Real world duration of curative intent breast, colorectal, non-small cell lung, and prostate cancer treatment.

BACKGROUND: Advances in curative treatment for breast, colorectal, NSCLC and prostate cancer have led to improvements in cancer survival. Cancer treatment and recovery time can vary depending on the recommended modalities and intensity of therapy. Our objective was to determine the current real world duration of curative treatments for the four common cancers. METHODS: A retrospective review was completed of patients referred to BC Cancer from 2010 to 2016, ≤ 65 years old, newly diagnosed with stage I-III breast, colorectal, NSCLC or prostate cancer who received curative intent treatment. Information was collected on baseline characteristics, date of diagnosis, surgery, type, duration and intent of both radiotherapy and chemotherapy. RESULTS: In total, 22,275 patients were included: 55.7% breast, 22.4% colorectal, 9.2% NSCLC, 12.7% prostate cancer. Stage I/II/III at diagnosis: breast 47.2/38.7/14.1%, colorectal 26.5/30.1/43.5%, NSCLC 46.5/18.1/35.4%, prostate 7.7/62.9/29.4%. Patients treated with definitive surgery only: breast 35.9%, colorectal 58%, NSCLC 52.2%, prostate 40.1%. The median duration of multimodality treatment was breast 24.6 weeks, colorectal 26.7 weeks, NSCLC 9.1 weeks, and prostate 6.0 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately half of patients who undergo curative cancer treatment require definitive radiotherapy or multimodality treatment. The median duration of therapy for the most commonly treated cancers ranged from 6.0-26.7 weeks. Multimodality curative treatment can be prolonged for selected cancers when accounting for the duration of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy and recovery time between modalities.

Cancer in First Nations people living in British Columbia, Canada: an analysis of incidence and survival from 1993 to 2010.

BACKGROUND: For First Nations (FN) peoples living in British Columbia (BC), little is known regarding cancer in the population. The aim of this study was to explore cancer incidence and survival in the FN population of BC and compare it to the non-FN population. METHODS: All new cancers diagnosed from 1993 to 2010 were linked to the First Nations Client File (FNCF). Age-standardized incidence rates (ASIR) and rate ratios, and 1- and 5-year cause-specific survival estimates and hazard ratios were calculated. Follow-up end date for survival was December 31, 2011 and follow-up time was censored at a maximum of 15 years. RESULTS: ASIR of colorectal cancer (male SRR = 1.42, 95% CI 1.25-1.61; female SRR = 1.21, 95% CI 1.06-1.38) and cervical cancer (SRR = 1.84, 95% CI 1.45-2.33) were higher overall in FN residents in BC, compared to non-FN residents. Incidence rates of almost all other cancers were generally similar or lower in FN populations overall and by sex, age, and period categories, compared to non-FN residents. Trends in ASIR over time were similar except for lung (increasing for FN, decreasing for non-FN) and colorectal cancers (increasing for FN, decreasing for non-FN). Conversely, survival rates were generally lower for FN, with differences evident for some cancer sites at 1 year following diagnosis. CONCLUSION: FN people living in BC face unique cancer issues compared to non-FN people. Higher incidence and lower survival associated with certain cancer types require further research to look into the likely multifaceted basis for these findings.

Impact of hospital volume on quality indicators for rectal cancer surgery in British Columbia, Canada.

BACKGROUND: The relationship between hospital volume and patient outcomes remains controversial for rectal cancer. METHODS: This is a population-based database study. Patients treated with surgery for a stage I to III rectal adenocarcinoma from 2003 to 2009 were identified. High-volume hospitals (HVH) were those centers performing 20 surgeries or more per year. Primary outcomes were operative and perioperative factors that have proven influence on patient outcomes. RESULTS: In all, 2,081 patients had surgery for rectal cancer. Of these, 1,690 patients had surgery in an HVH and 391 had surgery in a low-volume hospital. On multivariate analysis, patients who had surgery in an HVH were more likely to have sphincter-preserving surgery, 12 or more lymph nodes removed with the tumor, neoadjuvant radiation therapy, and receive pre-operative or postoperative chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: For rectal cancer patients in British Columbia, Canada, being treated at an HVH is associated with several quality indicators linked to better patient outcomes.

Correlating Quantitative Fecal Immunochemical Test Results with Neoplastic Findings on Colonoscopy in a Population-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Program: A Prospective Study.

Background and Aims. The Canadian Partnership Against Cancer (CPAC) recommends a fecal immunochemical test- (FIT-) positive predictive value (PPV) for all adenomas of ≥50%. We sought to assess FIT performance among average-risk participants of the British Columbia Colon Screening Program (BCCSP). Methods. From Nov-2013 to Dec-2014 consecutive participants of the BCCSP were assessed. Data was obtained from a prospectively collected database. A single quantitative FIT (NS-Plus, Alfresa Pharma Corporation, Japan) with a cut-off of ≥10 µg/g (≥50 ng/mL) was used. Results. 20,322 FIT-positive participants underwent CSPY. At a FIT cut-off of ≥10 µg/g (≥50 ng/mL) the PPV for all adenomas was 52.0%. Increasing the FIT cut-off to ≥20 µg/g (≥100 ng/mL) would increase the PPV for colorectal cancer (CRC) by 1.5% and for high-risk adenomas (HRAs) by 6.5% at a cost of missing 13.6% of CRCs and 32.4% of HRAs. Conclusions. As the NS-Plus FIT cut-off rises, the PPV for CRC and HRAs increases but at the cost of missed lesions. A cut-off of ≥10 µg/g (≥50 ng/mL) produces a PPV for all adenomas exceeding national recommendations. Health authorities need to take into consideration endoscopic resources when selecting a FIT positivity threshold.

Prognostic factors and sites of metastasis in unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

Due to differences in natural history and therapy, clinical trials of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer have recently been subdivided into unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) and metastatic disease. We aimed to evaluate prognostic factors in LAPC patients who were treated with first-line chemotherapy and describe patterns of disease progression. Patients with LAPC who initiated first-line palliative chemotherapy, 2001-2011 at the BC Cancer Agency were included. A retrospective chart review was conducted to identify clinicopathologic variables, treatment, and subsequent sites of metastasis. Kaplan-Meier and Cox-regression survival analyses were performed. A total of 244 patients were included in this study. For the majority of patients (94.3%), first-line therapy was single-agent gemcitabine. About 144 (59%) patients developed distant metastatic disease and the most frequent metastatic sites included peritoneum/omentum (42.3%), liver (41%), lungs (13.9%), and distant lymph nodes (9%). Median overall survival (OS) for the entire cohort was 11.7 months (95% CI, 10.6-12.8). Development of distant metastases was associated with significantly inferior survival (HR 3.56, 95% CI 2.57-4.93), as was ECOG 2/3 versus 0/1 (HR 1.69, 95% CI 1.28-2.23), CA 19.9 > 1000 versus ≤ 1000 (HR 1.59, 95% CI 1.19-2.14) and female gender, (HR 1.57, 95% CI 1.19-2.08). In this population-based study, 41% of LAPC patients treated with first-line chemotherapy died without evidence of distant metastases. Prognostic factors for LAPC were baseline performance status, elevated CA 19.9, gender, and development of distant metastasis. Results highlight the heterogeneity of LAPC and the importance of locoregional tumor control.

Influence of nurse navigation on wait times for breast cancer care in a Canadian regional cancer center.

BACKGROUND: The wait times for breast cancer care in our region do not meet acceptable benchmarks. We implemented the Interior Breast Rapid Access Investigation and Diagnosis (IB-RAPID) nurse navigation program to address this issue. METHODS: The IB-RAPID prospective database was reviewed for patients entering the program between April 1, 2011 and April 30, 2012 (2011/2012 cohort), and was compared with patients from the same area in 2010. The main end point was the time between the 1st diagnostic imaging test and the surgery. Multiple linear regression was performed to investigate factors influencing the wait times. RESULTS: The wait times decreased with the introduction of IB-RAPID (59 vs 48 days; median). Stage of disease, total number of biopsies, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) use influenced wait times. MRI significantly delayed surgical intervention in both groups with those not having an MRI having a shorter wait time to surgery (68.5 vs 57.6 days; mean) in 2011/2012. CONCLUSION: The implementation of nurse navigation for patients with breast cancer appears to be effective at reducing the wait times for surgical treatment.

A randomized placebo-controlled trial of manuka honey for radiation-induced oral mucositis.

BACKGROUND: Few treatments have the potential to reduce the severity of radiation-induced mucositis in head and neck cancer patients. Some small studies have suggested that organic honey may be a useful preventive treatment. METHODS: This investigator-initiated double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial investigated whether honey reduced the severity of radiation-induced oral mucositis (ROM). One hundred six head and neck cancer patients from the Vancouver and Sudbury Cancer Centers in Canada were randomized to swish, hold, and swallow either 5 ml of irradiated organic manuka honey or a placebo gel, four times a day throughout radiation treatment, plus seven more days. Severity of oral mucositis according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG), World Health Organization (WHO), and Oral Mucositis Assessment Scale scales, weight, and subjects' symptom severity and quality of life were assessed weekly. Sialometry was performed at baseline and at the last study visit. RESULTS: One hundred six patients were recruited. Twenty-four did not attend any mucositis assessments. One was removed from the study because of off-study consumption of store-bought manuka honey. The remaining 81 patients had at least one mucositis assessment and were included in the analysis. Sixty-two percent of subjects received concurrent chemotherapy; 81 % were male. The groups were well-matched, and blinding was excellent. Dropouts were mostly due to nausea and were similar in both arms, with 78 % being able to tolerate the study products for more than 1 week. The dropout rate was 57 % in those who received honey and 52 % in those who received placebo gel. The dropout rate in those who had concurrent chemotherapy was 59 % and in those who only received radiation was 47 %. There was no statistically significant difference between the honey and placebo arms in any of the outcome indicators. Those who completed the study in both treatment arms had low rates of RTOG greater than or equal to grade 3 mucositis; 35 % in the honey group and 43 % in the placebo group. CONCLUSION: Despite promising earlier reports, manuka honey was not tolerated well by our patients and, even when used as directed, did not have a significant impact on the severity of ROM.

Differences between referred and nonreferred patients in cancer research.

BACKGROUND: In Canada, provincial cancer registries have been established to provide rigorous population-based data for patients with colorectal cancer. Databases maintained by regional cancer agencies contain a broader scope of information and have been used as a surrogate source of information for colorectal cancer research. It is unclear whether these data can be reliably extrapolated to all patients affected by colorectal cancer. We sought to determine whether patients included in a referral-based database are systematically different from patients who are not included. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study to compare patients referred to the British Columbia Cancer Agency with those who were not referred. Comparison was based on age, sex and geographic location. We used univariate and logistic regression analysis to identify significant differences between the cohorts. RESULTS: Univariate analysis demonstrated that the referral and nonreferral cohorts differed in sex, age and geographic location. For patients with rectal cancer, the referral and nonreferral cohorts varied in age and geographic location. Multivariate analysis demonstrated significant differences in age and geographic location but not sex for patients with colon and rectal cancer. CONCLUSION: Patients included in the referral database differed in age and geographic location from those included only in the provincial database. Studies using large data sets from referral centres must be interpreted with caution and may not be representative of the entire patient population.

CONTEXTE: Au Canada, on a établi des registres provinciaux en oncologie pour générer des données représentatives rigoureuses au sujet des patients atteints de cancer colorectal. Les bases de données maintenues par les agences régionales du cancer contiennent un éventail plus large de renseignements et ont servi de source de données de substitution pour la recherche sur le cancer colorectal. Or, on ignore s'il est possible d'extrapoler ces données de manière fiable à tous les patients atteints de cancer colorectal. Nous avons voulu déterminer si les patients inclus dans une base de données de référence sont systématiquement différents des patients qui n'y figurent pas. MÉTHODES: Nous avons procédé à une étude de cohorte rétrospective pour comparer les patients référés à l'agence de lutte contre le cancer de la Colombie-Britanniqueà ceux qui n'y avaient pas été référés. La comparaison reposait sur l'âge, le sexe et l'emplacement géographique. Nous avons utilisé une analyse de régression univariée et logistique pour dégager les différences significatives entre les cohortes. RÉSULTATS: L'analyse univariée a démontré que les cohortes référée et non référée différaient aux plans du sexe, de l'âge et de l'emplacement géographique. Pour les patients atteints d'un cancer rectal, les cohortes référée et non référée variaient selon l'âge et l'emplacement géographique. L'analyse multivariée a révélé des différences significatives aux plans de l'âge et de l'emplacement géographique, mais non au plan du sexe en ce qui concerne les patients atteints de cancer du côlon et du rectum. CONCLUSION: Les patients inclus dans la base de données de référence étaient différents de ceux qui ne figuraient que dans la base de données provinciale, pour ce qui est de l'âge et de l'emplacement géographique. Il faut interpréter avec prudence lesétudes reposant sur d'importantes séries de données provenant de centres de référence, car elles pourraient ne pas être représentatives de toute la population de patients.

Stage at diagnosis and colorectal cancer survival in six high-income countries: a population-based study of patients diagnosed during 2000-2007.

BACKGROUND: Large international differences in colorectal cancer survival exist, even between countries with similar healthcare. We investigate the extent to which stage at diagnosis explains these differences. METHODS: Data from population-based cancer registries in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden and the UK were analysed for 313 852 patients diagnosed with colon or rectal cancer during 2000-2007. We compared the distributions of stage at diagnosis. We estimated both stage-specific net survival and the excess hazard of death up to three years after diagnosis, using flexible parametric models on the log-cumulative excess hazard scale. RESULTS: International differences in colon and rectal cancer stage distributions were wide: Denmark showed a distribution skewed towards later-stage disease, while Australia, Norway and the UK showed high proportions of 'regional' disease. One-year colon cancer survival was 67% in the UK and ranged between 71% (Denmark) and 80% (Australia and Sweden) elsewhere. For rectal cancer, one-year survival was also low in the UK (75%), compared to 79% in Denmark and 82-84% elsewhere. International survival differences were also evident for each stage of disease, with the UK showing consistently lowest survival at one and three years. CONCLUSION: Differences in stage at diagnosis partly explain international differences in colorectal cancer survival, with a more adverse stage distribution contributing to comparatively low survival in Denmark. Differences in stage distribution could arise because of differences in diagnostic delay and awareness of symptoms, or in the thoroughness of staging procedures. Nevertheless, survival differences also exist for each stage of disease, suggesting unequal access to optimal treatment, particularly in the UK.

Lung cancer survival and stage at diagnosis in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden and the UK: a population-based study, 2004-2007.

BACKGROUND: The authors consider whether differences in stage at diagnosis could explain the variation in lung cancer survival between six developed countries in 2004-2007. METHODS: Routinely collected population-based data were obtained on all adults (15-99 years) diagnosed with lung cancer in 2004-2007 and registered in regional and national cancer registries in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden and the UK. Stage data for 57 352 patients were consolidated from various classification systems. Flexible parametric hazard models on the log cumulative scale were used to estimate net survival at 1 year and the excess hazard up to 18 months after diagnosis. RESULTS: Age-standardised 1-year net survival from non-small cell lung cancer ranged from 30% (UK) to 46% (Sweden). Patients in the UK and Denmark had lower survival than elsewhere, partly because of a more adverse stage distribution. However, there were also wide international differences in stage-specific survival. Net survival from TNM stage I non-small cell lung cancer was 16% lower in the UK than in Sweden, and for TNM stage IV disease survival was 10% lower. Similar patterns were found for small cell lung cancer. CONCLUSIONS: There are comparability issues when using population-based data but, even given these constraints, this study shows that, while differences in stage at diagnosis explain some of the international variation in overall lung cancer survival, wide disparities in stage-specific survival exist, suggesting that other factors are also important such as differences in treatment. Stage should be included in international cancer survival studies and the comparability of population-based data should be improved.

The impact of geographic variations in treatment on outcomes in ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE: There are significant regional differences in survival outcomes across British Columbia among women with ovarian cancer. The age-adjusted hazard ratio for mortality is 1.27 (95% confidence interval, 1.08-1.49) in 1 health authority region compared to the provincial mean. The objective of this study was to look at variations in the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer among the 5 health authority regions in the province of British Columbia and determine their effect on survival. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This was a population-based retrospective cohort study of all incident cases of epithelial ovarian cancer diagnosed in British Columbia from 2005 to 2008. Health authority regions were compared with the χ(2) test for demographic and disease characteristics, as well as treatment practices including assessment by a gynecologic oncologist, rate of optimal debulking, and proportion receiving platinum-based combination chemotherapy. Multivariable Cox regression analysis evaluated the effect of covariates on survival. RESULTS: There were 854 evaluable patients. Across health authority regions, there were significant differences in disease characteristics, including the proportion with serous histotype (44.0%-60.7%, P = 0.043) and stage IIIC/IV disease (50.3%-69.4%, P = 0.0048). There were also significant differences in treatment, including the proportion of patients assessed by a gynecologic oncologist (56.8%-79.4%, P = 0.0003), rate of suboptimal debulking, (21.4%-60.2%, P = 0.0036), and the proportion receiving combination chemotherapy, (61.5%-81.9%, P < 0.0001). Cox regression model revealed that stage, grade, optimal debulking, and combination chemotherapy were significantly associated with survival. The health authority region with the highest mortality had the lowest rate of optimal debulking and combination chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in survival rates for ovarian cancer across British Columbia can be attributed to variations in disease characteristics and treatment, particularly rates of optimal debulking and combination chemotherapy.

