A single case experimental design study using an operationalised version of the Kaufman Speech to Language Protocol for children with childhood apraxia of speech.

PURPOSE: A Phase I study was conducted to examine the treatment effectiveness of the Kaufman Speech to Language Protocol using a research-operationalised protocol. It was hypothesised that articulatory accuracy would improve as a result of the treatment and that these improvements would be maintained after treatment was discontinued. METHOD: A single case experimental design was used to evaluate the effectiveness of the Kaufman Speech to Language Protocol. Four children with a confirmed childhood apraxia of speech diagnosis were included in this study. Each child received 12 individual 1 hr treatment sessions that each consisted of an approximation setting phase and a practice phase. Probe data was collected during treatment and at post-treatment time points to measure treatment effectiveness and to measure changes in the untreated words. Untreated (control) sounds were included to test whether recorded improvements in articulatory accuracy could be attributed to the Kaufman Speech to Language Protocol. RESULT: Two of the four children demonstrated a response to the intervention and maintenance of these changes, while the two remaining children demonstrated some generalisation in the absence of improved target (treatment) words. No specific child factors were clearly associated with positive treatment outcomes. CONCLUSION: This study replicated the findings of an earlier pilot study and found that the operationalised protocol for the Kaufman Speech to Language Protocol is effective in improving articulatory accuracy for some children with childhood apraxia of speech. Additional replication with a further refined treatment protocol and a larger sample size is needed to support a recommendation of clinical use of the Kaufman Speech to Language Protocol.

Speech and swallowing intervention following oral cancer treatment: A survey of speech-language pathologists in Australia and New Zealand.

PURPOSE: Treatment for oral cancer has debilitating effects on speech and swallowing, however, little is known about current speech-language pathology practice. METHOD: An online survey of speech-language pathologists (SLPs) was disseminated via emails to speech pathology departments, social media platforms, and professional online forums. Survey questions captured demographics, service delivery, type and timing of speech and swallowing interventions, and influences and barriers to practice. RESULT: Forty-three SLPs working in Australia (n = 41) and New Zealand (n = 2) completed the survey. SLPs recommended speech and swallowing compensatory strategies significantly more frequently than active intervention. Swallowing outcomes measures were either instrumental (n = 31, 94%) or performance ratings (n = 25, 76%), whereas speech was measured informally with judgements of intelligibility (n = 30, 91%). SLPs used a range of supports for their decision making, particularly expert opinion (n = 81, 38.2%). They reported time and staffing limitations (n = 55, 55%) and a lack of relevant evidence (n = 35, 35%) as the largest barriers to evidence-based service delivery. CONCLUSION: There is variability amongst SLPs in Australia and New Zealand regarding rehabilitation of speech and swallowing for people with oral cancer. This study highlights the need for evidence-based guidelines outlining best practice for screening processes, active rehabilitation protocols, and valid outcome measures with this population.

Weekly Treatment for Childhood Apraxia of Speech With Rapid Syllable Transition Treatment: A Single-Case Experimental Design Study.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to pilot the efficacy of rapid syllable transition (ReST) treatment when provided once per week for a 50-min treatment session for 12 weeks with five children with childhood apraxia of speech. Of central importance was the children's retention and generalization of gains from treatment as indicators of speech motor learning. METHOD: A multiple-baseline across-participant design was employed to investigate (a) treatment effect on the 20 treated pseudowords, (b) generalization to 40 untreated real words and 10 untreated polysyllabic word sentences, and (c) maintenance of any treatment and generalization goals to up to 4 months posttreatment. To investigate any difference between in-session performance and retention, a comparison was made between data collected during treatment and probe sessions. RESULTS: Treatment data collected during therapy showed all children improving across their 12 treatment sessions. Three of the five children showed a treatment effect on treated pseudowords in the probe sessions, but only one child showed generalization to untreated real words, and no children showed generalization to sentences. CONCLUSIONS: ReST treatment delivered at a dose frequency of once per week was efficacious for only one of the five children. In-session treatment data were not a reliable indicator of children's learning. One session per week of ReST therapy is therefore not recommended. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.23751018.

The Reliability of Expert Diagnosis of Childhood Apraxia of Speech.

PURPOSE: The current standard for clinical diagnosis of childhood apraxia of speech (CAS) is expert clinician judgment. The psychometric properties of this standard are not well understood; however, they are important for improving clinical diagnosis. The purpose of this study is to determine the extent to which experts agree on the clinical diagnosis of CAS using two cohorts of children with mixed speech sound disorders (SSDs). METHOD: Speech samples of children with SSDs were obtained from previous and ongoing research from video recordings of children aged 3-8 years (n = 36) and audio recordings of children aged 8-17 years (n = 56). A total of 23 expert, English-speaking clinicians were recruited internationally. Three of these experts rated each speech sample to provide a description of the observed features and a diagnosis. Intrarater reliability was acceptable at 85% agreement. RESULTS: Interrater reliability on the presence or absence of CAS among experts was poor both as a categorical diagnosis (κ = .187, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.089, 0.286]) and on a continuous "likelihood of CAS" scale (0-100; intraclass correlation = .183, 95% CI [.037, .347]). Reliability was similar across the video-recorded and audio-only samples. There was greater agreement on other diagnoses (such as articulation disorder) than on the diagnosis of CAS, although these too did not meet the predetermined standard. Likelihood of CAS was greater in children who presented with more American Speech-Language-Hearing Association CAS consensus features. CONCLUSIONS: Different expert raters had different thresholds for applying the diagnosis of CAS. If expert clinician judgment is to be used for diagnosis of CAS or other SSDs, further standardization and calibration is needed to increase interrater reliability. Diagnosis may require operationalized checklists or reliable measures that operate along a diagnostic continuum. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.23949105.

The Effectiveness of Rapid Syllable Transition Treatment in Improving Communication in Children with Cerebral Palsy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Cerebral palsy (CP) is a movement disorder and majority of children with CP have communication impairments which impact participation with this population. Rapid Syllable Transition Treatment (ReST) is a motor speech intervention primarily for children with Childhood Apraxia of Speech (CAS). A recent pilot study in which ReST was trialed with children with CP showed improved speech performance. Therefore, a single blind randomized controlled trial to compare ReST to usual care with 14 children with moderate-to-severe CP and dysarthria was conducted. ReST was provided on telehealth. ANCOVA with 95% confidence intervals indicated significant group differences in favor of ReST in speech accuracy (F = 5.1, p = .001), intelligibility (F = 2.8, p = .02) and communicative participation on both the FOCUS (F = 2, p = .02) and Intelligibility in Context Scale (F = 2.4, p = .04). ReST was found to be more effective than usual care.

A Pilot Randomized Control Trial of Motor-Based Treatments for Childhood Apraxia of Speech: Rapid Syllable Transition Treatment and Ultrasound Biofeedback.

PURPOSE: Both Rapid Syllable Transition Treatment (ReST) and ultrasound biofeedback are effective approaches to treating childhood apraxia of speech (CAS). The purpose of the study was to compare outcomes from these two motor-based treatment approaches for school-age children with CAS. METHOD: In a single site, single blind randomized control trial, 14 children with CAS ages 6-13 years were randomly assigned to 12 sessions over 6 weeks of either of ultrasound biofeedback treatment (with a speech motor chaining practice structure) or ReST. Treatment was delivered at The University of Sydney by students trained and supervised by certified speech-language pathologists. Transcriptions from blinded assessors were used to compare the two groups on speech sound accuracy (percent phonemes correct) and prosodic severity (lexical stress errors and syllable segregation) in untreated words and sentences at three time points: pretreatment, immediately posttreatment, and 1-month posttreatment (i.e., retention). RESULTS: Both groups showed significant improvement on treated items indicating a treatment effect. At no time was there a difference between groups. Both groups showed a significant improvement in speech sound accuracy on untreated words and sentences from pre to post and neither group showed an improvement in prosody pre-post. Changes to speech sound accuracy were retained by both groups at 1-month follow-up. Significant improvement in prosodic accuracy was reported at the 1-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: ReST and ultrasound biofeedback were equally effective. Either ReST or ultrasound biofeedback may be viable treatment options for school-age children with CAS. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.22114661.

Effect of a Nursing Research Council on System-Wide Practice Changes: An Evidence-Based Practice Process Improvement.

Ensuring that evidence-based practice is adopted across hospital systems is difficult. A system-wide Nursing Research Council in a large academic health care system in Maryland implemented a unique strategy to support the evidence-based practice process by collaborating with other system-wide councils. As a result, new system-wide evidence-based practices were adopted and improved organizational outcomes were seen. [J Contin Educ Nurs. 2023;54(1):25-31.].

