European guidelines for quality assurance in cervical cancer screening: recommendations for collecting samples for conventional and liquid-based cytology.

The current paper presents an annex in the second edition of the European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Cervical Cancer Screening. It provides guidance on how to make a satisfactory conventional Pap smear or a liquid-based cytology (LBC) sample. Practitioners taking samples for cytology should first explain to the woman the purpose, the procedure and how the result will be communicated. Three sampling methods are considered as acceptable for preparing conventional Pap smears: (i) the cervical broom; (ii) the combination of a spatula and an endocervical brush; and (iii) the extended tip spatula. Smear takers should take care to sample the entire circumference of the transformation zone, to quickly spread the cellular material over a glass slide, and to fix the preparation within a few seconds to avoid drying artefacts. According to local guidelines, one of these three methods may be preferred. Sampling with a cotton tip applicator is inappropriate. Similar procedures should be followed for sampling cells for LBC, but only plastic devices may be used. The collected cells should be quickly transferred into a vial with fixative liquid according to the instructions of the manufacturer of the LBC system. Subsequently, the slide or vial and the completed request form are sent to the laboratory for cytological interpretation.

Persistent high risk HPV infection associated with development of cervical neoplasia in a prospective population study.

AIMS: To monitor the association between the course of high risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) infection and the development of cervical neoplasia over time, from a baseline of normal cervical cytology. METHODS: This paper presents the follow up data from a previous cross sectional analysis. Women from a screening population who had normal cytology and who were HR-HPV positive were recalled after two to three years for cytology and HPV genotyping. The development of cervical neoplasia at follow up was related to the course of HPV infection (clearance, persistence, or sequential infection) and the presence of single or multiple HPV infections at baseline. A comparator control group of women who were HPV and cytologically negative at baseline were selected from the same population. RESULTS: Twelve cases of dyskaryosis were found in women who were HPV positive at baseline; four were high grade. Only three cases of low grade dyskaryosis were found in the control group. Women with type specific persistent infections were significantly more likely to develop cervical neoplasia than women who cleared the infection (p = 0.0001) or were sequentially infected with different types (p = 0.001). Women with multiple HPV infections at baseline were no more likely to develop cervical dyskaryosis than those with a single infection. CONCLUSIONS: Type specific persistent HR-HPV infection as monitored by genotyping can identify women at increased risk of cervical neoplasia more accurately than a single or repeated presence/absence HPV test. The cost effectiveness of such an approach should be investigated by an appropriate, large scale cost-benefit analysis.

Liquid-based cytology in cervical screening: an updated rapid and systematic review and economic analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To update an earlier published report reviewing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of liquid-based cytology (LBC). DATA SOURCES: Electronic bibliographic databases, relevant articles, sponsor submissions and various health services research-related resources. REVIEW METHODS: The selected data were reviewed and assessed with respect to the quality of the evidence. Pooled estimates of the parameters of interest were derived from the original and the updated studies. Meta-analyses were undertaken where appropriate. The mathematical model developed for the original rapid review of LBC was adapted to synthesise the updated data to estimate costs, survival and quality-adjusted survival of patients tested using LBC and using Papanicolaou (Pap) smear testing. Cost data from published sources were incorporated into the above model to allow economic, as well as clinical, implications of treatment to be assessed. The primary incremental cost-effectiveness ratio is the cost per life year gained (LYG), although estimates of the cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained are also presented. A sensitivity analysis was undertaken to identify the key parameters that determine the cost-effectiveness of the treatments, with the objective of identifying how robust the results of the economic analysis are, given the current level of evidence. RESULTS: From the evidence available, it is likely that the LBC technique will reduce the number of false-negative test results. Modelling analyses undertaken as part of this study indicate that this would reduce the incidence of invasive cancer. There is now more evidence to support improvements emanating from the use of LBC screening in terms of a reduced number of unsatisfactory specimens and a decrease in the time needed to obtain the smear samples. The estimated annual gross cost of consumables and operating equipment, and other one-off conversion costs associated with introducing the new technique, will be between 17 British pounds and 38 British pounds million in England and Wales, depending on the LBC system and the configuration of the service. Analyses based on models of disease natural history, conducted in this study, showed that conventional Pap smear screening was extendedly dominated by LBC (LBC was always more cost-effective than conventional Pap smear testing over the same screening interval). Comparing LBC across alternative screening intervals gave a cost-effectiveness of under 10,000 British pounds per LYG when screening was undertaken every 3 years. The cost-effectiveness results were relatively stable under most conditions, although if screening outcomes such as borderline results and colposcopy are assumed to induce even small amounts of disutility then LBC screening at 5-yearly intervals may be the most cost-effective option. CONCLUSIONS: This updated analysis provides more certainty with regard to the potential cost-effectiveness of LBC compared with conventional Pap smear testing. However, there is uncertainty regarding the relative effectiveness (and cost-effectiveness) of the two main LBC techniques. Further research in the area of utility assessment may be worthwhile and possibly a full cost-effectiveness study of LBC based on a trial of its introduction in a low-prevalence population, although the results of the modelling analysis provide a robust argument that LBC is a cost-effective alternative to conventional cervical cancer screening. A randomised comparison of the two main techniques may also be useful.

