Exposure assessments in reproductive and developmental toxicity testing: An IQ-DruSafe industry survey on current practices and experiences in support of exposure-based high dose selection.

The draft ICH S5(R3) guideline includes an exposure-based endpoint as an option for selecting the high dose in developmental and reproductive toxicity (DART) studies. In 2016, IQ DruSafe conducted an anonymous survey to identify industry practices and experiences related to pharmacokinetic assessments in DART studies in order to facilitate a pragmatic data-driven approach to development of an acceptable multiple of the clinical exposure to be proposed for dose selection in the guideline. Questions in the survey were designed to explore pharmacokinetic differences in pregnant versus non-pregnant animals, and to assess exposure levels attained in the absence of maternal toxicity as well as DART outcomes in animal studies associated with those exposures. Small molecule and therapeutic proteins were analyzed separately. The key findings for small molecules were: a) differences in exposures between pregnant and non-pregnant animals were generally ≤3-fold, b) Cmax or AUC exposures ≥25-fold the clinical exposure were achieved in the absence of maternal toxicity for 31% and 23% of rat and rabbit developmental toxicity studies, respectively, and c) only 3.3% (5/153) and 1.6% (2/128) of the developmental toxicity studies were positive for malformations or embryofetal lethality in rats and rabbits, respectively, that were not observed until exposure margins were ≥25-fold.

Analysis of exposure margins in developmental toxicity studies for detection of human teratogens.

The draft Step 2 ICH S5(R3) guideline includes an exposure-based endpoint as an option for selecting the high-dose in reproductive and developmental toxicity studies. To help determine an appropriate exposure margin for embryofetal developmental toxicity testing, a retrospective analysis was undertaken to determine what threshold would have been sufficient to detect hazards to embryofetal development in rats and rabbits for 18 known and 4 presumed human teratogens. The analysis showed that using a high dose that provided at least a 6-fold exposure margin in the developmental toxicity studies would have been sufficient to detect the teratogenic hazard with relevance for humans for all these therapeutics. With regards to human risk assessment practices for developmental toxicity, the analysis showed that, after excluding lenalidomide and pomalidomide data in rats, all available AUC margins at the NOAEL for the induction of malformations or embryofetal lethality were <4-fold of the exposure at the MRHD for all 22 therapeutics. These data support the proposed general approach of increased level of concern for human risk when exposure margins of the NOAEL to the MRHD are <10-fold, reduced concern when the exposure margins are 10- to 25-fold, and minimal concern when the exposure margin is > 25-fold.

Safety assessment of propylparaben in juvenile rats.

There are conflicting literature reports that parabens, useful antimicrobial additives in pharmaceuticals, may have estrogenic activity. We conducted a comprehensive study to determine whether propylparaben (PP) administration to juvenile rats is associated with adverse effects on reproductive development and function. PP was administered orally once daily to groups of Crl:CD(SD) rats at doses of 0 (vehicle), 10, 100, or 1,000 mg/kg on Postnatal Days (PNDs) 4-90. In-life observations, clinical pathology, reproductive organ weights and histopathology, landmarks of sexual maturation, estrous cyclicity and functional reproductive competence were assessed. A conventional uterotrophic assay was conducted separately using the same doses. Systemic exposures to PP and 3 metabolites were evaluated on PND 7, 21 and 83. These studies demonstrated that PP was well tolerated when administered from PND 4-90 at all doses (AUC[0-T] on PND 83 = 69.9 ng•h/mL). Para-hydroxybenzoic acid, a non-estrogenic compound, was the predominant metabolite contributing to 95% of the total exposure at 1,000 mg/kg/day on PND 7. There was no evidence of estrogenic activity at any dose, and no effects on reproductive organs or function. The No-Observed-Adverse-Effect-Level (NOAEL) was 1,000 mg/kg/day.

Comparing rat and rabbit embryo-fetal developmental toxicity data for 379 pharmaceuticals: on systemic dose and developmental effects.

A database of embryo-fetal developmental toxicity (EFDT) studies of 379 pharmaceutical compounds in rat and rabbit was analyzed for species differences based on toxicokinetic parameters of area under the curve (AUC) and maximum concentration (Cmax) at the developmental lowest adverse effect level (dLOAEL). For the vast majority of cases (83% based on AUC of n = 283), dLOAELs in rats and rabbits were within the same order of magnitude (less than 10-fold different) when compared based on available data on AUC and Cmax exposures. For 13.5% of the compounds the rabbit was more sensitive and for 3.5% of compounds the rat was more sensitive when compared based on AUC exposures. For 12% of the compounds the rabbit was more sensitive and for 1.3% of compounds the rat was more sensitive based on Cmax exposures. When evaluated based on human equivalent dose (HED) conversion using standard factors, the rat and rabbit were equally sensitive. The relative extent of embryo-fetal toxicity in the presence of maternal toxicity was not different between species. Overall effect severity incidences were distributed similarly in rat and rabbit studies. Individual rat and rabbit strains did not show a different general distribution of systemic exposure LOAELs as compared to all strains combined for each species. There were no apparent species differences in the occurrence of embryo-fetal variations. Based on power of detection and given differences in the nature of developmental effects between rat and rabbit study outcomes for individual compounds, EFDT studies in two species have added value over single studies.

Comparison of rat and rabbit embryo-fetal developmental toxicity data for 379 pharmaceuticals: on the nature and severity of developmental effects.

Regulatory non-clinical safety testing of human pharmaceuticals typically requires embryo-fetal developmental toxicity (EFDT) testing in two species (one rodent and one non-rodent). The question has been raised whether under some conditions EFDT testing could be limited to one species, or whether the testing in a second species could be decided on a case-by-case basis. As part of a consortium initiative, we built and queried a database of 379 compounds with EFDT studies (in both rat and rabbit animal models) conducted for marketed and non-marketed pharmaceuticals for their potential for adverse developmental and maternal outcomes, including EFDT incidence and the nature and severity of adverse findings. Manifestation of EFDT in either one or both species was demonstrated for 282 compounds (74%). EFDT was detected in only one species (rat or rabbit) in almost a third (31%, 118 compounds), with 58% (68 compounds) of rat studies and 42% (50 compounds) of rabbit studies identifying an EFDT signal. For 24 compounds (6%), fetal malformations were observed in one species (rat or rabbit) in the absence of any EFDT in the second species. In general, growth retardation, fetal variations, and malformations were more prominent in the rat, whereas embryo-fetal death was observed more often in the rabbit. Discordance across species may be attributed to factors such as maternal toxicity, study design differences, pharmacokinetic differences, and pharmacologic relevance of species. The current analysis suggests that in general both species are equally sensitive on the basis of an overall EFDT LOAEL comparison, but selective EFDT toxicity in one species is not uncommon. Also, there appear to be species differences in the prevalence of various EFDT manifestations (i.e. embryo-fetal death, growth retardation, and dysmorphogenesis) between rat and rabbit, suggesting that the use of both species has a higher probability of detecting developmental toxicants than either one alone.

Assessment of cervical passage of vital dyes in pregnant, nonpregnant, and mated rats and mice.

Risk assessment for indirect exposure to small molecule pharmaceuticals in semen to the conceptus has traditionally been handled by calculations based on assumptions that any embryo-fetal exposure would be secondary to maternal absorption and redistribution. This study was designed to assess the potential for transcervical passage of drugs from semen. Reproductive tracts of rodents were examined following vaginal dosing with vital dyes during the estrous cycle, mating, and pregnancy. Toluidine Blue was not observed beyond the cervix after vaginal administration in pregnant rats; additionally, it did not pass the cervix in rats during any phase of estrous. In order to address the effects of semen, rats were dosed at receptivity and mated. Vital dyes were not visually evident in the uterus despite vaginal and sperm plug staining. This study provides evidence that direct transcervical passage is not a substantial route of direct embryo-fetal exposure for small molecule drugs in semen.

Evaluation of early fetal exposure to vaginally-administered metronidazole in pregnant cynomolgus monkeys.

Given concern about potential embryo-fetal harm following seminal exposure to drugs with teratogenic potential, pharmaceutical companies use theoretical calculations to estimate seminal concentrations, maternal exposure, and distribution across the placenta to the embryo-fetal compartment for risk assessment. However, it is plausible that there are additional mechanisms whereby the conceptus is exposed. In order to determine if theoretical calculations are sufficiently conservative to predict embryo-fetal exposure from drugs in semen, pregnant cynomolgus monkeys were given a vaginal dose of metronidazole during the early fetal period and cesarean-sectioned. Maternal, fetal, and amniotic fluid samples were analyzed for metronidazole and 2-hydroxymetronidazole. Exposure to metronidazole and its metabolite were comparable in all matrices. These data demonstrated no preferential transfer mechanism to conceptus following intravaginal administration of a small molecule drug; and therefore, suggest that traditional modeling for embryo-fetal exposure to drugs in semen in support of risk assessment for pharmaceutical agents is sufficiently conservative.