The Incidence of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Diagnosis Increases after Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery.

Purpose: Arthroscopic shoulder surgery has been identified as a potential risk factor for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). The purposes of this study were as follows: to (1) examine the percentage of patients who underwent arthroscopic shoulder procedures and later developed ipsilateral CTS within 1 year of the procedure, (2) determine the percentage of those patients with CTS who subsequently underwent an injection or release, and (3) examine comorbidities associated with developing CTS after surgery. Methods: Patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR), labral repair, or biceps tenodesis were retrospectively identified in a national database. Within 1 year, we compared the rates of ipsilateral CTS diagnoses versus the contralateral side. The rates of comorbidities between those who did and did not develop CTS were also compared. Results: Within 1 year, arthroscopic RCR patients (1.47% vs 1.00%; odds ratio [OR], 1.48; P < .001) and arthroscopic labral repair patients (0.76% vs 0.52%; OR, 1.47; P < .001) had a significantly higher rate of ipsilateral carpal tunnel diagnosis versus contralateral side diagnosis. Arthroscopic RCR patients were also significantly more likely to have ipsilateral carpal tunnel injection (0.16% vs 0.11%; OR, 1.45; P < .001) and release (0.46% vs 0.37%; OR, 1.24; P < .001). Patients who had an ipsilateral carpal tunnel diagnosis following arthroscopic RCR and labral repair were both significantly older (both P < .001), a higher percentage of women (both P<.001), and more likely to have had a preoperative nerve block (both P < .05). Both cohorts had significantly higher mean Elixhauser comorbidity Index (P < .001) and more comorbidities. Conclusions: This study demonstrated a significantly higher incidence of operative side CTS within 1 year following arthroscopic RCR and labral repairs. Arthroscopic RCR was also demonstrated to result in significantly higher rates of injections and carpal tunnel release. The cohort that developed ipsilateral CTS was older, had higher percentage of women, and had more comorbidities. Type of study/level of evidence: Prognostic III.

The Snuffbox: The Effect of Smokeless Tobacco Use on Scaphoid Fracture Healing.

BACKGROUND: Smoking has been demonstrated to be a risk factor for nonunion of scaphoid fractures, but it is unclear if chewing tobacco confers similar risk. The purpose of this study was to evaluate rates of bone-related complications after nonsurgical management of scaphoid fractures in smokeless tobacco users compared with matched control subjects and compared with smokers. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the PearlDiver database. For patients who underwent nonsurgical management of scaphoid fractures, 212 smokeless tobacco users and 6,048 smokers were matched 1:4 with control subjects (n = 848 and 24,192, respectively) and 212 smokeless tobacco users were matched 1:4 with 848 smokers. Rates of bone-related complications within 2 years of initial injury were compared using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: From weeks 12 through 104 after initial injury, compared with control subjects who do not use tobacco, the smokeless tobacco cohort demonstrated markedly higher rates of nonunion (5.7% vs 2.7%, OR: 2.07). Compared with control subjects who do not use tobacco, the smoking cohort demonstrated markedly higher rates of nonunion (4.3% vs 2.6%, OR: 1.91), repair of nonunion (1.5% vs 0.9%, OR: 1.87), and four corner fusion and proximal row carpectomy (0.3% vs 0.1%, OR: 3.17). Smokeless tobacco use was markedly underdiagnosed in the adult male cohort of unilateral scaphoid fractures with 2 years of follow-up found in the database (372 of 25,704, 1.45%) relative to Centers for Disease Control estimates for adult male smokeless tobacco use (4.5%) ( P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Given the higher rates of nonunion diagnoses after nonsurgical management in this cohort, surgeons should consider asking all patients with scaphoid fractures if they use smokeless tobacco or smoke and consider adding this to the patient's intake history to further identify patients at risk for nonunions. Tobacco cessation counseling is indicated for all tobacco users, including smokeless with scaphoid fractures.

Use of Wrist Denervation in the Treatment of SLAC and SNAC Wrist by ASSH Members.

Background Scapholunate advanced collapse (SLAC) and scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse (SNAC) are common patterns of wrist arthritis, and surgical treatment options include partial and total wrist arthrodesis and wrist denervation, which maintains the current anatomy while relieving pain. Introduction The purpose of this study is to elucidate current practices within the hand surgery community with respect to the use of anterior interosseous nerve/posterior interosseous nerve (AIN/PIN) denervation in the treatment of SLAC and SNAC wrists. Methods An anonymous survey was distributed to 3,915 orthopaedic surgeons via the American Society for Surgery of the Hand (ASSH) listserv. The survey collected information on conservative and operative management, indications, complications, diagnostic block, and coding of wrist denervation. Results In total, 298 answered the survey. 46.3% ( N = 138) of the respondents used denervation of AIN/PIN for every SNAC stage, and 47.7% ( N = 142) of the respondents used denervation of AIN/PIN for every SLAC wrist stage. AIN and PIN combined denervation was the most common standalone procedure ( N = 185, 62.1%). Surgeons were more likely to offer the procedure ( N = 133, 55.4%) if motion preservation had to be maximized ( N = 154, 64.4%). The majority of surgeons did not consider loss of proprioception ( N = 224, 84.2%) or diminished protective reflex ( N = 246, 92.1%) to be significant complications. 33.5%, 90 respondents reported never performing a diagnostic block prior to denervation. Conclusion Both SLAC and SNAC patterns of wrist arthritis can result in debilitating wrist pain. There is a wide range of treatment for different stages of disease. Further investigation is required to identify ideal candidates and evaluate long-term outcomes.

Fixation Methods for Replacement Screws in Scaphoid Fractures: A Biomechanical Study.

Purpose: To investigate the changes in biomechanical fixation of an initial and replacement headless compression screw by quantifying interfragmentary compression and shear displacement. Methods: A bone model was created with 2 blocks of rigid polyurethane foam to simulate a fracture site. A 24-mm headless compression screw was inserted into the model at a perpendicular or oblique angle, removed, and replaced with the 22-mm screw. The 22-mm screw replaced the 24-mm screw in either the same or reverse direction of initial insertion. All 4 methods of initial and replacement screw fixation were trialed 15 times for a total of 60 trials. Two button load cells measured compression. A digital microscope recorded shear displacement. Statistical analysis was performed to determine the differences in compression and sheer between the initial and replacement screw for each angle and screw insertion group with a 2-sided paired Student t test. Results: In comparison with the average compression force achieved by placement of the primary screw, there was a significant loss of average compression force when the secondary screw was placed in the same direction and perpendicular to the fracture plane (50 N, P < .001), in the reverse direction and perpendicular to the fracture plane (9 N, P = .049), and in the same direction and 60º to the fracture plane (11 N, P < .001). A significantly greater average shear displacement was noted for initial screw insertion at oblique compared with perpendicular orientations (0.03 mm, P < .001). Conclusions: This study demonstrates loss of compression when replacing screws despite varying orientations. Additionally, shear displacement in obliquely placed screws increased compared with perpendicularly placed screws. Clinical relevance: This study provided quantitative evidence to support the importance of establishing the correct screw length initially to avoid compression loss caused by replacing a primary screw.

Far Anterior Medial Portals in Complicated Elbow Arthroscopic Procedures: Safety Profile in a Cadaveric Model.

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to describe the placement and evaluate the safety of the far anterior proximal and distal anteromedial portals by comparing them to previously defined portal techniques in a cadaveric model of the elbow. Methods: Six paired (left and right) fresh, frozen cadaveric elbow joints were dissected. .62-mm Kirschner wires were placed at the literature-defined distal and proximal portal sites on right elbows. The proposed "far anterior" distal and proximal portals were established on the matched left elbows. The elbows were dissected to display the median and ulnar nerves. Digital calipers were used to measure distances from wires to nerves. Results: For the distal portal, the literature-defined portals were a significantly greater distance (P = .014) from the ulnar nerve (31.22 mm) compared to the far anterior portals (24.65 mm). For the proximal portal, the far anterior portals were a significantly greater distance (P = .026) from the ulnar nerve (26.98 mm) than the literature-defined portals (13.75 mm). There was no significant difference between the far anterior and literature-defined proximal and distal portal techniques in relation to the median nerve. Conclusions: Analysis of elbow arthroscopy anteromedial portal technique shows the far, anterior, proximal, and distal portals are a safe distance from the ulnar and median nerves. A portal modification that may address complicated elbow conditions is a more anterior placement of the medial portals to allow for better visualization and access. Clinical Relevance: The elbow is a difficult joint in which to perform arthroscopic surgery. One option our institution has used for safe portal modification to address complicated elbow conditions is a further anterior placement of the medial portals to allow better visualization and access.

Complications after Nonoperative Management of Hamate Fractures.

Hamate fractures are an infrequent injury and are often missed or have a delayed diagnosis with potential for significant patient morbidity. There is a relative paucity in the literature involving large population studies of hamate fractures and subsequent complications. Gaining a better understanding of complications associated with nonoperative management will help guide the decision for operative intervention. Methods: The PearlDiver patient records database was used to query for patients who sustained a hamate fracture using ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes. Postinjury complications within 1 year of diagnosis were assessed using ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes for diagnoses of complications. Results: A total of 1120 patients who sustained a hamate hook or body fracture met inclusion and exclusion criteria and were included in the study. Patients who were managed nonoperatively showed a nonunion rate of 2%, ulnar neuropathy rate of 1.7%, and tendon rupture rate of 0.2%. In a subanalysis using only ICD-10 codes to distinguish between hook and body fractures, hook fractures demonstrated a nonunion rate of 2.2%, ulnar neuropathy rate of 2.7%, and tendon rupture rate of 0%, while body fractures had a nonunion rate of 1.2%, ulnar neuropathy rate of 1%, and tendon rupture rate of 0%. Conclusion: The current study shows very low rates of nonunion, ulnar neuropathy and tendon rupture after nonoperative management of hamate fractures.

Differences in Patient and Physician Perceptions of Urgency for Musculoskeletal Conditions During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

In 2020, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic limited musculoskeletal care to urgent or "nonelective" office visits and procedures. No guidelines exist to inform patients or physicians what meets these criteria. The purpose of this multi-institutional study was to describe the differences in perceptions of urgency for musculoskeletal complaints between patients and providers during the COVID-19 pandemic. An anonymous survey was distributed to patients who visited the authors' orthopedic clinics in January and February 2020 and practicing orthopedic surgeons. The surveys were administered in May 2020 after COVID-19 was officially labeled a pandemic and included questions regarding demographic information and perceptions of orthopedic urgency. A total of 1491 patients and 128 physicians completed the surveys. A significantly higher percentage of physicians considered the following diagnoses an appropriate indication for an urgent visit compared with patients: fracture (P<.001), acute dislocation (P<.001), infection (P<.001), neurologic compromise (P<.001), tumor (P<.001), acute tendon injury (P<.001), weakness (P<.001), inability to bear weight (P<.001), post-surgical problem (P<.001), and painful joint effusion (P<.001). There were no significant differences in the perception of urgency for the following conditions: bursitis/tendonitis (P=1.00), joint/extremity deformity without pain (P=.113), and loss of range of motion of a joint (P=.467). Younger patients and those with higher levels of education were significantly more likely to consider their conditions urgent. Patients may require additional education to prevent delay in treatment of urgent conditions-especially time-sensitive conditions such as neurologic compromise, tumors, and infections-when access to physicians is limited. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(4):e534-e538.].

Hand Infections Associated with Systemic Conditions.

Systemic conditions are associated with higher rates of hand and upper extremity infections, leading to more severe and atypical presentations. Understanding the unique problems associated with some of the most common systemic conditions, including human immunodeficiency virus, diabetes mellitus, and rheumatoid arthritis, can assist the hand surgeon in diagnosing and treating infection in these patients. This article reviews the most common presentation of hand infections for these patients and summarizes current approaches to the management of hand infections for patients with common immunocompromising conditions.

Safety of Anteromedial Portals in Elbow Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review of Cadaveric Studies.

PURPOSE: To systematically review available literature comparing location and safety of 2 common anteromedial portals with nearby neurovascular structures in cadaveric models and to determine the correct positioning and preparation of the joint before elbow arthroscopy. METHODS: The review was devised in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Inclusion criteria consisted of original, cadaveric studies performed by experienced surgeons on male or female elbows evaluating anteromedial portal placement with regard to proximity of the arthroscope to neurovascular structures. Exclusion criteria consisted of case reports, clinical series, non-English language studies, and noncadaveric studies. Statistical analysis was done to measure reviewer reliability after scoring of each study. RESULTS: During screening, 2,596 studies were identified, and 10 studies met final inclusion as original, cadaveric investigations of anteromedial portal proximity to neurovascular structures. The difference in distance between proximal and distal portals was <1 mm for the brachial artery and <1.5 mm for the medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve, whereas the ulnar nerve was 4.17 mm further from the distal portal and the median nerve was 5.07 mm further from the proximal portal. Joint distension increased the distances of neurovascular structures to portal sites, with the exception of the ulnar nerve in distal portals. Elbow flexion to 90° increased distances of all neurovascular structures to portal sites. CONCLUSION: The results show that the proximal anteromedial portal puts fewer structures at risk compared with the distal portal. Elbows in 90° flexion with joint distension carry a lower risk for neurovascular injury during portal placement. These findings suggest the proximal anteromedial portal to be the safer technique in anteromedial arthroscopy of the elbow. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Discrepancies in placement of portals have existed in the literature, indicating differing safety margins regarding surrounding neurovascular anatomy. The present study aims to link together the literature-based evidence to describe the safest anteromedial portal variation.

Operative Distal Humerus Fractures in Older Patients: Predictors for Early Complications Based on a National Database.

BACKGROUND: Open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) and total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) have both been utilized in the treatment of distal humerus fractures in patients over 65 years of age. Comparisons of early complications between these procedures have not been well described. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purpose of this study is to evaluate complication rates in the treatment of distal humerus fractures in elderly patients and to utilize prediction models to identify risk factors associated with postoperative complications. Additionally, to compare ORIF and TEA treatment. METHODS: A retrospective case series was performed by querying the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program for both ORIF and TEA performed for distal humerus fractures in patients over the age of 65 years between 2005 and 2014. We examined both preoperative risk factors and complications within 30 days in these three groups. RESULTS: The sample included 216 ORIF and 65 TEA cases. No outcomes examined differed significantly between treatment groups. The most common outcome for both groups was bleeding requiring transfusion (8%). The observed effect size for the association between procedure and the composite morbidity outcome indicated little to no association (phi = 0.004). Furthermore, no presurgery variables were found to be significantly associated with procedure type. The only predictor with a significant independent association with the composite outcome, regardless of procedure type, was ASA class 3/4. CONCLUSION: Clinical complications were low no matter the type of treatment. Low preoperative hematocrit was a risk factor in both ORIF and TEA.

Complications, Readmissions, and Reoperations in Posterior Cervical Fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2011 to 2012. OBJECTIVE: Minimizing the morbidity of posterior cervical fusion can be improved with identification of patient risk factors. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Posterior cervical fusion is an effective technique for treating a variety of pathology. Stability and neurological improvement have been well documented. The increasing frequency of these procedures necessitates further investigation into the factors that may negatively impact perioperative care. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was queried for all patients undergoing posterior cervical fusion in 2011 and 2012. Preoperative and intraoperative variables were investigated for correlation to complications, readmissions, prolonged intubation, reintubation, and reoperation. A frailty-based score was used to assess preoperative risk. Regression models for prediction were performed. RESULTS: The study identified 5627 patients of posterior cervical fusion in 2011 and 2012. Of these, 2029 patients (36.1%) had any of our identified complications. Transfusion was the most common in 1482 (26.3%) patients. Excluding transfusion, the complication rate was 9.8%. Prolonged intubation greater than 48 hours occurred in 83 (1.5%) patients. Reintubation occurred in 72 (1.3%) patients. Readmission occurred in 398 (7.8%) patients. Reoperation was necessary in 273 (4.9%) patients with postoperative infection being the most common reason. The frailty-based score was shown to be predictive of any of the above events (P < 0.0001). The majority of patients (54.9%) in the group that had complications was found to have a frailty score of 1 or higher. CONCLUSION: The predictors for any event included female sex, increased surgical time, combined anterior-posterior procedures, preoperative inpatient status, diabetes, smoking, American Society of Anesthesiologists class 3 or higher, and increasing age. The frailty-based score is a viable option to predict morbidity in posterior cervical fusion.Level of Evidence: 3.

Identifying the Risk of Swallowing-Related Pulmonary Complications in Older Patients With Hip Fracture.

To identify and potentially modify the risk of pulmonary complications in a group of older patients with hip fracture, the authors obtained speech and language pathology consultations for these patients. Then they performed a retrospective chart review of all patients 65 years and older who were admitted to their institution between June 2011 and July 2013 with acute hip fracture, were treated surgically, and had a speech and language pathology evaluation in the immediate perioperative period. The authors identified 52 patients who met the study criteria. According to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification system, at the time of surgery, 1 patient (2%) was classified as ASA I, 12 patients (23%) were ASA II, 26 (50%) were ASA III, and 12 (23%) were ASA IV. Based on a speech and language pathology evaluation, 22 patients (42%) were diagnosed with dysphagia. Statistical analysis showed that ASA III status and ASA IV status were meaningful predictors of dysphagia and that dysphagia itself was a strong risk factor for pulmonary aspiration, pneumonia, and aspiration pneumonitis. Evaluation by a speech and language pathologist, particularly of patients classified as ASA III or ASA IV, may be an efficient means of averting pulmonary morbidity that is common in older patients with hip fracture.

Functional and Clinical Outcomes of Upper Extremity Amputation.

Upper extremity amputation is an uncommon but often necessary procedure. It can be required as a result of trauma, infection, or malignancy. Amputation is a life-changing procedure. Careful planning for it must not only include the level of amputation and assurance of durable soft-tissue coverage of the amputation site, but it must also consider patients' goals and occupations, as well as social factors affecting amputees. The choice of prosthesis is an individual matter, but new technology permits lighter and more multifunctional prostheses. Targeted muscle reinnervation can be used to achieve improved myoelectric signaling and possibly decrease limb pain following amputation. Rehabilitation is crucial to achieving favorable results.