Development and Psychometric Testing of the Bimanual Assessment Measure for People With Chronic Stroke.

IMPORTANCE: Few tools are available to assess bimanual deficits after stroke. OBJECTIVE: To develop the Bimanual Assessment Measure (BAM), which assesses a person's hand coordination in both preferred and prestroke roles (i.e., stabilizer or manipulator). DESIGN: Development and psychometric testing of the BAM. SETTING: Research laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: People with chronic stroke (n = 24), age-matched controls (n = 23), and occupational therapists (n = 40). OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: We assessed the BAM's internal consistency, reliability, and face and known-groups validity. RESULTS: Items were selected as meaningful tasks that represented a range of bimanual coordination requirements (e.g., symmetrical forces and timing, asymmetrical forces and timing, time-limited reactive movement). Focus groups of people with stroke and occupational therapists provided input into BAM development. The BAM was found to have excellent reliability and internal consistency and face and known-groups validity. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The BAM is a valid, reliable measure for people with chronic stroke that identifies bimanual coordination deficits beyond unimanual impairments and the potential capacity for people to return to prestroke hand roles (i.e., as a manipulator). What This Article Adds: This article introduces the BAM as a new assessment measure of bimanual functioning with the potential capacity to restore prestroke hand roles as either a manipulator or a stabilizer among people with chronic stroke.

Comparison of Lateral Perturbation-Induced Step Training and Hip Muscle Strengthening Exercise on Balance and Falls in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: This factorial, assessor-blinded, randomized, and controlled study compared the effects of perturbation-induced step training (lateral waist-pulls), hip muscle strengthening, and their combination, on balance performance, muscle strength, and prospective falls among older adults. METHODS: Community-dwelling older adults were randomized to 4 training groups. Induced step training (IST, n = 25) involved 43 progressive perturbations. Hip abduction strengthening (HST, n = 25) utilized progressive resistance exercises. Combined training (CMB, n = 25) included IST and HST, and the control performed seated flexibility/relaxation exercises (SFR, n = 27). The training involved 36 sessions for a period of 12 weeks. The primary outcomes were the number of recovery steps and first step length, and maximum hip abduction torque. Fall frequency during 12 months after training was determined. RESULTS: Overall, the number of recovery steps was reduced by 31% and depended upon the first step type. IST and CMB increased the rate of more stable single lateral steps pre- and post-training than HST and SFR who used more multiple crossover and sequential steps. The improved rate of lateral steps for CMB exceeded the control (CMB/SFR rate ratio 2.68). First step length was unchanged, and HST alone increased hip torque by 25%. Relative to SFR, the fall rate ratios (falls/person/year) [95% confidence interval] were CMB 0.26 [0.07-0.90], IST 0.44 [0.18-1.08], and HST 0.30 (0.10-0.91). CONCLUSIONS: Balance performance through stepping was best improved by combining perturbation and strength training and not strengthening alone. The interventions reduced future falls by 56%-74% over the control. Lateral balance perturbation training may enhance traditional programs for fall prevention.

Not all brain regions are created equal for improving bimanual coordination in individuals with chronic stroke.

OBJECTIVE: The now standard cortical stimulation approach of inhibiting contralesional primary motor cortex (cM1) disrupts bimanual coordination while facilitating ipsilesional M1 (iM1) fails to enhance paretic arm function, in severely impaired individuals. We propose an alternative target, enhancing contralesional dorsal premotor cortex (cPMd) to improve bimanual coordination and compare its effects to iM1. METHODS: Fourteen participants with stroke received 5-Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on cPMd or iM1 in a repeated cross-over design. Bimanual force/neuromuscular coordination and cortical excitability were assessed. We also examined the relationship of baseline motor function/interhemispheric inhibition (IHI) to participant's responses to each stimulation target. RESULTS: We identified two patterns of responses. Participants with more severe impairment and weaker IHI improved bimanual force/neuromuscular coordination, ipsilesional activations and reduced IHI after cPMd-rTMS; whereas, those with milder impairment and stronger IHI improved only after iM1-rTMS. CONCLUSIONS: Cortical stimulation protocols could be tailored to the types of tasks and to individuals' severity of impairment. Facilitation of cPMd may improve bimanual coordination especially for individuals with limited arm/hand function. SIGNIFICANCE: Our study is the first to identify cortical stimulation strategies for improving bimanual coordination for individuals with different level of severity of stroke.

Stepping characteristics during externally induced lateral reactive and voluntary steps in chronic stroke.

BACKGROUND: Stepping is critical for responding to perturbations, whether externally induced or self-initiated. Falls post-stroke is equally likely to happen from either mechanism. The objective of the study was, to examine lateral stepping performance during waist-pull induced reactive steps and voluntary choice reaction time steps in chronic stroke and controls. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study participants with chronic stroke (N = 10) and age- and gender-matched controls (N = 10) performed reactive and voluntary lateral steps. Step initiation time, global step length, step clearance, and step velocity were calculated. Other measures for reactive step included, Balance tolerance limit (perturbation magnitude when recovery transitioned from single to multiple steps), and step type. The Community Balance & Mobility Scale, and hip abductor and adductor isokinetic asymmetry torque ratio were assessed. RESULTS: The paretic and non-paretic leg were combined since step characteristics did not differ. Step (voluntary vs. reactive) by group (stroke vs. controls) was significant for step initiation time. The stroke group took longer initiating a voluntary step (P = 0.004). Reactive and voluntary steps were executed slower (P = 0.041), with a reduced step length (P = 0.028) by the stroke group. The stroke group had a lower balance tolerance limit (P = 0.01) and took reactive medial steps more frequently (P = 0.001). The Community Balance & Mobility Scale (P > 0.001), and hip abductor and adductor asymmetry torque ratio (P > 0.001; P = 0.015) was reduced in the stroke group. SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings indicate individuals post-stroke are slower initiating and executing reactive and voluntary steps. Though the reactive step timing is less impaired, this may be a method for enhancing faster voluntary movements and training reactive balance.

Impaired posture, movement preparation, and execution during both paretic and nonparetic reaching following stroke.

Posture and movement planning, preparation, and execution of a goal-directed reaching movement are impaired in individuals with stroke. No studies have shown whether the deficits are generally impaired or are specific to the lesioned hemisphere/paretic arm. This study utilized StartReact (SR) responses elicited by loud acoustic stimuli (LAS) to investigate the preparation and execution of anticipatory postural adjustments (APAs) and reach movement response during both paretic and nonparetic arm reaching in individuals with stroke and in age-matched healthy controls. Subjects were asked to get ready after receiving a warning cue and to reach at a "go" cue. An LAS was delivered at -500, -200, and 0 ms relative to the go cue. Kinetic, kinematic, and electromyographic data were recorded to characterize APA-reach movement responses. Individuals with stroke demonstrated systemwide deficits in posture and in movement planning, preparation, and execution of APA-reach sequence as shown by significant reduction in the incidence of SR response and impaired APA-reach performance, with greater deficits during paretic arm reaching. Use of trunk compensation strategy as characterized by greater involvement of trunk and pelvic rotation was utilized by individuals with stroke during paretic arm reaching compared with nonparetic arm reaching and healthy controls. Our findings have implications for upper extremity and postural control, suggesting that intervention should include training not only for the paretic arm but also for the nonparetic arm with simultaneous postural control requirements to improve the coordination of the APA-reach performance and subsequently reduce instability while functional tasks are performed during standing. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Our study is the first to show that nonparetic arm reaching also demonstrates impairment in posture and movement planning, preparation, and execution when performed during standing by individuals with stroke. In addition, we found compensatory trunk and pelvic rotations were used during a standing reach task for the paretic arms. The findings have clinical implications for upper extremity and postural rehabilitation, suggesting that training should include the nonparetic arms and incorporate simultaneous postural control demands.

Neural motor control differs between bimanual common-goal vs. bimanual dual-goal tasks.

Coordinating bimanual movements is essential for everyday activities. Two common types of bimanual tasks are common goal, where two arms share a united goal, and dual goal, which involves independent goals for each arm. Here, we examine how the neural control mechanisms differ between these two types of bimanual tasks. Ten non-disabled individuals performed isometric force tasks of the elbow at 10% of their maximal voluntary force in both bimanual common and dual goals as well as unimanual conditions. Using transcranial magnetic stimulation, we concurrently examined the intracortical inhibitory modulation (short-interval intracortical inhibition, SICI) as well as the interlimb coordination strategies utilized between common- vs. dual-goal tasks. Results showed a reduction of SICI in both hemispheres during dual-goal compared to common-goal tasks (dominant hemisphere: P = 0.04, non-dominant hemisphere: P = 0.03) and unimanual tasks (dominant hemisphere: P = 0.001, non-dominant hemisphere: P = 0.001). For the common-goal task, a reduction of SICI was only seen in the dominant hemisphere compared to unimanual tasks (P = 0.03). Behaviorally, two interlimb coordination patterns were identified. For the common-goal task, both arms were organized into a cooperative "give and take" movement pattern. Control of the non-dominant arm affected stabilization of bimanual force (R2 = 0.74, P = 0.001). In contrast, for the dual-goal task, both arms were coupled together in a positive fashion and neither arm affected stabilization of bimanual force (R2 = 0.31, P = 0.1). The finding that intracortical inhibition and interlimb coordination patterns were different based on the goal conceptualization of bimanual tasks has implications for future research.

Evaluating touchless capacitive gesture recognition as an assistive device for upper extremity mobility impairment.

INTRODUCTION: This paper explores the feasibility of using touchless textile sensors as an input to environmental control for individuals with upper-extremity mobility impairments. These sensors are capacitive textile sensors embedded into clothing and act as proximity sensors. METHODS: We present results from five individuals with spinal cord injury as they perform gestures that mimic an alphanumeric gesture set. The gestures are used for controlling appliances in a home setting. Our setup included a custom visualization that provides feedback to the individual on how the system is tracking the movement and the type of gesture being recognized. Our study included a two-stage session at a medical school with five subjects with upper extremity mobility impairment. RESULTS: The experimenting sessions derived binary gesture classification accuracies greater than 90% on average. The sessions also revealed intricate details in participant's motions, from which we draw two key insights on the design of the wearable sensor system. CONCLUSION: First, we provide evidence that personalization is a critical ingredient to the success of wearable sensing in this population group. The sensor hardware, the gesture set, and the underlying gesture recognition algorithm must be personalized to the individual's need and injury level. Secondly, we show that explicit feedback to the user is useful when the user is being trained on the system. Moreover, being able to see the end goal of controlling appliances using the system is a key motivation to properly learn gestures.

Lateral Perturbation-Induced Stepping: Strategies and Predictors in Persons Poststroke.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Falls commonly occur as weight is transferred laterally, and impaired reactive stepping responses are associated with falls after stroke. The purpose of this study was to examine differences in and the determinants of mediolateral (M-L) protective stepping strategies when pulled off balance toward the paretic and nonparetic sides. METHODS: Eighteen individuals more than 6 months poststroke were pulled in the M-L direction by a lateral waist-pull perturbation system. Step type (crossover, medial, and lateral) and count were recorded, along with first-step initiation time, length, and clearance. Sensorimotor variables including hip adductor/abductor and ankle plantar flexor/dorsiflexor peak isokinetic torques, paretic foot plantar cutaneous sensation, and motor recovery were used to predict step type by discriminant function analyses (DFAs). RESULTS: Regardless of pull direction, nearly 70% of trials required 2 or more recovery steps, with more frequent nonparetic leg first steps, 63.5%. The step type was significantly different for pull direction (P = 0.005), with a greater percentage of lateral steps when pulled toward the nonparetic side (45.1%) compared with the paretic side (17.5%). The M-L step length of the lateral step was increased (P < 0.001), with a reduced step clearance (P = 0.05), when pulled toward the paretic side compared with a pull toward the nonparetic side. DFAs revealed that nonparetic and paretic-side pulls could respectively classify step type 64% and 60% of the time, with foot cutaneous sensation discriminating for pull direction. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Balance recovery initiated with the nonparetic leg occurred more frequently in response to M-L perturbations, and paretic foot cutaneous sensation was an important predictor of the stepping response regardless of the pull direction.Video Abstract available for more insights from the authors (see Video, Supplementary Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A190).

Relationship Between Head-Turn Gait Speed and Lateral Balance Function in Community-Dwelling Older Adults.

OBJECTIVE: To determine and compare gait speed during head-forward and side-to-side head-turn walking in individuals with lower versus greater lateral balance. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: University research laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Older adults (N=93; 42 men, 51 women; mean age ± SD, 73 ± 6.08y) who could walk independently. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: (1) Balance tolerance limit (BTL), defined as the lowest perturbation intensity where a multistep balance recovery pattern was first evoked in response to randomized lateral waist-pull perturbations of standing balance to the left and right sides, at 6 different intensities (range from level 2: 4.5-cm displacement at 180cm/s2 acceleration, to level 7: 22.5-cm displacement at 900cm/s2 acceleration); (2) gait speed, determined using an instrumented gait mat; (3) balance, evaluated with the Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale; and (4) mobility, determined with the Timed Up and Go (TUG). RESULTS: Individuals with low versus high BTL had a slower self-selected head-forward gait speed and head-turn gait speed (P=.002 and P<.001, respectively); the magnitude of difference was greater in head-turn gait speed than head-forward gait speed (Cohen's d=1.0 vs 0.6). Head-turn gait speed best predicted BTL. BTL was moderately and positively related (P=.003) to the ABC Scale and negatively related (P=.017) to TUG. CONCLUSIONS: Head-turn gait speed is affected to a greater extent than head-forward gait speed in older individuals with poorer lateral balance and at greater risk of falls. Moreover, head-turn gait speed can be used to assess the interactions of limitations in lateral balance function and gait speed in relation to fall risk in older adults.

Determining Levels of Upper Extremity Movement Impairment by Applying a Cluster Analysis to the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity in Chronic Stroke.

OBJECTIVE: To quantitatively determine levels of upper extremity movement impairment by using a cluster analysis of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) with and without reflex items. DESIGN: Secondary analysis. SETTING: University and research centers. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals (N=247) with chronic stroke (>6mo poststroke). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cutoff scores defined by FMA-UE total scores of clusters identified by 2 hierarchical cluster analyses performed on the full sample of FMA-UE individual item scores (with and without reflexes). Patterns of motor function defined by aggregate item scores of clusters. RESULTS: FMA-UE scores ranged from 2 to 63 (mean, 26.9±15.7) with reflex items and from 0 to 57 (mean, 22.1±15.3) without reflex items. Three clusters were identified. The distributions of the FMA-UE scores revealed considerable overlap between the clusters; therefore, 4 distinct stroke impairment levels were derived. CONCLUSIONS: For chronic stroke, the cluster analysis of the FMA-UE supports either a 3- or a 4-impairment level classification scheme.

Impaired motor preparation and execution during standing reach in people with chronic stroke.

Movement preparation of both anticipatory postural adjustments (APAs) and goal directed movement during a standing reaching task in adults with chronic hemiparesis and healthy controls was investigated. Using a simple reaction time paradigm, while standing on two separate force platforms, subjects received a warning light cue to "get ready to reach" followed 2.5s later by an imperative light cue to "reach as quickly as possible" with the paretic arm (matched arm for controls) to touch a target in front of them for a total of 90 trials. In 30 of the reaching trials a loud acoustic stimulus (LAS) of 123 dB was randomly - -200, or 0ms relative to the "go" cue. APA (postural) responses were characterized by the onset and maximal posterior displacement of center of pressure (CoP) and onset/offset of electromyography (EMG) from tibialis anterior (TA), soleus (SOL), while reach was characterized by onset and maximal forward displacement of the reach hand and onset of the anterior (AD), biceps brachii (BB) and middle deltoid (MD). Subjects with stroke, demonstrated a marked reduction in the occurrence of the StartReact responses for both APA and forward reach at all LAS time points indicating movement preparation dysfunction. Movement execution during a cued reach showed significant delays in APA and reach onsets, significant reduction in the magnitude of APA (posterior CoP displacement) and reach excursion, and an increased latency between the APA and reach compared to controls. EMG activation patterns for the TA and SOL demonstrated co contraction compared to the temporally sequenced pattern of control subjects. When LAS was provided at the "go" there were earlier but not significant differences in APA onset latency compared to reaching without LAS and significant delays in reach onset latency when compared to control subjects with or without LAS. An early burst of EMG in biceps brachii muscles with a further delay of the reach onset compared to reaching without LAS may be indicative of interference of a classical startle reflex activating elbow flexors. Results indicated impairments in movement preparation of both APA's and goal directed UE movement in individuals with stroke which impact the functional performance of reaching in the standing position.