Multiple high risk HPV infections are common in cervical neoplasia and young women in a cervical screening population.

AIMS: If human papillomavirus (HPV) testing is to be included within cervical screening programmes, the importance of multiple HPV infections in cervical neoplasia needs to be determined. This study investigated the diversity of multiple HPV types in a routine cervical screening population, and assessed associations with cervical neoplasia. METHODS: Overall HPV prevalence, type specific prevalence, and extent of multiple infection were assessed in residual material from 3444 liquid based cytology samples, using real time GP5+/GP6+ polymerase chain reaction for screening and linear array assay for genotyping. HPV status was studied in relation to age and concurrent cytological evidence of dyskaryosis. RESULTS: Twenty per cent of samples were HPV positive. HPV type diversity was broad, and multiple HPV infections occurred in half of the HPV positive samples. Younger women were significantly more likely to harbour multiple high risk HPV (HR-HPV) infections. Infections with multiple HR-HPV types were found in 3.4% of samples negative for neoplasia and in 33.3%, 41.8%, and 40.4% of samples with borderline, mild, or high grade dyskaryosis, respectively. Single HR-HPV infections were found in 4.9%, 38.6%, 45.0%, and 51.1% of negative, borderline, mild, or high grade dyskaryosis samples, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple HR-HPV infections were most prevalent in young women. Multiple HR-HPV infections were not more frequent in high grade than in low grade cervical neoplasia, reflecting common sexual transmission of multiple HR-HPV. Prospective cohort studies linking sequential loss or gain of HPV types with cytological analysis are required to assess the impact of multiple HR-HPV infections on neoplastic progression.

Management of women who test positive for high-risk types of human papillomavirus: the HART study.

BACKGROUND: Certain types of human papillomavirus (HPV) are the primary cause of almost all cervical cancers. HPV testing of cervical smears is more sensitive but less specific than cytology for detecting high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+). HPV testing as a primary screening approach requires efficient management of HPV-positive women with negative or borderline cytology. We aimed to compare the detection rate and positive predictive values of HPV assay with cytology and to determine the best management strategy for HPV-positive women. METHODS: We did a multicentre screening study of 11085 women aged 30-60 years. Women with borderline cytology and women positive for high-risk HPV with negative cytology were randomised to immediate colposcopy or to surveillance by repeat HPV testing, cytology, and colposcopy at 12 months. FINDINGS: HPV testing was more sensitive than borderline or worse cytology (97.1% vs 76.6%, p=0.002) but less specific (93.3% vs 95.8%, p<0.0001) for detecting CIN2+. Of 825 randomised women, surveillance at 12 months was as effective as immediate colposcopy. In women positive for HPV at baseline, who had surveillance, 73 (45%) of 164 women with negative cytology and eight (35%) of 23 women with borderline cytology were HPV negative at 6-12 months. No CIN2+ was found in these women, nor in women with an initial negative HPV test with borderline (n=211) or mild (32) cytology. INTERPRETATION: HPV testing could be used for primary screening in women older than 30 years, with cytology used to triage HPV-positive women. HPV-positive women with normal or borderline cytology (about 6% of screened women) could be managed by repeat testing after 12 months. This approach could potentially improve detection rates of CIN2+ without increasing the colposcopy referral rate.

Rapid real time PCR to distinguish between high risk human papillomavirus types 16 and 18.

AIMS: To assess the validity and practicality of real time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for human papillomavirus (HPV) testing in combination with liquid based cytology samples for cervical screening. METHODS: Real time PCR using consensus (GPS+/6+) and type specific primers was developed to detect genital HPV types. This provides rapid, efficient amplification followed by denaturation of the product and computer analysis of the kinetics data that are generated. Liquid based cytology samples were obtained from patients attending routine cervical screening clinics. DNA was extracted from the residual cellular suspension after cytology using spin columns. RESULTS: Real time PCR successfully distinguished between HPV-16 and HPV-18 on the basis of amplification with consensus primers followed by DNA melting temperature (Tm) analysis. Sensitivities of one to 10 copies of HPV-16 (mean Tm = 79.4 degrees C; 2 SD, 0.8) and four to 40 copies of HPV-18 (mean Tm = 80.4 degrees C; 2 SD, 0.4) were obtained. In a mixed population of SiHa and HeLa cells containing known copy numbers of HPV-16 and HPV-18 genomes, HPV-16 and HPV-18 products were clearly separated by Tm analysis in mixtures varying from equivalence to 111000. Together with detailed melt analysis, type specific primers from the same region of the L1 gene confirmed the differential ability of this system. The method was applied to 100 liquid based cytology samples where HPV status using conventional GP5+/6+ PCR was already known. There was 95% agreement between the methods, with 55 positives detected by conventional PCR and 59 with real time PCR. The method was then tested on 200 routine liquid based cytology samples. Approximately 10% were positive by real time PCR, most of which were classified as HPV-16 by detailed melt analysis. Thirteen (6.8%) HPV positives were identified in 189 samples showing no evidence of cervical cytological abnormality. CONCLUSIONS: Real time PCR is a rapid, efficient method for the detection of HPV with the separation of HPV-16 and HPV-18 on the basis of differential Tm. Preliminary results suggest it could prove

Competency assessment and proficiency testing.

Competency assessment is an ongoing, continuous process of monitoring individuals' abilities to perform their specific job functions. A variety of methods are useful in monitoring cytology competency, including rescreening studies, descriptive monitors (abnormality rates), discrepancy rates, workload patterns, competency-based educational programs and programs using unknown slide challenges. The goal of proficiency testing (PT) is to ascertain and assess the ability of individuals beyond the particular items or challenges presented. However, cytology PT faces many challenges for implementation as it cannot duplicate normal working conditions, and there is often no gold standard to define the truth. PT is just one measure of performance and should be considered in conjunction with other quality assessment monitors. There is no consensus on the value or validity of a large-scale regulatory PT program. Any regulatory PT program should be field tested prior to implementation, and the grading system should be scientifically defensible. Scoring of performance on PT should occur in a timely fashion, and there should be an opportunity for educational feedback. The ultimate aim of both competency assessment and PT is to positively affect laboratory procedures and improve the cervical cancer screening process.

The borderline cervical smear: colposcopic and biopsy outcome.

AIMS: To review the outcome of women referred with smears showing borderline nuclear change (BNC), and to determine any differences in outcome if BNC was persistent, preceded by dyskaryosis, or followed treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). In addition, to determine criteria that might permit delineation of a BNC subtype, predictive of CIN. METHODS: The records of 178 women referred for colposcopy in 1993, with last smear showing BNC, were obtained from our laboratory database. The cytology, colposcopy, and biopsy follow up for a five year period were also obtained. The patients were divided into three categories according to their smear status before the last referral borderline smear: category 1, persistent BNC (n = 39); category 2, BNC preceded by dyskaryotic smears (n = 100); and category 3, BNC after treatment for CIN (n = 39). The referral borderline smears were reviewed on cases with negative outcome and those with a biopsy diagnosis of CIN2 and CIN3. RESULTS: In 50 women (28%) no biopsy was deemed necessary after colposcopic assessment. The biopsy results in the remaining 128 (72%) women were as follows: normal in 18 (10%), koilocytosis in 12 (7%), CIN1 in 45 (25%), CIN2 in 32 (18%), and CIN3 in 21 (12%) women. High grade lesions (CIN2, CIN3) were seen on biopsy in 14 of 39, 33 of 100, and six of 39 cases in category 1, category 2, and category 3, respectively. Blind review of the referral borderline smears from 53 women with a biopsy diagnosis of high grade lesions (32 CIN2, 21 CIN3) confirmed they were borderline in 23, upgraded them to mild dyskaryosis in 15, and found that 14 cases of isolated moderate or severe dyskaryotic cells had been missed originally. The borderline change was in mature squamous cells in five of 23 and in immature metaplastic epithelium in 18 of 23 cases. After smear review in 68 women with negative outcome, 36 smears were reclassified as negative in keeping with inflammation and atrophy, three were considered unsatisfactory, one was upgraded to CIN1, and 28 were confirmed as BNC. Of the latter, 25 of 28 were in mature squamous cells. The five year follow up on women with negative colposcopy (n = 50), negative loop excision of transformation zone (LETZ) (n = 18), and LETZ with koilocytosis (n = 12) showed subsequent high grade CIN on LETZ in 16, 0, and two patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: On referral of women for colposcopy with last smear showing BNC, the outcome was high grade CIN in over 30% of cases, irrespective of whether the borderline smear was preceded by another borderline smear or by a dyskaryotic smear. In contrast, in those referred because of BNC after treatment of CIN, high grade CIN was seen less frequently (15% of cases). Furthermore, in cases that necessitated loop excisions, high grade CIN was seen in 41%. This study also showed that BNC associated with inflammation or atrophy, or BNC in mature squamous cells, appears to have lower predictive value for CIN than those cases where BNC is associated with immature metaplastic epithelium. The use of terms such as "BNC favour reactive" for the former and "BNC favour dyskaryosis" for the latter is recommended, together with follow up by cytology and colposcopy, respectively.

Detection of high-risk human papillomavirus nucleic acid in archival cervical smears.

OBJECTIVE: To test the usefulness of a commercial DNA hybridization assay for the detection of high-risk (HR) human papillomavirus (HPV) types in archival cervical smears and to compare the sensitivity with that of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using consensus primers. STUDY DESIGN: Stained material was scraped from archival slides and the pellet volume noted. DNA was extracted using silica/guanidinium isothiocyanate and the quality checked by amplification of the beta-globin gene. HR-HPV DNA was detected using a commercial hybrid capture assay (HCA) and the results compared with an in-house amplification system with consensus primers. RESULTS: Of 156 archival smears stored for 12-13 years, 20 were positive by HCA using an HR probe cocktail. Ninety-eight were also tested by PCR, and 35 were positive. The percentage of HPV-positive samples increased with the increasing size of the pellet. HR-HCA detected more positives in samples with high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (moderate/severe dyskaryosis). CONCLUSION: Both hybridization by HCA and amplification by PCR could be used to detect genital HPV in archival smears. The general primers PCR detected more positives than HR-HCA but included HPV 6/11. While variation in sample size and prolonged storage may reduce the quality of DNA, the use of archival material for longitudinal studies of HPV presence is potentially worthwhile.

Anal cytological abnormalities in HIV-infected homosexual men.

This study aimed to examine the prevalence of anal cytological abnormalities in groups of HIV-infected and non-infected homosexual men, and to monitor changes with time. Dyskaryosis suggestive of anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN) was noted in 24 (30%) of the 80 satisfactory anal smears from 66 HIV-seropositive homosexual men; such changes were found in only 7 (4.7%) of the 149 satisfactory smears from 181 HIV-seronegative homosexual men (P < 0.005), and in none of 34 satisfactory preparations from 51 HIV-seronegative heterosexual men. In the follow-up of 20 HIV-seropositive men, the severity of the cytological abnormalities found in 2 men increased, with the most recent smear showing changes suggestive of AIN III; one of these men subsequently developed anal cancer. Smears from 4 men showed apparent regression in the degree of dyskaryosis. Although the numbers of patients studied were small, there appeared to be a trend towards a more severe degree of dyskaryosis in those men with increasing immunodeficiency. There was no significant difference in the detection of human papillomavirus types 6b, 11, 16 and 18 between HIV-infected and non-infected men.

Cell preparation methods and criteria for sample adequacy. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.

ISSUES: Cell Preparation Methods Standardized fixation and optimal staining Sampling of cervix, sampling error, homogenization of sample, subsampling Assessment of liquid-based preparations: efficacy and economic impact Training and transitional procedures before full implementation of new technologies Criteria for Sample Adequacy Clinician responsibility for collecting and providing representative sample to laboratory Collection instruments, number of slides Cellular content of samples: evidence of transformation zone (TZ) sampling, number of squamous cells present, obscuring factors Screening issues CONSENSUS POSITION The conventional cervical smear remains the standard method of cervical cancer screening but has limitations in individual test sensitivity and specificity. Sample takers should: (1) receive appropriate training in sample collection, (2) be held responsible for providing the laboratory with appropriate samples, and (3) have their performance monitored. The instruments used for sampling should collect cells from both the ectocervix and endocervix; optimally, TZ sampling, represented by the presence of endocervical or squamous metaplastic cells, should be identifiable in samples other than atrophic specimens. The adequacy of a specimen (as judged microscopically) does not guarantee that it is representative of the cervix. Each cytology report should include a comment on cellular content/adequacy of the specimen. Liquid-based preparations may overcome many of the inherent problems with the conventional cervical smear. ONGOING ISSUES: We need further data on the cost-effectiveness of making two slides from cervical specimens and/or using two samplers rather than a single one. Do we have enough information to make recommendations as to the appropriate type of sampler to be used in particular situations, such as routine screening? What is the best method of screening for/detecting endocervical glandular neoplasia? How are such terms as unsatisfactory and inadequate defined in cervical cytology classifications other than the Bethesda System? What number and types of epithelial cells should be present (visualized) in a cervical smear or liquid-based preparation for it to be considered adequate? Do we need to have evidence of TZ sampling in specimens taken during the follow-up period after treatment of squamous intraepithelial lesion or after detection of endocervical glandular neoplasia? What criteria for obscuring factors, such as blood and inflammation, should be used in assessing adequacy? Cost-benefit analyses of utilizing liquid-based preparations are needed. Should we inform women about the technical details of the test methods available or chosen by the laboratory? Are women in a position to decide which method is the most appropriate to assess their cervical scrape sample? We need to obtain more information about the properties of proprietary liquid fixative/transport media with respect to inactivation of viral pathogens, tuberculosis and other bacterial pathogens and suitability for immunobiologic and molecular tests, etc. We need to obtain more information on the use of stoichiometric stains and the limitations of Papanicolaou stain for image analysis systems. The use of liquid-based preparations for nongynecologic cytopathology and ancillary tests must be considered, including criteria for adequacy. We need to obtain more information on the time required for and best methods of training experienced cytotechnologists to become competent at assessing liquid-based cervical preparations.

Quality assurance/control issues. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.

ISSUES: General definitions of quality assurance and quality control (QA/C) have existed in many forms for decades, and a new discipline guides their application to diverse industrial and recently medical processes without much fanfare. However, in the field of cervical cytology screening, the range of QA/C options has recently broadened and become controversial. With the advent of new systems of terminology, larger-scale laboratories and new technologies--plus strong governmental and legal pressures in some nations--the range of extremely difficult and sometimes expensive QA/C choices our community faces is greater than ever. CONSENSUS POSITION: At our conference, the basic definitions of QA/C posed little difficulty. Presentation of the range of methods in use today and of those based on new technologies where use is proposed or has just begun also was achieved with little or no dispute. However, there was lack of consensus on exactly how QA/C methods are to be assessed. Indeed, there was little consistency in the use of different outcome measures with which we can judge success or failure of specific QA/C options. In addition, the tension between pressure to adopt sometimes uncertain or expensive method enhancements and pressure to maintain affordability and the widest possible access for populations that most need cervical cytology screening is greater than ever. ONGOING ISSUES: More data are required that would enable assessment of QA/C options with the clearest possible understanding of cost/benefits and current or new assumptions of risk. Other task forces, such as medicolegal, cost/benefit and those devoted to new technologies, are our essential partners in meeting the challenges described above.

Digital imagery/telecytology. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.

ISSUES: Optical digital imaging and its related technologies have applications in cytopathology that encompass training and education, image analysis, diagnosis, report documentation and archiving, and telecommunications. Telecytology involves the use of telecommunications to transmit cytology images for the purposes of diagnosis, consultation or education. This working paper provides a mainly informational overview of optical digital imaging and summarizes current technologic resources and applications and some of the ethical and legal implications of the use of these new technologies in cytopathology. CONSENSUS POSITION: Computer hardware standards for optical digital imagery will continue to be driven mainly by commercial interests and nonmedical imperatives, but professional organizations can play a valuable role in developing recommendations or standards for digital image sampling, documentation, archiving, authenticity safeguards and teleconsultation protocols; in addressing patient confidentiality and ethical, legal and informed consent issues; and in providing support for quality assurance and standardization of digital image-based testing. There is some evidence that high levels of accuracy for telepathology diagnosis can be achieved using existing dynamic systems, which may also be applicable to telecytology consultation. Static systems for both telepathology and telecytology, which have the advantage of considerably lower cost, appear to have lower levels of accuracy. Laboratories that maintain digital image databases should adopt practices and protocols that ensure patient confidentiality. Individuals participating in telecommunication of digital images for diagnosis should be properly qualified, meet licensing requirements and use procedures that protect patient confidentiality. Such individuals should be cognizant of the limitations of the technology and employ quality assurance practices that ensure the validity and accuracy of each consultation. Even in an informal teleconsultation setting one should define the extent of participation and be mindful of potential malpractice liability. ONGOING ISSUES: Digital imagery applications will continue to present new opportunities and challenges. Position papers such as this are directed toward assisting the profession to stay informed and in control of these applications in the laboratory. Telecytology is an area in particular need of studies of good quality to provide data on factors affecting accuracy. New technologic approaches to addressing the issue of selective sampling in static image consultation are needed. The use of artificial intelligence software as an adjunct to enhance the accuracy and reproducibility of cytologic diagnosis of digital images in routine and consultation settings deserves to be pursued. Other telecytology-related issues that require clarification and the adoption of workable guidelines include interstate licensure and protocols to define malpractice liability.

Expression of p21waf1/Cip1, MDM2 and p53 in vivo: analysis of cytological preparations.

The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that expression of p21waf1/Cip1 and MDM2 could be used as indicators of the activity of wild-type p53 which can transcriptionally activate the p21waf1/Cip1 and mdm2 genes. In cytological preparations of serous fluids, the expression of p53, p21waf1/Cip1 and MDM2 protein was assessed by immunohistochemistry. A series of 50 cases was assessed for both p53 and p21waf1/Cip1 expression and a subset of 37 cases had sufficient material for analysis of MDM2. In samples in which there were reactive mesothelial cells (n = 48) there was general concordance between p53 and p21waf1/Cip1 expression, but in nine cases p21waf1/Cip1 was expressed in the absence of detectable p53. Similarly, MDM2 expression was not correlated with p53 in 15 of 31 cases. p21waf1/Cip1 was correlated with MDM2 in 24 of 31 cases, while in the remaining seven, MDM2 was expressed without detectable p21waf1/Cip1 immunoreactivity. In samples with neoplastic cells (n = 18) the presence of p21waf1/Cip1 and MDM2 expression was always associated with p53 expression. Polymorphonuclear leucocytes frequently showed p21waf1/Cip1 immunoreactivity, and this was confirmed by immunoblotting of peripheral blood polymorphonuclear leucocytes. These data indicate that in general p21waf1/Cip1 expression correlates with p53 expression in reactive mesothelial cells, consistent with a known mechanism of regulation. However, in reactive mesothelial cells, MDM2 expression is perhaps dissociated from p53 expression, contrary to current models of MDM2 regulation. Finally, in addition to many normal tissues, it is likely that in reactive mesothelial cells and some tumours p21waf1/Cip1 expression is not dependent on the presence of wild-type p53 protein. In conclusion, p53 status cannot be reliably predicted based only on p21waf1/Cip1 or MDM2 expression.

Would monolayers provide more representative samples and improved preparations for cervical screening? Overview and evaluation of systems available.

