A phase III study of radiation therapy plus carmustine with or without recombinant interferon-alpha in the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed high-grade glioma.

BACKGROUND: The current study was conducted to determine whether the addition of interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) to treatment with radiation therapy and carmustine (BCNU) improves time to disease progression or overall survival in patients with high-grade glioma. METHODS: Patients with anaplastic astrocytoma, anaplastic oligoastrocytoma, glioblastoma multiforme, or gliosarcoma received radiation therapy plus BCNU as initial therapy. Subsequently, patients without tumor progression at the completion of radiation therapy were stratified by age, extent of surgery, tumor grade and histology, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, and treating institution, and then were randomly assigned to receive either BCNU alone (200 mg/m(2) on Day 1) or BCNU (150 mg/m(2) on Day 3) plus IFN--alpha (12 million U/m(2) on Days 1-3, Weeks 1, 3, and 5) every 7 weeks for a maximum of 6 cycles. RESULTS: Of the 383 patients enrolled in the study, 275 eligible patients were randomized. There was no significant difference with regard to time to disease progression or overall survival between the two groups. Patients receiving IFN-alpha experienced more fever, chills, myalgias, and neurocortical symptoms including somnolence, confusion, and exacerbation of neurologic deficits. Cox multivariate regression models confirmed known favorable prognostic variables including younger age, Grade 3 tumor (according to World Health Organization criteria), and greater extent of surgery. Cox and classification and regression tree analysis models also demonstrated that a normal baseline Folstein mini-mental status examination (MMSE) score was associated with better prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: IFN-alpha does not appear to improve time to disease progression or overall survival in patients with high-grade glioma and appears to add significantly to toxicity. The baseline MMSE score may serve as an independent prognostic factor and warrants further investigation.

Efficacy of neuroradiological imaging, neurological examination, and symptom status in follow-up assessment of patients with high-grade gliomas.

OBJECT: It is standard practice for the oncological follow-up of patients with brain tumors (especially in the setting of clinical trials) to include neurological examination and neuroradiological studies such as computerized tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in addition to evaluation of the patients' symptomatology and performance score. The validity of this practice and its impact on the welfare of patients with high-grade gliomas has not been adequately assessed. The purpose of this study is to provide such an assessment. METHODS: The authors studied 231 similarly treated patients who were participating in three prospective North Central Cancer Treatment Group or Mayo Clinic trials who developed progressive disease during follow up. According to the protocol, the symptom status, performance score, results of neurological examination, and CT or MR status were recorded prospectively in each patient at each evaluation (every 6-8 weeks). At progression, 177 (77%) of 231 patients experienced worsening of their baseline symptoms or they developed new ones. In the remaining 54 asymptomatic patients (23%), neuroradiological imaging revealed the progression. Asymptomatic progression was more likely to be detected on MR imaging compared with CT studies (p < 0.01). In no asymptomatic patient was progression detected on neurological examination alone. The median survival time after tumor recurrence was 13.3 weeks in symptomatic patients compared with 41.7 weeks in the asymptomatic group (p < 0.0001). Asymptomatic patients were more aggressively treated, with surgery (p < 0.0001) and second-line chemotherapy (p < 0.0002). Multivariate analysis of survival time following first progression by using both classification and regression trees and Cox models showed that treatment at recurrence was the most important prognostic variable. CONCLUSIONS: Symptoms are the most frequent indicators of progression in patients with high-grade gliomas (77%). All asymptomatic progressions were detected on neuroradiological studies; MR imaging was more likely than CT scanning to reveal asymptomatic recurrences. Survival after disease progression was significantly longer in asymptomatic patients and could be related both to treatment following progression and to other favorable prognostic factors such as performance score.

Primary central nervous system non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (PCNSL): survival advantages with combined initial therapy? A final report of the North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) Study 86-72-52.

PURPOSE: We herein report updated survival and toxicity data on the entire cohort of 53 eligible patients treated on North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) protocol 86-72-52, which is now closed. METHODS AND MATERIALS: An initial report was published in this journal in 1995. No substantive changes in the conclusions of that report were identified in this analysis. Median survival was 9.6 months for the entire cohort; median survival for the 20 patients who completed the prescribed protocol treatment was 20.7 months. The hematologic and non-hematologic toxicity distributions are virtually the same as those reported in the original paper. RESULTS: Results are given for the entire group and for subsets defined by age < or = 60 versus > 60 years, and < 70 versus > or = 70 years of age. CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences were observed in any of the outcome variables by age group. There was, however, a nonsignificant suggestion of poorer outcome in those who were > 60 years of age.

The possible advantage of hyperfractionated thoracic radiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma: results of a North Central Cancer Treatment Group Phase III Study.

BACKGROUND: A three-arm Phase III randomized trial was performed to compare response rates, time to local or distant progression, and survival for patients with unresectable (Stage IIIA or IIIB) nonsmall cell lung carcinoma treated with standard fractionated thoracic radiotherapy (SFTRT) versus accelerated hyperfractionated thoracic radiotherapy (AHTRT) with or without combination etoposide and cisplatin chemotherapy. METHODS: This trial was initiated in 1992 by the North Central Cancer Treatment Group. Patients with Stage IIIA or IIIB nonsmall cell lung carcinoma were eligible. They were randomly assigned to either SFTRT (6000 centigray [cGy] in 30 fractions) or AHTRT (150 cGy twice daily to a total dose of 6000 cGy, with a 2-week break after the initial 3000 cGy); the AHTRT was given alone or with concomitant cisplatin (30 mg/m2, Days 1-3 and 28-30) and etoposide (100 mg/m2, Days 1-3 and 28-30). RESULTS: A total of 110 patients were entered on study. Eleven patients were declared ineligible or off study on the day of study entry. This analysis was confined to the 99 eligible patients. This article reports mature follow-up, because more than 80% of the patients have died. The median follow-up of living patients was 2.5 years. There were suggestions of improvement in the rates of freedom from local recurrence and survival for patients treated with AHTRT (with or without chemotherapy) as opposed to SFTRT (P = 0.06 and P = 0.10, respectively). The improvement in survival associated with AHTRT (with or without chemotherapy) was statistically significant for the subgroup of patients with nonsquamous cell carcinoma after adjustment for other potentially confounding factors (P = 0.02). No differences in freedom from systemic progression or survival were found in a comparison of AHTRT with chemotherapy and AHTRT without chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that treatment of Stage IIIA or IIIB nonsmall cell lung carcinoma with AHTRT with or without chemotherapy may improve freedom from local progression and survival as compared with SFTRT, especially for patients with nonsquamous cell carcinoma. The statistical powers to detect the observed differences in median time to local progression and survival were approximately 55% and 35%, respectively. Therefore, further investigation comparing SFTRT with AHTRT is warranted.

Placebo-controlled trial of sucralfate for inhibiting radiation-induced esophagitis.

PURPOSE: To determine whether a sucralfate oral solution can prevent/alleviate radiation-induced esophagitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients included on this clinical trial were beginning thoracic radiation therapy to the mediastinum. Following stratification, they were randomized, in a double-blind manner, to receive a sucralfate solution or an identical-appearing placebo solution. Esophagitis was measured by physicians who used standard criteria and also by patients who used short questionnaires completed weekly during the course of the trial. RESULTS: A total of 97 assessable patients were entered onto this clinical trial. During the first 2 weeks of the study, two placebo patients (4%) stopped their study medication, compared with 20 sucralfate patients (40%). This was related to substantially increased incidences of gastrointestinal toxicity (58% of sucralfate patients v 14% of placebo patients; P > .0001). There was no substantial benefit from the sucralfate in terms of esophagitis scores. CONCLUSION: This oral sucralfate solution does not appear to inhibit radiation-induced esophagitis and is associated with disagreeable gastrointestinal side effects in this patient population.

Thoracic radiation therapy alone compared with combined chemoradiotherapy for locally unresectable non-small cell lung cancer. A randomized, phase III trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the survival of patients with medically inoperable or unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer treated with thoracic radiotherapy alone or in combination with chemotherapy. DESIGN: Randomized, prospective phase III trial. SETTING: Multi-institutional cooperative oncology group. PATIENTS: A total of 121 patients were enrolled in the study, of whom 7 (5.8%) were ineligible. All patients were ambulatory and had measurable or evaluable disease. Before they were randomized, patients were stratified by ECOG performance score, histologic type, maximum tumor diameter, and NCCTG institution. INTERVENTIONS: Radiotherapy consisted of a total of 5000 cGy in 5 weeks with a 1000 cGy boost in 5 fractions to a small tumor field. Combined modality therapy was MACC which is intravenous methotrexate, intravenous doxorubicin, intravenous cyclophosphamide, and oral lomustine (CCNU), on day 1 and 28. Chemotherapy was followed by identical thoracic radiotherapy 4 weeks after the second cycle of chemotherapy. Four weeks after thoracic radiotherapy was completed, patients received another two cycles of identical chemotherapy. Patients who had progression of disease after chest irradiation only were treated with MACC chemotherapy. MAIN RESULTS: Major clinical responses were observed in 31 of 56 (55%; 95% Cl, 42% to 68%) patients treated with combination therapy and 37 of 58 (64%; Cl, 51% to 76%) treated with radiation only (P greater than 0.2). The median time to progression was 192 days with radiotherapy only compared with 199 days for combined modality therapy (P greater than 0.2). The median survival time was 313 days compared with 317 days, respectively (P greater than 0.2). The 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival rates after thoracic radiation only were 45% (Cl, 32% to 58%), 16% (Cl, 6% to 25%), and 7%. With chemoradiotherapy, the survival rates were 46% (Cl, 33% to 60%), 21% (Cl, 11% to 32%), and 5%, respectively. Myelosuppression was significantly greater for the combined modality therapy arm (P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Chemotherapy with MACC, in combination with thoracic radiotherapy, did not result in significant survival advantage compared with radiation alone (P greater than 0.2) in patients with medically inoperable or unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer.