Accuracy of cup placement compared with preoperative surgeon targets in primary total hip arthroplasty using standard instrumentation and techniques: a global, multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Acetabular cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is closely related to outcomes. The literature has suggested cup parameters defined by the Lewinnek safe zone; however, the validity of such measures is in question. Several studies have raised concerns about the benefits of using the Lewinnek safe zone as a predictor of success. In this study we elected to use prospective surgeon targets as the basis for comparison to see how successful surgeons are positioning their cup using standard instruments and techniques. METHODS: A prospective, global, multicenter study was conducted. Cup positioning success was defined as a composite endpoint. Both cup inclination and version needed to be within 10° of the surgeon target to be considered a success. Radiographic analysis was conducted by a third-party reviewer. RESULTS: In 170 subjects, inclination, target versus actual, was 44.8° [standard deviation (SD 0.9°)] and 43.1° (SD 7.6°), respectively (p = 0.0029). Inclination was considered successful in 84.1% of cases. Mean version, target versus actual, was 19.4° (SD 3.9°) and 27.2° (SD 5.6°), respectively (p < 0.0001). Version was considered successful in 63.4% of cases, and combined position (inclination and version) was considered successful in 53.1%. CONCLUSION: This study shows that with traditional methods of placing the cup intraoperatively, surgeons are only accurate 53.1% of the time compared with a predicted preoperative plan. This study suggests that the inconsistency in cup positioning based on the surgeon's planned target is potentially another important variable to consider while using a mechanical guide or in freehand techniques for cup placement in THA. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03189303.

Spinopelvic challenges in primary total hip arthroplasty.

There is no universal safe zone for cup orientation. Patients with spinal arthrodesis or a degenerative lumbar spine are at increased risk of dislocation. The relative contributions of the hip (femur and acetabulum) and of the spine (lumbar spine) in body motion must be considered together. The pelvis links the two and influences both acetabular orientation (i.e. hip flexion/extension) and sagittal balance/lumbar lordosis (i.e. spine flexion/extension). Examination of the spino-pelvic motion can be done through clinical examination and standard radiographs or stereographic imaging. A single, lateral, standing spinopelvic radiograph would be able to providemost relevant information required for screening and pre-operative planning. A significant variability in static and dynamic spinopelvic characteristics exists amongst healthy volunteers without known spinal or hip pathology. The stiff, arthritic, hip leads to greater changes in pelvic tilt (changes are almost doubled), with associated obligatory change in lumbar lordosis to maintain upright posture (lumbar lordosis is reduced to counterbalance for the reduction in sacral slope). Following total hip arthroplasty and restoration of hip flexion, spinopelvic characteristics tend to change/normalize (to age-matched healthy volunteers). The static spinopelvic parameters that are directly associated with increased risk of dislocation are lumbo-pelvic mismatch (pelvic incidence - lumbar lordosis angle >10°), high pelvic tilt (>19°), and low sacral slope when standing. A high combined sagittal index (CSI) when standing (>245°) is associated with increased risk of anterior instability, whilst low CSI when standing (<205°) is associated with increased risk of posterior instability. Aiming to achieve an optimum CSI when standing within 205-245° (with narrower target for those with spinal disease) whilst ensuring the coronal targets of cup orientation targets are achieved (inclination/version of 40/20 ±10°) is our preferred method.

