Inhibition of Tumor Microenvironment Cytokine Signaling Sensitizes Ovarian Cancer Cells to Antiestrogen Therapy.

Antiestrogen therapy (AET) is an alternative to cytotoxic chemotherapy for recurrent ovarian cancer, yet the often short duration of response suggests mechanisms of resistance. We previously demonstrated that tumor microenvironment interleukin-6/leukemia inhibitory factor (IL6/LIF) cytokines induce tumor cell JAK-STAT signaling to promote cancer growth. Crosstalk between estrogen signaling and cytokine signaling has been reported. Therefore, we sought to characterize the impact of IL6/LIF signaling on estrogen signaling in epithelial ovarian cancer and investigate the efficacy of combination therapy. We first assessed patient tumors for cytokine expression and compared it with response to AET to determine clinical relevance. In vitro, we determined the effect of IL6/LIF on estrogen receptor expression and signaling. Cell viability assays were used to determine the efficacy and potential synergy of cytokine blockade and AET. We then extended studies to animal models, incorporating patient-derived stromal cells. Our results demonstrated shorter progression-free interval on AET in patients with stromal IL6/LIF expression. In vitro, IL6/LIF increased tumor cell estrogen receptor expression and signaling, and combination cytokine blockade and AET resulted in synergistic inhibition of tumor cell growth. The anticancer effect was verified in a mouse model. In conclusion, due to crosstalk between IL6/LIF cytokine signaling and estrogen signaling, dual blockade is a potential new treatment approach for ovarian cancer.

Multidisciplinary Clinical Considerations in the Treatment of Pediatric Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Epithelial ovarian cancers are a rare subset of the less than 1% of ovarian cancers diagnosed in children. This case highlights considerations when caring for these patients. CASE: Evaluation of a 12-year-old postmenarchal girl who presented with suprapubic pain revealed a solid/cystic pelvic mass involving bilateral adnexa and elevated Cancer Antigen 125 (CA-125) level. Diagnostic laparoscopy pathology confirmed low-grade papillary serous ovarian carcinoma. Treatment involved surgical tumor debulking, hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and omentectomy; adjuvant chemotherapy with no residual disease, and normalization of Cancer Antigen 125 (CA-125) level; and an aromatase inhibitor for maintenance. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION: In children with adult-type gynecologic cancers necessitating treatments including surgical sterilization and hormone-modulating therapy, psychological support and developmentally informed collaboration between adult and pediatric services is essential. Clinical decisions for long-term bone and sexual health present opportunities for future research.

Reflex test reminders in required cancer synoptic templates decrease order entry error: An analysis of mismatch repair immunohistochemical orders to screen for Lynch syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Endometrial carcinoma (EC) is the most common extracolonic malignant neoplasm associated with Lynch syndrome (LS). LS is caused by autosomal dominant germline mutations in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes. Screening for LS in EC is often evaluated by loss of immunohistochemical (IHC) expression of DNA MMR enzymes MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 (MMR IHC). In July 2013, our clinicians asked that we screen all EC in patients ≤60 for loss of MMR IHC expression. Despite this policy, several cases were not screened or screening was delayed. We implemented an informatics-based approach to ensure that all women who met criteria would have timely screening. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Reports are created in PowerPath (Sunquest Information Systems, Tucson, AZ) with custom synoptic templates. We implemented an algorithm on March 6, 2014 requiring pathologists to address MMR IHC in patients ≤60 with EC before sign out (S/O). Pathologists must answer these questions: is patient ≤60 (yes/no), if yes, follow-up questions (IHC done previously, ordered with addendum to follow, results included in report, N/A, or not ordered), if not ordered, one must explain. We analyzed cases from July 18, 2013 to August 31, 2016 preimplementation (PreImp) and postimplementation (PostImp) that met criteria. Data analysis was performed using the standard data package included with GraphPad Prism® 7.00 (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). RESULTS: There were 147 patients who met criteria (29 PreImp and 118 PostImp). IHC was ordered in a more complete and timely fashion PostImp than PreImp. PreImp, 4/29 (13.8%) cases did not get any IHC, but PostImp, only 4/118 (3.39%) were missed (P = 0.0448). Of cases with IHC ordered, 60.0% (15/25) were ordered before or at S/O PreImp versus 91.2% (104/114) PostImp (P = 0.0004). Relative to day of S/O, the mean days of order delay were longer and more variable PreImp versus PostImp (12.9 ± 40.7 vs. -0.660 ± 1.15; P = 0.0227), with the average being before S/O PostImp. CONCLUSION: This algorithm ensures MMR IHC ordering in women ≤60 with EC and can be applied to similar scenarios. Ancillary tests for management are increasing, especially genetic and molecular-based methods. The burden of managing orders and results remains with the pathologist and relying on human intervention alone is ineffective. Ordering IHC before or at S/O prevents oversight and the additional work of retrospective ordering and reporting.