Quantifying motor recovery after stroke using independent vector analysis and graph-theoretical analysis.

The assessment of neuroplasticity after stroke through functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) analysis is a developing field where the objective is to better understand the neural process of recovery and to better target rehabilitation interventions. The challenge in this population stems from the large amount of individual spatial variability and the need to summarize entire brain maps by generating simple, yet discriminating features to highlight differences in functional connectivity. Independent vector analysis (IVA) has been shown to provide superior performance in preserving subject variability when compared with widely used methods such as group independent component analysis. Hence, in this paper, graph-theoretical (GT) analysis is applied to IVA-generated components to effectively exploit the individual subjects' connectivity to produce discriminative features. The analysis is performed on fMRI data collected from individuals with chronic stroke both before and after a 6-week arm and hand rehabilitation intervention. Resulting GT features are shown to capture connectivity changes that are not evident through direct comparison of the group t-maps. The GT features revealed increased small worldness across components and greater centrality in key motor networks as a result of the intervention, suggesting improved efficiency in neural communication. Clinically, these results bring forth new possibilities as a means to observe the neural processes underlying improvements in motor function.

Sequencing bilateral and unilateral task-oriented training versus task oriented training alone to improve arm function in individuals with chronic stroke.

BACKGROUND: Recovering useful hand function after stroke is a major scientific challenge for patients with limited motor recovery. We hypothesized that sequential training beginning with proximal bilateral followed by unilateral task oriented training is superior to time-matched unilateral training alone. Proximal bilateral training could optimally prepare the motor system to respond to the more challenging task-oriented training. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-six participants with moderate severity hemiparesis Intervention: PARTICIPANTS received either 6-weeks of bilateral proximal training followed sequentially by 6-weeks unilateral task-oriented training (COMBO) or 12-weeks of unilateral task-oriented training alone (SAEBO). A subset of 8 COMB0 and 9 SAEBO participants underwent three functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scans of hand and elbow movement every 6 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Fugl-Meyer Upper extremity scale, Modified Wolf Motor Function Test, University of Maryland Arm Questionnaire for Stroke, Motor cortex activation (fMRI). RESULTS: The COMBO group demonstrated significantly greater gains between baseline and 12-weeks over all outcome measures (p = .018 based on a MANOVA test) and specifically in the Modified Wolf Motor Function test (time). Both groups demonstrated within-group gains on the Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity test (impairment) and University of Maryland Arm Questionnaire for Stroke (functional use). fMRI subset analyses showed motor cortex (primary and premotor) activation during hand movement was significantly increased by sequential combination training but not by task-oriented training alone. CONCLUSIONS: Sequentially combining a proximal bilateral before a unilateral task-oriented training may be an effective way to facilitate gains in arm and hand function in those with moderate to severe paresis post-stroke compared to unilateral task oriented training alone.

Compensatory arm reaching strategies after stroke: induced position analysis.

After stroke, movement patterns of the upper limb (UL) during functional arm reaching change to accommodate altered constraints. These compensatory movement control strategies do not, however, have a one-to-one mapping with posttraining outcomes. In this study, we quantify arm movement control strategies in unilateral and bilateral reaching tasks using induced position analysis. In addition, we assess how those strategies are associated with UL residual impairments and with functional improvement after a specific bilateral arm training intervention. Twelve individuals with chronic stroke were measured while reaching to a box as part of their pre- and posttesting assessments. Other measurements included the Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Assessment (FM), Modified Wolf Motor Function Test (WT), and the University of Maryland Arm Questionnaire for Stroke (UMAQS). We identified arm control strategies that did not differ between unilateral and bilateral tasks but did differ by FM impairment level and by predicted gains in WT but not UMAQS. Increased shoulder relative to elbow moment contribution was associated with less impairment and greater gains of speed in functional tasks. These results suggest that one goal of training to achieve better outcomes may be to decrease the abnormal coupling of the shoulder and elbow.

Arm training in standing also improves postural control in participants with chronic stroke.

PURPOSE: To prove the concept that postural control will improve without specific balance control training during arm training in standing with individuals with chronic stroke. METHODS: Nine participants (mean age 64±7) received training involving hand orthotic assisted grasp, reach and release in standing 1 h, 3×'s/week for 6 weeks. Training focused on task completion with no explicit instructions provided for postural alignment, weight shift or balance strategy. Testing consisted of quantified measures using NeuroCom™ Balance Master, Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC). RESULTS: Post training participants demonstrate increased (p<.05) composite stability scores for sensory organization testing (mean 71.55±12.7-75.55±11). Velocity and directional control of COP weight shift improved for all 9 subjects with 6/9 achieving 100% target acquisition. Directional control improved (p<.05) for medial/lateral movements for all speeds and composite score. Anterior/posterior rhythmic weight shifting increased significantly in COP velocity control at moderate and fast velocities and composite score. Increases in mean BBS (p<.01) from 41.33±10.1-46.88±8.03 exceeded the clinically important cutoff for the scale. Balance confidence improved with ABC mean scores 70.22±14.5-79.55±12.86 (p<.05). Seven participants demonstrated changes above the minimally important difference for this scale. CONCLUSIONS: Postural control improved following task oriented arm training in standing without explicit postural control goals, instruction or feedback challenging current training paradigms of isolated postural control training with conscious attention directed to center of pressure location and movement.

Mesencephalic corticospinal atrophy predicts baseline deficit but not response to unilateral or bilateral arm training in chronic stroke.

OBJECTIVE: Stroke survivors with motor deficits often have pyramidal tract atrophy caused by degeneration of corticospinal fibers. The authors hypothesized that the degree of atrophy correlates with severity of motor impairment in patients with chronic stroke and predicts the response to rehabilitation training. METHODS: They performed a post hoc analysis of 42 hemiparetic patients (>6 months) who had been randomized to either 6 weeks of bilateral arm training with rhythmic auditory cueing (BATRAC) or dose-matched therapeutic exercise (DMTE). Arm function was measured using the Fugl-Meyer (FM) and modified Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT). Structural MRI and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) on the pontine level measured corticospinal tract (CST) atrophy by planimetric measurement of the mesencephalon (mesencephalic atrophy ratio) and fractional anisotropy (FA), respectively. Voxel-based lesion symptom mapping (VLSM) was used to determine the lesions associated with highest degrees of atrophy. The predictive value of CST atrophy for impairment and training response was analyzed. RESULTS: CST atrophy predicted baseline motor arm function measured by the FM and WMFT. The authors found only a trend for the correlation with FA. No measure of atrophy predicted response to either BATRAC or DMTE. CST atrophy was higher with larger lesions and those that affected the CST. VLSM identified internal capsule lesions as being associated with highest CST atrophy. CONCLUSION: Larger lesions, internal capsule lesions, and those overlapping the pyramidal tract are associated with greater CST atrophy. CST atrophy explains in part the variability of baseline deficits but does not seem to predict the response to BATRAC or unilateral arm training on upper-extremity function.