Contemporary, non-navigation, cup orientation techniques improve accuracy and eliminate differences seen between the anterior and posterior approach in THA.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to: (1) Determine the ability to achieve the surgeons' desired cup orientation, without navigation, using contemporary measures with the anterior- (AA) and posterior- approaches (PA); and (2) assess whether surgical approach is associated with cup orientation accuracy, as previously reported, when contemporary measures are used. METHODS: A prospective, 2-centre, multi-surgeon study of 400 THAs (200 AA; 200 PA) was performed. Intraoperative radiographs were obtained with the AA. A digital inclinometer and 3-point pelvic support were used with the PA. With the PA, intraoperative cup inclination at impaction was recorded. Radiographic inclination/anteversion (RI/RA) was measured from intraoperative radiographs (AA-only) and from postoperative radiographs for all cases. Optimum inclination/anteversion was defined as 40°/20° (±10°). The difference between intra- and postoperative orientations allowed for determination of the difference in pelvic position at impaction. RESULTS: Optimum RI and RA were achieved in 91.3% (n = 365) and 92% (n = 368) of cases respectively. Optimum cup orientation was detected in 84% of cases (n = 336). There was equivalent ability to achieve cup orientation between approaches (AA: 82.5% vs. PA: 85.5%; p = 0.41). The use of an inclinometer in the PA was associated with a smaller variability of inclination at implantation (10° vs. 14°) and counteracted the greater difference in pelvic position (4.4° vs. 2.1°) seen with the PA. CONCLUSIONS: Over 80% of cases can have optimum orientation without navigation, using simple, cheap contemporary measures. Such measures eliminate differences between approaches, related to patient position. Narrower implantation angles will further reduce variability in cup orientation achieved.

Cup orientation following posterior approach THA - the effect of different visual aids and pelvic supports.

INTRODUCTION: This study aims to compare cup inclination achieved (1) Using two orientation guides, whilst using the same 3-point pelvic positioner and (2) Using two types of pelvic positioners, whilst measuring intra-operative cup inclination with an inclinometer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a prospective, diagnostic cohort study of a consecutive series of 150 THAs performed through a posterior approach. Two types of 3-point pelvic positioners were used (Stulberg and modified Capello Hip Positioners) and the cup was positioned freehand using one of two orientation guides (mechanical guide or digital inclinometer). Intra-operative inclination was recorded, radiographic cup inclination and anteversion were measured from radiographs. The differences in inclination due to pelvic position (ΔPelvicPosition) and orientation definitions (ΔDefinition) were calculated. Target radiographic inclination and anteversion was 40/20° ± 10°. RESULTS: There was no difference in radiographic cup inclination/ (p = 0.63) using a mechanical guide or digital inclinometer. However, differences were seen in ΔPelvicPosition between the positioners ((Stulberg: 0° ± 5 vs. Capello: 3° ± 6); p = 0.011). Intra-operative inclination at implantation was different between positioners and this led to equivalent cases within inclination/anteversion targets (Stulberg:84%, Capello:80%; p = 0.48). CONCLUSIONS: With the pelvis securely positioned with 3-point supports, optimum cup orientation can be achieved with both alignment guides and inclinometer. Non-optimal cup inclinations were seen when intra-operative inclinations were above 40° and below 32°, or the ΔPelvicPosition was excessive (> 15°; n = 2). We would thus recommend that the intra-operative cup inclination should be centered strictly between 30° and 35° relative to the floor. Small differences exist between different type of pelvic positioners that surgeons need to be aware off and account for.

Cup placement in primary total hip arthroplasty: how to get it right without navigation or robotics.

Acetabular component orientation and position are important factors in the short- and long-term outcomes of total hip arthroplasty. Different definitions of inclination and anteversion are used in the orthopaedic literature and surgeons should be aware of these differences and understand their relationships. There is no universal safe zone. Preoperative planning should be used to determine the optimum position and orientation of the cup and assess spinopelvic characteristics to adjust cup orientation accordingly. A peripheral reaming technique leads to a more accurate restoration of the centre of rotation with less variability compared with a standard reaming technique. Several intraoperative landmarks can be used to control the version of the cup, the most commonly used and studied is the transverse acetabular ligament. The use of an inclinometer reduces the variability associated with the use of freehand or mechanical alignment guides.

Early outcomes and predictors of patient satisfaction after TKA: a prospective study of 200 cases with a contemporary cemented rotating platform implant design.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to identify the earliest time point where subjects realized the greatest clinical improvement after TKA, and the time when post-operative scores became superior to pre-operative scores. Post-hoc exploratory analyses were conducted to investigate predictors of early post-operative outcomes and patient satisfaction. METHODS: Six investigators across 4 sites in the Netherlands prospectively implanted 200 subjects with a contemporary cemented rotating platform device. Patient Reported Outcome Measurements (PROMs) KOOS-PS, PKIP, and EQ-5D were collected pre-operatively and post-operatively through 2-years. PROMs change from pre-operative baseline were summarized, along with radiographic outcomes and adverse events (AEs). Pre-operative patient characteristics were explored for correlation with patient outcomes, and patient satisfaction for correlation with KOOS-PS. RESULTS: Follow-up compliance was 99% at 6-months, and 95.5% at 2-years. The percentage with higher KOOS-PS compared to baseline was 81.3% at 6-months. KOOS-PS, PKIP, and PKIP subscore means were all better at 6-weeks versus baseline. Gender, BMI, hypertension, and pre-operative KOOS-PS were weakly correlated with 6-week KOOS-PS (multivariate R-squared = 14.1%), but only pre-operative KOOS-PS demonstrated correlation with post-operative KOOS-PS at 6-months or later (R-squared < 5% at 6-months and 2 years). Satisfaction was moderately correlated with concurrent KOOS-PS at each post-operative time point, with (R-squared = 35.3% at 6-months, and 37.5% at 2 years). CONCLUSION: The greatest mean clinical improvement occurred within the first 6-weeks. Although some pre-operative factors were correlated with higher early post-operative KOOS-PS outcomes, these advantages disappeared by 6-months aside from weak correlation with pre-operative KOOS-PS. Post-operative KOOS-PS was moderately correlated with concurrent post-operative satisfaction. These results may be used for pre-operative counseling and management of patient's postoperative expectations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02339610 . Registered 15 January 2015.

Comparative Analysis Investigating the Impact of Implant Design on Hospital Length of Stay and Discharge Destination in a Dutch Hospital With an Established Enhanced Recovery Program.

BACKGROUND: Global demand for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is increasing, driven by an aging and increasingly overweight patient population, culminating in higher healthcare costs. In the Netherlands, the number of TKA surgeries performed annually increased from 21,000 in 2010 to 29,000 in 2017. This study aimed to assess the impact of implant design on hospital length of stay (LOS), surgery time, and discharge destination (home vs a rehabilitation center) in a Dutch hospital with an established enhanced recovery program and short baseline LOS. METHODS: A retrospective review of consecutive adult patients who underwent primary TKA in a Dutch hospital between 2015 and 2017 using either the comparator device or the control device. RESULTS: A total of 200 patients were enrolled in the study (100 per group). Patients who received a comparator device had a significantly shorter LOS (adjusted mean 2.76 days; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.45, 3.11) vs the control group (adjusted mean 3.43 days; 95% CI: 3.08, 3.81; P < .01). The proportion of patients discharged to a rehabilitation center, instead of home, was also significantly lower in the comparator device group (adjusted 4.4%; 95% CI: 1.8, 10.7 vs adjusted 11.4%; 95% CI: 6.0, 20.6; P < .05). There was no difference in surgical time between the 2 groups. None of the sensitivity analyses performed affected the original analysis outcome. CONCLUSION: This study shows a modest but significant reduction in length of stay and lower rate of discharge to a rehabilitation center in the comparator device group.

