Evaluation of Racial, Ethnic, and Socioeconomic Disparities in Indication for Carpal Tunnel Release.

BACKGROUND: Disparities in the utilization of orthopaedic surgery based on race and ethnicity continue to be reported. We examined the impact of sociodemographic factors on treatment recommendation by hand surgeons for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) of similar disease severity. METHODS: Patients with electrodiagnostic study (EDS)-confirmed CTS were evaluated at a single institution between 2016 and 2020. Data including patient age, sex, race/ethnicity, ZIP Code, and EDS severity were collected. The primary outcome was the recommended treatment by the hand surgeon at the first clinic visit according to patient race/ethnicity and the Social Deprivation Index (SDI). Secondary outcomes included the treatment selected by patients (nonsurgical or surgical) and the time to surgery. RESULTS: The 949 patients had a mean age of 58 years (range, 18 to 80 years); 60.5% (n = 574) were women. The race/ethnicity of the patient cohort was 9.8% (n = 93) Black non-Hispanic, 11.2% (n = 106) Hispanic/Latino, 70.3% (n = 667) White non-Hispanic, and 8.7% (n = 83) "other." Overall, Black non-Hispanic patients (38.7%; odds ratio, [OR] 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.40 to 0.96) and Hispanic/Latino patients (35.8%; OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.84) were less likely to have surgery recommended at their first visit compared with White non-Hispanic patients (50.5%). This was no longer apparent after adjusting for demographic and clinical variables including EDS severity and SDI (Black non-Hispanic patients: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.67; 95% CI, 0.4 to 1.11; Hispanic/Latino patients: aOR, 0.69: 95% CI, 0.41 to 1.14). Across all categories of EDS severity, surgeons were less likely to recommend surgery to patients with a higher SDI (aOR: 0.66, 0.64, and 0.54 for quintiles 2, 3 and 4, respectively). When surgery was recommended, patients in the highest SDI quintile were less likely to proceed with surgery (p = 0.032). There was no association between patient race/ethnicity and the treatment selected by the patient or time to surgery (p = 0.303 and p = 0.725, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Patients experiencing higher levels of social deprivation were less likely to be recommended for CTS surgery and were less likely to proceed with surgery, regardless of patient race/ethnicity. Additional investigation into the social factors influencing both surgeon and patient selection of treatment for CTS, including the impact of patient socioeconomic background, is warranted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Alleged recurrent traumatic shoulder dislocation in a young male patient - Diagnostic and management considerations.

A young male presented to a nearby hospital with a left shoulder dislocation after an alleged kickboxing injury. The patient reported worrying clinical findings including excruciating pain and absent sensation distally. Reduction was successful but his shoulder re-dislocated shortly after. His reported symptoms worsened and he was transferred to our institution. Imaging findings were not immediately concerning and he went to theatre the next day for an examination under anaesthetic. His shoulder was re-located easily and an immobiliser applied. Less than an hour later, the patient managed to re-dislocate his shoulder in recovery. He was subjected to another general anaesthetic and successful reduction. He absconded the following day after being declined multiple and increasing doses of opioid analgesia. He re-presented three weeks later with similar clinical findings but a different mechanism of injury. Further exploration of his collateral history revealed that he had been using a false identity. He had presented to all hospitals in our city within the previous 6 months. Once confronted, he did not return to these hospitals. He was also capable of self-relocating his shoulder. This case bore a striking resemblance to a case described by Warren in 2000 of a young lady with an apparently dislocated shoulder presenting to multiple city hospitals looking for analgesia and general anaesthetics. We wished to highlight the diagnostic and ethical challenges associated with these patients. They are vulnerable and so a high index of clinical suspicion is needed on the part of the surgeon to avoid unnecessary interventions. Effective communication between orthopaedic departments is a key recommendation from this case to mitigate risk of harm to these patients.

Current concepts and outcomes in cemented femoral stem design and cementation techniques: the argument for a new classification system.

Cemented implant fixation design principles have evolved since the 1950s, and various femoral stem designs are currently in use to provide a stable construct between the implant-cement and cement-bone interfaces.Cemented stems have classically been classified into two broad categories: taper slip or force closed, and composite beams or shaped closed designs. While these simplifications are acceptable general categories, there are other important surgical details that need to be taken into consideration such as different broaching techniques, cementing techniques and mantle thickness.With the evolution of cemented implants, the introduction of newer implants which have hybrid properties, and the use of different broaching techniques, the classification of a very heterogenous group of implants into simple binary categories becomes increasingly difficult. A more comprehensive classification system would aid in comparison of results and better understanding of the implants' biomechanics.We review these differing stem designs, their respective cementing techniques and geometries. We then propose a simple four-part classification system and summarize the long-term outcomes and international registry data for each respective type of cemented prosthesis. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:241-252. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.190034.