Bipedicled Scrotal Flap for Penile Resurfacing.

BACKGROUND: Acquired penile defects can be secondary to various pathologic conditions, including infection, scar, or complications following urologic procedures. Penis defects with skin deficit carry a distinct challenge for reconstructive surgeons. Scrotal flaps can provide reliable coverage and can restore distinct qualities of native penile skin. METHODS: A series of patients presented with a variety of acquired penile defects. Each of these patients underwent staged bipedicle scrotal flap surgery for coverage by the senior author. RESULTS: Eight patients underwent bipedicle scrotal flap reconstruction for penile defects with a skin deficit. All eight patients had satisfactory outcomes postoperatively. Only two of the eight patients had minor complications. CONCLUSIONS: For select patients presenting with underlying deficit of penile skin, bipedicle scrotal flaps prove to be a safe, reproducible, and reliable reconstructive technique for penile resurfacing. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, V.

An Algorithmic Approach for Deploying Buccal Fat Pad Flaps and Buccal Myomucosal Flaps Strategically in Primary and Secondary Palatoplasty.

OBJECTIVE: Recent publications have introduced the use of buccal myomucosal and fat pad flaps to augment palatal repairs with autologous tissue. We propose a workflow for intraoperative decision-making to introduce these adjuncts into standard palatoplasty procedures. DESIGN/PATIENTS: A retrospective chart review of a single-surgeon series of patients undergoing primary and secondary palatoplasties performed between October 2017 and November 2020 was completed after Institutional Review Board approval. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient demographics, phenotype, operative details, and postoperative complications were recorded. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients were included in a review. For those undergoing primary repair, 23.3% underwent a Furlow palatoplasty alone, 46.3% had a Furlow palatoplasty accompanied with acellular dermal matrix (ADM) and/or a buccal fat flap (BFF). A unilateral buccal myomucosal flap (BMMF) with or without augmentation with BFF or ADM was employed in 16.3% of the cases. Fourteen percent required a bilateral BMMF+/- ADM. Fistula occurrence was 2.3% (n = 1). For revisions, 27% underwent only a conversion Furlow palatoplasty, 26% had a conversion Furlow palatoplasty accompanied with ADM and/or a BFF, 33% had a unilateral BMMF or BMMF/ADM, and 14% required a bilateral BMMF+/- ADM. CONCLUSIONS: In severe phenotypes or complicated cases, buccal fat flaps and myomucosal flaps may be utilized. This approach has mostly replaced the use of ADM over time. An algorithmic approach to palatoplasty allows surgeons to tailor the extent of surgery to the needs of each patient.

Function-Sparing Free Split Latissimus Dorsi Flap for Lower-Extremity Reconstruction: Five-Year Consecutive Single-Surgeon Series.

BACKGROUND: The free split latissimus dorsi flap for lower-extremity reconstruction has some advantages over the traditional latissimus dorsi flap. The flap is harvested with the patient in the supine position and is associated with minimal morbidity as the function of the remaining latissimus dorsi muscle is preserved through the posterior division of the thoracodorsal nerve. METHODS: A consecutive single-surgeon 5-year series of free split latissimus dorsi muscle flaps for lower-extremity reconstruction (n = 42) was evaluated. Donor site morbidity was evaluated through assessment of the strength of the remaining latissimus dorsi at least 1 month after surgery. Shoulder function was evaluated postoperatively using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI). RESULTS: The mean age of the 42 patients was 40.7 years. The mean length and width of the flaps were 17.9 cm and 8.6 cm. The majority (71%) of the wounds were due to acute trauma. Of the 42 flap procedures performed, 95% (40) were successful. Assessment of remaining latissimus dorsi strength at least 1 month postoperatively, during 3 activities, showed a Medical Research Council (MRC) grade of 5 in all patients. The mean and median scores were 6.4 and 0 according to the DASH, 6.0/6.4 and 0/0 on the SPADI pain/disability scales, and 90.7 and 100 on the ASES. CONCLUSIONS: The free split latissimus dorsi flap is a large reliable muscle flap with negligible donor site morbidity that is particularly advantageous for lower-extremity resurfacing following trauma. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.