Motor Speech Interventions for Children With Cerebral Palsy: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: Dysarthria is common among children with cerebral palsy (CP) and results in poor speech intelligibility and subsequently low communicative participation. Neuroplasticity evidence suggests that adherence to principles of motor learning (PML) improves motor speech intervention outcomes. Motor speech interventions aim to improve speech intelligibility and ultimately facilitate participation, but the effectiveness of these interventions and their inclusion of PML are not clear. Aims are as follows: (a) evaluate the effectiveness motor speech interventions in improving speech intelligibility; (b) summarize the aims, outcome measures, and outcomes relating to the International Classification of Functioning and Disability Child and Youth; and (c) summarize the principles of motor learning used in the intervention. METHOD: Eight databases were searched, complemented by a hand search. Studies of any level of evidence were included if they used a motor speech intervention and measured speech in children with CP aged 0-18 years. Studies before 2000 or not in English were excluded. The review was conducted and reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Study quality was rated using the Single Case Experimental Design Scale and Physiotherapy Evidence Database-P rating scales. The strength of evidence was evaluated with Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation. RESULTS: Of 1,036 initial articles, 21 were included. Eight interventions were identified including 131 participants aged 3-18 years. All studies aimed to improve speech intelligibility or articulation and reported improvement at sound, word, or sentence level. One study reported improvements in communicative participation. The strength of evidence ranged from very low to moderate for one intervention. Adherence to PML was inconsistent. CONCLUSIONS: The quality of evidence is very low to moderate. More research on motor speech interventions that adhere to PML is required. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.21817959.

Evaluating the dose-response relationship of the number of sessions of "It Takes Two to Talk®" in young children with language delay.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the dose-response relationship between the number of It Takes Two to Talk® (ITTT) sessions attended and the language outcomes of young children with language delay and their parent's responsivity in a multicultural clinical population. METHOD: A clinical caseload of 273 early language delayed children (mean age 29.2 months, SD 7.8) and their families participated in parent group workshops and individual coaching sessions of the parent responsivity program ITTT. The children's vocabulary and early syntax, collected using the MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories and mean length of the three longest utterances respectively, were collated from pre- and post-intervention from pre-existing clinical data. Parental responsivity was evaluated utilising the Parent-Child Interaction checklist at three time points. Multilevel regression was used to determine the relationship between the number of sessions attended and outcomes, while accounting for covariates such as age and language spoken. RESULT: ITTT dosage did not predict child language outcomes. Rather, vocabulary and early syntax outcomes were predicted by age, pre-scores and parent responsivity at the beginning of treatment. A higher dosage of ITTT did however positively predict parent responsivity, as did speaking only English at home. Socioeconomic status, gender and presence of receptive language difficulties did not contribute significantly to either child or parent outcomes. CONCLUSION: A lower dosage of the intervention may be considered for parents and children with fewer known risk factors without significant implications.

A survey of interventions used by speech-language pathologists for children with speech sound disorders in the Middle East.

PURPOSE: While many examples of speech pathology intervention approaches for children with speech sound disorders (SSDs) exist in English and some other European languages, approaches with children in other languages are largely unknown. The aim was to determine current speech-language pathologists (SLPs) intervention practices with children with SSDs in the ME, and to then compare these with international practices. METHODS: Data were collected by online questionnaire using Qualtrics. One hundred and eighty-nine SLPs completed the survey. Participants were required to be Arabic first language speaking SLPs practicing in the ME (e.g. Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, UAE, and Egypt), working with children with SSDs. RESULTS: The respondents reported a frequent use of phonological awareness, traditional articulation therapy, auditory discrimination, minimal pairs, and whole language therapy approaches in the treatment of children with SSDs, like their counterparts in Australia, the USA, UK, and Portugal. Gaps between research recommendations for evidence-based practice and actual clinical practice are identified, and discussed. CONCLUSIONS: Future research should investigate the efficacy of speech-therapy approaches to improve service delivery for Arabic-speaking children with SSDs in the ME.

"I still have issues with pronunciation of words": A mixed methods investigation of the psychosocial and speech effects of Childhood Apraxia of Speech in adults.

PURPOSE: Adolescents with Childhood Apraxia of Speech (CAS) are likely to have persistent speech errors compared to non-CAS peers (Lewis et al., 2018) and may have ongoing psychosocial issues (e.g. Carrigg, Parry, Baker, Shriberg, & Ballard, 2016). Beyond this, little is known about the long-term consequences of CAS in adulthood. This study explored whether adults who were reported to have had CAS as children have ongoing psychosocial or speech impacts. METHOD: A cross-sectional descriptive design, with mixed-method analyses of demographic, psychosocial, and speech data was used. Data were collected via a four-part online survey. Part one consisted of questions about demographic information and participants' self-reported performance in speech, language and literacy. Parts two and three investigated the psychosocial impacts of CAS using the Brief Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale - Revised (BFNE- R) and The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Part four collected single word and connected speech data via an online audio recording, which was then transcribed following the Connected Speech Transcription Protocol (CoST-P). Analyses of speech characteristics reported in CAS was completed using Phon software. RESULT: There were 17 participants in part one, 16 in parts two and three, and six in part four. Participants reported elevated levels of state (p = 0.01) and trait (p = 0.0001) anxiety compared to normative data. Ongoing segmental and suprasegmental speech errors were observed, with a significant difference between percent phonemes correct in single words versus connected speech (p = 0.03). Participants who provided a speech sample had difficulty with correct stress, use of juncture, and had increased intra- and inter-word segregation. Participants with better speech reported less anxiety. CONCLUSION: Psychosocial effects and speech characteristics associated with CAS in childhood appear to persist into adulthood. Confirmation of these results and research to determine treatment and psychosocial support needs past early childhood is warranted.

Speech Development Across Subgroups of Autistic Children: A Longitudinal Study.

Subgroups of children with different speech profiles have been described however, little is known about the trajectories of speech development or stability of subgroups over time. This longitudinal study described both speech trajectories and subgroup stability of 22 autistic children, aged 2;0-6;11 years, over 12 months. Independent and relational speech analyses, vocabulary size and nonverbal communication were used in clustering. Results suggest varied speech trajectories, particularly for children with 'low language and low speech' at Time 1. Receptive vocabulary and consonant inventory at Time 1 may predict speech outcomes after 12 months. A small subgroup of children (n = 3) present with low expressive vocabulary and speech but higher receptive vocabulary and use of gestures. This unique profile remained stable.

Changes in variability during intervention for childhood apraxia of speech: implications for therapy.

Typically developing children are variable in their speech production with decreasing variability indicating mastery of speech. Excessive variability which does not change over time may be an indication of unstable motor plans as often seen in children with childhood apraxia of speech (CAS). Dynamic Systems Theory (DST) provides a framework for understanding the role of variability in speech development and disorder. There are few studies that explore the impact of therapy on speech variability. This work explores the impact of therapy on perceptual speech production variability. It is a post-hoc analysis of data collected in two intervention studies of a motor-based treatment approach with children with CAS and explores DST variability effects in speech skill acquisition based on the case data from those studies. There were six participants in total across the two studies. Findings were mixed showing some non-linear changes in variability with larger changes in variability observed in participants who engaged in more extensive therapy. However, the pattern of variability change was not consistent across the participants. These findings suggest that targeting variability in therapy may be an effective way to improve the speech of children with CAS. A model for utilising variability in therapy is presented.

Identifying Clinical Behaviors Using the Motor Learning Classification Framework: A Pilot Study.

CONTEXT: Although differences in clinical interactions with patients between students and experienced clinicians are well described, differences in therapeutic training behaviors have not been explored, especially in relation to motor learning principles. AIMS: This pilot study compared clinical behaviors between speech language pathology (SLP) students and experienced SLPs in a voice therapy task, using prepractice variables in the Motor Learning Classification Framework (MLCF). METHODS: Using a quasi-experimental design, five final-year undergraduate SLP students and four experienced SLPs with a voice therapy caseload taught a standardized patient to produce a vocal siren. Two trained raters categorized the clinicians' behaviors using the MLCF. RESULTS: High intrarater reliability (91.9%, 92.3%) and interrater reliability (89.6%, 82.1%) were shown across both raters. Both clinician groups used the same percentage of behaviors classified as verbal information but differed in the subtypes of these behaviors. Experienced clinicians used behaviors categorized as problem-solving and only experienced clinicians used repeated behavior sequences that included perceptual training. Both groups used significantly more talking behaviors than doing behaviors. CONCLUSIONS: The MLCF can be reliably used to identify prepractice behaviors during client interactions in voice therapy. Students and experienced clinicians showed similarities in behaviors, but experienced clinicians used more problem solving and perceptual training behaviors than students. These differences have implications for student training. The greater use of talking behaviors than doing behaviors warrants further investigation into whether this impacts the subsequent quality of practice engaged by the client and ultimately treatment effectiveness.

Language and early literacy professional development: A complex intervention for early childhood educators and speech-language pathologists.

Purpose: Improving language and literacy skills in preschoolers can lead to better life outcomes. One way speech-language pathologists (SLPs) can improve these skills in preschoolers is by supporting educators through professional development (PD). However, PD in early childhood education and care (ECEC) settings is a complex intervention. To improve preschoolers' language and literacy skills using PD, SLPs must first work with educators to change or increase educators' language and literacy-promoting behaviours. This paper aimed to describe educator behaviours and preschooler skills following a real-world language and literacy PD intervention facilitated by two community SLPs.Method: Two pragmatic studies were conducted across four ECEC centres: (1) an observation study of 13 educators' self-reported language and literacy promoting behaviours, and (2) a non-randomised controlled trial investigating the language and literacy skills of 82 preschoolers as reported by their educators and parents/carers.Result: After the intervention, educators rated themselves as performing language and literacy-promoting behaviours more frequently. Educators also rated the early reading skills of preschoolers more highly after the PD intervention, but not preschoolers' oral language or early writing skills. Parents/carers did not report any significant improvements in preschoolers' skills.Conclusion: PD as an SLP intervention, whilst promising, showed mixed outcomes. Educator outcomes improved; however, preschooler outcomes were varied.

A cost analysis of a 5-day simulation-based learning program for speech-language pathology student training.

Purpose: There is poor reporting of the cost of simulation and greater transparency is needed. The primary study aim was to conduct a financial analysis of the university/training institution costs associated with a 5-day simulation-based learning program for speech-language pathology students. The secondary aim was to consider the economic costs of the model.Method: Costs associated with the delivery of a 5-day simulation-based learning program for speech-language pathology students from six Australian universities were collected regarding: (a) pre-program training, (b) personnel, (c) room hire, (d) equipment, and (e) consumables. Both financial costs and economic costs (Australian dollar, at June 2017) were calculated per university site, and per student.Result: The simulation program was run 21 times involving 176 students. Average total financial cost per program ranged from $4717 to $11 425, with cost variation primarily attributed to local labour costs and various use of in-kind support. Average financial cost per student was $859 (range $683-$1087), however this was almost double ($1461 per student, range $857-$2019) in the economic cost calculation. Personnel was the largest contributing cost component accounting for 76.6% of financial costs. Personnel was also the highest contributing cost in the economic analysis, followed by room hire.Conclusion: This study provides clarity regarding financial and economic costing for a 5-day simulation-based learning program. These data can help universities consider potential up-front financial costs, and well as strategies for financial cost minimisation, when implementing simulation-based learning within the university context.

Unpacking the black box of voice therapy: A clinical application and revision of the Motor Learning Classification Framework (MLCF).

Purpose: Voice therapy is a complex behavioural intervention. Understanding its components is integral for continued advancement of voice therapy research, translation of evidence into the clinical setting and improved client care. The Motor Learning Classification Framework (MLCF) offers an excellent opportunity for increasing such knowledge, specifically in relation to identifying variables that affect motor learning (ML), an important mechanism hypothesised to bring about voice change during voice therapy. The MLCF has shown promising results in identifying speech-language pathologists' (SLPs) use of ML variables during experimentally controlled voice therapy contexts. The purpose of this study was to test the feasibility of applying the framework in the clinical context of everyday voice therapy practice.Method: Data consisted of two video-recorded voice therapy sessions representing usual voice therapy care. Classification of ML variables used by SLPs during the recorded sessions was attempted based on the MLCF.Result: Several problematic features of the framework were identified. Based on deliberations between the authors of the current paper, the MLCF was revised using an iterative process. This resulted in the construction of an updated version of the framework (MLCF-V2). The MLCF-V2 organises ML strategies into two broad categories: directly observable behaviours and learning processes. The framework incorporates greater consideration of theory and empirical evidence supporting motivational, attentional focus and subjective error estimation influences on ML. Several examples of each ML variable are included as well as an attempt to provide clearer classification instruction.Conclusion: It is anticipated that the MLCF-V2 will provide a more useful and reliable classification for use in future investigations of SLPs' use of ML variables during usual voice therapy practice.

Similarities and differences across patient completed voice case history questionnaires - A scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Case history assessments are ubiquitously performed across various health professions for diagnostic purposes. Questionnaires are considered a valuable tool within this process. There is currently no standardized tool available to collect such information in the assessment of voice disorders. Conflicting advice from peak bodies and research evidence makes the process heterogenous, haphazard and difficult to compare findings. OBJECTIVE: To systematically identify existing case history questionnaires available for general clinical practice and provide synthesis and analysis of the questions within. METHODS: A scoping review was conducted across published and unpublished literature using the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews framework. The broad search included research papers within six electronic databases, textbooks, online publishing sites, voice clinic websites and peak body websites. Search criteria were uniformly applied. Descriptive analysis and content analysis was conducted. At each stage, transparency and replicability was achieved through an independent review process. RESULTS: Identified voice case history questionnaires were few (n = 23) with 80% from unpublished sources. A total of 581 unique questions were identified. No single question was common across all 23 questionnaires. The most frequently asked questions, excluding demographics, included medicines taken (n = 21), smoking (n = 20) and alcohol (n = 19). These questions were not reflected in the highest frequency categories: Health Status/Medical Conditions/Reports (n = 200), Vocal Symptoms (n = 88), Voice Use (n = 51) despite these categories representing 58% of all questions asked. Within the highest frequency category, the subcategory of Systemic Diseases was the highest, representing 19% of all questions within the category. CONCLUSIONS: This study illuminates the similarities yet many differences that exist across identified voice case history questionnaires in terms of number of questions, number of categories, preference for question-type and structure. It demonstrates the need for standardization of a voice case history questionnaire which would potentially enable more accurate diagnosis and data comparison between voice clinics to aid future research.

Outcomes of a novel single case study incorporating Rapid Syllable Transition treatment, AAC and blended intervention in children with cerebral palsy: a pilot study.

PURPOSE: Motor speech and augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) interventions are commonly used with children with cerebral palsy (CP) but there is limited literature comparing the effectiveness of these interventions. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of intensive AAC, Rapid Syllable Transition Treatment (ReST), and blended intervention, a combination of motor-speech and AAC, on speech accuracy and sentence length and complexity. METHODS: A single case experimental design across participants with repeated measurements across phases (ABACADA design) was used. Four participants aged 8-14 years with CP who used a speech-generating device (SGD) received three 6-week intervention blocks that included ReST, AAC, and blended intervention. Measures were taken during intervention and baseline phases and at maintenance two and four weeks after the last intervention phase. Participants were randomized to starting with either ReST or AAC with the blended intervention delivered last. RESULTS: All participants improved their speech accuracy and sentence length and complexity in speech and with their SGD in all three interventions. The data demonstrated overall immediacy of the effect with all interventions and retention of gains across the whole sequence of phases. The order of AAC or ReST interventions or the severity of CP did not impact the intervention gains. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that intensive AAC, a multi-modal approach, and ReST improve speech accuracy and sentence length and complexity in children with moderate CP, but all require further investigation.Implications for rehabilitationIn this paper intensive AAC intervention with a speech generating device (SGD), ReST treatment and multimodal blended intervention were effective in improving speech accuracy and sentence length and complexity in both verbal speech and on communication with the SGD.ReST treatment has not been used with children with CP before. This study established a proof of concept for its effectiveness in children with CP. Further research is warranted.

Predicting Treatment Outcomes in Rapid Syllable Transition Treatment: An Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to identify predictors of treatment outcomes in Rapid Syllable Transition Treatment (ReST) for childhood apraxia of speech through an individual participant data meta-analysis. METHOD: A systematic literature search identified nine ReST studies for inclusion. Individual participant data were obtained, and studies were coded for methodological design, baseline participant characteristics, service delivery factors, and treatment outcomes. Bivariate analyses were conducted to identify potential predictor variables. Multiple linear regressions were then performed to identify predictors of treatment outcomes. RESULTS: Data for 36 participants from seven studies were included in the statistical analyses. In multivariate modeling, better performance on treated pseudowords posttreatment was predicted by higher baseline expressive language and Goldman-Fristoe Test of Articulation scores, lower speech inconsistency and percentage of vowels correct, and higher pretreatment accuracy on pseudoword targets. Better performance on untreated real words posttreatment was predicted by higher pretreatment accuracy on real words. Gains in performance and retention of gains were not significantly predicted by any individual variable or combination of variables. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline speech and expressive language skills and accuracy on pseudowords and real words were significant predictors of absolute posttreatment performance. Regardless of baseline characteristics, all children were statistically as likely to achieve gains during ReST and retain these gains for up to 4 weeks posttreatment. Large-scale prospective research is required to further examine the effects of dose frequency and co-occurring language impairments on treatment outcomes and the complex co-effects of percentage of vowels correct with other potential predictors. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.19611714.