Alkene Isomerisation Catalysed by a Superbasic Sodium Amide.

Typically catalysed by transition metals, alkene isomerisation is a powerful  methodology for preparation of internal olefins. In contrast, the use of more earth abundant main group reagents is limited to activated substrates, requiring high temperatures and excess stoichiometric amounts. Opening a new portal for progressing this field, here we report applications of bulky sodium amide NaTMP (TMP = 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidide) when partnered by tridentate Lewis donor PMDETA (N,N,N',N'',N''-pentamethyldiethylenetriamine) in catalytic alkene isomerisation of terminal olefins under mild reaction conditions. An array of distinct olefins could successfully be isomerised, including unactivated olefins, allylamines and allylethers, showing the high activity of this partnership. In-depth mechanistic insights provided by X-ray crystallography, real-time nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) monitoring, and density functional theory (DFT) calculations have unveiled the crucial role of in-situ-generated TMP(H) in facilitating efficient isomerisation and the choice of alkali-metal. Additionally, theoretical studies shed light on the observed E/Z selectivity, particularly accounting for selective formation of Z-vinyl ethers. The versatility of our method is further demonstrated through isomerisation of unactivated cycloalkenes, which undergo hydrogen isotope exchange to produce deuterated compounds.

Critical care outreach during the COVID-19 pandemic: An observational study.

BACKGROUND: Since the beginning of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak, the Critical Care Outreach Team (CCOT) remained operational to provide critical care support to acutely ill and deteriorating patients on the wards. AIM: We aimed to evaluate the demand and efficacy of the critical care outreach service during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHOD: We prospectively evaluated all patients referred to critical care outreach enrolled during a twelve-month period. We reported the cumulative number of activities and interventions and baseline characteristics, acuity level and patients' clinical outcome. The rate of ICU admissions, activity plan, patients' acuity and mortality are compared to historical data pre-pandemic. RESULTS: Amongst 4849 patients referred, 3913 had a clinical review and of those 895 were COVID-19 positive. Non-invasive ventilation was mostly delivered to COVID-19 patients (COVID-19 +VE: 853/895, 95% vs. COVID-19 -VE: 119/3018, 4%) alongside awake prone positioning (COVID-19 +VE: 232/895, 26% vs. COVID-19 -VE: 0/3018, 0%). Compared to pre-pandemic, the cumulative number of patients assessed increased (observed: 3913 vs. historical: 3615; p = 0.204), patients meeting Level 2 acuity were higher (observed: 51% vs. historical: 21%; p = 0.003), but ICU admission rate did not increase significantly (observed: 12% vs. historical: 9%; p = 0.065), and greater mortality rate (observed: 14% vs. historical: 8%; p = 0.046) was observed. CONCLUSION: Critical care outreach bridges the gap between the intensive care unit and general wards and supports the concept of 'critical care without walls' acting as a valuable resource in optimizing and triaging acutely unwell patients and potentially averting critical care admissions. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The COVID-19 pandemic has generated an unprecedented surge of deteriorating and critically ill patients with has caused severe and sustained pressures on intensive care units (ICUs) and general wards. Acutely ill patients can deteriorate quickly, and early recognition is vital to commence critical intervention on the wards or transfer timely to ICU. The Critical Care Outreach Team can help staff and optimize acutely ill and deteriorating patients by providing timely critical care interventions at the patient bedside.

A multidisciplinary safety briefing for acutely ill and deteriorating patients: A quality improvement project.

BACKGROUND: Safety briefings can help promoting situational awareness, interprofessional communication and improve patient safety. LOCAL PROBLEM: A clinical survey highlighted that 90% of the participants including the medical team and the critical care outreach team nurses perceived the meeting for escalating acutely ill and deteriorating patients during the out-of-hours period (20.00 to 08.00) to have unconstructive and unwelcoming atmosphere with belittling, hostility and unhelpful criticisms. The participants reported that the communication across teams lacked in structure and clear information given; but staff also self-reported lacking confidence in communicating key issues. METHOD: A quality improvement project with Plan-Do-Study-Act was adopted to design and implement a dedicated multidisciplinary safety briefing with a structured format. RESULTS: The multidisciplinary safety briefing was to 90% of clinicians, and it took a median of 10 min to complete. Delayed referrals to the critical care outreach team were reduced by 46%. Positive changes included increased situational awareness and clearer communication across teams. Barriers identified were variable usage and need for face-to-face presence. Considering all the findings and the time constraint during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, we changed to a telephonic safety briefing directly to the team leaders. CONCLUSION: A structured multidisciplinary safety briefing can improve patient safety and support management of deteriorating and acutely ill patients on the wards during the out-of-hours period.

The impact of implementing a hospital electronic prescribing and administration system on clinical pharmacists' activities - a mixed methods study.

BACKGROUND: The increasing adoption of hospital electronic prescribing and medication administration (ePA) systems has driven a wealth of research around the impact on patient safety. Yet relatively little research has sought to understand the effects on staff, particularly pharmacists. We aimed to investigate the effects of ePA on pharmacists' activities, including interactions with patients and health professionals, and their perceptions of medication safety risks. METHODS: A mixed methods study comprising quantitative direct observations of ward pharmacists before and after implementation of ePA in an English hospital, and semi-structured interviews post-ePA. Quantitative data comprised multi-dimensional work activity sampling to establish the proportion of time ward pharmacists spent on different tasks, with whom and where. These data were extrapolated to estimate task duration. Qualitative interviews with pharmacists explored perceived impact on (i) ward activities, (ii) interactions with patients and different health professionals, (iii) locations where tasks were carried out, and (iv) medication errors. RESULTS: Observations totalled 116 h and 50 min. Task duration analysis suggested screening inpatient medication increased by 16 mins per 10 patients reviewed (p = 0.002), and searching for paper drug charts or computer decreased by 2 mins per 10 patients reviewed (p = 0.001). Pharmacists mainly worked alone (58% of time pre- and 65% post-ePA, p = 0.17), with patient interactions reducing from 5 to 2% of time (p = 0.03). Seven main themes were identified from the interviews, underpinned by a core explanatory concept around the enhanced and shifting role of the ward pharmacist post-ePA. Pharmacists perceived there to be a number of valuable safety features with ePA. However, paradoxically, some of these may have also inadvertently contributed to medication errors. CONCLUSION: This study provides quantitative and qualitative insights into the effects of implementing ePA on ward pharmacists' activities. Some tasks took longer while others reduced, and pharmacists may spend less time with patients with ePA. Pharmacists valued a number of safety features associated with ePA but also perceived an overall increase in medication risk. Pharmacy staff demonstrated a degree of resilience to ensure 'business as usual' by enhancing and adapting their role.