Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Oncotarget ; 6(42): 44995-5004, 2015 Dec 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26575326

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although biliary tract cancers (BTC) are common in older age-groups, treatment approaches and outcomes are understudied in this population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from 913 patients diagnosed with BTC from January 1987 to July 2013 and treated at Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto were analyzed. The differences in treatment patterns between older and younger patients were explored and the impact of age, patient and disease characteristics on survival outcomes was assessed. RESULTS: Three hundred and twenty one patients ≥ 70 years were identified. Older patients were more likely to receive best supportive care, 40% (n = 130), compared to younger patients 26% (n = 154); p < 0.0001. On multivariable analysis, factors associated with receipt of surgery included stage I/II disease (p < 0.0001) and ECOG PS < 2 (p < 0.0001). Older age was not associated with lack of surgical intervention. In comparison, older age was associated with non-receipt of palliative chemotherapy (p = 0.0007). Similar survival benefit from treatment was seen in older and younger patients. Of 626 patients that underwent either surgery or palliative chemotherapy (n = 188), the median survival was 21.1 months (95% CI 19.0-27.9) in patients >70 years of age, and 21.1 months in younger patients (n = 438) (95% CI 19.5-24.5). CONCLUSIONS: In this large retrospective analysis, older patients with BTC are less likely to undergo an intervention. However, active therapy when given is associated with similar survival benefits, irrespective of age.


Assuntos
Neoplasias do Sistema Biliar/terapia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Biliar/tendências , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/tendências , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/tendências , Cuidados Paliativos/tendências , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Neoplasias do Sistema Biliar/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Sistema Biliar/mortalidade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Biliar/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Biliar/mortalidade , Feminino , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Análise Multivariada , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Razão de Chances , Ontário , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Hepatogastroenterology ; 62(139): 564-9, 2015 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26897929

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The impact of statins, aspirin and metformin use on recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients with biliary tract cancer (BTC) has not been evaluated. METHODOLOGY: Baseline demographics/comorbidity and use of statins, aspirin or metformin at diagnosis were evaluated in patients with BTC from January/1987-July/2013. RESULTS: Median age at diagnosis; 65.7 years, performance status < 2; 795 patients, male; 461 (50.5%). Among 913 patients; 151 (16.5%) reported statin use at diagnosis, 146 (16%) aspirin use, and 81 (9%) metformin use. Charlson Comorbidity index score was not significantly associated with RFS or OS. Stage was prognostic on multivariable analysis for RFS and OS (both P ≤ 0.001) and age, performance status ≥ 2 and site were also prognostic for OS (P < 0.05, P < 0.001, and P < 0.05 respectively). Recurrence-free and OS among statin-users and nonusers was similar (RFS Hazard Ratio [HR]1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.78 - 1.58, P = 0.57), (OS HR0.98, 95% CI 0.77-1.24, P = 0.86), and among aspirin-users and nonusers (RFS HR0.83, 95% CI 0.57-1.23, P = 0.35), (OS HR1.07, 95% CI 0.85 - 1.34, P = 0.58), and among metformin-users and non-users (RFS HR0.75, 95% CI 0.43-1.30, P = 0.30), (OS HR0.96, 95% CI 0.69-1.33, P = 0.79). CONCLUSION: In this large retrospective cohort of BTC patients, comorbidity, statin, aspirin or metformin use did not have significant effects on RFS or OS.


Assuntos
Aspirina/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias do Sistema Biliar/terapia , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/uso terapêutico , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/uso terapêutico , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Metformina/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Neoplasias do Sistema Biliar/mortalidade , Neoplasias do Sistema Biliar/patologia , Comorbidade , Progressão da Doença , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Análise Multivariada , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Am J Clin Oncol ; 38(4): 382-7, 2015 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24572429

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: There are high rates of recurrence after definitive surgery in biliary tract cancer patients. We reviewed the use and effectiveness of adjuvant therapy (AT; chemotherapy±radiotherapy) in a single institution series. METHODS: Characteristics, treatment details, and follow-up data of all patients with biliary tract cancer who had definitive surgery from January 1987 to September 2011 were reviewed. The association between baseline variables and disease-free survival/overall survival (OS) were tested using Cox proportional hazard analysis in the univariable and multivariable settings. RESULTS: Analysis included 296 patients (58% male; median age, 63 y). Negative or microscopically positive resections were reported in 42% and 14%, respectively, with 44% not reported. Node positivity was reported in 35% patients. AT was given in 28% of patients with 59% receiving chemotherapy and 35% concurrent chemotherapy/radiotherapy. Disease recurred in 60% patients. AT was associated with significantly improved OS (hazard ratio, 0.41; P=0.02). Compared with R0 resection, patients with R1 resection derived significantly increased benefit from AT (P for difference 0.02). In the node positive population (n=103), AT was associated with significantly improved OS (hazard ratio, 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.38-0.95; P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with R1 resection and node positive disease receiving AT after definitive surgery seem to derive OS advantage. Large prospective trials are needed to confirm these data.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias do Sistema Biliar/terapia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Biliar , Carcinoma Adenoescamoso/terapia , Linfonodos/patologia , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Idoso , Neoplasias dos Ductos Biliares/patologia , Neoplasias dos Ductos Biliares/terapia , Ductos Biliares Intra-Hepáticos/patologia , Neoplasias do Sistema Biliar/patologia , Carcinoma Adenoescamoso/patologia , Quimiorradioterapia Adjuvante , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Colangiocarcinoma/patologia , Colangiocarcinoma/terapia , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Neoplasias da Vesícula Biliar/patologia , Neoplasias da Vesícula Biliar/terapia , Ducto Hepático Comum/patologia , Humanos , Tumor de Klatskin/patologia , Tumor de Klatskin/terapia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...