Clinical Outcomes and Associations With Radial to Femoral Crossover in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Radial access during primary percutaneous coronary intervention is associated with reduced mortality and major bleeding compared with femoral access and is the recommended access site. Nevertheless, failure to secure radial access may necessitate crossover to femoral access. This study aimed to identify the associations with crossover from radial to femoral access in all comers with ST-elevation myocardial infarction and to compare the clinical outcomes with those patients who did not require crossover. From 2016 to 2021, a total of 1,202 patients presented to our institute with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Associations, clinical outcomes, and independent predictors of crossover from radial to femoral access were identified. From 1,202 patients, radial access was used in 1,138 patients (94.7%) and crossover to femoral access occurred in 64 patients (5.3%). Patients who required crossover to femoral access had higher rates of access site complications and longer length of stay in the hospital. Inpatient mortality was higher in the group requiring a crossover. This study identified 3 independent predictors of crossover from radial to femoral access in primary percutaneous coronary intervention: cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest before arrival at the catheterization laboratory, and previous coronary artery bypass grafting. Biochemical infarct size and peak creatinine was also found to be higher in those requiring crossover. In conclusion, crossover in this study portended an increased rate of access site complications, greatly prolonged length of stay, and a significantly higher risk of death.

Outcomes of nurse-led clinic for patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention: A retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: With an increasing prevalence of coronary heart disease, secondary prevention forms a major cornerstone of management. A dedicated nurse-led clinic for patients post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) offers a great opportunity to address risk factors in order to reduce cardiovascular events. PURPOSE: To determine the impact of a nurse-led clinic follow up of patients post PCI in relation to the 30 day mortality rate and re-admission, and patient satisfaction. Risk factor assessment, compliance with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), and interventions at the clinic visit were also assessed. METHODS: A retrospective review of parameters recorded at clinic appointments from January 2015-December 2017. The data of patients were examined for baseline characteristics, risk factor assessment, and interventions at the clinic visit. Thirty day mortality and re-admission rates and patient satisfaction were major outcomes. RESULTS: 1325 individual patient records were retrospectively reviewed in our clinic. Mean age was 64 and 78% were males. The indications for PCI were STEMI (22.7%), NSTEMI (21.9%), and unstable and stable angina (43.1%). 5 patients (0.4%) died and 132 patients (10%) were re-admitted within 30 days after the follow-up visit. However, only 24 (1.8%) of the re-admissions were due to cardiac reasons. At the clinic appointment, 852 (64.3%) patients had non-pharmacological intervention and 473 (35.7%) patients had a pharmacological intervention. 712 (53.7%) patients had LDL-C above target and their statin therapy was amended accordingly. CONCLUSION: Nurse-led PCI clinics provide satisfactory assessment and management of risk factors achieving high patient satisfaction rates without increased risk of poor outcomes.