A phase I/IIa clinical trial of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

OBJECTIVE: To verify the safety and potential effect on ALS progression of a low-intensity immunosuppressive regimen followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT) in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients. METHODS: ALS eligible patients underwent a set of clinical and laboratory evaluations at T-4 (screening), T-1 (pre-treatment visit), and for the 12 consecutive months after treatment (T3, T6, T9, T12). We evaluated the tolerability of the procedure, its efficacy on clinical course and quality of life (QoL). RESULTS: Eight of the 11 ALS patients enrolled received the established immunoablative protocol. The procedure was well tolerated and side effects were those expected. One patient died 4 months after the conditioning regimen and another patient underwent tracheotomy just before T3 for a sudden respiratory failure, but he is still alive 4 years after the procedure without being ventilated any more. A third patient died 10 months after conditioning. In the other cases, there was no statistical difference in all functional measures and QoL pre- and post-treatment; however, a transitory slopes' reduction of ALSFRS-R and seated SVC% after the conditioning procedures was reported. Moreover, although not statistically significant, trends of reduction of CD4 + and increment of CD8 + were found. CONCLUSIONS: aHSCT was overall well tolerated, but it was not followed by any significant modification in disease progression. Considering the negative results of this small trial, further studies aimed to evaluate the possible efficacy of the aHSCT using a higher-intensity regimen should be carefully and with caution evaluated.

Epidemic and pandemic viral infections: impact on tuberculosis and the lung: A consensus by the World Association for Infectious Diseases and Immunological Disorders (WAidid), Global Tuberculosis Network (GTN), and members of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Study Group for Mycobacterial Infections (ESGMYC).

Major epidemics, including some that qualify as pandemics, such as severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS), HIV, influenza A (H1N1)pdm/09 and most recently COVID-19, affect the lung. Tuberculosis (TB) remains the top infectious disease killer, but apart from syndemic TB/HIV little is known regarding the interaction of viral epidemics and pandemics with TB. The aim of this consensus-based document is to describe the effects of viral infections resulting in epidemics and pandemics that affect the lung (MERS, SARS, HIV, influenza A (H1N1)pdm/09 and COVID-19) and their interactions with TB. A search of the scientific literature was performed. A writing committee of international experts including the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control Public Health Emergency (ECDC PHE) team, the World Association for Infectious Diseases and Immunological Disorders (WAidid), the Global Tuberculosis Network (GTN), and members of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) Study Group for Mycobacterial Infections (ESGMYC) was established. Consensus was achieved after multiple rounds of revisions between the writing committee and a larger expert group. A Delphi process involving the core group of authors (excluding the ECDC PHE team) identified the areas requiring review/consensus, followed by a second round to refine the definitive consensus elements. The epidemiology and immunology of these viral infections and their interactions with TB are discussed with implications for diagnosis, treatment and prevention of airborne infections (infection control, viral containment and workplace safety). This consensus document represents a rapid and comprehensive summary on what is known on the topic.

Strictly monitored exercise programs reduce motor deterioration in ALS: preliminary results of a randomized controlled trial.

The objective of our study was to perform a randomized controlled trial (RCT) aimed to evaluate the effects of three strictly monitored exercise programs(SMEP) compared to "usual care" (UCP) in a cohort of ALS patients. We included patients with definite and probable ALS and disease duration ≤24 months. Patients were randomized to receive a SMEPs or a UCP. SMEPs included three subgroups of treatment: active exercises associated with cycloergometer activity (1A), only active (1B) and passive (1C) exercises, respectively. Moreover, SMEP patients and their caregivers were trained to a daily home-based passive exercise program. The UCP group was treated with passive and stretching exercises twice weekly. The treatment period for both groups was 6 months (T180), and patients were assessed by revised ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R), % Forced Vital Capacity (FVC %), and McGill Quality of Life (MGQoL) questionnaire. ALSFRS-R score was also evaluated at 6 months after the treatment period (T360). Sixty ALS patients were randomly assigned to one of two arms: SMEP Group included 30 patients, ten subjects for each subgroup (1A, 1B, and 1C); 30 patients were included in the UCP Group.At T180 and T360, SMEPs group had significantly higher ALSFRS-R score compared to the UCP group (32.8 ± 6.5 vs 28.7 ± 7.5, p = 0.0298; 27.5 ± 7.6 vs 23.3 ± 7.6, p = 0.0338, respectively). No effects of SMEPs on survival, respiratory decline and MGQol were found. In conclusion, although no effect on survival was demonstrated,our data suggest that a strictly monitored exercise program may significantly reduce motor deterioration in ALS patients.

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Survival Score (ALS-SS): A simple scoring system for early prediction of patient survival.

Our objectives were: (1) to identify independent prognostic factors to determine a survival score for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) in a cohort of patients followed in the NEMO Centre (NEuroMuscular Omnicentre); (2) to replicate results in an independent cohort obtained from the Pooled Resource Open Access ALS Clinical Trial Consortium (PRO-ACT) database. Samples were collected from 428 ALS patients from the NEMO database and 2481 patients from the PRO-ACT database. Study design was a retrospective analysis with clinical and biochemical variables, using univariable and multivariable Cox models of analysis. Results showed that, in multivariable analysis, age at diagnosis, diagnostic delay, ALSFRS-R total score, Body Mass Index, aspartate aminotransferase and creatinine level were independently related to survival. These factors were recoded as categorical variables assigning a score from 5 to 15, and the sums of these scores were used to obtain the ALS-Survival Score (ALS-SS). This then allowed to identify three groups having different survival curves. The ALS-SS results were also replicated using data from the PRO-ACT database. In conclusion, considering independent prognostic factors, we were able to give an estimate of survival in our cohort of ALS patients. Whether this ALS-SS may be useful in clinical practice, and potentially in clinical trials, will have to be determined prospectively.