Outcomes of unselected patients with pathologic T3N0 rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This study compares the outcomes of patients with pathological (p) T3N0 rectal cancer treated with surgery alone (S), surgery and radiation (SR) or surgery, radiation and chemotherapy (SRC), in a population based setting. MATERIALS: Three hundred and seven patients with operable, macroscopically resected pT3N0 rectal cancer referred to the BC Cancer Agency between 2000 and 2004 were segregated by treatment type: S (n=65), SR (n=97) and SRC (n=145). Patient characteristics, 5-year locoregional recurrence (LRR) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were compared between treatment cohorts. RESULTS: Median age differed significantly between S, SR and SRC patient cohorts: 76, 72 and 64 years respectively. Five-year LRR differed by treatment group, with 29% for S, 6.3% for SR and 3.84% for SRC patients. DSS was superior in SRC compared to S patients (hazard ratio=0.31 [0.17, 0.60]). Co-morbidities and patient preference were most common reasons for omission of radiation. CONCLUSIONS: Unselected patients with pT3N0 rectal cancer not treated with peri-operative radiation experience a high rate of LRR and reduced DSS in comparison to patients treated with bimodality and trimodality therapies. Advanced age is significantly associated with omission of therapy in patients with early stage rectal cancer.

Stage at diagnosis and ovarian cancer survival: evidence from the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership.

OBJECTIVE: We investigate what role stage at diagnosis bears in international differences in ovarian cancer survival. METHODS: Data from population-based cancer registries in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, and the UK were analysed for 20,073 women diagnosed with ovarian cancer during 2004-07. We compare the stage distribution between countries and estimate stage-specific one-year net survival and the excess hazard up to 18 months after diagnosis, using flexible parametric models on the log cumulative excess hazard scale. RESULTS: One-year survival was 69% in the UK, 72% in Denmark and 74-75% elsewhere. In Denmark, 74% of patients were diagnosed with FIGO stages III-IV disease, compared to 60-70% elsewhere. International differences in survival were evident at each stage of disease; women in the UK had lower survival than in the other four countries for patients with FIGO stages III-IV disease (61.4% vs. 65.8-74.4%). International differences were widest for older women and for those with advanced stage or with no stage data. CONCLUSION: Differences in stage at diagnosis partly explain international variation in ovarian cancer survival, and a more adverse stage distribution contributes to comparatively low survival in Denmark. This could arise because of differences in tumour biology, staging procedures or diagnostic delay. Differences in survival also exist within each stage, as illustrated by lower survival for advanced disease in the UK, suggesting unequal access to optimal treatment. Population-based data on cancer survival by stage are vital for cancer surveillance, and global consensus is needed to make stage data in cancer registries more consistent.

Determination of factors predictive of outcome for patients undergoing a pancreaticoduodenectomy of pancreatic head ductal adenocarcinomas.

