Prognostic Tools in Patients With Advanced Cancer: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: In 2005, the European Association for Palliative Care made recommendations for prognostic markers in advanced cancer. Since then, prognostic tools have been developed, evolved, and validated. The aim of this systematic review was to examine the progress in the development and validation of prognostic tools. METHODS: Medline, Embase Classic and Embase were searched. Eligible studies met the following criteria: patients with incurable cancer, >18 years, original studies, population n ≥100, and published after 2003. Descriptive and quantitative statistical analyses were performed. RESULTS: Forty-nine studies were eligible, assessing seven prognostic tools across different care settings, primary cancer types, and statistically assessed survival prediction. The Palliative Performance Scale was the most studied (n = 21,082), comprising six parameters (six subjective), was externally validated, and predicted survival. The Palliative Prognostic Score composed of six parameters (four subjective and two objective), the Palliative Prognostic Index composed of nine parameters (nine subjective), and the Glasgow Prognostic Score composed of two parameters (two objective) and were all externally validated in more than 2000 patients with advanced cancer and predicted survival. CONCLUSION: Various prognostic tools have been validated but vary in their complexity, subjectivity, and therefore clinical utility. The Glasgow Prognostic Score would seem the most favorable as it uses only two parameters (both objective) and has prognostic value complementary to the gold standard measure, which is performance status. Further studies comparing all proved prognostic markers in a single cohort of patients with advanced cancer are needed to determine the optimal prognostic tool.

A systematic review of opioid effects on the hypogonadal axis of cancer patients.

PURPOSE: Opioids are the mainstay of analgesic therapy in patients with cancer-related pain. While many of the side effects of opioids are well documented, the effect on the hypogonadal axis is less well understood. The aim of this systematic review is to examine the relationship between opioid therapy and hypogonadism in patients with cancer. METHODS: An electronic search of the following databases was undertaken: MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL from 1974 to August 2013. To be eligible for inclusion, studies had to meet the following criteria: adult patients (>18 years) with cancer taking any opioid by any route for any duration, gonadal function measured and the relationship between opioid use and gonadal function examined. All potentially eligible papers were reviewed independently and data extracted using a pro forma. RESULTS: Four studies met the inclusion criteria. Due to the heterogeneous nature of the studies, it was not possible to amalgamate the results. Three studies suggested a relationship between opioid use and hypogonadism in patients with cancer. These studies also suggested this relationship to be dose dependent. There was evidence to suggest that hypogonadism was symptomatic and associated with reduced survival. One study showed no link between opioids and hypogonadism. CONCLUSIONS: Studies conducted have suggested an association between opioids and hypogonadism in patients with cancer. This warrants further investigation. A longitudinal study examining the impact of opioids on the hypogonadal axis would be of interest.

Propofol for terminal sedation in palliative care: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: We undertook a systematic review of published evidence of the effectiveness of propofol for terminal sedation. INCLUSIONS: Prospective or retrospective trials (controlled or uncontrolled) or case series of propofol for sedation in advanced incurable disease in either generalist setting or specialist palliative care units. EXCLUSIONS: Use in anesthetic or intensivist settings (e.g., intensive care units); pediatric use. Identification of relevant studies: Using the search terms: [Hospice Care/OR Terminal Care/OR Palliative Care/OR palliative.mp] AND [Propofol/]. Studies were identified using a detailed search strategy from a number of electronic databases: Embase (1988-2005); MEDLINE (1966-2005) Cinahl (1982-2005), Cancerlit (1962-2005) The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005 Issue 4. Hand searches of a number of palliative care journals were also undertaken (Palliative Medicine, Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, Progress in Palliative Care, Journal of Palliative Care, Journal of Palliative Medicine). No restriction was placed on the language of the original article. RESULTS: Four articles--all case series or case reports--reporting generally favorable reports of the use of propofol as sedation for intractable symptoms in the last days of life especially when one or more other drugs have failed. Since these four articles are essentially hypothesis-generating, the article also discusses the possibility of the design of a clinical trial to compare propofol with other drugs used in this situation.