindrome, forming a 15 bp ERE palindrome, increased ERalpha and ERbeta affinity and transcription. In contrast, the addition of an AT-rich flanking sequence from genes highly stimulated by E(2) had little effect on affinity or reporter gene activity. Notable differences between ERalpha and ERbeta include: both K(d) and transcriptional induction were generally higher for ERalpha than ERbeta, better correlation between ERE palindrome length and transcriptional induction for ERalpha than ERbeta, and a better correlation between (ER-ERE)K(d) and transcriptional induction for ERalpha than for ERbeta.

Contact allergy to corticosteroids in patients using inhaled or intranasal corticosteroids for allergic rhinitis or asthma.

BACKGROUND: Patients using topically applied corticosteroids are at risk of developing allergic contact hypersensitivity. OBJECTIVE: To assess prevalence of allergic contact hypersensitivity reactions to inhaled or intranasal corticosteroids. METHODS: A prospective study of 30 adult patients using inhaled or intranasal corticosteroids for conditions such as allergic rhinitis was performed. We used epicutaneous patch testing to determine the prevalence of allergic contact hypersensitivity to corticosteroids and common additives (propylene glycol and benzalkonium chloride) in inhaled and nasal corticosteroid preparations in this population. RESULTS: Of 30 patients, 4 (13%) had positive patch test results. 3 (10%) were allergic reactions and 1 (3%) was an irritant reaction. Half of the reactions were to a corticosteroid (budesonide) and half were to a common preservative in nasal preparations (benzalkonium chloride). CONCLUSION: This study supports other clinical evidence that contact dermatitis/mucositis from inhaled or intranasal corticosteroid products can occur. The corticosteroids or added agents such as preservatives can be causative and may result in allergic or irritant reactions, which can be relevant to clinical symptoms.