INTRODUCTION: A pancreaticoduodenectomy is the reference treatment for a resectable pancreatic head ductal adenocarcinoma. The probability of 5-year survival in patients undergoing such treatment is 5-25% and is associated with relatively high peri-operative morbidity and mortality. The objective of the present study was to evaluate risk factors predictive of outcome for patients undergoing a pancreaticoduodenectomy for a pancreatic adenocarcinoma. METHODS: This retrospective analysis incorporated data from the Vancouver General Hospital and the British Columbia Cancer Agency (BCCA) from 1999-2007. RESULTS: The 5-year survival of 100 patients was 12% with a median survival of 16.5 months. Ninety-day mortality was 7%. Predictors of 90-day mortality included age ≥ 80 years (P < 0.001) and an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score = 3 (P= 0.012) by univariate analysis and age ≥80 years (P < 0.001) by multivariate analysis. The identifiable predictive factor for poor 5-year survival was an ASA score = 3 (P= 0.043) whereas a Dindo-Clavien surgical complication grade ≥ 3 was associated with a worse outcome (P= 0.013). Referral to the BCCA was associated with a favourable 5-year survival (P= 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The present study identifies risk factors for patient selection to enhance survival benefit in this patient population.

Referral Patterns of Patients for Palliative Radiation Therapy in British Columbia: A Comparison Between Rural and Urban Family Physicians.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that palliative radiation therapy (PRT) is often underused, especially in rural and remote settings despite evidence supporting its effectiveness in managing symptoms from advanced or metastatic cancer. PURPOSE: To identify factors which influence family physicians (FPs) in British Columbia (BC) to refer patients for PRT at the BC Cancer Agency (BCCA) and to compare referral patterns between FPs in rural and urban areas. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 1,001 questionnaires were sent to all FPs practicing in rural areas and randomly to FPs in urban areas (351 and 650, respectively). Rural and urban areas were chosen based on our previous study of utilization rates of PRT in BC. The questionnaire was adapted from a previously validated survey, and was used to obtain information on referral practices of FPs in BC. FPs who did not practice family medicine or where 80% of their practice was spent with either obstetrical or pediatric patients were excluded. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 33% (44% rural vs. 28% urban). Rural FPs were more involved in both palliative care and metastatic cancer management of their patients (88% vs. 74%; P = .01 and 58% vs. 39%; P = .01). No difference was observed in the FPs' awareness of the BCCA's Radiation Oncology Program. The most significant factors influencing an FP to refer a patient for PRT were: poor functional status, inconvenience to travel and life expectancy. A higher proportion of rural FPs had 10 years or less of experience in family practice than the urban FPs (P = .03). There was no significant difference in the formal training or additional training between the rural and urban FPs. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that FPs practicing in rural areas were more involved in palliative management of their patients and participated more in the care of patients with advanced or metastatic cancer than those in urban areas. They also more commonly referred patients for palliative radiotherapy than their urban counterparts. The reported factors that influenced rural and urban FPs to refer were patients' functional status and life expectancy, combined with uncertain benefit and potential side effects of radiotherapy. More than twice as many FPs from rural compared to urban areas were influenced by perceived inconvenience to travel for palliative radiotherapy. After controlling for potential confounding factors, FP awareness of the radiotherapy program, high participation in advanced, metastatic, or palliative care of cancer patients, formal training in radiation oncology, and additional training in palliative care were all associated with an increased probability of ever referring for palliative radiotherapy.

Surveillance after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: outcomes, costs, and cost-effectiveness.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate outcomes and costs of surveillance strategies after treatment for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). METHODS: A hypothetical cohort of women was evaluated after treatment for CIN 2 or 3 using a Markov model incorporating data from a large study of women treated for CIN, systematic reviews of test accuracy, and individual preferences. Surveillance strategies included initial conventional or liquid-based cytology, human papillomavirus testing, or colposcopy 6 months after treatment, followed by annual or triennial cytology. Estimated outcomes included CIN, cervical cancer, cervical cancer deaths, life expectancy, costs, cost per life-year, and cost per quality-adjusted life-year. RESULTS: Conventional cytology at 6 and 12 months, followed by triennial cytology, was least costly. Compared with triennial cytology, annual cytology follow-up reduced expected cervical cancer deaths by 73% to 77% and had an average incremental cost per life-year gained of $69,000 to $81,000. For colposcopy followed by annual cytology, the incremental cost per life-year gained ranged from $70,000 to more than $1 million, depending on risk. Between-strategy differences in mean additional life expectancy per woman were less than 4 days; differences in mean incremental costs per woman were as high as $822. In the cost-utility analysis, colposcopy at 6 months followed by annual cytology had an incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year of less than $5,500. Human papillomavirus testing or liquid-based cytology added little to no improvement to life-expectancy with higher costs. CONCLUSION: Annual conventional cytology surveillance reduced cervical cancers and cancer deaths compared with triennial cytology. For high risk of recurrence, a strategy of colposcopy at 6 months increased life expectancy and quality-adjusted life expectancy. Human papillomavirus testing and liquid-based cytology increased costs, but not effectiveness, compared with traditional approaches.

Effects of change in rectal cancer management on outcomes in British Columbia.

BACKGROUND: In a province-wide audit of patients undergoing treatment for rectal cancer in British Columbia in 1996, the 4-year rate of pelvic recurrence for stage 3 rectal cancer was 27%. The management guidelines were changed in 2002 to include adjuvant short-course preoperative radiation and total mesorectal excision surgical techniques. Education workshops were held to implement the protocol change. METHODS: We performed a provincial audit of rectal cancer cases for patients treated in the year after the protocol change, and we compared the pelvic recurrence rates with those from the audit performed in 1996. RESULTS: During a 12-month period beginning Oct. 1, 2003, a total of 367 patients underwent radical resection of rectal cancer with a curative intent. Preoperative adjuvant radiotherapy was used in 54% of cases (197/367). Median follow-up was 34.5 months, and 91% of patients were followed for at least 2 years. Relative to the 1996 cohort, there was a decreasing trend in 2-year overall pelvic recurrence rates in the 2003/04 cohort (9.6% v. 6.9%) and a significant decrease in recurrence among patients with stage 3 cancers (18.2% v. 9.2%; p = 0.020). Use of adjuvant radiation increased significantly (37% v. 65%; p < 0.001), and negative radial margins were achieved in 87% (319/367) of cases. CONCLUSION: The rates of pelvic recurrence were improved after changes in the management guidelines advocating increased use of total mesorectal excision surgery and preoperative radiation. Knowledge translation with an integrated strategy among surgeons and medical and radiation oncologists was successful in improving population outcomes among patients with rectal cancer.

Long-term survivorship of esophageal cancer patients treated with radical intent.

To investigate the recent trends in definitive management of esophageal cancer, the records of 138 consecutive patients treated with radical intent in a single institution between 1995 and 2003 were reviewed and analyzed. The median follow-up period was 5.7 years (range 1.1 to 10.4 years). Seventy-seven patients were treated with radiation therapy (RT) only and 61 with combined regimens (CRT), in which RT was combined with either radical surgery or chemotherapy, or both. The overall survival of the entire cohort was 32% over two years and 20% over five years. The survivorship in the RT group was 17% over two years and 5% over five years. In the CRT group, 51% and 35% survived over two and five years, respectively. From all the potential prognostic factors examined by univariate and multivariate analyses, only male sex and use of CRT were strongly associated with better survivorship. There was no significant difference in the outcomes among the different regimens of CRT. Survivorship was not affected by the location or histology of the tumour, clinical stage, dose of RT or use of endoluminal brachytherapy in addition to external beam RT. There was a greater tendency to use RT only more often in older patients, but patient age did not affect survivorship. The proportion of patients treated with CRT did not change significantly over the last versus the first four years of the observed period. Combined regimens are undoubtedly superior to RT as a single modality. The long-term survivorship of patients in a subgroup of our patients treated with combined modality protocols compared favourably with the previously reported results in the literature and specifically in prospective randomized trials. However, the optimal combined modality regimen is yet to be defined.

Clinical impact of second pathology opinion: a longitudinal study of central genitourinary pathology review before prostate brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical impact of pathology review before prostate brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Original and reviewing pathologists' reports were retrospectively collected from 1323 men treated with prostate brachytherapy between July 1998 and October 2005 at one institution. Statistical analysis was performed pre- and post-January 2002. The clinical impact of pathology review was evaluated. RESULTS: Gleason Score (GS) change (GS(Delta)) occurred in 25.2% (334) of cases; GS increased in 21.6%, decreased in 2.4%, and diagnosed malignancy in 1.2% of cases. Post-2002, concordance in attributed GS improved, with GS(Delta) of 31.9-20.6%, respectively (p<0.001), and a reduction in the average GS(Delta) (p<0.001). The clinical impact was substantial with management changing in 14.8% of cases. CONCLUSION: Concordance between the original and reviewing pathologists' GS has improved during the study period. Nevertheless, discordance persists in one of five cases. Pathology review remains essential, if treatment decisions hinge on GS.