Efficacy and safety of elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide in Asian participants with human immunodeficiency virus 1 infection: A sub-analysis of phase 3 clinical trials.

Background: The efficacy and safety of a single tablet regimen (STR) of elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (E/C/F/TAF) was analyzed in Phase 3 clinical trials in antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naive and ART-experienced Asian participants infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 through 96 or 144 weeks.Objective: In Asian population requiring treatment, it is imperative to have data specific to this group, particularly as there is a general concern that Asians with lower body weight have increased risk of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)-related renal dysfunction.Methods: Studies -104 and 111 were randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 144-week studies conducted in ART-naive participants, comparing E/C/F/TAF versus E/C/F/TDF. Study 109 was a randomized, open-label, 96-week study conducted in virologically suppressed, ART-experienced participants, who switched to E/C/F/TAF from ritonavir/cobicistat-boosted atazanavir ATV+(RTV or COBI) + F/TDF regimens, from non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI) + F/TDF regimens, or from E/C/F/TDF. Study 112 was a single arm, open-label, 144-week study conducted in HIV suppressed, ART-experienced participants with mild-moderate renal impairment, who switched to E/C/F/TAF.Results: Asian participants in these studies had sustained efficacy safety and tolerability. In Study 104/111, Asian participants achieved 93% virologic suppression on TAF vs 88% on TDF at week 144. At baseline, there were numerically more Asians with median CD4 counts < 200 cells/uL and VL > 100,000 c/mL. In Study 109, 95% of Asians on TAF vs 86% on TDF maintained virologic suppression at week 96. Lastly, in Study 112, 91% maintained virologic suppression at week 144. There were no discontinuations due to renal AE, no cases of PRT or Fanconi syndrome in any of the studies.

Switching to the single-tablet regimen of elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir DF from non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor plus coformulated emtricitabine and tenofovir DF regimens: Week 96 results of STRATEGY-NNRTI.

BACKGROUND: HIV-1-infected, virologically suppressed adults wanting to simplify or change their non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based regimens may benefit from switching to the single-tablet regimen of elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (E/C/F/TDF). OBJECTIVE: We examined differences in the proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL (Snapshot analysis), change in CD4 cell count, safety, and patient-reported outcomes in participants switching to E/C/F/TDF from an NNRTI + FTC/TDF (TVD) regimen. METHODS: STRATEGY-NNRTI was a 96-week, phase 3b, randomized, open-label, study examining the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of switching to E/C/F/TDF in virologically suppressed individuals (HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL) on an NNRTI + TVD regimen. Participants were randomized to switch or remain on their NNRTI-based regimen (no-switch). RESULTS: At Week 96, 87% (251/290) of switch and 80% (115/143) of no-switch participants maintained HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL (difference 6.1%; 95% CI -1.3 to 14.2%; p = 0.12) according to the FDA-defined snapshot algorithm. Both groups had similar proportions of subjects with virologic failure (2.8% switch, 1.4% no-switch). Discontinuations resulting from adverse events were infrequent (3% [9/291] switch, 2% [3/143] no-switch). Three switch participants (1%) discontinued due to renal adverse events (2 of the 3 before Week 48). Switch participants reported significant improvements in neuropsychiatric symptoms by as early as Week 4, and which were maintained through Week 96. CONCLUSIONS: E/C/F/TDF is safe and effective and reduces NNRTI-associated neuropsychiatric symptoms for virologically suppressed HIV-positive adults switching from an NNRTI plus FTC/TDF-based regimen.

Simplification to single-tablet regimen of elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, tenofovir DF from multi-tablet ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor plus coformulated emtricitabine and tenofovir DF regimens: week 96 results of STRATEGY-PI.

