Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Cancer Med ; 13(5): e6923, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38491824

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Our aim was to determine the impact of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on the diagnosis and prognosis of colorectal cancer (CRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective cohort study included individuals diagnosed with CRC between March 13, 2019 and June 20, 2021 across 21 Spanish hospitals. Two time periods were compared: prepandemic (from March 13, 2019 to March 13, 2020) and pandemic (from March 14, 2020 to June 20, 2021, lockdown period and 1 year after lockdown). RESULTS: We observed a 46.9% decrease in the number of CRC diagnoses (95% confidence interval (CI): 45.1%-48.7%) during the lockdown and 29.7% decrease (95% CI: 28.1%-31.4%) in the year after the lockdown. The proportion of patients diagnosed at stage I significantly decreased during the pandemic (21.7% vs. 19.0%; p = 0.025). Centers that applied universal preprocedure SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing experienced a higher reduction in the number of colonoscopies performed during the pandemic post-lockdown (34.0% reduction; 95% CI: 33.6%-34.4% vs. 13.7; 95% CI: 13.4%-13.9%) and in the number of CRCs diagnosed (34.1% reduction; 95% CI: 31.4%-36.8% vs. 26.7%; 95% CI: 24.6%-28.8%). Curative treatment was received by 87.5% of patients diagnosed with rectal cancer prepandemic and 80.7% of patients during the pandemic post-lockdown period (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a decrease in the number of diagnosed CRC cases and in the proportion of stage I CRC. The reduction in the number of colonoscopies and CRC diagnoses was higher in centers that applied universal SARS-CoV-2 PCR screening before colonoscopy. In addition, the COVID-19 pandemic has affected curative treatment of rectal cancers.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Neoplasias Colorretais , Neoplasias Retais , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Pandemias , Estudos Prospectivos , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis , Prognóstico , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorretais/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Teste para COVID-19
2.
Rev. esp. enferm. dig ; 114(8): 468-473, agosto 2022. tab
Artigo em Inglês | IBECS | ID: ibc-205703

RESUMO

Introduction: deep sedation controlled by the endoscopist is safe in patients with low anesthetic risk (ASA I-II). However, scarce evidence is available in patients with intermediate risk (ASA III).Objective: to evaluate the safety of deep sedation with propofol controlled by the usual endoscopy staff (endoscopist, nurse, assistant) in outpatients classified as ASA III and the risk factors for the occurrence of complications during deep sedation.Patients and methods: this observational and single-center cross-sectional study included consecutive patients undergoing non-complex procedures in which deep sedation was administered by the endoscopy staff. Patients were divided into group I (ASA = III) and group II (ASA < III).Results: a total of 562 patients were included and 80 (14.2 %) were in group I. Complications related to deep sedation were more frequent in group I (23.8 % vs 14.5 %; p = 0.036), mainly mild desaturations (13.8 % vs 7.5 %; p = 0.058). Emergency intervention or death were not registered. The adjusted analysis identified age as the only independent baseline risk factor for developing global adverse events.Conclusion: ASA III patients developed more sedation-related complications than ASA I-II patients. However, these complications were mild and did not prevent the correct performance of the procedure. (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Sedação Consciente/efeitos adversos , Sedação Profunda/efeitos adversos , Sedação Profunda/métodos , Endoscopia Gastrointestinal , Propofol/efeitos adversos , Estudos Transversais , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/efeitos adversos , Estudos Prospectivos
3.
Rev. esp. quimioter ; 33(1): 18-23, feb. 2020. ilus, tab
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-196178

RESUMO

OBJETIVO: Desarrollar un modelo de sepsis abdominal en animal de experimentación. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Se utilizan ratas Sprague-Dawley(R), machos de 5 semanas con pesos entre 270-280 g en el momento de la inoculación (N=39). Inicialmente se realiza un estudio piloto (N=9), distribuyéndolas en 3 grupos (3/3/3) con inóculo de 1cc de Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 intraperitoneal en concentraciones de 10E8, 10E9 y 10E10 UFC. En un segundo estudio (N=6) con distribución en dos grupos (3/3) se utilizan 1cc una concentración de E. coli 10E10 UFC que se diluyen en 10 y 15 ml de agua destilada para su inoculación. Por último se inicia un ensayo experimental con aleatorización de 24 ratas en tres grupos de tratamiento tras la infección intraperitoneal: Grupo I con suero fisiológico (N=6), Grupo II con antibiótico (ceftriaxona) (N=9), Grupo III con antibiótico más adyuvante (ceftriaxona más alicina) (N=9). Se realizan muestras microbiológicas de sangre y líquido peritoneal, así como estudio histopatológico de órganos intraperitoneales (hígado, diafragma y peritoneo). RESULTADOS: Se observa muerte en el 100% de las ratas infectadas con la concentración de E. coli 10E10 UFC con la dilución de 15 ml de agua destilada y sin antibiótico. El hemocultivo y cultivo de líquido peritoneal es positivo a la misma cepa en todas ellas. Se observa la formación de abscesos en la superficie del hígado e infiltración por polimorfonucleares en los tejidos. CONCLUSIÓN: Se establece que la dosis letal de E. coli es 10E10 UFC diluida en 15 ml agua destilada en inyección intraperitoneal


OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to develop a model of abdominal sepsis in the experimental animal. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sprague-Dawley male rats of 5 weeks (N=39) were used. Initially, a pilot study (N = 9) was performed and distributed in 3 groups with 1cc inoculum of Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 intraperitoneally at concentrations of 10E8, 10E9 and 10E10 CFU. Subsequently, concentrations of 10E10 CFU are used in two groups of 3 rats with dilutions of 10 cc and 15 cc of distilled water respectively. Finally, a randomized trial of 24 rats was started in three treatment groups after intraperitoneal infection: Group I with physiological serum (N = 6), Group II with ceftriaxone (N = 9), Group III with ceftriaxone plus allicin (N = 9). Microbiological samples of blood and peritoneal fluid were made, as well as histopathological study of intraperitoneal organs (liver, diaphragm and peritoneum). RESULTS: Death of 100% of the rats infected with 10E10 E. coli UFC concentration with the dilution of 15 ml of distilled water and without antibiotic was oberved. The blood culture and peritoneal fluid culture was positive for the same strain in all of them. The formation of abscesses on the liver surface and polymorphonuclear infiltration in tissues were observed. CONCLUSION: The lethal dose of E. coli is 10E10 CFU diluted in 15 cc distilled water by intraperitoneal injection


Assuntos
Animais , Masculino , Ratos , Carga Bacteriana , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Infecções por Escherichia coli/microbiologia , Peritonite/microbiologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecções por Escherichia coli/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Escherichia coli/patologia , Abscesso Hepático/microbiologia , Abscesso Hepático/patologia , Peritonite/tratamento farmacológico , Peritonite/patologia , Projetos Piloto , Distribuição Aleatória , Ratos Sprague-Dawley
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA