The reproducibility of organ position using active breathing control (ABC) during liver radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the intrafraction and interfraction reproducibility of liver immobilization using active breathing control (ABC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with unresectable intrahepatic tumors who could comfortably hold their breath for at least 20 s were treated with focal liver radiation using ABC for liver immobilization. Fluoroscopy was used to measure any potential motion during ABC breath holds. Preceding each radiotherapy fraction, with the patient setup in the nominal treatment position using ABC, orthogonal radiographs were taken using room-mounted diagnostic X-ray tubes and a digital imager. The radiographs were compared to reference images using a 2D alignment tool. The treatment table was moved to produce acceptable setup, and repeat orthogonal verification images were obtained. The positions of the diaphragm and the liver (assessed by localization of implanted radiopaque intra-arterial microcoils) relative to the skeleton were subsequently analyzed. The intrafraction reproducibility (from repeat radiographs obtained within the time period of one fraction before treatment) and interfraction reproducibility (from comparisons of the first radiograph for each treatment with a reference radiograph) of the diaphragm and the hepatic microcoil positions relative to the skeleton with repeat breath holds using ABC were then measured. Caudal-cranial (CC), anterior-posterior (AP), and medial-lateral (ML) reproducibility of the hepatic microcoils relative to the skeleton were also determined from three-dimensional alignment of repeat CT scans obtained in the treatment position. RESULTS: A total of 262 fractions of radiation were delivered using ABC breath holds in 8 patients. No motion of the diaphragm or hepatic microcoils was observed on fluoroscopy during ABC breath holds. From analyses of 158 sets of positioning radiographs, the average intrafraction CC reproducibility (sigma) of the diaphragm and hepatic microcoil position relative to the skeleton using ABC repeat breath holds was 2.5 mm (range 1.8-3.7 mm) and 2.3 mm (range 1.2-3.7 mm) respectively. However, based on 262 sets of positioning radiographs, the average interfraction CC reproducibility (sigma) of the diaphragm and hepatic microcoils was 4.4 mm (range 3.0-6.1 mm) and 4.3 mm (range 3.1-5.7 mm), indicating a change of diaphragm and microcoil position relative to the skeleton over the course of treatment with repeat breath holds at the same phase of the respiratory cycle. The average population absolute intrafraction CC offset in diaphragm and microcoil position relative to skeleton was 2.4 mm and 2.1 mm respectively; the average absolute interfraction CC offset was 5.2 mm. Analyses of repeat CT scans demonstrated that the average intrafraction excursion of the hepatic microcoils relative to the skeleton in the CC, AP, and ML directions was 1.9 mm, 0.6 mm, and 0.6 mm respectively and the average interfraction CC, AP, and ML excursion of the hepatic microcoils was 6.6 mm, 3.2 mm, and 3.3 mm respectively. CONCLUSION: Radiotherapy using ABC for patients with intrahepatic cancer is feasible, with good intrafraction reproducibility of liver position using ABC. However, the interfraction reproducibility of organ position with ABC suggests the need for daily on-line imaging and repositioning if treatment margins smaller than those required for free breathing are a goal.

Phase I trial of radiation dose escalation with concurrent weekly full-dose gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

PURPOSE: The primary objective of this phase I trial was to determine the maximum-tolerated dose of radiation that could be delivered to the primary tumor concurrent with full-dose gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty seven patients with unresectable (n = 34) or incompletely resected pancreatic cancer (n = 3) were treated. Gemcitabine was administered as a 30-minute intravenous infusion at a dose of 1,000 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Radiation therapy was initiated on day 1 and directed at the primary tumor alone, without prophylactic nodal coverage. The starting radiation dose was 24 Gy in 1.6-Gy fractions. Escalation was achieved by increasing the fraction size in increments of 0.2 Gy, keeping the duration of radiation constant at 3 weeks. A second cycle of gemcitabine alone was intended after a 1-week rest. RESULTS: Two of six assessable patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity at the final planned dose level of the trial (42 Gy in 2.8-Gy fractions), one with grade 4 vomiting and one with gastric/duodenal ulceration. Two additional patients at this dose level experienced late gastrointestinal toxicity that required surgical management. CONCLUSION: The final dose investigated (42 Gy) is not recommended for further study considering the occurrence of both acute and late toxicity. However, a phase II trial of this novel gemcitabine-based chemoradiotherapy approach, at a radiation dose of 36 Gy in 2.4-Gy fractions, is recommended on the basis of tolerance, patterns of failure, and survival data.

Recent advances in the use of radiosensitizing nucleosides.

Chemotherapeutic drugs that perturb nucleotide metabolism have the potential to produce substantial sensitization of tumor cells to radiation treatment. The clinical effectiveness of fluoropyrimidines as radiosensitizers has been proven in multiple randomized trials. The development of oral fluoropyrimidine formulations may allow protracted exposure without the need for indwelling intravenous lines and infusion pumps. These agents may also provide more selective radiosensitization and are likely to be widely incorporated into chemoradiotherapy regimens for patients with gastrointestinal malignancies. Gemcitabine has been well studied in the laboratory, with respect to mechanisms of radiosensitization and strategies that may increase the therapeutic index. Clinical trials based on these studies are now defining the role of this radiosensitizing nucleoside. Issues regarding the use oral fluoropyrimidines and gemcitabine need to be viewed in the context of both local and distant disease control, given the potential systemic activity of these agents.

Combined-modality therapy in pancreatic cancer: current status and future directions.

The use of chemotherapy with concurrent radiation therapy remains a standard treatment option for patients with unresectable or resected adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. This treatment strategy is based in large part on data from serial Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group (GITSG) trials, which have included 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Unfortunately, the majority of patients continue to succumb to the disease process. Recently, there has been a resurgence in clinical trials investigating alternative combined modality treatment strategies for patients with pancreatic cancer. In this review, we will summarize both the mature and more recent data pertaining to combined modality therapy for patients with unresectable or resected pancreatic cancer. Strategies utilizing concurrent gemcitabine, alternative radiation therapy techniques, and/or altered sequencing of therapies will be highlighted. Such modifications to the approach in use since the 1980s will need to be fully considered as clinical trials utilizing chemoradiotherapy regimens and new systemic agents or novel targeted therapies are designed.

Cell cycle regulation of the G0/G1 transition in 5-fluorouracil-sensitive and -resistant human colon cancer cell lines.

PURPOSE: Resistance to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has been associated with thymidylate synthase (TS) gene amplification and increased TS protein levels. Increased TS protein expression has also been found to be a significant independent prognostic factor for disease-free survival and overall survival in patients treated with adjuvant 5-FU-based chemotherapy. In these studies and in our prior preclinical studies, TS has been considered a marker of proliferative capacity. The purpose of the current study was to further evaluate the association between TS levels and cell cycle regulation, by investigating cell cycle kinetics in a 5-FU-resistant cell line with constitutive overexpression of TS. The influence of increased TS levels on cell cycle progression may provide insight into methods to overcome 5-FU resistance. MATERIALS: 5-FU-sensitive NCI H630(WT) and 5-FU-resistant NCI H630(R1) (with 15- to 20-fold higher TS protein levels) were utilized in this investigation to determine the influence of constitutive overexpression of TS on cell cycle kinetics. RESULTS: There was no apparent influence of increased TS levels on cell cycle distribution during asynchronous growth, and both cell lines reach plateau growth phase in 120 hours, arresting in G0/G1 as determined by flow cytometry. In the H630(WT) cells, this G0/ G1 arrest was associated with a 14- to 17-fold reduction in TS activity and protein levels (using the TS-106 monoclonal antibody), whereas in the H630(R1) cells, only a two- to fivefold reduction was noted. Flow cytometry analysis utilizing Ki-67 indicated that there was no evidence of a G0 population in the confluent H630(R1), whereas 26% +/- 7% of confluent H630(WT) cells were Ki-67 negative (G0) and the remainder had low Ki-67 signal intensity. Analysis of pRb phosphorylation and p16 and p21 expression suggested that the arrest point for both cell lines was before the point at which Rb phosphorylation takes place, yet the confluent H630(R1) cells had threefold higher p21 than confluent H630(WT) cells. DISCUSSION: These data suggest that the 5-FU-resistant H630(R1) cell lines arrest at a later point in G0/G1 and have a potentially greater capacity for proliferation.

Escalated focal liver radiation and concurrent hepatic artery fluorodeoxyuridine for unresectable intrahepatic malignancies.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the response, time to progression, survival, and impact of radiation (RT) dose on survival in patients with intrahepatic malignancies treated on a phase I trial of escalated focal liver RT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From April 1996 to January 1998, 43 patients with unresectable intrahepatic hepatobiliary cancer (HB; 27 patients) and colorectal liver metastases (LM; 16 patients) were treated with high-dose conformal RT. The median tumor size was 10 x 10 x 8 cm. The median RT dose was 58.5 Gy (range, 28.5 to 90 Gy), 1.5 Gy twice daily, with concurrent continuous-infusion hepatic arterial fluorodeoxyuridine (0.2 mg/kg/d) during the first 4 weeks of RT. RESULTS: The response rate in 25 assessable patients was 68% (16 partial and one complete response). With a median potential follow-up period of 26.5 months, the median times to progression for all tumors, LM, and HB were 6, 8, and 3 months, respectively. The median survival times of all patients, patients with LM, and patients with HB were 16, 18, and 11 months, respectively. On multivariate analyses, escalated RT dose was independently associated with improved progression-free and overall survival. The median survival of patients treated with 70 Gy or more has not yet been reached (16.4+ months), compared with 11.6 months in patients treated with lower RT doses (P =.0003). CONCLUSION: The excellent response rate, prolonged intrahepatic control, and improved survival in patients treated with RT doses of 70 Gy or more motivate continuation of dose-escalation studies for patients with intrahepatic malignancies.

Radiosensitization by gemcitabine.

Gemcitabine is a potent radiosensitizer in both laboratory studies and in the clinic. Initial laboratory studies showed that gemcitabine radiosensitizes a wide variety of rodent and human tumor cells in culture. Maximum radiosensitization occurs in cells that demonstrate concurrent redistribution into S phase and d-adenosine triphosphate pool depletion. Although the mechanism of sensitization is not yet clear, recent evidence from our laboratory suggests that gemcitabine lowers the threshold for radiation-induced apoptosis. Our preclinical data were used to design gemcitabine dose-escalation trials in combination with standard radiation for patients with unresectable head and neck cancer and pancreatic cancer. In head and neck cancer, we have found that gemcitabine doses far below the maximum tolerated dose for the drug when used alone significantly potentiate the toxicity of treatment. Comparatively, normal tissue sensitization has not been as marked in the treatment of pancreatic tumors. These findings have led us to conduct experiments using an animal model to improve the therapeutic index of treatment. We conclude that gemcitabine is a promising radiation sensitizer that will need to be developed cautiously if excessive normal tissue toxicity is to be avoided.

Improvement of CT-based treatment-planning models of abdominal targets using static exhale imaging.

PURPOSE: CT-based models of the patient that do not account for the motion of ventilation may not accurately predict the shape and position of critical abdominal structures. Respiratory gating technology for imaging and treatment is not yet widely available. The purpose of the current study is to explore an intermediate step to improve the veracity of the patient model and reduce the treated volume by acquiring the CT data with the patients holding their breath at normal exhale. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The ventilatory time courses of diaphragm movement for 15 patients (with no special breathing instructions) were measured using digitized movies from the fluoroscope during simulation. A subsequent clinical protocol was developed for treatment based on exhale CT models. CT scans (typically 3.5-mm slice thickness) were acquired at normal exhale using a spiral scanner. The scan volume was divided into two to three segments, to allow the patient to breathe in between. Margins were placed about intrahepatic target volumes based on the ventilatory excursion inferior to the target, and on only the reproducibility of exhale position superior to the target. RESULTS: The average patient's diaphragm remained within 25% of the range of ventilatory excursion from the average exhale position for 42% of the typical breathing cycle, and within 25% of the range from the average inhale position for 15% of the cycle. The reproducibility of exhale position over multiple breathing cycles was 0.9 mm (2sigma), as opposed to 2.6 mm for inhale. Combining the variation of exhale position and the uncertainty in diaphragm position from CT slices led to typical margins of 10 mm superior to the target, and 19 mm inferior to the target, compared to margins of 19 mm in both directions under our prior protocol of margins based on free-breathing CT studies. For a typical intrahepatic target, these smaller volumes resulted in a 3.6% reduction in Veff for the liver. Analysis of portal films shows proper target coverage for patients treated based on exhale modeled plans. CONCLUSIONS: Modeling abdominal treatments at exhale, while not realizing all the gains of gated treatments, provides an immediate reduction in the volume of normal tissue treated, and improved reliability of patient data for NTCP modeling, when compared to current "free breathing" CT models of patients.

Treatment of intrahepatic cancers with radiation doses based on a normal tissue complication probability model.

PURPOSE: To attempt to safely escalate the dose of radiation for patients with intrahepatic cancer, we designed a protocol in which each patient received the maximum possible dose while being subjected to a 10% risk of radiation-induced liver disease (RILD, or radiation hepatitis) based on a normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) model. We had two hypotheses: H1; with this approach, we could safely deliver higher doses of radiation than we would have prescribed based on our previous protocol, and H2; the model would predict the observed complication probability (10%). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with either primary hepatobiliary cancer or colorectal cancer metastatic to the liver and normal liver function were eligible. We used an NTCP model with parameters calculated from our previous patient data to prescribe a dose that subjected each patient to a 10% complication risk within the model. Treatment was delivered with concurrent hepatic arterial fluorodeoxyuridine (HA FUdR). Patients were evaluated for RILD 2 and 4 months after the completion of treatment. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients completed treatment and were followed up for at least 3 months. The mean dose delivered by the current protocol was 56.6 +/- 2.31 Gy (range, 40.5 to 81 Gy). This dose was significantly greater than the dose that would have been prescribed by the previous protocol (46.0 +/- 1.65 Gy; range, 33 to 66 Gy; P < .01). These data are consistent with H1. One of 21 patients developed RILD. The complication rate of 4.8% (95% confidence interval, 0% to 23.8%) did not differ significantly from the predicted 8.8% NTCP (based on dose delivered) and excluded a 25% true incidence rate (P < .05). This finding supports H2. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that an NTCP model can be used prospectively to safely deliver far greater doses of radiation for patients with intrahepatic cancer than with previous approaches. Although the observed complication probability is within the confidence intervals of our model, it is possible that this model overestimates the risk of complication and that further dose escalation will be possible. Additional follow-up and accrual will be required to determine if these higher doses produce further improvements in response and survival.

A phase I trial of hepatic arterial bromodeoxyuridine and conformal radiation therapy for patients with primary hepatobiliary cancers or colorectal liver metastases.

PURPOSE: We have previously found that conformal radiation therapy (RT) and hepatic arterial fluorodeoxyuridine was associated with durable responses and long-term survival for patients treated for nondiffuse primary hepatobiliary tumors and colorectal liver metastases. Further improvements in hepatic control may result from the addition of selective radiosensitization using bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) infused through the hepatic artery (HA) concurrently with RT. This is a Phase I study of escalating doses of HA BrdU combined with our standard hepatic RT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with unresectable primary hepatobiliary cancer or colorectal liver metastases were treated with concurrent HA BrdU and conformal RT (1.5 Gy per fraction, twice a day). Three-dimensional treatment planning was used to define both the target and normal liver volumes. The total dose of RT (24, 48, or 66 Gy) was determined by the fractional volume of normal liver excluded from the high dose volume. HA BrdU was escalated in standard Phase I fashion with at least three patients receiving each combination of RT dose and BrdU dose. The starting dose of HA BrdU was 10 mg/kg/day, with two potential escalations to a maximum of 25 mg/kg/day (the maximum tolerable dose of HA BrdU when given alone on this same schedule). Grade > or = 3 toxicity was considered dose limiting. Patients receiving 24 Gy had one cycle of HA BrdU, while those receiving either 48 or 66 Gy had two cycles. Patients were followed for toxicity, complications, and response (when evaluable). RESULTS: A total of 41 patients (18 with colorectal liver metastases, 16 with cholangiocarcinoma and 7 with hepatoma) were treated. Five patients were removed from the protocol (three had HA catheter complications, one developed atrial fibrillation, and one was removed due to recurrent Grade 4 toxicity), although all five are included for toxicity purposes. Dose-limiting toxicity was primarily thrombocytopenia and there was no obvious relationship with the RT dose. Only 2 of 17 cycles given at 25 mg/kg/day had Grade > or = 3 toxicity. Complications developed in four patients, including one patient with radiation-induced liver disease. Response rates were not improved compared to our previous experience. CONCLUSIONS: The appropriate dose of HA BrdU for Phase II evaluation is 25 mg/kg/day. Neither the hepatic parenchyma nor the gastrointestinal mucosa appeared to be sensitized by this method of BrdU administration. It is anticipated that these, or still newer methods of therapy, can improve treatment results in the near future.

Radiosensitizing nucleosides.

Chemotherapeutic drugs that perturb nucleotide metabolism have the potential to produce substantial sensitization of tumor cells to radiation treatment. The process is called radiosensitization, and the agents that induce it are called radiosensitizers. The clinical effectiveness of fluoropyrimidines as radiosensitizers has been proven in multiple randomized trials. Thymidine analogues and hydroxyurea also appear to produce clinically relevant increases in radiation sensitivity. Recent laboratory investigations have identified difluorodeoxycytidine (gemcitabine) and fludarabine as promising agents to use in combination with radiation. Until recently, little was known about how the biochemical changes caused by these drugs produced radiosensitization. However, advances in related fields, such as cell cycle checkpoint control, have permitted the development of a hypothesis that may explain the relative tumor selectivity of fluoropyrimidine-mediated radiosensitization. In addition, recent findings suggest that the rational manipulation of drug administration schedules and the use of combinations of radiosensitizers have the potential to improve the efficacy of the currently used agents and to establish the benefit of new ones.

Leucovorin modulation of 5-iododeoxyuridine radiosensitization: a phase I study.

Evidence for clinically significant radiosensitization by the halogenated pyrimidine 5-iododeoxyuridine (IdUrd) continues to accumulate. In vitro radiosensitization has been demonstrated in human colon tumor cell lines following exposure to 1-10 micrometer. Coadministration of leucovorin (LV) increases radiosensitization, which correlates directly with increased IdUrd DNA incorporation. Clinical data regarding proliferation rates and thymidine kinase levels in tumors versus normal tissues suggest selective incorporation of IdUrd into gastrointestinal tumors may occur. The objectives of this Phase I study were: (a) to assess the feasibility of LV modulation of IdUrd radiosensitization by determining the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of IdUrd plus LV; and (b) to perform correlative laboratory studies to investigate the potential of IdUrd plus LV to increase radiosensitization in vivo. Seventeen patients with unresectable or recurrent gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas received a 14-day course of continuous i.v. infusion of IdUrd prior to initiation of radiotherapy. Two additional 14-day infusions of IdUrd with LV were given during the course of radiotherapy (60 Gy in 6 weeks). The initial dose of IdUrd was 250 mg/m2/day and was escalated in subsequent patients to 400 and 600 mg/m2/day. The LV dose remained fixed at 250 mg/m2/day. Leukopenia was the dose-limiting toxicity, and 400 mg/m2/day was the MTD for this trial. At the MTD, the mean +/- SD steady-state plasma concentration of IdUrd during the infusion, measured by high-performance liquid chromatography, was 0.66 +/- 0.23 micrometer. There was no significant influence of LV on IdUrd DNA incorporation in peripheral blood granulocytes as measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. Based on toxicity data and correlative laboratory studies, a meaningful increase in radiosensitization would not be achieved with the IdUrd infusion schedule and dose of LV investigated compared with IdUrd alone.

Increased thymidylate synthase protein levels are principally associated with proliferation but not cell cycle phase in asynchronous human cancer cells.

We have analysed cell cycle variations in thymidylate synthase (TS) protein in asynchronously growing NCl H630 and HT 29 colon cancer and MCF-7 breast cancer cell lines. Western immunoblot analysis using the TS 106 monoclonal antibody revealed a 14- to 24-fold variation in TS levels between the peak exponential and confluent growth phase in the three cell lines. Similar variations in TS levels and TS activity were detected using the 5-fluorodeoxyuridine monophosphate and deoxyuridine monophosphate biochemical assays. The percentage of cells in S-phase, which paralleled changes in TS levels, reached a maximum of 38-60% in asynchronous exponentially growing cells compared with 5-10% in confluent cells. In asynchronous exponential cells, analysis of TS levels in each cell cycle phase using two-parameter flow cytometric analysis revealed that TS protein levels were 1.3- to 1.5-fold higher in S than in G0/G1 phase cells, and 1.5- to 1.8-fold higher in G2/M than G0/G1 cells. Similar differences of 1.1- to 1.5-fold between G0/G1 and S-phase and 1.6- to 1.9-fold between G0/G1 and G2/M-phase were detected by Western immunoblot and biochemical assays. TS protein was not detectable by Western blot analysis, flow cytometry or biochemical analysis in the G0/G1 population of confluent cells. Twenty-six per cent of cells in this population were G0 cells compared with 2% in exponentially growing cells. In contrast to TS, a 4-fold difference in thymidine kinase (TK) was detected between G0/G1 and S-phase cells in exponentially growing MCF-7 cells. The level of TS enzyme is associated with cellular proliferation and the percentage of cells in S-phase; however, TS protein is not exclusively associated with S-phase in asynchronously growing cells. The variation in TS levels between exponentially growing and confluent cell population appears to be due to differences in TS levels between G0 and G1 cells.

The role of cell cycle redistribution in radiosensitization: implications regarding the mechanism of fluorodeoxyuridine radiosensitization.

PURPOSE: Radiosensitization has previously been demonstrated in a human colon cancer cell line (HT-29) following a 2 h exposure to low, clinically relevant concentrations (0.05-0.5 microM) of fluorodeoxyuridine (FdUrd) (15). The sensitizer enhancement ratio value (measured at 10% survival) plateaued at approximately 1.7 between 16 and 32 h following removal of drug. Parallel studies investigating the effect of FdUrd on the distribution of cells throughout the cell cycle found that the percentage of cells in early S-phase increased to approximately 70% during the same period that maximal radiosensitization was noted. As a follow-up to these findings, experiments have been designed to investigate the contribution of this early S-phase delay to radiosensitization. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Synchronized populations of HT-29 cells have been obtained with three separate techniques. Two involve the induction of a reversible metaphase arrest (with high pressure N2O or colcemid) followed by a shakeoff of mitotic cells. The third uses a plant amino acid, mimosine, to induce a reversible block at the G1/S boundary. Flow cytometry was used to analyze the degree of synchrony based on bromodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd) uptake and propidium iodide (PI) staining. Radiation survival curves were obtained on these synchronized populations to investigate changes in radiosensitivity through the cell cycle. Additionally, levels of thymidylate synthase (TS), the primary target of FdUrd cytotoxicity, were measured in each phase of the cell cycle using the TS 106 monoclonal antibody against human TS. RESULTS: Synchronization with mitotic shakeoff produced relatively pure populations of cells in G1; however, the degree of synchrony in early S-phase was limited both by cells remaining in G1 and by cells progressing into late S-phase. These techniques failed to reveal increased radiosensitivity in early S-phase at 10% survival. An 18 h exposure to mimosine resulted in populations that more closely resembled the early S-phase enrichment following FdUrd exposure and revealed increased radiosensitivity during early S-phase. TS levels were noted to be only 1.3 times higher in S phase than in G0/G1. CONCLUSION: Radiation survival data from cells synchronized with mitotic shakeoff techniques suggest that early S-phase delay is unlikely to be the primary mechanism of FdUrd radiosensitization. In contrast, the increased sensitivity seen in early S-phase with mimosine synchronized cells is similar to that seen with FdUrd. Although confounding biochemical pertubations cannot be ruled out, these data continue to suggest an association between early S-phase enrichment and radiosensitization. The significance of TS inhibition as a mechanism of FdUrd radiosensitization remains unclear.

Dose intensification in curative head and neck cancer radiotherapy--linear quadratic analysis and preliminary assessment of clinical results.

PURPOSE: The feasibility of reducing overall treatment time by 2 weeks in the curative radiotherapeutic management of head and neck cancer patients is reported in a pilot trial of Hyperfractionated, Accelerated Radiotherapy with Dose Escalation (HARDE). This regimen prescribes 76 Gy in 5 weeks to definitive head and neck cancer patients, and 65 Gy in 5 weeks to high-risk postoperative patients. The linear quadratic model is used to compare predicted tumor cell kill with HARDE versus that expected with conventional fractionation (CF). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 1991 and March 1992, 40 head and neck cancer patients were treated with HARDE at the University of Wisconsin Comprehensive Cancer Center. Case-matched controls treated with CF were identified from patients treated at the same institution between 1980-1990, based on tumor site, stage, and extent of prior surgery. Individual patient treatment data (total dose, fraction size, overall time) rather than idealized schedule data from each group were analyzed using the linear quadratic model. RESULTS: Seventy-nine case-matched controls were identified for comparison with HARDE patients. The predicted increase in log cell kill for HARDE patients over case-matched controls was 1.5 and 1.3 logs, respectively, in the definitive and postoperative settings. This difference in log cell kill projects an improvement in locoregional tumor control for HARDE patients of between 10-25%. HARDE patients experience very brisk acute mucosal reactions and moderately prolonged mucosal healing, however, 91% have completed therapy without a treatment break. CONCLUSION: A 2-week reduction in overall treatment time for curative head and neck cancer patients is feasible while maintaining doses > 70 Gy. Based on radiobiologic predictions, such treatment intensification may significantly improve rates of locoregional tumor control. However, intensified acute mucosal reactions accompany such accelerated therapy.

The clinical rationale for S-phase radiosensitization in human tumors.

Nonhypoxic cell radiosensitizers, principally the halogenated pyrimidines and hydroxyurea, have been studied in the laboratory and clinical setting for more than 30 years. Early clinical experience in the 1960s and 1970s with the thymidine analogs 5-bromodeoxyuridine (BUdR) and 5-iododeoxyuridine (IUdR) was disappointing because normal tissue toxicity eliminated any potential for therapeutic gain. Inadequate delivery systems for intravenous and intraarterial infusions also contributed to the decline of this strategy. More recently, laboratory investigations have revealed further information regarding the mechanism of IUdR/BUdR radiosensitization. This knowledge provided a rationale for the sequence and timing of drug and radiation exposure, which could be both effective and tolerable. Advancing technology also provided safer infusion devices, and a resurgence in clinical trials combining IUdR or BUdR and radiation resulted. Current laboratory studies are now providing data on tumor cell kinetics, which is being applied to ongoing clinical trials. Fluoropyrimidines, principally 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), were also used in early clinical trials and unlike IUdR/BUdR were found to have significant activity as single agents against a variety of tumor types. The clinical integration of 5-FU and radiation occurred more slowly, but recent trials have demonstrated a therapeutic gain. Improved rates of local control and survival with combined 5-FU and radiation versus radiation alone have now been demonstrated in patients with rectal, esophageal, and anal carcinomas. However, the mechanism of interaction between the fluoropyrimidines and radiation remains uncertain and continues to be investigated with the hope of improved clinical outcome. As the cellular pathways influenced by the halogenated pyrimidines have been defined, the potential for biochemical modulation of these agents has been recognized. Leucovorin, the most commonly applied modulator, has been shown to enhance the activity of 5-FU in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma. These studies serve as an example for current trials that use biochemical modulators of IUdR, BUdR, and 5-FU as radiosensitizers. Hydroxyurea, currently used in the treatment of chronic leukemia, has also been considered a radiosensitizer. As with IUdR/BUdR, the clinical trials have often been inconclusive and interest in this radiosensitizer has waned. A poor understanding of the mechanism of action and tumor cell/normal tissue kinetics may be responsible for the lack of overall success with this strategy. Current investigations of cell kinetics in humans and potential mechanisms of hydroxyurea action could provide information critical to future trials of hydroxyurea radiosensitization.

The experimental and clinical rationale for the use of S-phase-specific radiosensitizers to overcome tumor cell repopulation.

Clinical and laboratory evidence suggests that several common human cancers contain populations of rapidly proliferating clonogens that may have a substantial impact on local control following conventional radiotherapy. Strategies to improve locoregional control include the use of S-phase-specific radiosensitizers, such as the halogenated pyrimidine analogues (5-iododeoxyuridine, 5-bromodeoxyuridine, fluorodeoxyuridine, 5-fluorouracil) and hydroxyurea. These drugs are taken up and metabolized only by cells synthesizing DNA so that increased tumor proliferation should result in increased radiosensitization. Although the initial clinical trials with these agents were inconclusive, several recent reports have rekindled interest in these radiosensitizers. Ongoing laboratory research has provided further insight into the basic mechanisms of radiosensitization. However, many questions remain unanswered. We will review the data that suggest rapid tumor proliferation, experimental studies with the S-phase-specific drugs, and the results of clinical trials. We will also consider the possible design of future trials based on our current understanding of tumor proliferation and the mechanisms of radiosensitization of S-phase-specific agents.

Combined modality therapy.

Encouraging results continue to emerge with the use of chemoradiotherapy. This review of the current literature demonstrates some of the advances that have been achieved in a variety of common malignancies with strategies based on well-defined rationales. Preliminary randomized trials now reveal a survival advantage for chemoradiotherapy in patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer and patients with rectal cancer at high risk for recurrence following resection. Other studies report that concurrent chemoradiotherapy may improve local control in patients with limited-stage, small cell lung cancer or esophageal malignancies. The additional toxicity of these approaches is discussed.

Cardiac tamponade resulting from pneumopericardium: case report and implications for the critical care nurse.

Pneumopericardium resulting in cardiac tamponade may be caused by a variety of phenomena. The onset of cardiac tamponade can indicate the presence of a rare underlying condition. As a rare complication of mechanical ventilation and PEEP, our patient experienced pneumopericardium that resulted in cardiac tamponade. Perhaps the most crucial therapy of all is astute critical care nursing assessment of patients at risk of developing the life-threatening complication of cardiac tamponade. All critical care nurses should know the signs and symptoms of cardiac tamponade. Through accurate data collection, frequent monitoring, and immediate referral to the critical care team for medical diagnosis and treatment, a patient's death can be prevented.