Conventional cervical smears prepared on site by the smear taker are subject to great variation in technical quality and allow little control of the critical parameters required for optimal microscopic diagnosis. More critical, however, is that a significant proportion of the cells removed from the cervix are discarded along with the collecting device and that the material placed on the slide is not transferred in a representative way and may not fully represent the cells removed from the cervix. If the cells were placed directly into preservative fluid, all the material scraped from the cervix would be sent to the laboratory in a well-preserved state, and fully representative slides could be prepared. Several studies have suggested that this would result in an increased cell harvest with a reduction of inadequate slides and an increase in the detection of abnormal cells. Automated preparation devices are now available. Two such devices, CytoRich and ThinPrep, were recently evaluated at the University of Edinburgh Department of Pathology (UEPD). The operational characteristics of each device were evaluated and consumables costed according to 1993-1994 prices. The consumables for the CytoRich were calculated to be more expensive, while operator time for the ThinPrep was more expensive. More mechanical problems were encountered with the ThinPrep, which was also considered more tedious to use. Cytotechnologists required considerable retraining before reaching competence in screening monolayers. They could assess them in approximately half the time required for conventional smears but found it more tiring. Almost no monolayer slides were considered unsatisfactory for laboratory interpretation due to the cells' being obscured by blood, pus or thick streaks of other cells. Scanty monolayers proved particularly difficult to read and interpret. Despite the bias introduced by using only the "leftover" material to make the monolayer, the diagnostic results of the monolayers from both devices were broadly similar to those for the matched split sample conventional smears. UEPD concluded that both devices produced monolayers that were adequate for diagnostic purposes. Neither device was ideal for routine laboratory use in cervical cytopathology in the model tested by UEPD, but both companies recently modified their devices in the light of the deficiencies identified by UEPD. The substantial loss of potentially diagnostic cells during the conventional transfer of cervical scrape material to glass slide alone merits consideration of alternative methods of preparation to obtain representative cell samples for optimal conventional microscopic diagnosis. Monolayers prepared by automated devices offer such an improvement for routine cervical cytopathology. The general deployment of such machines (involving substantial changes in the methods of working of laboratory staff responsible for tens of thousands of clinically important decisions each year) must await the completion of extensive and exhaustive laboratory and field trials. It is recommended that such trials be designed so that all the cellular material removed from the cervix is placed in the cell suspension, and the assessments should be carried out in a routine laboratory environment by cytotechnologists working in a routine cervical cytopathology service.

A collaborative trial of a semi-automatic system for slide preparation and screening in cervical cytopathology.

We report a test of an experimental system for machine-aided screening in cervical cytology, comprising the 'CYTOPRESS' semi-automatic slide preparation system (Nijmegen) and the 'CERVIFIP' interactive scanner (Edinburgh). Material from women attending clinics in Edinburgh and Nijmegen was stratified according to the severity of the conventional laboratory diagnosis and selected randomly within strata for inclusion in the test. Monolayered slides were prepared by CYTOPRESS from cervical scrape material remaining after preparation of conventional smears and scanned by CERVIFIP to determine the positions of the most 'suspicious' objects. The test was based on a set of 701 monolayers, divided equally between 'negatives' and 'abnormals' of various grades, of which 585 (83.4%) were passed automatically as adequate for machine-aided analysis. Approximately 15% of adequate slides were passed as 'negative' without operator interaction. In the remaining 85%, the suspicious objects were inspected by a human operator and a decision was then made either to refer each monolayer for conventional microscopic analysis, or to pass it as 'negative'. Where discrepancies occurred between the conventional laboratory and the system results, a consensus diagnosis was reached by taking into account all relevant information including clinical data. Of those with a consensus diagnosis of CIN 3 or worse an estimated 9.3 +/- 4.1% were passed by the system as 'negative'. Closer investigation of these false-negatives revealed that most, and perhaps all, were preventable by system improvements either planned or in progress. Corresponding false-negative rates for those graded 'CIN 1 or 2' and 'negative-early recall' were estimated, respectively as 18.9 +/- 5.3% and 22.9 +/- 3.1%. Of those with a 'negative-routine recall' consensus, 19.4 +/- 2.5% were referred for conventional microscopic analysis, a level well within acceptable limits for cost-effectiveness. Women whose initial laboratory smears were negative, but whose consensus diagnosis was 'negative-early recall' or CIN, are being investigated further to determine whether cervical abnormalities were in fact present. Over two-thirds of this group were referred by the machine-aided system for conventional microscopic analysis.