Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Curr Top Microbiol Immunol ; 354: 75-99, 2012.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21904984

RESUMO

The great potential of mucosal vaccination is widely accepted but progress in the clinical development of subunit mucosal vaccines has been disappointing. Of the available approaches, the use of polymer-based microparticles is attractive because these delivery vehicles can be specifically tailored for vaccines and they offer the potential for integration of adjuvant. Here we address recent developments in the use of particulates as mucosal vaccines and the potential of novel targeting strategies, formulation approaches and adjuvant combinations to enhance the efficacy of particle-based mucosal vaccines. This review discusses the current status of mucosal vaccines based on particles and highlights several of the strategies that are currently under investigation for improving their immunogenicity. These include enhancing the stability of formulations in the luminal environment, increasing uptake by specifically targeting particles to mucosal inductive sites, and augmenting immunogenicity through co-formulation with immunostimulatory agents.


Assuntos
Sistemas de Liberação de Medicamentos/instrumentação , Mucosa/imunologia , Nanopartículas/química , Vacinação/instrumentação , Animais , Sistemas de Liberação de Medicamentos/métodos , Humanos , Vacinação/métodos
2.
Adv Drug Deliv Rev ; 51(1-3): 43-54, 2001 Sep 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11516778

RESUMO

Many of the vaccines in use today were designed on an empirical basis with little understanding of the mechanism of protective immunity or knowledge of the protective antigens. Certain of these vaccines, based on killed or attenuated bacteria or viruses, are associated with unacceptable side-effects. New generation vaccines based on recombinant proteins or naked DNA have considerably improved safety profiles, but are often poorly immunogenic, especially when administered by mucosal routes. This is a particular problem with oral delivery; where high doses of antigen are required to generate even modest immune responses. In contrast, nasal delivery of antigens with a range of adjuvants or delivery systems has been shown to generate relatively potent immune responses and to protect against infection in animal models. Advances in immunology have demonstrated that a variety of cellular and humoral immune effector mechanisms, that are regulated by distinct Th1 and Th2 subtypes of T cells, mediate protection against different infectious diseases. The identification of adjuvants and immunomodulators, that can promote the selective induction of these distinct populations of T cells, has now made it possible to rationally design safe and effective mucosal vaccines against a range of infectious diseases of man.


Assuntos
Adjuvantes Imunológicos/administração & dosagem , Sistemas de Liberação de Medicamentos , Vacinas/administração & dosagem , Animais , Formação de Anticorpos , Humanos , Imunidade Celular , Vacinas de DNA/administração & dosagem
3.
Vaccine ; 19(9-10): 1188-98, 2000 Dec 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11137256

RESUMO

The development of new generation vaccines against diphtheria is dependent on the identification of antigens and routes of immunization that are capable of stimulating immune responses similar to, or greater than, those obtained with the parenterally-delivered toxoid vaccine, while reducing the adverse effects that have been associated with the traditional vaccine. In this study, we examined the cellular and humoral immune responses in mice generated after both parenteral and mucosal immunizations with cross-reacting material (CRM(197)) of diphtheria toxin. We found that both native and mildly formaldehyde-treated CRM(197) and conventional diphtheria toxoid (DT) induced mixed Th1/Th2 responses and similar levels of anti-DT serum IgG following parenteral immunization. In contrast, CRM(197) preparations were poorly immunogenic when administered intranasally in solution. However, formulation of the antigens with chitosan significantly enhanced their immunogenicity, inducing high levels of antigen-specific IgG, secretory IgA, toxin-neutralizing antibodies and T cell responses, predominately of Th2 subtype. Furthermore, intranasal immunization with CRM(197) and chitosan induced protective antibodies against the toxin in a guinea pig passive challenge model. We also found that priming parenterally with DT in alum and boosting intranasally with CRM(197) was a very effective method of immunization in mice, capable of inducing high levels of anti-DT IgG and neutralizing antibodies in the serum and secretory IgA in the respiratory tract. Our findings suggest that boosting intranasally with CRM(197) antigen may be very effective in adolescents or adults who have previously been parenterally immunized with a conventional diphtheria toxoid vaccine.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Antibacterianos/biossíntese , Proteínas de Bactérias/administração & dosagem , Quitina/análogos & derivados , Toxina Diftérica/administração & dosagem , Toxoide Diftérico/administração & dosagem , Células Th2/imunologia , Administração Intranasal , Compostos de Alúmen/administração & dosagem , Animais , Quitina/administração & dosagem , Quitosana , Toxoide Diftérico/imunologia , Epitopos de Linfócito T , Feminino , Cobaias , Imunização , Camundongos , Camundongos Endogâmicos BALB C
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...