Survival following stereotactic radiosurgery for newly diagnosed and recurrent glioblastoma multiforme: a multicenter experience.

Despite decades of clinical trials investigating new treatment modalities for glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), there have been no significant treatment advances since the 1980s. Reported median survival times for patients with GBM treated with current modalities generally range from 9 to 19 months. The purpose of the current study is to retrospectively review the ability of CyberKnife (Accuray Incorporated, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) radiosurgery to provide local tumor control of newly diagnosed or recurrent GBM. Twenty patients (43.5%) underwent CyberKnife treatment at the time of the initial diagnosis and/or during the first 3 months of their initial clinical management. Twenty-six patients (56.5%) were treated at the time of tumor recurrence or progression. CyberKnife was performed in addition to the traditional therapy. The median survival from diagnosis for the patients treated with CyberKnife as an initial clinical therapy was 11.5 months (range, 2-33) compared to 21 months (range, 8-96) for the patients treated at the time of tumor recurrence/progression. This difference was statistically significant (Kaplan-Meier analysis, P = 0.0004). The median survival from the CyberKnife treatment was 9.5 months (range, 0.25-31 months) and 7 months (range, 1-34 months) for patients in the newly diagnosed and recurrent GBM groups (Kaplan-Meier analysis, P = 0.79), respectively. Cox proportional hazards survival regression analysis demonstrated that survival time did not correlate significantly with treatment parameters (Dmax, Dmin, number of fractions) or target volume. Survival time and recursive partitioning analysis class were not correlated (P = 0.07). Patients with more extensive surgical interventions survived longer (P = 0.008), especially those who underwent total tumor resection vs. biopsy (P = 0.004). There is no apparent survival advantage in using CyberKnife in initial management of glioblastoma patients, and it should be reserved for patients whose tumors recur or progress after conventional therapy.

Cyberknife radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia treatment: a preliminary multicenter experience.

OBJECTIVE: Radiosurgery has gained acceptance as a treatment option for trigeminal neuralgia. We report our preliminary multicenter experience treating trigeminal neuralgia with the CyberKnife (Accuray, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA). METHODS: A total of 95 patients were treated for idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia between May 2002 and October 2005. Radiosurgical dose and volume parameters were retrospectively analyzed in relation to pain response, complications, and recurrence of symptoms. Optimal treatment parameters were identified for patients who had excellent and sustained pain relief with no complications, including severe or moderate hypesthesia. RESULTS: Excellent pain relief was initially experienced by 64 out of 95 patients (67%). The median time to pain relief was 14 days (range, 0.3-180 d). Posttreatment numbness occurred in 45 (47%) of the patients treated. Using higher radiation doses and treating longer segments of the nerve led to both better pain relief and a higher incidence of hypesthesia. The presence of posttreatment numbness was predictive of better pain relief. The overall rate of complications was 18%. At the mean follow-up time of 2 years, 47 of the 95 patients (50%) had sustained pain relief, all of whom were completely off pain medications. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest the following optimal radiosurgical treatment parameters for treatment of idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia: a median maximal dose of 78 Gy (range, 70-85.4 Gy) and a median length of the nerve treated of 6 mm (range, 5-12 mm).

CyberKnife radiosurgery for idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia.

OBJECT: Gamma knife surgery is an accepted treatment option for trigeminal neuralgia (TN). The safety and efficacy of CyberKnife radiosurgery as a treatment option for TN, however, has not been established. METHODS: Forty-one patients were treated between May 2002 and September 2004 for idiopathic TN at Stanford University and the Rocky Mountain CyberKnife Center. Patients with atypical pain, multiple sclerosis, or previous radiosurgical treatment or a follow-up duration of less than 6 months were excluded. Patients were evaluated for the level of pain control, response rate, time to pain relief, occurrence of hypesthesia, and time to pain recurrence with respect to the length of the nerve treated and the maximum and the minimum dose to the nerve margin. Thirty-eight patients (92.7%) experienced initial pain relief at a median of 7 days after treatment (range, 24 hours-4 months). Pain control was ranked as excellent in 36 patients (87.8%), moderate in two (4.9%), and three (7.3%) reported no change. Six (15.8%) of the 38 patients with initial relief experienced a recurrence of pain at a median of 6 months (range 2-8 months). Long-term response after a mean follow-up time of 11 months was found in 32 (78%) of 41. Twenty-one patients (51.2%) experienced numbness after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: CyberKnife radiosurgery for TN has high rates of initial pain control and short latency to pain relief compared with those reported for other radiosurgery systems. The doses used for treatment were safe and effective. Higher prescribed doses were not associated with improvement in pain relief or recurrence rate. The hypesthesia rate was related to the length of the trigeminal nerve treated.