The impact of the implementation of physician assistants in inpatient care: A multicenter matched-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Medical care for admitted patients in hospitals is increasingly reallocated to physician assistants (PAs). There is limited evidence about the consequences for the quality and safety of care. This study aimed to determine the effects of substitution of inpatient care from medical doctors (MDs) to PAs on patients' length of stay (LOS), quality and safety of care, and patient experiences with the provided care. METHODS: In a multicenter matched-controlled study, the traditional model in which only MDs are employed for inpatient care (MD model) was compared with a mixed model in which besides MDs also PAs are employed (PA/MD model). Thirty-four wards were recruited across the Netherlands. Patients were followed from admission till one month after discharge. Primary outcome measure was patients' LOS. Secondary outcomes concerned eleven indicators for quality and safety of inpatient care and patients' experiences with the provided care. RESULTS: Data on 2,307 patients from 34 hospital wards was available. The involvement of PAs was not significantly associated with LOS (ß 1.20, 95%CI 0.99-1.40, p = .062). None of the indicators for quality and safety of care were different between study arms. However, the involvement of PAs was associated with better experiences of patients (ß 0.49, 95% CI 0.22-0.76, p = .001). CONCLUSIONS: This study did not find differences regarding LOS and quality of care between wards on which PAs, in collaboration with MDs, provided medical care for the admitted patients, and wards on which only MDs provided medical care. Employing PAs seems to be safe and seems to lead to better patient experiences. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01835444.

Percutaneous, Transtrapezial Fixation without Bone Graft Leads to Consolidation in Selected Cases of Delayed Union of the Scaphoid Waist.

Purpose We evaluated clinical and radiographic outcome of percutaneous transtrapezial fixation of the scaphoid delayed union or nonunion using a headless bone screw without bone grafting. Methods Sixteen patients with delayed union or nonunion of the scaphoid were included in this retrospective study between 2006 and 2011. All patients had a delayed presentation of scaphoid fracture, and none of them was treated conservatively elsewhere. Patients with bone graft, sclerotic bone debridement, or displacement of the fragment at the nonunion site were excluded. A percutaneous transtrapezial fixation technique was used in all cases. Patients were reviewed until clinical and radiographic union was observed. At the final follow-up, DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) and PRWHE (Patient-Rated Wrist and Hand Evaluation) outcome scores were completed. Results Radiographic union was obtained in 15 out of 16 patients (94%) at an average follow-up of 36 months (range: 12-98 months). No complications from the percutaneous technique were noted. The average DASH score was 6 (range: 0-39) and the average PRWHE score was 10 (range: 0-56). No statistical significant difference in range of motion and grip strength was found between the operated side and the contralateral side. Conclusion Percutaneous transtrapezial screw fixation for delayed or nonunion of selected scaphoid fractures without bone grafting is promising. At a mean of 4 months, 94% union was obtained with good functional results when there was no sclerosis, minimal osteolysis, and no displacement at the scaphoid nonunion site. Type of Study Therapeutic study. Level of Evidence IV.

Estimating Scaphoid Lengths Using Anatomical Measurements in the Wrist.

PURPOSE: In reconstructive surgery of scaphoid nonunions with humpback deformity, some surgeons recommend restoration of the normal scaphoid length whereas others overexpand the normal length to ensure carpal realignment and prevent late collapse. To be able to define overexpansion and investigate which levels of overexpansion yield optimal clinical results, a precise method for estimating the original scaphoid length is required. The purpose of this anatomic study was to investigate the precision of estimating normal scaphoid lengths based on intact adjacent bone dimensions, compared with using the contralateral scaphoid length. METHODS: From bilateral computed tomographic scans of 28 healthy wrist pairs, 3-dimensional virtual bone models were created. The left and right scaphoid lengths were determined at the central axis. The capitate length at the central axis and the distal radius width served to derive an ipsilateral scaphoid length estimate. Estimation precision for individual cases was based on the 95% range (±1.96 × SD) of the observed differences between the actual and estimated lengths. RESULTS: On average, the capitate length was 10% smaller than the scaphoid length; the radius width was 9% larger. Consequently, we averaged the capitate length and radius width for ipsilateral estimations. The average difference between the scaphoid length and the latter ipsilateral estimate was 0.1 mm. The average contralateral scaphoid length difference was also 0.1 mm. Estimation precisions, however, were ±2.2 and ±1.4 mm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Scaphoid length estimation based on the contralateral scaphoid is more precise than the estimating scaphoid length using the ipsilateral radius and capitate. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Scaphoid overexpansion can be ensured if the restored length is at least 1.4 mm longer than the contralateral length. This may be valuable information when establishing a target length for reconstruction and investigating the consequences of scaphoid overexpansion on clinical function, such as range of motion, which are currently unknown.

