RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Infections by Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) remain a leading cause of death in critically ill patients. Fosfomycin has been regarded as an alternative therapy for treatment of infections caused by CRE organisms. The purpose of this study is to evaluate clinical outcomes amongst patients with CRE infection who are receiving a fosfomycin dosing regimen using a Monte Carlo simulation and fosfomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fosfomycin MIC was defined by the E-test method. We used Fosfomycin pharmacokinetic parameters from a previously published study. The percent of the time period in which the drug concentration exceeded the MIC, or %T>MIC, used in this study were determined to be 70% of T>MIC and 100% of T>MIC, respectively. All dosing regimens were estimated for the probability of target attainment using a Monte Carlo simulation. RESULTS: In this study, we found the MIC's of fosfomycin against CRE isolates ranged from 8 mg/L to 96 mg/L. The total daily dose of fosfomycin ranged from 16 - 24 g and was administered utilizing various fosfomycin dosing regimens to achieve the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target in pathogens with a MIC of 32 mg/L for 70%T>MIC and a MIC of 12 mg/L for 100%T>MIC, respectively. For the twelve patients who received the recommended fosfomycin dosing regimen, eleven achieved bacterial eradication for a microbiological cure rate of 91%; and of those patients achieving eradication, two died despite having negative cultures for CRE; the one remaining patient had bacterial persistence. The most commonly observed adverse drug reactions were hypernatremia (3 cases) and hypokalemia (3 cases) and acute kidney injury (3 cases). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest fosfomycin has tended to good efficacy when using dosing regimens that achieve the PK/PD target. Nonetheless, further validation of these regimens in larger populations is needed.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To identify reasons for inclusion of international practice experiences in pharmacy curricula and to understand the related structure, benefits, and challenges related to the programs. METHODS: A convenience sample of 20 colleges and schools of pharmacy in the United States with international pharmacy education programs was used. Telephone interviews were conducted by 2 study investigators. RESULTS: University values and strategic planning were among key driving forces in the development of programs. Global awareness and cultural competency requirements added impetus to program development. Participants' advice for creating an international practice experience program included an emphasis on the value of working with university health professions programs and established travel programs. CONCLUSION: Despite challenges, colleges and schools of pharmacy value the importance of international pharmacy education for pharmacy students as it increases global awareness of health needs and cultural competencies.
