A comparative study of classic and HIV-viremic and aviremic AIDS Kaposi sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Kaposi sarcoma in people living with HIV (PLHIV) is the most common AIDS-associated malignancy. There is increased interest in Kaposi sarcoma in PLHIV with controlled HIV viremia. OBJECTIVES: To describe Kaposi sarcoma occurring in PLHIV despite virological control and to compare their clinical presentations with viremic AIDS-Kaposi sarcoma (AIDS-KS) and classic Kaposi sarcoma (CKS). METHODS: This was a monocentric retrospective study, including all Kaposi sarcoma patients registered between the 1 January of 2000 and 31 December 2017 in a comprehensive data bank for all cancers in the Hérault region, South of France. AIDS-KS were also described using chart reviews from the Infectious diseases Department, which followed more than 90% of PLHIV from the same region. We defined aviremic AIDS-KS as Kaposi sarcoma occurring in persons taking HAART with a HIV viral load less than 50 copies for more than 12 months. We compared clinical characteristics of persons with aviremic AIDS-KS, viremic AIDS-KS and CKS, using the Kriegel score and number and topography of skin lesions, and presence of lymphedema. RESULTS: We retrieved 187 Kaposi sarcoma cases, of which 12 occurred in PLHIV with aviremic AIDS-KS. Kriegel score stage I was found in 10 (83%) of the aviremic AIDS-KS, 34 (68%) of CKS and 38 (58.4%) of viremic AIDS-KS cases, with similar clinical presentations between aviremic AIDS-KS and CKS groups, and viremic AIDS-KS persons having more aggressive presentations. One person with aviremic AIDS-KS had visceral involvement. CONCLUSION: We showed that Kaposi sarcoma in PLHIV with controlled viremia were generally indolent, similarly to CKS. Visceral involvement is, however, possible.

HIV-1 DNA ultra-deep sequencing analysis at initiation of the dual therapy dolutegravir + lamivudine in the maintenance DOLULAM pilot study.

Background: The DOLULAM study assessed the efficacy of dolutegravir + lamivudine dual therapy to maintain virological suppression in heavily treatment-experienced HIV-1-infected adults. No virological failure occurred during the first year of the dual therapy. Objectives: A virological substudy was conducted to assess the prevalence of M184I/V mutations at dual therapy initiation using historical DNA/RNA genotypes and baseline DNA genotype obtained by next-generation sequencing (NGS). Methods: HIV-1 RT sequences were obtained from DNA and/or historical RNA using Sanger technology. HIV-1 DNA RT and integrase NGS was performed using Illumina® technology. Results: Among the 27 patients enrolled in the DOLULAM study, historical HIV DNA and RNA Sanger sequences were available in 14 and 18 patients, respectively. At the initiation of DOLULAM, DNA NGS genotypes showed that 45% and 21% of the patients harboured minority resistant variants (MRV) in RT and integrase, respectively. Combining all available genotype data, an M184I/V was observed in 17 of 27 (63%) of the patients. Most M184V were detected in historical RNA genotypes (n = 8 of 11), whereas M184I were exclusively detected in DNA genotypes (n = 10, including 7 as MRV). Ten patients displayed defective viral genomes in cellular reservoirs, all including M184I and stop codons. At the time of DOLULAM initiation, M184V was observed in DNA NGS in five patients, including one as MRV. Conclusions: These first NGS data on HIV DNA at initiation of a switch study showed (i) a high proportion of patients harbouring defective viral genomes, whose mutation M184I is a marker, and (ii) a low number of patients in whom M184V remained as a major viral variant in PBMCs.