Influence of prostate volume on dosimetry results in real-time 125I seed implantation.

PURPOSE: Achieving a minimal dose of 140 Gy to 90% of the prostate (D90) on postimplant dosimetry has been shown to yield improved biochemical control by 125I brachytherapy, and a D90 >180 Gy can be associated with increased long-term toxicity of seed implantation. Significant enlargement of the prostate on postimplant CT compared with the ultrasound (US) volume at implantation (CT/US ratio) has been associated with lower dose results, but other factors predicting for high or low doses are not well established. We determined whether the prostate size at implantation influenced the CT/US ratio results affecting postimplant dosimetry or predicted for D90 values <140 or >180 Gy in patients implanted with 125I in a community hospital setting. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The dosimetry results from 501 patients from 33 community hospitals were analyzed after full dose 125I implantation. Implant radioactivity was obtained from reference tables relating millicuries to prostate volume (PV). Seeds were placed under real-time US guidance with peripheral weighting in a uniform method for all prostate sizes. CT-based dosimetry was performed 1 month after implantation. Dose-volume histogram parameters were analyzed for volume effects, including D90, the dose to 10% and 30% of the rectal wall, and the dose to 30% of the urethra and bladder. The PV was defined as small (<25 cm3), medium (25 to <40 cm3), or large (> or =40 cm3). RESULTS: The PV ranged from 9 to 79 cm3 (median 32.7). A D90 > or =140 Gy was achieved in 452 patients (90%). The median D90 was 164 Gy (range 90-230) and increased from 149.5 Gy in small prostates to 164 Gy in medium (p <0.001) and 176 Gy in large (p <0.001) prostates. A D90 <140 Gy occurred in 20% of small vs. 9% of medium and 3% of large prostates (p = 0.003). A D90 >180 Gy occurred in 7% of small and 10% of medium vs. 25% of large glands (p <0.001). The rectal dose increased significantly with an enlarging PV. The bladder and urethral doses increased from the small to medium PVs, although did not increase further in the large glands. The median CT/US ratios showed a significant volume relationship, decreasing with enlarging PVs, but were not associated with a D90 <140 or >140 Gy. The D90 results for <140 Gy and >140 Gy occurred at equal activities per volume. CONCLUSION: Ninety percent of patients implanted by community-level practitioners using reference tables and real-time US-guided implantation achieved a D90 outcome of > or =140 Gy. Significant differences in dose outcomes <140 Gy and >180 Gy occurred related to PV. Those with prostates <25 cm3 had a 20% frequency of D90 <140 Gy, unrelated to excessive postimplant volume enlargement or insufficient activity per reference table, suggesting that the activity-to-volume recommendations may not allow for much variance in final seed position. Such seed displacement may contribute to lower doses, most commonly in small glands. One may consider increasing the activity implanted in small prostates, because a D90 >180 Gy occurred in only 7% of these cases. Patients with glands >40 cm3 were 25% likely to have a D90 result >180 Gy and were at only 3% risk of a D90 <140 Gy. These patients may benefit from intraoperative dosimetry or a reduction in implant activity.

Preradiation chemotherapy in primary high-risk brainstem tumors: phase II study CCG-9941 of the Children's Cancer Group.

PURPOSE: This Children's Cancer Group group-wide phase II trial evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of two chemotherapy arms administered before hyperfractionated external-beam radiotherapy (HFEBRT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients with newly diagnosed brainstem gliomas were randomly assigned to regimen A and 31 to regimen B. Regimen A comprised three courses of carboplatin, etoposide, and vincristine; regimen B comprised cisplatin, etoposide, cyclophosphamide, and vincristine. Both arms included granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Patients were evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging after induction chemotherapy and HFEBRT at a dose of 72 Gy. RESULTS: Ten percent +/- 5% of regimen A patients objectively responded to chemotherapy. For combined induction and radiotherapy, 27% +/- 9% of patients improved. The neuroradiographic response rate for regimen B was 19% +/- 8% for chemotherapy and 23% +/- 9% after HFEBRT. Response rates were not statistically significant between regimens after induction or chemotherapy/HFEBRT. Event-free survival was 17% +/- 5% (estimate +/- SE) at 1 year and 6% +/- 3% at 2 years. Survival was significantly longer among patients who responded to chemotherapy (P <.05). Among patients who received regimen A induction, grades 3 and 4 leukopenia were observed in 50% to 65%, with one toxicity-related death. For regimen B, severe leukopenia occurred in 86% to 100%, with febrile neutropenia in 48% to 60% per course. CONCLUSION: Neither chemotherapy regimen meaningfully improved response rate, event-free survival, or overall survival relative to previous series of patients with brainstem gliomas who received radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy.