Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
J Pediatr ; 232: 200-206.e4, 2021 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33417918

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess the performance of a hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) severity score among children with Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) infections and HUS by stratifying them according to their risk of adverse events. The score has not been previously evaluated in a North American acute care setting. STUDY DESIGN: We reviewed medical records of children <18 years old infected with STEC and treated in 1 of 38 participating emergency departments in North America between 2011 and 2015. The HUS severity score (hemoglobin [g/dL] plus 2-times serum creatinine [mg/dL]) was calculated using first available laboratory results. Children with scores >13 were designated as high-risk. We assessed score performance to predict severe adverse events (ie, dialysis, neurologic complication, respiratory failure, and death) using discrimination and net benefit (ie, threshold probability), with subgroup analyses by age and day-of-illness. RESULTS: A total of 167 children had HUS, of whom 92.8% (155/167) had relevant data to calculate the score; 60.6% (94/155) experienced a severe adverse event. Discrimination was acceptable overall (area under the curve 0.71, 95% CI 0.63-0.79) and better among children <5 years old (area under the curve 0.77, 95% CI 0.68-0.87). For children <5 years, greatest net benefit was achieved for a threshold probability >26%. CONCLUSIONS: The HUS severity score was able to discriminate between high- and low-risk children <5 years old with STEC-associated HUS at a statistically acceptable level; however, it did not appear to provide clinical benefit at a meaningful risk threshold.


Assuntos
Regras de Decisão Clínica , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Infecções por Escherichia coli/diagnóstico , Síndrome Hemolítico-Urêmica/diagnóstico , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Escherichia coli Shiga Toxigênica , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Infecções por Escherichia coli/complicações , Infecções por Escherichia coli/mortalidade , Feminino , Síndrome Hemolítico-Urêmica/complicações , Síndrome Hemolítico-Urêmica/mortalidade , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , América do Norte , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
2.
J Pediatr ; 204: 240-244.e2, 2019 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30274923

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To characterize the frequency of opioid prescribing for pediatric headache in both ambulatory and emergency department (ED) settings, including prescribing rates by provider type. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study of Washington State Medicaid beneficiaries, aged 7-17 years, with an ambulatory care or ED visit for headache between January 1, 2012, and September 30, 2015. The primary outcome was any opioid prescribed within 1 day of the visit. RESULTS: A total of 51 720 visits were included, 83% outpatient and 17% ED. There was a predominance of female (63.2%) and adolescent (59.4%) patients, and 30.5% of encounters involved a pediatrician. An opioid was prescribed in 3.9% of ED and 1.0% of ambulatory care visits (P < .001). Pediatricians were less likely to prescribe opioids in both ED (-2.70 percentage point; 95% CI, -3.53 to -1.88) and ambulatory settings (-0.31 percentage point; 95% CI, -0.54 to -0.08; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Opioid prescribing rates for pediatric headache were low, but significant variation was observed by setting and provider specialty. We identified opioid prescribing by nonpediatricians as a potential target for quality improvement efforts.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Cefaleia/tratamento farmacológico , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Assistência Ambulatorial/estatística & dados numéricos , Criança , Estudos de Coortes , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Washington
3.
J Pediatr ; 179: 211-215, 2016 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27634627

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To describe the inpatient management of pediatric migraine and the association between specific medications and hospital length of stay (LOS). STUDY DESIGN: Historical cohort study review of patients age <19 years of age admitted to a single tertiary care children's hospital between 2010 and 2015 for treatment of migraine headache. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 58 encounters with an average patient age of 14.3 years (SD 3.2 years) with a female predominance (62%). The mean number of inpatient medications received by patients was 3 (range 1-7), with dopamine antagonists and dihydroergotamine used most commonly (67% and 59% of encounters, respectively). The average LOS was 56 hours (95% CI 48.2-63.2) and did not vary by medication received, although patients who received an opioid had a significantly longer LOS (79.2 vs 47.9 hours respectively; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Children admitted to the hospital for treatment of migraine headache frequently require a large number of medications over an average hospital LOS of more than 2 days without apparent differences based on medication received other than prolonged stays for subjects who received opioids.


Assuntos
Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Di-Hidroergotamina/uso terapêutico , Antagonistas de Dopamina/uso terapêutico , Hospitalização , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos
4.
J Pediatr ; 167(5): 1143-8.e1, 2015 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26297483

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To characterize emergency medical service (EMS) providers' perceptions of the factors that contribute to safety events and errors in the out-of-hospital emergency care of children. STUDY DESIGN: We used a Delphi process to achieve consensus in a national sample of 753 emergency medicine physicians and EMS professionals. Convergence and stability were achieved in 3 rounds, and findings were reviewed and interpreted by a national expert panel. RESULTS: Forty-four (88%) states were represented, and 66% of participants were retained through all 3 rounds. From an initial set of 150 potential contributing factors derived from focus groups and literature, participants achieved consensus on the following leading contributors: airway management, heightened anxiety caring for children, lack of pediatric skill proficiency, lack of experience with pediatric equipment, and family members leading to delays or interference with care. Somewhat unexpectedly, medications and communication were low-ranking concerns. After thematic analysis, the overarching domains were ranked by their relative importance: (1) clinical assessment; (2) training; (3) clinical decision-making; (4) equipment; (5) medications; (6) scene characteristics; and (7) EMS cultural norms. CONCLUSIONS: These findings raise considerations for quality improvement and suggest important roles for pediatricians and pediatric emergency physicians in training, medical oversight, and policy development.


Assuntos
Emergências , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/normas , Tratamento de Emergência/métodos , Segurança do Paciente/normas , Percepção/fisiologia , Formulação de Políticas , Adulto , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estados Unidos
5.
J Pediatr ; 163(6): 1634-7, 2013 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23968749

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To describe the variability in diagnostic testing and treatment of headaches in children presenting to the emergency department (ED) with use of a nationally representative sample. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study using the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey during 2005-2009. To assess the use of evidence-based treatment, we analyzed all patients <18 years old in 2 groups: (1) primary discharge diagnosis of headache and (2) discharge diagnosis of migraine. RESULTS: Four hundred forty-eight sampled ED visits from 2005-2009 represented a national estimate of 1.7 million visits with a discharge diagnosis of headache. A total of 95 visits represented a national estimate of 340 000 visits with a discharge diagnosis of migraine. Median age was 13.1 years and 60% were female with a primary diagnosis of headache. In this group, neuroimaging was performed in 37% of patients and 39% underwent blood tests. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and opioids were most commonly used for treatment. For children with a discharge diagnosis of migraine, approximately 40% of patients received non-evidence-based treatment, most commonly with opioid medications, and >20% of patients underwent computed tomography scanning. CONCLUSIONS: There is significant variability in the evaluation and treatment of pediatric headache in the ED. Despite evidence-based clinical guidelines for migraine headache, a large number of children continue to receive opioids and ionizing radiation in the ED.


Assuntos
Tratamento de Emergência , Cefaleia/diagnóstico , Cefaleia/terapia , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos de Coortes , Estudos Transversais , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA