Validation of the Adult Attachment Questionnaire-Revised (CAA-r).

The Adult Attachment Questionnaire-Revised and its psychometric properties are presented for dimensional and categorical evaluation of adult attachment style. Eight items were added to the original questionnaire (CAA; Melero and Cantero, 2008) that expanded avoidance dimension assessment and sensitivity evaluation. The exploratory factor analysis EFA led to 35 items grouped in 4 affective dimensions. (1) Anxiety: Need for approval, negative self-esteem, fear for rejection/abandonment and relationship anxiety; (2) Socioemotional competence: Emotional openness, sensitivity, and confidence; (3) Avoidance: Self-reliance and emotional discomfort with intimacy, and (4) Anger: Resentment, anger and intransigence. The cluster analysis confirmed the categorization of the 4 styles of attachment described by Bartholomew (Bartholomew and Horowitz, 1991). The questionnaire showed satisfactory levels of reliability and validity.

Habits and perceptions regarding open science by researchers from Spanish institutions.

The article describes the results of the online survey on open science (OS) carried out on researchers affiliated with universities and Spanish research centres and focused on open access to scientific publications, the publication process, the management of research data and the review of open articles. The main objective was to identify the perception and habits of researchers with regard to practices closely linked to open science and the scientific value added is that offers an in-depth picture of researchers as one of the main actors to whom this transformation and implementation of open science will fall. It focuses on the different aspects of OS: open access, open data, publication process and open review in order to identify habits and perceptions. This is to make possible an implementation of the OS movement. The survey was carried out among researchers who had published in the years 2020-2021, according to data obtained from WoS. It was emailed to a total of 8,188 researchers and obtained a total of 666 responses, of which 554 were complete, the rest being forms with some questions unanswered. The main results showed that open access still requires the diffusion of practices and services provided by the institution, as well as training (library or equivalent service) and institutional support from the competent authorities (vice rectors or equivalent) in specific aspects such as data management. In the case of data, around 50% of respondents stated they had stored data in a repository, and of all the options, the most frequently given was that of an institutional repository, followed by a discipline repository. Among the main reasons for doing this, we found transparency, visibility of data and the ability to validate results. For those who stated they had never stored data, the most frequent reasons for not having done so were privacy and confidentiality, the lack of a mandated data policy or a lack of knowledge of how to do it. In terms of open peer review, participants mentioned a certain reticence to the opening of evaluations due to potential conflicts of interest that may arise or because lower-quality content might be accepted in order to avoid conflicts. In addition, the hierarchical structure of senior researcher versus junior researcher might affect reviews. The main conclusions indicate a need for persuasion of OA to take place; APCs are an economic barrier rather than the main criterion for journal selection; OPR practices may seem innovative and emerging; scientific and evaluation policies seem to have a clear effect on the behaviour of researchers; researchers state that they share research data more for reasons of persuasion than out of obligation. Researchers do question the pathways or difficulties that may arise on a day-to-day basis and seem aware that we are undergoing change, where academic evaluation or policies related to open science, its implementation and habits among researchers may change. In this sense, more and better support is needed on the part of institutions and faculty support services.

La importancia de compartir los datos de investigación en temas de salud pública relacionados con la drogodependencia / The importance of sharing research data on public health topics concerning drug dependence

Los datos de investigación avalan los resultados y conclusiones de proyectos de investigación, poder disponer de ellos en acceso abierto permiten su consulta y potencial reutilización, siempre con fines responsables. En el caso de la salud pública disponer de ellos, siempre bajo el lema de “tan abierto como sea posible y tan cerrado como sea necesario” es de relevante importancia por las aplicaciones que puedan tener en tratamientos y seguimiento de enfermedades, como ya se ha demostrado en la pandemia del COVID19. Existen directrices, políticas y legislación que requieren la apertura de los datos, pero todavía hay reticencias para hacerlo una realidad. En este artículo se enumeran algunas de ellas que afectan a España y al entorno europeo, y también se describen algunos de los portales que indexan datos relacionados con temas de drogadicción y drogodependencia. (AU)

Research data support the results and conclusions of research projects, making them available in open access allows them to be searched and potentially reused, always for responsible purposes. In the case of public health, making them available, always under the motto “as open as possible and as closed as necessary” is of relevant importance for the applications they may have in treatments and monitoring of diseases, as has already been demonstrated during the pandemic of COVID-19. There are guidelines, policies and legislation requiring open research data, but there is still some reluctance to make it a reality. This article describes some of those policies that affect Spain and the European Union, and also outlines some portals that index data related to drug addiction and drug dependence issues. (AU)

The importance of sharing research data on public health topics concerning drug dependence / La importancia de compartir los datos de investigación en temas de salud pública relacionados con la drogodependencia

Research data support the results and conclusions of research projects, making them available in open access allows them to be searched and potentially reused, always for responsible purposes. In the case of public health, making them available, always under the motto “as open as possible and as closed as necessary” is of relevant importance for the applications they may have in treatments and monitoring of diseases, as has already been demonstrated during the pandemic of COVID-19. There are guidelines, policies and legislation requiring open research data, but there is still some reluctance to make it a reality. This article describes some of those policies that affect Spain and the European Union, and also outlines some portals that index data related to drug addiction and drug dependence issues. (AU)

Los datos de investigación avalan los resultados y conclusiones de proyectos de investigación, poder disponer de ellos en acceso abierto permiten su consulta y potencial reutilización, siempre con fines responsables. En el caso de la salud pública disponer de ellos, siempre bajo el lema de “tan abierto como sea posible y tan cerrado como sea necesario” es de relevante importancia por las aplicaciones que puedan tener en tratamientos y seguimiento de enfermedades, como ya se ha demostrado en la pandemia del COVID19. Existen directrices, políticas y legislación que requieren la apertura de los datos, pero todavía hay reticencias para hacerlo una realidad. En este artículo se enumeran algunas de ellas que afectan a España y al entorno europeo, y también se describen algunos de los portales que indexan datos relacionados con temas de drogadicción y drogodependencia. (AU)

Altmetrics - a complement to conventional metrics.

Emerging metrics based on article-level does not exclude traditional metrics based on citations to the journal, but complements them. Both can be employed in conjunction to offer a richer picture of an article use from immediate to long terms. Article-level metrics (ALM) is the result of the aggregation of different data sources and the collection of content from multiple social network services. Sources used for the aggregation can be broken down into five categories: usage, captures, mentions, social media and citations. Data sources depend on the tool, but they include classic metrics indicators based on citations, academic social networks (Mendeley, CiteULike, Delicious) and social media (Facebook, Twitter, blogs, or Youtube, among others). Altmetrics is not synonymous with alternative metrics. Altmetrics are normally early available and allow to assess the social impact of scholarly outputs, almost at the real time. This paper overviews briefly the meaning of altmetrics and describes some of the existing tools used to apply this new metrics: Public Library of Science--Article-Level Metrics, Altmetric, Impactstory and Plum.

[Self-archiving of biomedical papers in open access repositories]. / Autoarchivo de articulos biomedicos en repositorios de acceso abierto.

INTRODUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT: Open-access literature is digital, online, free of charge, and free of most copyright and licensing restrictions. Self-archiving or deposit of scholarly outputs in institutional repositories (open-access green route) is increasingly present in the activities of the scientific community. Besides the benefits of open access for visibility and dissemination of science, it is increasingly more often required by funding agencies to deposit papers and any other type of documents in repositories. In the biomedical environment this is even more relevant by the impact scientific literature can have on public health. However, to make self-archiving feasible, authors should be aware of its meaning and the terms in which they are allowed to archive their works. In that sense, there are some tools like Sherpa/RoMEO or DULCINEA (both directories of copyright licences of scientific journals at different levels) to find out what rights are retained by authors when they publish a paper and if they allow to implement self-archiving. PubMed Central and its British and Canadian counterparts are the main thematic repositories for biomedical fields. In our country there is none of similar nature, but most of the universities and CSIC, have already created their own institutional repositories. CONCLUSION: The increase in visibility of research results and their impact on a greater and earlier citation is one of the most frequently advance of open access, but removal of economic barriers to access to information is also a benefit to break borders between groups.

Autoarchivo de artículos biomédicos en repositorios de acceso abierto / Self-archiving of biomedical papers in open access repositories

Introducción y desarrollo. El acceso abierto es el acceso digital, en línea y libre de barreras económicas, o al menos de algunos derechos de explotación (copyright), a la producción científica o académica de nuestros profesores e investigadores. El autoarchivo o depósito de estos trabajos en repositorios institucionales (vía verde) está cada vez más presente entre las actividades de la comunidad científica. Además de beneficiarse de sus ventajas, los autores son, cada vez con más frecuencia, requeridos por las instituciones financiadoras de la investigación y por las suyas propias para que depositen sus trabajos en repositorios. En el entorno biomédico esto es más necesario, por la repercusión que puede tener en la salud de las personas que los profesionales dispongan o no de la mejor evidencia científica. Para que esto sea posible, los autores deben conocer qué es y cómo funciona un repositorio y deben saber manejar herramientas fáciles como Sherpa/ RoMEO o DULCINEA para averiguar qué derechos retienen como autores y si éstos les permiten llevar a la práctica el autoarchivo. PubMed Central y sus homólogos británico y canadiense son los principales repositorios temáticos del ámbito biomédico. En nuestro país no existe ninguno de naturaleza similar; sin embargo, la mayoría de las universidades y el Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas disponen de un repositorio institucional en funcionamiento. Conclusión. La mayor visibilidad de los resultados de investigación y su repercusión en una mayor y más temprana citación es uno de los beneficios más esgrimidos del acceso abierto, así como la eliminación de las barreras económicas en el acceso a la información contrastada para colectivos habitualmente excluidos (AU)

Introduction and development. Open-access literature is digital, online, free of charge, and free of most copyright and licensing restrictions. Self-archiving or deposit of scholarly outputs in institutional repositories (open-access green route) is increasingly present in the activities of the scientific community. Besides the benefits of open access for visibility and dissemination of science, it is increasingly more often required by funding agencies to deposit papers and any other type of documents in repositories. In the biomedical environment this is even more relevant by the impact scientific literature can have on public health. However, to make self-archiving feasible, authors should be aware of its meaning and the terms in which they are allow to archive their works. In that sense, there are some tools like Sherpa/RoMEO or DULCINEA (both directories of copyright licences of scientific journals at different levels) to find out what rights are retained by authors when they publish a paper and if they allow to implement self-archiving. PubMed Central and its British and Canadian counterparts are the main thematic repositories for biomedical fields. In our country there is none of similar nature, but most of the universities and CSIC, have already created their own institutional repositories. Conclusion. The increase in visibility of research results and their impact on a greater and earlier citation is one of the most frequently advance of open access, but removal of economic barriers to access to information is also a benefit to break borders between groups (AU)