Risk Factors for Adverse Radiographic Outcomes After Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nailing of Unstable Diaphyseal Tibia Fractures in Children.

OBJECTIVES: Elastic stable intramedullary nails (ESIN) are commonly utilized to treat unstable pediatric tibia fractures but have been associated with complications. The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for adverse radiographic outcomes after ESIN of pediatric tibia fractures. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients who underwent diaphyseal tibia fracture stabilization with ESIN between 2010 and 2018 at 3 pediatric level 1 trauma centers was performed. Inclusion criteria were open growth plates, no intra-articular or physeal fracture involvement, and radiographic follow-up until union. Patient demographics, injury mechanism, fracture characteristics, and implant fill relative to the medullary canal were recorded. Radiographic outcome measures included achievement of and time to union, residual angular deformity, and additional procedures. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-two patients met inclusion criteria and were followed for a mean of 1.2 years. Nonunions were observed in 3% of the patient cohort. Another 10% required >6 months to heal, but did not require further surgical intervention. Angular deformities were common with 57% having a residual deformity ≥5 degrees and 14% having a residual deformity ≥10 degrees. Of the patients with a residual deformity between 5 and 10 degrees, 3% were symptomatic, where as 26% of the patients with a residual deformity ≥10 degrees were symptomatic. Greater angular deformities were associated with open fractures, compartment syndrome, and longer time to union. Patient age, weight, tibial comminution, and canal fill were not associated with nonunions or malunions. CONCLUSIONS: ESIN of pediatric tibia fractures results in reliable healing for a majority of patients, but poses risks for residual angular deformities and delayed healing. Open fractures and compartment syndrome were associated with adverse radiographic outcomes.

Multimodal analgesia decreases opioid consumption after shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Studies on perioperative pain control in shoulder arthroplasty focus on regional anesthesia, with little research on other approaches. Perioperative multimodal analgesia regimens decrease opioid intake and opioid-related side effects in lower-extremity arthroplasty. In this study we compare pain scores, opioid consumption, length of stay, and readmission rates in postoperative shoulder arthroplasty patients treated with a standard or multimodal analgesia regimen. METHODS: A prospective cohort analysis was performed at a single institution. Patients undergoing elective shoulder arthroplasty were treated with either a standard opioid-based regimen or a multimodal analgesia regimen perioperatively. Outcome measures included inpatient pain scores, opioid use, length of stay, and 30- and 90-day emergency department visits and readmission rates. RESULTS: Seventy-five patients were included in each cohort. Patients treated with the multimodal analgesia regimen had lower postoperative day 0 pain scores (mean, 1.5 vs 2.2; P = .027). Opioid use in the multimodal cohort was lower on all days: 47% lower on postoperative day 0, 37% on day 1, and 44% on day 2 (all P < .01). The length of inpatient stay was significantly shorter for multimodal patients than for patients treated with the standard regimen (1.44 days vs 1.91 days, P < .01). There was no difference in the rate of 30- or 90-day emergency department visits or readmission. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty have decreased postoperative pain and opioid consumption and shorter hospital stays when given a multimodal analgesia regimen. There is no increase in short-term complications or unplanned readmissions, indicating that this is a safe and effective means to control postoperative pain.