Which Patients Are at Higher Risk for Residual Valves After Posterior Urethral Valve Ablation?

PURPOSE: To find patients at high risk of obstructive remnant leaflets after valve ablation among boys with posterior urethral valve (PUV), we evaluated any possible relationship between preoperative findings in our patients and residual obstructive leaflets after valve ablation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 55 patients with PUV that was treated by the same surgeon between 2008 and 2012. Of these, 37 patients (67.3%) had no obstructive remnant leaflets (group A) and 18 patients (32.7%) had obstructive remnant leaflets (group B) in follow-up cystoscopy. Preoperative clinical and radiological findings were evaluated and compared between the groups. RESULTS: Among all the preoperative data we examined, the analysis revealed that age at the time of surgery (median age: group A, 15 months; group B, 7 months; p=0.017), echogenicity of kidneys (p<0.05), presence of vesicoureteral reflux (p<0.05), and grade of reflux (p<0.05) were significantly different between the groups. Method of valve ablation, anterior-posterior diameters of the renal pelvis, renal cortical thickness, bladder wall thickening, and scarring on the dimercaptosuccinic acid scan showed no significant differences between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In our patients, younger age at surgery time, hyperechogenicity of renal parenchyma, presence of vesicoureteral reflux, and grade 4 or 5 reflux before surgery had a significant relationship with residual valves. More studies may result in enhanced management of patients at high risk of residual valves after PUV ablation, because the sooner the obstruction is resolved entirely, the better the outcome.

Stereological Comparison of the Effects of Pentoxifylline, Captopril, Simvastatin, and Tamoxifen on Kidney and Bladder Structure After Partial Urethral Obstruction in Rats

PURPOSE: Limited studies have shown antifibrotic effects of pentoxifylline, captopril, simvastatin, and tamoxifen. No comparisons are available of the effects of these drugs on prevention of renal and bladder changes in partial urethral obstruction (PUO). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The rats were divided into six groups (n=7). The sham-operated rats (group I) only underwent laparotomy and did not receive any treatments. The PUO groups (group II-VI) received normal saline (PUO+NS), pentoxifylline (100 mg/kg/d; PUO+PEN), captopril (35 mg/kg/d; PUO+CAP), simvastatin (15 mg/kg/d; PUO+SIM), or tamoxifen (10 mg/kg/d; PUO+TAM) by gavage for 28 days. Then, the volume and/or length of the kidney components (tubules, vessels, and fibrous tissue) and the bladder components (epithelial and muscular layers, fibrous tissue, fibroblast and fibrocyte number) were quantitatively evaluated on the microscopic sections by use of stereological techniques. RESULTS: The volume of renal and bladder fibrosis was significantly ameliorated in the PUO+PEN group, followed by the PUO+CAP, PUO+SIM, and PUO+TAM groups. Also, the volume and length of the renal tubules and vessels and bladder layers were more significantly protected in the PUO+PEN group, followed by the PUO+CAP, PUO+SIM, and PUO+TAM groups. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of PUO with PEN was more effective in the prevention of renal and bladder fibrosis and in the preservation of renal and bladder structures.