BACKGROUND: Antiretroviral therapy (ART) simplification to a single-tablet regimen can benefit HIV-1-infected, virologically suppressed, individuals on ART composed of multiple pills. OBJECTIVE: We assessed long-term efficacy and safety of switching to co-formulated elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (E/C/F/TDF) from multi-tablet ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (PI + RTV) plus F/TDF (TVD) regimens. METHODS: STRATEGY-PI was a 96-week, phase 3b, randomized (2:1), open-label, non-inferiority study examining the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of switching to E/C/F/TDF from PI + RTV + TVD regimens in virologically suppressed individuals (HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL). Participants were randomized to switch to E/C/F/TDF (switch group) or to continue their PI + RTV + TVD regimens (no-switch group). Eligibility criteria included no resistance to F/TDF or history of virologic failure, and estimated creatinine clearance ≥70 mL/min. RESULTS: At week 96, 87% (252/290) of switch and 70% (97/139) of no-switch participants maintained HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL (difference: 17%, 95% CI 8.7-26.0%, p < 0.001). Superiority of the switch to E/C/F/TDF vs. no-switch was due to a smaller proportion of both virologic failures (switch, 1% [3/290]; no-switch, 6% [8/139]) and discontinuations for non-virologic reasons (switch, 11% [31/290]; no-switch, 24% [33/139]). No treatment-emergent resistance was observed in switch subjects with virologic failure. Discontinuation rates from adverse events were 3% in both groups (9/293, switch; 4/140, no-switch). Switching from PI + RTV + TVD to E/C/F/TDF was associated with significant improvements in patient-reported outcomes related to gastrointestinal symptoms (nausea and bloating). CONCLUSION: E/C/F/TDF is a safe, effective long-term alternative to multi-tablet PI + RTV + TVD-based regimens in virologically suppressed, HIV-1-infected adults, and improves patient-reported gastrointestinal symptoms.

Week 144 resistance analysis of elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir DF versus efavirenz/emtricitabine/tenofovir DF in antiretroviral-naive patients.

BACKGROUND: Here, the baseline and emergent resistance to elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF) versus efavirenz (EFV)/FTC/TDF in HIV-1-infected antiretroviral-naive adults through 144 weeks from the randomized, ongoing, Phase III study GS-US-236-0102 is described. METHODS: HIV-1 protease (PR) and reverse transcriptase (RT) were sequenced at screening; patients with HIV-1 resistant to EFV, FTC or TDF were excluded. Genotypic/phenotypic analyses were performed at virological failure confirmation and baseline for PR, RT and integrase (IN) for patients with virological failure and for patients with HIV-1 RNA≥400 copies/ml at weeks 48, 96, 144 or early study drug discontinuation. Retrospective, baseline, IN genotyping was conducted for EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF patients. RESULTS: In the EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF group through week 144, HIV-1 from 10 patients (2.9%; 10/348 treated patients) developed primary IN strand transfer inhibitor (n=9) and/or nucleoside RT inhibitor resistance substitutions (n=10). The emergence of resistance decreased over time with 8, 2 and 0 patients developing HIV-1 resistance through week 48, post-week 48-96 and post-week 96-144, respectively. Emergent substitutions were E92Q (n=7), N155H (n=3), Q148R (n=1) and T66I (n=1) in IN, and M184V/I (n=10) and K65R (n=4) in RT. All 10 isolates had reduced susceptibility to EVG, FTC or TDF. Virus with EVG phenotypic resistance had cross-resistance to raltegravir. In the EFV/FTC/TDF group, virus from 14 patients (4.0%; 14/352 treated patients; 4 during weeks 96-144) developed a resistance substitution to EFV (n=14; K103N: n=13), FTC (M184V/I: n=4) or TDF (K65R: n=3). CONCLUSIONS: Resistance development to EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF was infrequent through 144 weeks of therapy and decreased over time, consistent with durable efficacy.

Long-term efficacy and safety of E/C/F/TDF vs EFV/FTC/TDF and ATV+RTV+FTC/TDF in HIV-1-infected treatment-naïve subjects ≥50 years.

INTRODUCTION: In high-income countries, ≥30% of HIV-infected patients are ≥50 years (yrs) old (UNAIDS 2013). In two phases, three clinical trials (Studies 102 and 103) elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir DF (E/C/F/TDF; STB) had non-inferior efficacy and favourable safety vs efavirenz/emtricitabine/tenofovir DF (EFV/FTC/TDF; ATR) or ritonavir-boosted atazanavir (ATV+RTV)+FTC/TDF (TVD) in HIV-infected, treatment-naïve subjects at Week 144. The efficacy and safety of STB in subjects < or ≥50 yrs is described. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Post hoc analysis of efficacy, tolerability and safety in subjects < or ≥50 yrs at Week 144. RESULTS: Subjects ≥50 yrs in Study 102: STB: 14% (49/348), ATR: 16% (56/352); in Study 103: STB: 14% (48/353), ATV+RTV+TVD: 14% (48/355). Efficacy, safety and tolerability by age and study endpoint are shown in Table 1. Regardless of age, STB had robust efficacy at Week 144 with similar virologic outcomes vs ATR or ATV+RTV+TVD. Discontinuations (DC) due to AE on STB were similar to the comparators, most occurred by Week 48. Median changes in eGFR on STB were similar by age; DC with renal PRT was rare [STB: 4 (0.6%); ATV: 3 (0.8%); ATR: 0], 2 and 1 in ≥50 yrs old strata, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: STB compared to ATR or ATV+RTV+TVD, is an efficacious, well-tolerated and safe regimen for HIV-1-infected, treatment-naïve subjects

Week 144 resistance analysis of elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir DF versus atazanavir+ritonavir+emtricitabine/tenofovir DF in antiretroviral-naïve patients.

OBJECTIVE: To describe baseline and emergent HIV-1 resistance to elvitegravir/ cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir DF (EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF) and ritonavir-boosted atazanavir/emtricitabine/tenofovir DF (ATV+RTV+FTC/TDF) in HIV-1-infected, treatment-naïve subjects through 144 weeks. METHOD: This was a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study. HIV-1 protease (PR) and reverse transcriptase (RT) were sequenced at screening. Genotypic and phenotypic analyses were performed at virologic failure confirmation and retrospectively at baseline for PR, RT, and integrase (IN) for patients with virologic failure through week 144. RESULTS: In the EVG/ COBI/FTC/TDF group through week 144, HIV-1 from 8 patients (2.3%; 8/353 treated patients) developed primary IN strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) (n = 6) and/or nucleoside RT inhibitor (NRTI) resistance substitutions (n = 7). The emergence of resistance decreased after the first year, with 5 patients developing HIV-1 resistance through week 48, 1 from weeks 48-96, and 2 from weeks 96-144. Emergent substitutions were E92Q, N155H, or Q148R (n = 2 each) and T66I or T97A (n = 1 each) in IN and M184V/I (n = 7) and K65R (n = 1) in RT. All 8 isolates had reduced susceptibility to EVG, FTC, or TDF. Virus with EVG phenotypic resistance showed cross-resistance to raltegravir. In the ATV+RTV+FTC/TDF group, HIV-1 from 2 patients (0.6%; 2/355 treated patients; both at week 144) developed the resistance substitution M184V/I in RT. CONCLUSIONS: Resistance development to EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF was infrequent (2.3%) through 144 weeks of therapy and decreased over time, consistent with durable efficacy.

The combined anti-HIV-1 activities of emtricitabine and tenofovir plus the integrase inhibitor elvitegravir or raltegravir show high levels of synergy in vitro.

Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) involves combination treatment with three or more antiretroviral agents. The antiviral effects of combinations of emtricitabine (FTC) plus tenofovir (TFV) plus antiretroviral agents of all the major drug classes were investigated. Combinations of FTC and TFV with a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) (efavirenz or rilpivirine) or with a protease inhibitor (PI) (atazanavir, lopinavir, or darunavir) showed additive to synergistic anti-HIV-1 activity. FTC-TFV with an HIV-1 integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) (elvitegravir or raltegravir) showed the strongest synergy. Anti-HIV-1 synergy suggests enhancement of individual anti-HIV-1 activities within cells that may contribute to potent treatment efficacy and open new areas of research into interactions between reverse transcriptase (RT) and integrase inhibitors.

Resistance mutations outside the integrase coding region have an effect on human immunodeficiency virus replicative fitness but do not affect its susceptibility to integrase strand transfer inhibitors.

Most studies describing phenotypic resistance to integrase strand transfer inhibitors have analyzed viruses carrying only patient-derived HIV-1 integrase genes (INT-recombinant viruses). However, to date, many of the patients on INSTI-based treatment regimes, such as raltegravir (RAL), elvitegravir (EVG), and dolutegravir (DTG) are infected with multidrug-resistant HIV-1 strains. Here we analyzed the effect of drug resistance mutations in Gag (p2/NCp7/p1/p6), protease (PR), reverse transcriptase (RT), and integrase (IN) coding regions on susceptibility to INSTIs and viral replicative fitness using a novel HIV-1 phenotyping assay. Initial characterization based on site-directed mutant INSTI-resistant viruses confirmed the effect of a series of INSTI mutations on reduced susceptibility to EVG and RAL and viral replicative fitness (0.6% to 99% relative to the HIV-1NL4-3 control). Two sets of recombinant viruses containing a 3,428-bp gag-p2/NCp7/p1/p6/pol-PR/RT/IN (p2-INT) or a 1,088 bp integrase (INT) patient-derived fragment were constructed from plasma samples obtained from 27 virologic failure patients participating in a 48-week dose-ranging study of elvitegravir, GS-US-183-0105. A strong correlation was observed when susceptibility to EVG and RAL was assayed using p2-INT- vs. INT-recombinant viruses (Pearson coefficient correlation 0.869 and 0.918, P<0.0001 for EVG and RAL, respectively), demonstrating that mutations in the protease and RT have limited effect on susceptibility to these INSTIs. On the other hand, the replicative fitness of viruses harboring drug resistance mutations in PR, RT, and IN was generally impaired compared to viruses carrying only INSTI-resistance mutations. Thus, in the absence of drug pressure, drug resistance mutations in the PR and RT contribute to decrease the replicative fitness of the virus already impaired by mutations in the integrase. The use of recombinant viruses containing most or all HIV-1 regions targeted by antiretroviral drugs might be essential to understand the collective effect of epistatic interactions in multidrug-resistant viruses.

Impact of primary elvitegravir resistance-associated mutations in HIV-1 integrase on drug susceptibility and viral replication fitness.

Elvitegravir (EVG) is an effective HIV-1 integrase (IN) strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) in advanced clinical development. Primary INSTI resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) at six IN positions have been identified in HIV-1-infected patients failing EVG-containing regimens in clinical studies: T66I/A/K, E92Q/G, T97A, S147G, Q148R/H/K, and N155H. In this study, the effect of these primary IN mutations, alone and in combination, on susceptibility to the INSTIs EVG, raltegravir (RAL), and dolutegravir (DTG); IN enzyme activities; and viral replication fitness was characterized. Recombinant viruses containing the six most common mutations exhibited a range of reduced EVG susceptibility: 92-fold for Q148R, 30-fold for N155H, 26-fold for E92Q, 10-fold for T66I, 4-fold for S147G, and 2-fold for T97A. Less commonly observed primary IN mutations also showed a range of reduced EVG susceptibilities: 40- to 94-fold for T66K and Q148K and 5- to 10-fold for T66A, E92G, and Q148H. Some primary IN mutations exhibited broad cross-resistance between EVG and RAL (T66K, E92Q, Q148R/H/K, and N155H), while others retained susceptibility to RAL (T66I/A, E92G, T97A, and S147G). Dual combinations of primary IN mutations further reduced INSTI susceptibility, replication capacity, and viral fitness relative to either mutation alone. Susceptibility to DTG was retained by single primary IN mutations but reduced by dual mutation combinations with Q148R. Primary EVG RAMs also diminished IN enzymatic activities, concordant with their structural proximity to the active site. Greater reductions in viral fitness of dual mutation combinations may explain why some primary INSTI RAMs do not readily coexist on the same HIV-1 genome but rather establish independent pathways of resistance to EVG.

Trends in HIV-1 reverse transcriptase resistance-associated mutations and antiretroviral prescription data from 2003-2010.

BACKGROUND: The selection of antiretroviral (ARV) drugs for treatment of HIV-1 infection is based on several factors including potency, toxicity, resistance and ease of administration. Emtricitabine (FTC) or lamivudine (3TC), components of recommended initial ARV regimens, are structurally related and share the same resistance mutation (M184V/I). However they differ with respect to potency and incidence of M184V/I. METHODS: Resistance-associated mutation (RAM) prevalence data were obtained from genotype test results performed in a large reference laboratory from 2003-2010; subsets of data were defined by mutation pattern to resemble those following failure of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based combination therapy. Mutational trend data were compared to contemporaneous ARV prescription information. RESULTS: In the unfiltered data set (n=107,231), the prevalence in 2010 decreased compared to 2003 for all nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) RAMs, such as M184V/I (44.0% to 17.9%), T215Y (22.7% to 4.1%), and K65R (4.3% to 2.1%). Among samples resembling those typical of first-line NNRTI-based failures, prevalence of K103N increased slightly, but prevalence of M184V/I decreased (49.8% to 36.8%), as did other NRTI RAMs. These decreases were coincident with a shift in ARV prescriptions away from zidovudine and 3TC towards tenofovir and FTC, and an increase in use of fixed-dose combinations. CONCLUSIONS: RAM prevalence decreased substantially since 2003 among samples submitted for resistance testing in the US. The causes of this decrease are multifactorial, but our results suggest a possible role of increased use of potent ARVs that are available as fixed-dose combinations or as single-tablet regimens.

In vitro resistance selections using elvitegravir, raltegravir, and two metabolites of elvitegravir M1 and M4.

Elvitegravir is a strand transfer inhibitor of HIV-1 integrase that is currently undergoing phase 3 clinical testing. The two predominant metabolites of elvitegravir, M1 and M4 (elvitegravir hydroxide and elvitegravir glucuronide), have been shown to inhibit HIV-1 integrase in vitro. While they are markedly less potent than elvitegravir and present only at low levels in plasma clinically, we investigated their potential to select for elvitegravir resistance in vitro. Resistance selection experiments using metabolites M1 and M4 led to the development of the previously reported elvitegravir integrase resistance mutations H51Y, T66A, E92G, and S147G, as well as a novel S153F substitution. Additional resistance selection experiments using elvitegravir led to the development of previously reported integrase inhibitor resistance mutations (T66I, F121Y, and S153Y) as well as a novel R263K integrase mutation. Phenotypic analyses of site-directed mutants with these mutations demonstrated broad cross-resistance between elvitegravir and its M1 and M4 metabolites with more limited cross-resistance to the integrase inhibitor raltegravir. Overall, our in vitro studies demonstrate that the resistance profile of the M1 and M4 metabolites of elvitegravir overlaps with that of the parent molecule elvitegravir; as such, their presence at low levels is not considered clinically relevant.

Reduced emergence of the M184V/I resistance mutation when antiretroviral-naïve subjects use emtricitabine versus lamivudine in regimens composed of two NRTIs plus the NNRTI efavirenz.

PURPOSE: To compare the development of the M184V/I substitution among antiretroviral treatment-naïve patients taking the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) emtricitabine (FTC) or lamivudine (3TC) from three phase 3 clinical trials of dual NRTIs (including either FTC or 3TC) plus the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor efavirenz (EFV). METHODS: Study subjects from three phase 3 clinical trials (FTC 301A, GS-99-903, and GS-01-934) were classified as virologic failures (VF) if they had confirmed ≥400 copies/mL of HIV-1 RNA at week 48 or early study drug discontinuation. Subjects with VF were genotyped by population sequencing. The prevalence of the M184V/I substitution in the FTC or 3TC groups was analyzed using Fisher exact test and in multivariate logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Among the 3 trials, 522 subjects were treated with FTC dosed once daily and 841 subjects were treated with 3TC dosed twice daily. Among VF subjects at week 48, 5/26 (19.2%) FTC-treated subjects and 27/77 (35.5%) 3TC-treated subjects developed the M184V/I mutation (P = .145). Using the denominator of all subjects treated, 5/522 (1.0%) FTC-treated subjects versus 27/841 (3.2%) 3TC-treated subjects developed the M184V/I substitution (P = .009). Multivariate analyses adjusting for baseline viral load, baseline CD4 cell counts, and baseline NRTI resistance showed that treatment with FTC had a significantly lower rate of M184V/I development than treatment with 3TC (odds ratio 0.32; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this pooled analysis of 3 clinical trials indicate a lower frequency of development of the M184V/I mutation in subjects treated with FTC versus 3TC when combined in regimens containing dual NRTIs and EFV.

Low level of the K103N HIV-1 above a threshold is associated with virological failure in treatment-naive individuals undergoing efavirenz-containing therapy.

BACKGROUND: Study GS-01-934 was a randomized open-label phase III study comparing efavirenz and tenofovir/emtricitabine to efavirenz and zidovudine/lamivudine in treatment-naive HIV-1-infected individuals. Through 144 weeks, 50 of 487 participants without baseline nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance by population sequencing (efavirenz/tenofovir/emtricitabine, n = 19; efavirenz/zidovudine/lamivudine, n = 31) experienced virologic failure (>400 copies/ml). Here, we analyzed whether the presence of low levels of K103N at baseline correlated with virologic failure. METHODS: Available baseline plasma samples (n = 485) were amplified and tested for K103N using an allele-specific PCR (AS-PCR) assay with a lower detection cut-off of 0.5%. RESULTS: Sixteen of 476 (3.4%) evaluable participants had low-level K103N at baseline by AS-PCR (0.8-15%). The abundance of the K103N subpopulation at baseline distinguished individuals with virologic failure from those who responded durably to efavirenz-containing therapy. Among six participants with at least 2000 K103N copies/ml before treatment, five experienced virologic failure, compared with only one virologic failure among 10 who had less than 2000 K103N copies/ml (P = 0.008). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that K103N viral load at least 2000 copies/ml increased the risk of virologic failure with an odds ratio of 47.4 (95% confidence interval 5.2-429.2, P = 0.0006). CONCLUSION: The presence of K103N mutant virus in plasma above 2000 copies/ml prior to therapy in treatment-naive individuals correlated with increased risk of virologic failure of these efavirenz-containing triple-drug regimens.

Strand transfer inhibitors of HIV-1 integrase: bringing IN a new era of antiretroviral therapy.

HIV-1 integrase (IN) is one of three essential enzymes (along with reverse transcriptase and protease) encoded by the viral pol gene. IN mediates two critical reactions during viral replication; firstly 3'-end processing (3'EP) of the double-stranded viral DNA ends and then strand transfer (STF) which joins the viral DNA to the host chromosomal DNA forming a functional integrated proviral DNA. IN is a 288 amino acid protein containing three functional domains, the N-terminal domain (NTD), catalytic core domain (CCD) and the C-terminal domain (CTD). The CCD contains three conserved catalytic residues, Asp64, Asp116 and Glu152, which coordinate divalent metal ions essential for the STF reaction. Intensive research over the last two decades has led to the discovery and development of small molecule inhibitors of the IN STF reaction (INSTIs). INSTIs are catalytic inhibitors of IN, and act to chelate the divalent metal ions in the CCD. One INSTI, raltegravir (RAL, Merck Inc.) was approved in late 2007 for the treatment of HIV-1 infection in patients with prior antiretroviral (ARV) treatment experience and was recently approved also for first line therapy. A second INSTI, elvitegravir (EVG, Gilead Sciences, Inc.) is currently undergoing phase 3 studies in ARV treatment-experienced patients and phase 2 studies in ARV naïve patients as part of a novel fixed dose combination. Several additional INSTIs are in early stage clinical development. This review will discuss the discovery and development of this novel class of antiretrovirals. This article forms part of a special issue of Antiviral Research marking the 25th anniversary of antiretroviral drug discovery and development, Vol 85, issue 1, 2010.

Development of HIV-1 drug resistance through 144 weeks in antiretroviral-naïve subjects on emtricitabine, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, and efavirenz compared with lamivudine/zidovudine and efavirenz in study GS-01-934.

Study 934 was an open-label, randomized Phase III study of emtricitabine + tenofovir DF + efavirenz (FTC + TDF + EFV) compared with lamivudine + zidovudine + efavirenz (3TC + ZDV + EFV) in antiretroviral therapy-naïve HIV-1 infected subjects. Baseline genotyping revealed the presence of primary nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance (NNRTI-R) in 22 of 509 enrolled patients (4.3%, 11 subjects in each group). The 487 subjects without baseline NNRTI-R formed the primary efficacy population (modified intent-to-treat population). Through 144 weeks, 50 of 487 modified intent-to-treat subjects (FTC + TDF + EFV, n = 19; 3TC + ZDV + EFV, n = 31) were analyzed for resistance development after virologic failure. NNRTI-R, primarily the K103N mutation, was the most common form of resistance that developed in both groups. No subject on FTC + TDF + EFV developed the K65R mutation. Significantly fewer subjects on FTC + TDF + EFV compared with 3TC + ZDV + EFV developed the M184V/I mutation (two versus 10, respectively, P = 0.021). Thymidine analog mutations developed in two subjects on 3TC + ZDV + EFV. Subjects with baseline NRTI genotypic resistance (TAMs, n = 13) or non-B HIV-1 subtypes (n = 28) showed no evidence of reduced treatment responses in either group. Nine of 22 patients with baseline NNRTI-R experienced virologic failure (FTC + TDF + EFV, n = 4; 3TC + ZDV + EFV, n = 5); seven of nine developed M184V/I and/or additional NNRTI-R, but none developed K65R. Baseline NNRTI-R was significantly associated with virologic failure in both groups (P < 0.001).

Simplification of antiretroviral therapy to a single-tablet regimen consisting of efavirenz, emtricitabine, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate versus unmodified antiretroviral therapy in virologically suppressed HIV-1-infected patients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a simplification strategy for HIV-1-infected patients virologically suppressed on antiretroviral therapy (ART) by switching to a single-tablet regimen consisting of efavirenz/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (EFV/FTC/TDF). DESIGN: : Prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label, multicenter study. METHODS: Patients on stable ART with HIV-1 RNA <200 copies per milliliter for > or = 3 months were stratified by prior nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-based or protease inhibitor-based therapy and randomized (2:1) to simplify treatment to EFV/FTC/TDF or to stay on their baseline regimen (SBR). Efficacy and safety assessments were performed at baseline and at weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 48. Additional patient-reported outcomes included the following: adherence by visual analog scale, quality of life by SF-36 (v2) survey, HIV Symptom Index, and the Preference of Medication and Perceived Ease of the Regimen for Condition questionnaires. RESULTS: Three hundred patients (EFV/FTC/TDF 203, SBR 97) were evaluated (prior protease inhibitor-based ART, 53%; nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-based ART, 47%). The arms were well balanced at baseline with 88% males, 29% blacks, and a mean age of 43 years; CD4 was 540 cells per cubic millimeter, 96% had HIV-1 RNA <50 copies per milliliter, and 88% were on their first ART regimen. Through 48 weeks, 89% vs. 88% in the EFV/FTC/TDF vs. SBR arms, respectively, maintained HIV-1 RNA <200 copies per milliliter by time to loss of virologic response algorithm (intent to treat, noncompleters = failures) with the difference (95% confidence interval) between arms of 1.1% (-6.7% to 8.8%), indicating noninferiority of EFV/FTC/TDF vs. SBR. Similarly, maintenance of HIV-1 RNA <50 copies per milliliter by time to loss of virologic response algorithm was 87% vs. 85% for EFV/FTC/TDF vs. SBR, respectively [difference (95% confidence interval) 2.6% (-5.9% to 11.1%)]. Discontinuation rates were similar (EFV/FTC/TDF 11%, SBR 12%); more discontinuations for adverse events occurred in the EFV/FTC/TDF arm vs. SBR (5% vs. 1%), most commonly for nervous system symptoms. More patients withdrew consent in the SBR arm vs. EFV/FTC/TDF (7% vs. 2%). Estimated glomerular filtration rate (by Modification of Diet in Renal Disease) remained unchanged over 48 weeks in both arms (median change < 1 mL.min.1.73 m). A decrease in fasting triglycerides was observed at 48 weeks in the EFV/FTC/TDF vs. SBR arm (-20 vs. -3.0 mg/dL; P = 0.035). Adherence of > or = 96% was reported by visual analog scale in both arms at baseline and at all study visits. CONCLUSION: Simplification to EFV/FTC/TDF maintained high and comparable rates of virologic suppression vs. SBR through 48 weeks.

HIV type 1 integrase inhibitors: from basic research to clinical implications.