Treadmill exercise activates subcortical neural networks and improves walking after stroke: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Stroke often impairs gait thereby reducing mobility and fitness and promoting chronic disability. Gait is a complex sensorimotor function controlled by integrated cortical, subcortical, and spinal networks. The mechanisms of gait recovery after stroke are not well understood. This study examines the hypothesis that progressive task-repetitive treadmill exercise (T-EX) improves fitness and gait function in subjects with chronic hemiparetic stroke by inducing adaptations in the brain (plasticity). METHODS: A randomized controlled trial determined the effects of 6-month T-EX (n=37) versus comparable duration stretching (CON, n=34) on walking, aerobic fitness and in a subset (n=15/17) on brain activation measured by functional MRI. RESULTS: T-EX significantly improved treadmill-walking velocity by 51% and cardiovascular fitness by 18% (11% and -3% for CON, respectively; P<0.05). T-EX but not CON affected brain activation during paretic, but not during nonparetic limb movement, showing 72% increased activation in posterior cerebellar lobe and 18% in midbrain (P<0.005). Exercise-mediated improvements in walking velocity correlated with increased activation in cerebellum and midbrain. CONCLUSIONS: T-EX improves walking, fitness and recruits cerebellum-midbrain circuits, likely reflecting neural network plasticity. This neural recruitment is associated with better walking. These findings demonstrate the effectiveness of T-EX rehabilitation in promoting gait recovery of stroke survivors with long-term mobility impairment and provide evidence of neuroplastic mechanisms that could lead to further refinements in these paradigms to improve functional outcomes.

Bilateral arm training: why and who benefits?

Bilateral arm training has emerged as an approach that leads to positive outcomes in addressing upper extremity paresis after stroke. However, studies have not demonstrated improvements in all patients using current outcome measures. Furthermore, the rationale for using this type of training has been incompletely explained. The purpose of this article was to first review the theoretical justifications for the use of bilateral arm training by examining motor control and neural mechanisms underlying arm function and neural recovery, and second, to discuss examples of clinical studies using a variety of bilateral training strategies to identify who may benefit most from this approach. We argue that bilateral arm training is a necessary adjunct to unilateral training because bilateral re-training is important and best served through bilateral not unilateral training, and also, that bilateral training may help unilateral skill recovery through alternative putative mechanisms. Our review of the empirical evidence suggests that individuals at all levels of severity can benefit in some manner from bilateral training, but that not all approaches are effective for all severity levels. In addition to requesting more randomized controlled trials and studies of neurophysiological mechanisms we conclude the following: 1) Bilateral training can improve unilateral paretic limb functions of the upper extremity after stroke, however, specific training approaches need to be matched to baseline characteristics of the patients; 2) Given the importance of bilateral activities in daily life, there is a need to recognize, train and assess the important contribution of supportive role functions of the paretic arm used on its own and as part of complementary bilateral functional skills; 3) An assessment of bilateral and unilateral functioning which includes bilateral task analysis, as well as, evaluations of interlimb coordination should be included in all studies that include bilateral training; 4) Studies with thoughtful sequencing or combining of bilateral approaches or sequencing of bilateral and unilateral approaches are needed to assess if there are improved outcomes in paretic and bilateral limb function.

Intracortical inhibition and facilitation with unilateral dominant, unilateral nondominant and bilateral movement tasks in left- and right-handed adults.

PURPOSE: To investigate intracortical inhibition and facilitation in response to unilateral dominant, nondominant and bilateral biceps activation and short-term upper extremity training in right- and left-handed adults. METHODS: Paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation was used to measure intracortical excitability in motor dominant and nondominant cortices of 26 nondisabled adults. Neural facilitation and inhibition were measured in each hemisphere during unilateral dominant, nondominant and bilateral arm activation and after training in each condition. RESULTS: No differences were seen between right- and left-handed subjects. Intracortical facilitation and decreased inhibition were seen in each hemisphere with unilateral activation/training of contralateral muscles and bilateral muscle activation/training. Persistent intracortical inhibition was seen in each hemisphere with ipsilateral muscle activation/training. Inhibition was greater in the nondominant hemisphere during dominant hemisphere activation (dominant arm contraction). CONCLUSION: Strongly dominant individuals show no difference in intracortical responses given handedness. Intracortical activity with unilateral and bilateral arm activation and short-term training differs based on hemispheric dominance, with the motor dominant hemisphere exerting a larger inhibitory influence over the nondominant hemisphere. Bilateral activation and training have a disinhibitory effect in both dominant and nondominant hemispheres.