RESUMO
The Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Questionnaire is a reliable instrument for measuring health-related quality of life. This study aimed to develop a Malay version of the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Questionnaire and to evaluate the health-related impact of Malaysian women with polycystic ovary syndrome. The participants were women who were diagnosed with polycystic ovary syndrome using Rotterdam criteria in a gynecology clinic. Reliability was determined by internal consistency using Cronbach's coefficient alpha and test-retest reliability using an intra-class correlation coefficient. Validity was assessed through convergent and discriminant validity. Examining the correlation between similar content of the Malay version of the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Questionnaire and the SF-36 assessed the convergent validity. The discriminant validity was assessed using the known group comparison. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was over 0.70 for the total scale and over 0.60 for each subscale. Known group comparison supported the discriminant validity. The Malay version of the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Questionnaire differentiated between the subgroups of women who differed in polycystic ovary syndrome-specific symptoms. Convergent validity was consistent with the good positive correlation between related subscales of the two instruments. Polycystic ovary syndrome women in Malaysia scored the lowest for the weight (3.74) and infertility (3.41) domains, thereby indicating worse health status in these domains. Body hair (5.42) was the least troublesome for the local population. The Malay version of the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Questionnaire is a reliable and valid tool for assessing the health-related quality of life among women in the local population. It can be used to objectively assess the quality of life among Malaysian women with polycystic ovary syndrome and evaluate their responsiveness to treatment modalities.