Similar to other retroviruses, productive infection with HIV-1 requires three key steps in the viral replication: (i) reverse transcription of viral genomic RNA into viral cDNA by the viral reverse transcriptase; (ii) integration of viral cDNA into host cell genome using the viral integrase; and (iii) cleavage of newly synthesized viral polypeptide by the viral protease into individual viral proteins during new virion assembly. Following their discovery, all three viral enzymes were considered as targets for antiretroviral drugs. However, while multiple reverse transcriptase and protease inhibitors have been used for more than 12 years to treat HIV-infected individuals, only recently has the viral integrase enzyme emerged as an alternative, clinically validated target to block HIV-1 replication. Here we review the biology of HIV-1 integration, the mechanisms of action and development of resistance to integrase inhibitors, and the latest data on the most recent clinical trials involving this promising, novel class of antiretroviral drugs.

Evaluation of efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and adherence in HIV-1-infected, antiretroviral-naïve patients treated with ritonavir-boosted atazanavir plus fixed-dose tenofovir DF/emtricitabine given once daily.

OBJECTIVES: Evaluate efficacy, safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, adherence, and treatment satisfaction of atazanavir/ritonavir (ATV/r) 300 mg/100mg and tenofovir DF/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) 300 mg/200mg once daily in antiretroviral-naïve HIV-infected patients. METHOD: Single-arm, open-label, multicenter 48-week study. RESULTS: 100 patients were evaluated; 17 patients discontinued early including 6 for adverse events. There were 2 deaths (multi-organ failure, lactic acidosis). At 48 weeks, 81% achieved HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL (ITT, M=F). No K65R or ATV/r associated mutations emerged; M184V developed in one patient. Median CD4 increase was 217 cells/mm3. The most common adverse events (> or = 10%) were diarrhea, nausea, scleral icterus, fatigue, upper respiratory tract infection, headache, and vomiting. Grade 4 hyperbilirubinemia occurred in 5%. Median increases at 48 weeks in total cholesterol, HDL, LDL, and triglycerides were 11, 3, 2, and 5 mg/dL, respectively. Two patients had confirmed graded increases in serum creatinine (one grade 1, one grade 2). Median (IQR) creatinine clearance change from baseline at 48 weeks was -7 (-19, 2) mL/min. Geometric mean (95% CI) ATV trough concentrations exceeded suggested therapeutic range. At 48 weeks, 92% of patients reported complete adherence by 1-week recall and 90% reported being "very satisfied" with the regimen. CONCLUSION: ATV/r+TDF/FTC was safe, well tolerated, and convenient for patients. Larger comparative trials are ongoing.

Prevalence, genotypic associations and phenotypic characterization of K65R, L74V and other HIV-1 RT resistance mutations in a commercial database.

BACKGROUND: Nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI)-associated mutations (NAMs) can affect response to treatment with NRTIs and might also result in HIV-1 with reduced replication capacity. METHODS: A large commercial HIV-1 database (n=60,487) was analysed for the prevalence of NAMs, antiviral drug susceptibilities and viral replication capacity. RESULTS: Thymidine analogue mutations (TAMs) and M184V were the most commonly observed NAMs (>25%). L74V/I was detected in 11% of isolates. K65R was detected in 3.3% of isolates and its frequency remained stable from 2003 to 2006, similar to trends observed for other NAMs. TAMs were rarely observed in combination with K65R, but frequently associated with L74V/I. HIV-1 with K65R or L74V/I alone were fully susceptible to zidovudine and stavudine. K65R was associated with reduced susceptibility to tenofovir, didanosine, abacavir and lamivudine; L74V/I was associated with reduced susceptibility to abacavir and didanosine. The addition of M184V to either K65R or L74V/I improved susceptibility to tenofovir, zidovudine and stavudine, but reduced susceptibility to abacavir, didanosine and lamivudine. Other NAMs commonly associated with K65R were A62V, S68G and Y115F; their NRTI susceptibilities were similar to those of viruses containing K65R alone. The replication capacity for HIV-1 with M184V/I or K65R was significantly reduced compared with wild-type (median 68%/ and 72%, respectively; P<0.0001), whereas replication capacity for HIV-1 with L74V or TAMs was not significantly reduced (88% and 97%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate a relative stability in the prevalence of HIV-1 clinical isolates with NAMs from 2003 to 2006. Differences between the genotypic patterns, phenotype and replication capacity associated with common NAMs are described.