Transtrapezial Approach for Fixation of Acute Scaphoid Fractures: Rationale, Surgical Techniques, and Results: AAOS Exhibit Selection.

The ideal position for a screw used for scaphoid fixation is central. The purpose of this study was to compare the current volar percutaneous approaches used for scaphoid fracture fixation, explore different options to improve central screw placement, and describe our experience with the transtrapezial approach.

Transtrapezial Approach for Fixation of Acute Scaphoid Fractures.

INTRODUCTION: The transtrapezial approach for fixation of acute scaphoid fractures facilitates precise percutaneous placement of a screw along the central axis of the scaphoid, which has been shown to be biomechanically superior. STEP 1 POSITION THE PATIENT SURGEON AND FLUOROSCOPY EQUIPMENT: Correctly position the patient, surgeon, and fluoroscopy equipment before starting the procedure. STEP 2 MARK THE SKIN: Mark the central axis of the scaphoid on the skin along the anteroposterior and lateral (optional) planes as the markings allow visual control for insertion of the guidewire. STEP 3 STAB INCISION: Make a volar stab incision over the distal half of the trapezium. STEP 4 INSERT THE GUIDEWIRE: Insert the guidewire through the trapezium along the central axis of the scaphoid, which is the critical step of the procedure. STEP 5 DRILLING: Drill the trapezium and the distal cortex of the scaphoid to allow easy insertion of the screw. STEP 6 LENGTH MEASUREMENT: Precisely measure the scaphoid length to determine the appropriate screw length. STEP 7 INSERT THE SCREW: Insert the selected screw over the guidewire. RESULTS: In our report on the first results of this technique in forty-one patients with an acute nondisplaced scaphoid waist fracture, all fractures united within ten weeks (mean, 6.4 weeks) and the modified Mayo wrist score was good (four patients) or excellent (thirty-seven patients) at a mean follow-up of thirty-six months (range, fourteen to sixty-eight months).IndicationsContraindicationsPitfalls & Challenges.

Comparison of two percutaneous volar approaches for screw fixation of scaphoid waist fractures: radiographic and biomechanical study of an osteotomy-simulated model.

BACKGROUND: When a surgeon uses a percutaneous volar approach to treat scaphoid waist fractures, central screw placement is complicated by the shape of the scaphoid and by obstruction by the trapezium. In this study, we used radiographs and biomechanical tests to compare the standard volar percutaneous approach with the transtrapezial approach, with regard to central screw placement at the distal pole of the scaphoid. METHODS: Fourteen matched pairs of cadaveric wrists were randomly assigned to two treatment groups. Under fluoroscopic control, a guidewire was drilled into the scaphoid, either through a transtrapezial approach or through a standard volar approach that avoided the trapezium. Guidewire position was measured in the coronal and sagittal planes. A transverse osteotomy was performed along the scaphoid waist, and this was followed by the insertion of the longest possible cannulated headless bone screw. Each specimen was placed into a fixture with a pneumatically driven plunger resting on the surface of the distal pole. Load was applied by using a load-controlled test protocol in a hydraulic testing machine. RESULTS: All guidewires were inside the central one-third of the proximal pole. The guidewire positions at the distal pole differed significantly between the transtrapezial and standard volar approach groups (p < 0.001). The load to 2 mm of displacement and the load to failure averaged, respectively, 324.4 N (standard error of the mean [SEM] = 73.5 N) and 386.4 N (SEM = 65.6 N) for the transtrapezial approach group compared with 125.7 N (SEM = 22.6 N) (p = 0.002) and 191.4 N (SEM = 36.30 N) (p = 0.005) for the standard volar approach group. CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that, in a cadaveric osteotomy-simulated scaphoid waist fracture model, the transtrapezial approach reliably achieves central positioning of a screw in the proximal and distal poles. This position offers a biomechanical advantage compared with central placement in only the proximal pole.