Treatment of osteoarthritis with celecoxib, a cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of celecoxib, a cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor, with those of naproxen, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), and placebo in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee. METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 1003 patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis of the knee were randomly assigned to receive celecoxib at doses of 50, 100, or 200 mg twice a day; naproxen, 500 mg twice a day; or placebo for 12 weeks. Patients were evaluated with standard measures of efficacy 2 to 7 days after discontinuing previous NSAID or analgesic therapy and after 2, 6, and 12 weeks of treatment with the study drug. RESULTS: Celecoxib treatment led to significant improvement in the signs and symptoms of osteoarthritis as determined by all efficacy measures. Significant pain relief occurred within 2 days of the initiation of treatment, and maximum anti-inflammatory and analgesic activity, evident within 2 weeks, was sustained throughout the 12-week study. All celecoxib doses were efficacious compared with placebo, although the 50-mg twice-daily dosage regimen was minimally effective. The higher doses of celecoxib (100 and 200 mg twice a day) were similarly efficacious, and the magnitude of improvement observed with these dosing regimens was comparable to that seen with naproxen at a dose of 500 mg twice a day. All doses of celecoxib and naproxen were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: COX-2 inhibition with celecoxib is an effective approach for the treatment of osteoarthritis, as seen by clinical improvement in signs and symptoms comparable to treatment with naproxen.

Evaluation of the functional status aspects of health-related quality of life of patients with osteoarthritis treated with celecoxib.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the functional status of patients with signs and symptoms of osteoarthritis of the knee after treatment with celecoxib compared with placebo and naproxen. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, 12-week trial. SETTING: Multicenter study conducted at 71 sites in the United States and Canada. PATIENTS: One thousand four patients with active osteoarthritis of the knee in a flare state. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were assigned randomly to one of five treatment groups: placebo; celecoxib 50 mg twice/day, 100 mg twice/day, and 200 mg twice/day; and naproxen 500 mg twice/day. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index was used to measure functional status. At the end of the treatment period, patients in the four active treatment groups had significantly better functional status than those receiving placebo. Patients treated with celecoxib 100 mg twice/day had significantly better improvements in pain scores than those treated with placebo and naproxen. CONCLUSION: Celecoxib was better than placebo and comparable with naproxen in improving aspects of functional status in patients with osteoarthritis.

Safety and tolerability of metoprolol OROS in hypertension treatment.

One hundred twenty-six patients with mild to moderate hypertension responsive to beta-adrenergic blocking agents--alone or in combination with other antihypertensive drugs--entered this open-label, multicenter study designed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of metoprolol OROS (metoprolol fumarate). Metoprolol OROS was given once daily for 14 weeks in doses ranging from 100 to 600 mg. Satisfactory blood pressure control was achieved by 85% of the patients at doses between 100 and 400 mg. Mean diastolic blood pressure was maintained at or below 90 mm Hg. Adverse reactions were experienced by 29% of the patients; most of these reactions were mild or moderate, and none was unexpected for treatment with a beta-blocker. Only three patients withdrew because of adverse reactions. The results of this study indicate that metoprolol OROS given once daily is safe and well tolerated.

A multicenter, randomized, double-blind dose-response evaluation of step-2 guanfacine versus placebo in mild to moderate hypertension.

Guanfacine, an alpha-adrenoceptor agonist, may exhibit distinct dose-related curves for efficacy and adverse effects in the step-2 therapy of essential hypertension. To determine the lowest clinically effective safe dose, 462 newly or previously diagnosed subjects were admitted to a 5-week prerandomization phase at 8 centers. Patients were weaned from any current antihypertensive drugs and placed on 25-mg chlorthalidone, daily, in the morning. At the end of the 5-week weaning period, 362 patients with seated diastolic blood pressures (BPs) between 95 and 114 mm Hg qualified for the 12-week postrandomization phase. Subjects were randomized to receive either an indistinguishable placebo or 0.5, 1, 2 or 3 mg of guanfacine. Chlorthalidone was changed to bedtime administration and taken with the study medications. Guanfacine was started at the lowest dose in all subjects and increased (if scheduled, according to the randomization code) to the next higher dose at biweekly intervals. Of the 362 randomized patients, 278 completed the study. The 1-mg guanfacine dosage produced a 14/13 mm Hg decrease in BP (p less than 0.0125 compared with placebo). Doses of guanfacine at 2 and 3 mg/day were not more effective than the 1 mg/day dose; 0.5 mg/day was not better than placebo. There was an increase in the frequency of side effects possibly or probably associated with 2 and 3 mg/day guanfacine. Only 3.2% of the patients in the 1 mg/day group dropped out of the study because of side effects. We conclude that when added to a diuretic, 1 mg/day guanfacine at bedtime is the lowest safe and therapeutically effective dose.