RESUMO
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to establish and understand the provision process and impacts of first mobility aids for children with cerebral palsy (CP) in the United States - specifically orthoses, walkers and gait-trainers. METHODS: We performed a mixed-methods study including surveys and semi-structured interviews of caregivers of young children with CP (n = 10) and clinicians who work with young children with CP (n = 29). We used content analysis for the surveys and inductive coding for the interviews. RESULTS: Four themes emerged: (1) first mobility aids have mixed impacts and use patterns, (2) there is varied caregiver education and understanding about mobility aids, (3) clinician knowledge, consistency and connection impact care and (4) numerous access barriers exist for families, and there are still opportunities for improvement across all domains. CONCLUSIONS: This research provides insights into the lived experiences of clinicians and caregivers of young children with CP regarding the prescription, provision, use and impact of first mobility aids, specifically ankle foot orthoses and walkers/gait trainers. This study not only provides researchers and clinicians with an understanding of the current status of the prescription and provision process in the United States, but also offers suggestions for improvements of the process and mobility aids themselves. These results have implications for future research, mobility aid, design and the provision process of first mobility aids.
Implications for rehabilitationMore detailed education and training during the prescription and early use process of first mobility aids has been highlighted as an unmet need by many families.The current timeline for participants receiving first mobility aids after prescription such as ankle-foot orthoses and walkers ranges from 2 to 9 months, which may delay access to on-time mobility for young children.Clinicians and caregivers highlight benefits of ankle-foot orthoses such as improved gait and standing alignment but also point out these aids can be uncomfortable and inhibit functional floor mobility. Clinicians highlight benefits of walkers such as supporting upright mobility and independence, but also point out challenges with physical barriers in the community and contributions to poor postural habits. Open discussion of these pros and cons with caregivers may be an important part of the provision process.Understanding the impact of different types and levels of clinician education and training regarding first mobility aids on confidence and decision-making during provision processes is valuable to improve practice and device design.
