Enhanced Efficiency in Pediatric Interfacility Transport Through a Centralized Hospital System Communication Center.

OBJECTIVES: Assess the implementation of a new centralized communication center and the effect on our institution's interfacility transport team's ability to respond to requests for patient transport. DESIGN: Retrospective review of data over 12 months prior to opening compared with 12 months after implementation of our centralized communication center. SETTING: Quaternary academic pediatric hospital system with three campuses, a specialized transport team with expertise in pediatric, neonatal, and maternal-fetal critical care, and a new centralized hospital system communication center. PATIENTS: All patients for whom transport to our hospital system was requested within the review period. INTERVENTIONS: Our hospital developed a multidisciplinary, centralized hub incorporating technology and integrated electronic tracking systems to coordinate real-time patient flow including intra- and interhospital transfers. One function of this center is to provide a communication center for critical care transports. Multiple new protocols and processes for transport were implemented upon opening. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: After implementation, total transports increased 60% (from 1,200 to >1,900 transports/yr). Team dispatch time decreased 40% from 57-34 minutes. Time from initiation of call to physician acceptance decreased 15% (median, 27-23 min). Over the same interval, there were 59% fewer lost transport opportunities. With this growth, our program was able to expand our transport program in scope and numbers. CONCLUSIONS: A centralized communication center for pediatric hospital patient flow that included specialized critical care patient transport has increased transport capacity and enhanced efficiency throughout our multicampus hospital system.

Safe Ground Transport of Pediatric COVID-19 Patients-A Single-Center First-Surge Experience.

OBJECTIVES: The COVID-19 pandemic has brought new challenges to pediatric transport programs. The aims of this study were to describe the transport of pediatric patients with confirmed COVID-19 and to review the operational challenges that our transport system encountered. METHODS: A retrospective descriptive study was performed to review all COVID-19 pediatric transport performed over a 6-month period during the initial pandemic surge in 2020. Pediatric patients with a known positive SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction test at the time of transport were included. Patients' hospital records, including their transport record, were reviewed for demographics, diagnoses, transport interventions and complications, and admission disposition. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the patient cohort. RESULTS: Of the 883 transports performed between April and October 2020, 146 (16%) tested positive for COVID-19 during the initial surge in our geographical area. Patient acuity was diverse with 40% of children having a chronic complex medical condition. More than 25% of children required aerosol-generating procedures during transport. The most common medical diagnosis was respiratory compromise, and the most common surgical diagnosis was appendicitis. No adverse events occurred during transports, and no transport team members contracted COVID-19 because of workplace exposure. Transport program operational challenges ranged from rapidly changing system logistics/policies to educational and utilization of proper personal protective equipment. CONCLUSIONS: Children with COVID-19 can be transported safely with adaption of transport program procedures. Change management and team stress should be anticipated and can be addressed with repeated education and messaging.

A decade of pediatric tracheostomies: Indications, outcomes, and long-term prognosis.

OBJECTIVE: To define the mortality and long-term outcomes of children undergoing tracheostomy. DESIGN: Retrospective chart and Texas Department of Health Bureau of Vital Statistics review of patients admitted to a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit who underwent a tracheostomy between 2001 and 2011. Mortality and decannulation rates were compared based on tracheostomy indication and age. SUBJECTS: A total of 426 patients admitted to a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit in a large tertiary children's hospital. RESULTS: The median patient age was 1.5 years (3 days-24 years). Primary indications for tracheostomy included (a) airway obstruction, (b) congenital neurologic disease, (c) acquired neurologic disease, (d) congenital respiratory disease, and (e) acquired respiratory disease. Overall, 98 patients (23%) died during the study period, and 75th percentile survival time was 5.9 years (95%CI: 3-8). Patients undergoing a tracheostomy for airway obstruction were the least likely to die; while patients with acquired neurologic disease were most likely to die. A total of 163 patients (38%) were decannulated, and 50% were decannulated at 1.2 years (95%CI: 0.9-1.5). Patients with congenital neurologic disease were the least likely to undergo decannulation. Over half of the patients were discharged from the hospital requiring some form of mechanical respiratory support in addition to their tracheostomy. CONCLUSIONS: In this largest cohort of long-term follow-up to date, we have shown the overall risk of mortality varied according to the indication for the tracheostomy. We were unable to determine exact causes of death. The likelihood of being decannulated also correlates with the underlying indication for the tracheostomy. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2017; 52:946-953. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Implementation of a Standard Verbal Sign-Out Template Improves Sign-Out Process in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.

Sign-out of patient data at change of shifts is vulnerable to errors that impact patient safety. Although sign-outs are complex in intensive care units (ICU), a paucity of studies exists evaluating optimal ICU sign-out. Our prospective interventional study investigated the use of a standard verbal template in a Pediatric ICU to improve the sign-out process. We designed and validated a survey tool to measure 10 items of optimal sign-out. The survey and analysis of sign-out information exchanged was performed pre- and postintervention. Forty-eight clinicians participated, with a survey response rate of 88% and 81% in the pre- and postintervention phases, respectively. Seventy-nine percent clinicians identified the need for sign-out improvement. Clinician satisfaction with sign-out increased postintervention (preintervention survey scores: 3.26 (CI: 3.09-3.43), postintervention 3.9 (CI: 3.76-4.04) [p < .01]). Three scorers analyzed the verbal and written sign-out content with good inter-rater reliability. After the intervention, sign-out content revealed increased patient identification, background description, account of system-based clinical details [p = .001] and notation of clinical details, code status, and goals [p < .002]. Interruptions decreased [p = .04] without any change in sign-out duration [p = .86]. The standard verbal template improved clinician satisfaction with sign-out, augmented the amount of information transferred and decreased interruptions without increasing the duration of sign-out.

Children with new tracheostomies: planning for family education and common impediments to discharge.

OBJECTIVES: To describe an educational program and timeline for the discharge of children with a new tracheostomy and identify common impediments to the education and discharge process. METHODS: Retrospective pilot case series of 70 children and adolescents undergoing tracheostomy placement over a 24-month period in a large urban academic pediatric hospital. RESULTS: Eleven healthcare providers with expertise with technology dependent children identified the eight most common impediments to education and discharge for children with new tracheostomies. Length of stay, impediments to both education and discharge, and medical equipment needed at the time of discharge were extracted from hospital records. Caregivers of children with new tracheostomies needed a median of 14 days (range 5-110 days) to successfully complete a tracheostomy education program. Discharge occurred a median of 6.5 days (range 0-71 days) after education was completed. Common impediments to completing the education program included social issues (e.g., lack of sibling childcare), inter-current illness of the patient and/or language barriers. Impediments to discharge included patient's inter-current illnesses, social issues (e.g., lack of running water) and unavailability of home nursing. Our cohort of patients had a total median length of stay (LOS) of 46 days. At discharge, 55% of children required two or more medical devices (in addition to their tracheostomy) and 61% had some level of dependency on positive pressure ventilation. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric patients with a new tracheostomy undergo lengthy initial hospitalizations and have complex educational and discharge needs. Multiple factors (both medical and social) can impede the child's transition to the outpatient setting. A structured education and discharge program may result in a shorter LOS for children with new tracheostomies. Impediments to family education and discharge should be anticipated.

Pediatric tracheostomies: a recent experience from one academic center.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the indications, surgical timing, length of stay, hospital charges, and discharge disposition of pediatric tracheostomy patients. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. SETTING: Large urban academic pediatric hospital. PATIENTS: Seventy children and adolescents undergoing tracheostomy placement over a 24-month period. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Hospital database records were used to determine demographics and readmission rates, tabulate charges, and confirm deaths. Indications for tracheostomies included airway obstruction, inadequate airway protection, chronic lung disease, neuromuscular weakness, and central hypoventilation. Surgical timing of the tracheostomy was grouped into three categories: prolonged mechanical ventilation, elective, or emergent. The overall median hospital stay was 46 days (range 14-254) with a median hospital charge of $136,718 (range $36,237-$913,934). The prolonged mechanical ventilation group underwent a tracheostomy after a median of 26 days (mean 37.5 days) on the ventilator. Eighty-one percent of children were discharged home; 63% of children were readmitted within 6 months, with 11% requiring four or more admissions. The six-month mortality rate was 13%; no deaths were related to the tracheostomy. CONCLUSIONS: Children with tracheostomies are a heterogeneous population. Children who require tracheostomy for long-term mechanical ventilation have longer hospital stays than children who receive a tracheotomy on an elective or emergent basis. Hospital readmissions should be anticipated in this complex group of patients.

A validated pediatric transport survey: how is your team performing?

INTRODUCTION: Understanding referring practitioners' satisfaction with pediatric transport services is useful for quality improvement. Formal survey methodology was applied to develop a pediatric transport satisfaction survey. SETTING: Large metropolitan area in the Southwestern United States. METHODS: A four-stage process was used to create a 20-item pediatric transport satisfaction survey. The final survey was analyzed for test-retest and internal consistency reliability, and surveys were mailed to a large practitioner base. RESULTS: The survey encompassed three domains: patient care, accessing the transport system, and communication. Test-retest and internal consistency reliability were good (final Cronbach alpha coefficient of 0.88.) Of the 229 providers responding, 69% were local (<60 miles), and 31% were served by our long distance transport team (>60 miles). Respondents reported that physicians selected the transport team in 82% of cases, whereas 9% reported that the charge nurse decided. Transport team selection was based on: (1) ease of initiation, (2) fastest arrival, (3) presence of a physician on the team, (4) stabilization time at the referring facility, and (5) team providing best follow-up. Satisfaction with our transport service was high, with a median survey score of 83 (interquartile [IQ] range, 74-92). Physicians and nurses reported equal satisfaction. CONCLUSION: Survey design methodology was successfully applied to assess satisfaction with pediatric transport. This transport survey offers a reliable measurement of providers' satisfaction with transport services.

Reverse transport of children from a tertiary pediatric hospital.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to determine the epidemiology and resources used and to study the potential savings of pediatric reverse transport patients. METHODS: A case control study was performed with patients undergoing a reverse or outbound transport from a large, pediatric hospital. Twenty-five children undergoing reverse transport were compared with matched controls. Lengths of stay and costs were compared between the reverse transport and matched control patients. RESULTS: Fifty-two percent of the reverse transport patients returned home, whereas 32% went home for end-of-life care and 16% went to other facilities. The average reverse transport was more than 400 miles and cost $6,064. The reverse transport of these patients did not save pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) days but did result in a shorter hospital stay compared with the matched controls (10 vs. 19 days, P = .03). Decreased utilization of bed days came from less use of intermediate care unit resources. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric patients undergo reverse transports for a variety of reasons, often for end-of-life care. The ability to reverse transport pediatric patients may not save PICU bed days but may offer pediatric tertiary care hospitals a means to provide more intermediate care bed availability.

Institutional policies on determination of medically inappropriate interventions: use in five pediatric patients.

OBJECTIVE: To describe recent experience using the Texas Advance Directives Act to facilitate care of terminally ill children managed in the two tertiary pediatric hospitals of the Texas Medical Center, Houston, TX. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Two multidisciplinary pediatric intensive care units in Houston, TX. PATIENTS: Five terminally ill children whose parents were unable to acquiesce to comfort or palliative care. INTERVENTIONS: Implementation of the Texas Advanced Directives Act of 1999. RESULTS: Suspension of interventions thought to be medically inappropriate by the physicians of record in four of the five cases, with transfer of care in one instance. CONCLUSIONS: Use of institutional policies in accordance with the Texas Advance Directives Act may assist in the care of terminally ill children and their families.

Sutured securement of peripherally inserted central catheters yields fewer complications in pediatric patients.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) can be secured with tape, sutures, or sutureless securement devices. Despite widespread catheter use, no standardized method of securement has been proven superior. METHODS: A prospective randomized trial of catheter securement with either tape or suture was undertaken in pediatric patients hospitalized at a tertiary children's hospital. Patient demographics, catheter dwell time, and all catheter complications were collected. All patients were followed for the entire dwell time of the catheter, including those discharged with lines still in place. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients completed the study, with 34 children in the suture group and 32 children in the tape group. Patients' ages ranged from 9 months to 19 years. Overall complication rate in our sutured group was 5.8%, and 32.4% in the tape group. CONCLUSIONS: In this study of children of varying ages, sutured PICCs were associated with significantly fewer complications than those catheters secured with tape (p=.005). The 3 most common complications included migration, occlusion, and leaking catheters.

Noncompliance with medical follow-up after pediatric intensive care.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the medical follow-up ordered, the health care utilization, the appointment compliance, and the risk factors associated with noncompliance in patients who are discharged after a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) stay. METHODS: A prospective, analytic, cohort study of 111 critically ill children, age 1 day to 16 years, who were admitted to a 30-bed PICU in an urban, tertiary-care, pediatric teaching hospital compared children who were compliant with medical follow-up with those who were not. The main outcomes measured were emergent and unscheduled physician visits during the first 6 weeks after hospital discharge; compliance with ordered medical follow-up after hospital discharge; and comparisons of socioeconomic, demographic, and medical need factors between compliant and noncompliant children. Discharge orders for follow-up appointments with general pediatricians and subspecialists were collected from the chart at hospital discharge. Patients were contacted after hospital discharge to determine whether and when they received medical follow-up; 28% were found to be noncompliant. Risk factors associated with noncompliance were evaluated. Emergent and unscheduled physician visits were tracked during the first 6 weeks after hospital discharge. RESULTS: Lack of follow-up orders at hospital discharge did not affect the frequency of emergent visits. Children fell into 2 groups: those who were 100% compliant and those with < or =67% compliance. No socioeconomic or demographic risk factors could be identified between the 2 groups. Compared with the 100% compliant patients, patients who were compliant with < or =67% of appointments were more severely ill, as defined by higher peak pediatric risk of mortality scores during their PICU stay (11.5 vs 8.4), longer PICU length of stays (10.1 days vs 4.6 days), and longer hospital length of stays (25.5 days vs 14 days). Most predictive of noncompliance was the number of medical appointments ordered by physicians. Patients with 3 or more appointments were less likely to be compliant with follow-up. After hospital discharge, children were more likely to visit a primary care physician compared with a subspecialist (95% vs 82%). When patients were ordered to see a specialist, scheduled appointments were much better attended than the recommended appointments (92% vs 67%). CONCLUSIONS: Lack of ordered medical follow-up did not affect emergent visits. In this group of critically ill children, a significant percentage (28%) did not receive timely medical follow-up. No socioeconomic or demographic risk factors were identified in noncompliant children. However, severity of illness (higher peak pediatric risk of mortality score, longer PICU stay, and longer hospital stay) and the number of follow-up appointments ordered were predictors of noncompliance. Potential exists for implementing strategies to improve compliance in identified populations.